test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Possible solution for the "T5 Connie requests":

2»

Comments

  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Last I checked, the Galaxy wasn't banned by CBS, but the Connie was.

    People who choose to "whine" (The actual terms are "promote" or "endorse") the Galaxy are the smart ones, because they know which fight isn't impossible to win.

    Galaxy Reboot anyone?

    ;)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    I would hope they would. A T5 Connie would likely be pulverized in the first wave, and have a negative impact on the rest of the team.

    A T5 Connie needs only equip TBR to pull its weight in that fight.
    seaquest42 wrote: »
    And you be right about that Stardestoryer001, thanks for posting the link. So I will say I that I am wrong about the other ships and for that I am sorry. But if I am reading the link right... its says that CBS banned only the TOS Enterprise.


    Yup. The only one mentioned specifically is the TOS Constitution. But it's splitting hairs at this point.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • earlnyghthawkearlnyghthawk Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Last I checked, the Galaxy wasn't banned by CBS, but the Connie was.

    People who choose to "whine" (The actual terms are "promote" or "endorse") the Galaxy are the smart ones, because they know which fight isn't impossible to win.

    No, seeing as most of those fighting for improved Gal's call those wanting T4/5 Constitutions "whiners", I'll stick to the same terms for them. The Gal was/is/and always will be a useless POS. AND it's more than a hundred years old by now, so gee, I guess it should never be able to keep up with a Sov, Avenger, etc? right? Oh, and since the Defiant's only a little newer than that, there's no way in hell it should ever be able to be brought on par to a MVAE, Patrol Escort orany other "modern" ship...right?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    butcher suspect, "What'd you hit me with?"
    Temperance Brennan, "A building"
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    No, seeing as most of those fighting for improved Gal's call those wanting T4/5 Constitutions "whiners", I'll stick to the same terms for them. The Gal was/is/and always will be a useless POS. AND it's more than a hundred years old by now, so gee, I guess it should never be able to keep up with a Sov, Avenger, etc? right? Oh, and since the Defiant's only a little newer than that, there's no way in hell it should ever be able to be brought on par to a MVAE, Patrol Escort orany other "modern" ship...right?

    You know that overgeneralisation is always the best way to kill any support you'd have for your ideas, right?
    I have a beef with Cryptic about the Galaxy and yet I have always supported this requests by the Connie/TOS fans for their ship. If I was to judge the entire group of people that want a T5 Connie based on your childish reply here, I would take a storng stance against this then. Luckily, I'm not naive enough to judge an entire support group of people based on one individual that shares their opinion on a single topic.

    And if you're gonna rant and "counter argument" then at least get your facts straight.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • jacqueline3752jacqueline3752 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    writers did excellent job in the 60's getting things by the producers and TV managers

    so here is my purpose for operation Uhura
    staging area Location: Memory Alpha
    mission: crafting together in 3 groups (Engineering, Science and Tactical ) from any 4 of consoles that the player already has into 1 custom console that can only be use on T1 Light Cruiser , T1 Constitution class and NX Class Light Escort

    1 quad Engineering console
    1 quad Science console
    1 quad Tactical console

    Constitution has 2 Engineering slot so you can use 2 quad Engineering console
    NX Class Light Escort has 2 Tactical console slot so you can use 2 quad Tactical console

    purpose for operation Scotty
    staging area Location: Memory Alpha
    mission: crafting together 3 Federation Universal Consoles that are made to work on any ship and that the player already has into 1 triple Universal Console that just work for T1 Constitution Engineering console and NX Class Light Escort Tactical console Only one can be equipped per ship

    purpose for operation O'Brien
    staging area Location: Memory Alpha
    mission: crafting together 2 of same type of any beam array that the player already has into 1 360 beam array

    purpose for operation Reed
    staging area Location: Memory Alpha
    mission: crafting together 2 of any MK Standard Torpedo Launcher that the player already into 1 dual Torpedo Launcher that can only be use on T1 Light Cruiser , T1 Constitution class and NX Class Light Escort
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    seaquest42 wrote: »
    And you be right about that Stardestoryer001, thanks for posting the link. So I will say I that I am wrong about the other ships and for that I am sorry. But if I am reading the link right... its says that CBS banned only the TOS Enterprise.

