Saw on tribble that the AFK penalty of two hours and no reward has been put back in for almost all PvE maps. Will this be rolled out on Tuesday as well with Season 8? Excited to see something done about it.
Gold Sub since March 2010
Lifetime Sub since June 2010
It's the Cryptic Queue-of-DOOM about to be sprung upon us.
:cool:
STO Member since February 2009. I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born! Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
Somehow I doubt it. Expecting lots of rage posts about "I helped but got marked as AFK anyways. What gives?"
What will be funny is the amount of players raging about it... who actually were AFKing/leeching. There's no incentive to come clean about it, of course. And every reason to derp up the STO forums with "Omg I didn't do anything wrong!"
It's like a kid getting sent to the principal's office. What's the first thing they always say? "I didn't do anything!"
People will just be mad they were caught in the act and will lie and say Cryptic screwed up to try to save face for their laziness/negligence.
Of course, I'm not ruling out false positives at all... I'm just saying that the forums will have players who were mad that they were caught AFKing and pretending they weren't in order to blame Cryptic.
What will be funny is the amount of players raging about it... who actually were AFKing/leeching. There's no incentive to come clean about it, of course. And every reason to derp up the STO forums with "Omg I didn't do anything wrong!"
It's like a kid getting sent to the principal's office. What's the first thing they always say? "I didn't do anything!"
It's a good thing you're not in Law, then: you'd make a lousy Judge! "The presumption of guilt" is a bad, bad thing!
I just hope that they exempt private queues so at least those of us who avoid public queues can get around what is likely to be a complete and utter disaster.
What will be funny is the amount of players raging about it... who actually were AFKing/leeching. There's no incentive to come clean about it, of course. And every reason to derp up the STO forums with "Omg I didn't do anything wrong!"
It's like a kid getting sent to the principal's office. What's the first thing they always say? "I didn't do anything!"
People will just be mad they were caught in the act and will lie and say Cryptic screwed up to try to save face for their laziness/negligence.
Of course, I'm not ruling out false positives at all... I'm just saying that the forums will have players who were mad that they were caught AFKing and pretending they weren't in order to blame Cryptic.
Its not that we support AFKing, its that we have been around the block with these kind of automated systems in sto and remember how well they usually work. Last one was the auto ban for mentioning energy credit selling websites in chat. For weeks it was banning people for saying all kinds of random stuff and people had to wait days and even several weeks to get there accounts reinstated.
So yeah when we see systems like this coming and they are being all quite about how it is going to work we are not exactly filled with confidence that we are not about to get screwed over by this new system.
It's a good thing you're not in Law, then: you'd make a lousy Judge! "The presumption of guilt" is a bad, bad thing!
This isn't about accusing a specific individual, its about predicting the emergence of a subgroup of posters and players. An accurate prediction that any developer has to think about when reading user feedback.
What will be funny is the amount of players raging about it... who actually were AFKing/leeching. There's no incentive to come clean about it, of course. And every reason to derp up the STO forums with "Omg I didn't do anything wrong!"
It's like a kid getting sent to the principal's office. What's the first thing they always say? "I didn't do anything!"
People will just be mad they were caught in the act and will lie and say Cryptic screwed up to try to save face for their laziness/negligence.
Of course, I'm not ruling out false positives at all... I'm just saying that the forums will have players who were mad that they were caught AFKing and pretending they weren't in order to blame Cryptic.
Agreed. I was in a STF just after they tried it out and pulled it. We had 2 players afk in the STF (just pushing random buttons it seemed), and when I came here to say "they found a way around it!" I saw the same person complaining that he was lagging and not really afk. I know an afk player when I see it -- the guy was afk and purposely trying to game the new system. It does happen a lot and your right, they can't be expected to come clean about it -- all you can expect is that this "brick" will make the dogs it hit bark the loudest.
This reminds me of something my first sergeant did to our company once in the US Army while deployed in Afghanistan. There was a report of a few people who dabbled in the local pharmaceuticals and this is something not condoned by the US Government or the US Army. We're deployed, so the soldiers that were guilty were thinking "he can't TRIBBLE test us all". Funny enough, the first sergeant was thinking the same thing, and said, "everyone line up for a TRIBBLE test!" He was able to tell from that who needed the screening and who did not from the "what?!?" exclamations he got back out of it. All 18 soldiers