    No worries. And yes, only the TOS Connie has specifically been banned. The status of the TMP Connie remains uncertain, AFAIK.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    khan5000 wrote: »
    perhaps T5 connie fans don't believe in a no win scenario

    Regarding T5 Connie... Look at what they DIDN'T do for the T5 Galaxy. Don't expect ANYTHING to happen for the Constitution, ever.

    Try taking the T2 Connie into Tau Dawa with rep gear... it's fun and survivable! Do not take too much longer to complete missions - but then I run it with my Engineer.

    2x dual beam arrays up front, a beam or two (or a torp) in back. It moves fast like an escort, so dual beams make more sense. Ensign tactical: BFAW or BO, otherwise Engineering team and Science team.

    Do not take it into STFs and other multiplayer content, but you can still get your Constitution fix in other content.

    Use the T2 - it's still fun. I am also a member of the Star Trek Battles channel and we do content with canon ships, sometimes even the lower tier ships.
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    If you are really hot about a T5 Enterprise use the Ambassador class Retrofit. It was used by the Enterprise-C, looks a lot like the couple of hundred year old Constitution and has the 'modern' layout usable in this era. They were used in the Dominion War were they not? Any Constitutions used there? Of course not.

    Look if STO was set back in the TOS era that would be one thing but Starfleet obviously decided that they were no longer viable for upgrades and refits.

    Look, the Battleship Missouri was updated a number of times and was used as recently in the first Gulf War but eventually the Navy put a fork in it and retired it to a museum piece.
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    ltminns wrote: »
    If you are really hot about a T5 Enterprise use the Ambassador class Retrofit.

    That's just weird. Might as well tell them to fly an Intrepid.
    looks a lot like the couple of hundred year old Constitution and has the 'modern' layout usable in this era.

    It looks nothing like the ship people want to fly, the constitution.
    They were used in the Dominion War were they not?

    The Dominion War was 30 years ago in STO.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    sirokk wrote: »
    Regarding T5 Connie... Look at what they DIDN'T do for the T5 Galaxy. Don't expect ANYTHING to happen for the Constitution, ever.

    Try taking the T2 Connie into Tau Dawa with rep gear... it's fun and survivable! Do not take too much longer to complete missions - but then I run it with my Engineer.

    2x dual beam arrays up front, a beam or two (or a torp) in back. It moves fast like an escort, so dual beams make more sense. Ensign tactical: BFAW or BO, otherwise Engineering team and Science team.

    Do not take it into STFs and other multiplayer content, but you can still get your Constitution fix in other content.

    Use the T2 - it's still fun. I am also a member of the Star Trek Battles channel and we do content with canon ships, sometimes even the lower tier ships.

    One of my toons is decked out in TOS gear...I role play that his connie time traveled to the future. I use the blue phasers and everything...lots of compliments during a Dyson battleground run.

    I fly my T2 connie during missions from level 1-50 and when doing STFs and the like i switch to an Oddy cruiser I have.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • nethernynetherny Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Well, I took my Sov-R to the ship tailor and tried to get it fairly "Enterprisey" lol.
    I went with Material 1,
    Saucer - Noble - Aries
    Hull - Noble - Orion
    Nacelles - Regent - Corvus
    Neck - Regent - Gemini
    Pylons - Noble - Cygnus
    and a nice dark blue color for the stripes.

    It looks okay like that I guess. Kind of Enterprisey, and kind of more modern I guess. That's all I really want is that 60's *style*. I don't like the Regent saucer, it reminds me of a toilet lid.

    Thanks for all the replies peeps, and keep on Trekkin :)
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Dont know if it's been said op.... but if your asking for an RA version of the connie... it';s still T5.

    T1. ensign/Lt.
    T2. Lt. Comm.
    T3. Comm
    T4 Captain.
    T5. RA/VA.
  • nethernynetherny Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    All I really want is that classic style, like the TOS Enterprise had. I don't want to fly something that looks like a... chrome piggy bank with marital aids stuck all over it's body.
  • zachariyazachariya Member Posts: 156 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Here is a solution for all the T5 connie threads.

    Auto Deletion
    Shoot through the Galaxy, Final Master Spark!
  • nethernynetherny Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    zachariya wrote: »
    Here is a solution for all the T5 connie threads.

    Auto Deletion


    I did not say that I want a T5 TOS Connie. (Reading Comprehension really must be dead)


    Okay... all I was doing was trying to think of an idea to satisfy people on both sides. Apparently I was wrong, evil, horrible and sinful to try to do that. Like I said, I was just throwing an idea out there. I mean, far be it from me to try to break people's "game immersion" when every other ship you see is a Jem Hadar or a Dread (smh).

    But fine. Okay. You can not comprehend when I say "that 60's look". You still must think I actually mean the TOS Connie, instead of a costume or material variant, or just a style. How do I REACH THESE KEEDS?!?!

    Okay. (deep breath). How about this... Starfleet, in it's infinite wisdom, and in tribute to one of it's most iconic designs, comes out with a Constitution II Class, that borrows design cues from the first Connie, but is actually a bigger, more capable, T5 ship, that you can't fly until you ARE T5 and pay 2500 Zen etc etc. Maybe even based on the Sovereign platform.

    Once again... just some ideas... throwing it out there... no dead horse being beaten... if anything, I just brought the shovel, and buried it. M'kay? m'kay. I'm sure I'm not the only one tired of flying stuff that looks like toilets.

    And you know what? If you disagree, I really don't care. I realized a long time ago, that some people just aren't happy until they are utterly miserable. And everyone else around them as well. If this is you, go get therapy. I'm not taking anything away from you by trying to enjoy MY game, which I have spent a lot of money on. And besides, it's been a 99.9% single player experience for me anyway. Nothing I do in this game will have any effect on you and your game experience whatsoever. You're just being deliberately contrary, probably out of boredom. And all I did was try to think of an idea.

    I realize that elevating the TOS Connie to T5 would be silly and ridiculous, but some people clutch the pearls over just the thought of SEEING one that looks similar which is actually higher level. SO, I'm going to continue to fly my weird, hybrid, mutated Sov-R, and there's nothing you can do about it. So, nyaaa!!

    There, all I did was throw some more ideas out there, do with them what you will, but watch as people shall continue to lose their minds.
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Prophets forbid somebody should try to be reasonable on a web forum. :D
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    starswordc wrote: »
    Prophets forbid somebody should try to be reasonable on a web forum. :D

    Especially being 5 pages into a thread that has "T5 Connie" in the title! Whew! :P

    Seriously though, I like the idea of a tribute to the original Constitution... that is NOT a Constitution.

    A ship that has straight edges and simpler geometry... but this is what I see the Ambassador and the Excelsior as, at least in my own eye. No they are not tributes, just earlier designs.
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • zachariyazachariya Member Posts: 156 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    netherny wrote: »
    I did not say that I want a T5 TOS Connie. (Reading Comprehension really must be dead)


    Okay... all I was doing was trying to think of an idea to satisfy people on both sides. Apparently I was wrong, evil, horrible and sinful to try to do that. Like I said, I was just throwing an idea out there. I mean, far be it from me to try to break people's "game immersion" when every other ship you see is a Jem Hadar or a Dread (smh).

    But fine. Okay. You can not comprehend when I say "that 60's look". You still must think I actually mean the TOS Connie, instead of a costume or material variant, or just a style. How do I REACH THESE KEEDS?!?!

    Okay. (deep breath). How about this... Starfleet, in it's infinite wisdom, and in tribute to one of it's most iconic designs, comes out with a Constitution II Class, that borrows design cues from the first Connie, but is actually a bigger, more capable, T5 ship, that you can't fly until you ARE T5 and pay 2500 Zen etc etc. Maybe even based on the Sovereign platform.

    Once again... just some ideas... throwing it out there... no dead horse being beaten... if anything, I just brought the shovel, and buried it. M'kay? m'kay. I'm sure I'm not the only one tired of flying stuff that looks like toilets.

    And you know what? If you disagree, I really don't care. I realized a long time ago, that some people just aren't happy until they are utterly miserable. And everyone else around them as well. If this is you, go get therapy. I'm not taking anything away from you by trying to enjoy MY game, which I have spent a lot of money on. And besides, it's been a 99.9% single player experience for me anyway. Nothing I do in this game will have any effect on you and your game experience whatsoever. You're just being deliberately contrary, probably out of boredom. And all I did was try to think of an idea.

    I realize that elevating the TOS Connie to T5 would be silly and ridiculous, but some people clutch the pearls over just the thought of SEEING one that looks similar which is actually higher level. SO, I'm going to continue to fly my weird, hybrid, mutated Sov-R, and there's nothing you can do about it. So, nyaaa!!

    There, all I did was throw some more ideas out there, do with them what you will, but watch as people shall continue to lose their minds.

    All you did was beat the dead horse, we will never ever get any type of connie at T5. Or a looks like one but really is not one I swear.
    Shoot through the Galaxy, Final Master Spark!
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    zachariya wrote: »
    All you did was beat the dead horse, we will never ever get any type of connie at T5. Or a looks like one but really is not one I swear.

    Why are you:

    1- Reading these threads?
    2- Replying in these threads?

    You want the discussion to go away? Stop being part of the problem!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    zachariya wrote: »
    All you did was beat the dead horse, we will never ever get any type of connie at T5. Or a looks like one but really is not one I swear.

    Thanks for bumping the thread and keeping it alive :cool:

    I'm Warmaker and I endorse the idea of a T5 Connie.

    AND T5 Miranda.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • zachariyazachariya Member Posts: 156 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Why are you:

    1- Reading these threads?
    2- Replying in these threads?

    You want the discussion to go away? Stop being part of the problem!

    Its not gonna go away but you do bring up a very good point! I'm gonna go stop being part of the problem now.
    Shoot through the Galaxy, Final Master Spark!
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Why are you:

    1- Reading these threads?
    2- Replying in these threads?

    You want the discussion to go away? Stop being part of the problem!

    cause it's super kool to come into a thread and make snarky remarks
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Why are you:

    1- Reading these threads?
    2- Replying in these threads?

    You want the discussion to go away? Stop being part of the problem!

    The problem wouldn't originate in the first place, if we didn't get the same request over and over and over and over ad nauseam.

    Since there's no ignore button for anything involving the words "T5 Connie", we do the next best thing: ask them to cease and desist. Even include proof so they will cease to push for something that just cannot happen.

    Now, as for a T5 Oberth, I am all for that! Does Cryptic say "NO!"? Not as far as I know. It survived into the 2370s, proving it can handle the test of time.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    The problem wouldn't originate in the first place, if we didn't get the same request over and over and over and over ad nauseam.

    Since there's no ignore button for anything involving the words "T5 Connie", we do the next best thing: ask them to cease and desist. Even include proof so they will cease to push for something that just cannot happen.

    Now, as for a T5 Oberth, I am all for that! Does Cryptic say "NO!"? Not as far as I know. It survived into the 2370s, proving it can handle the test of time.

    You don't have to come into every thread...right now there is a thread on the Treaty of Something or other....I'm pretty sure it's probably another Fed cloak thread. I have nothing to add to that conversation and so I did not go into the thread.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
Sign In or Register to comment.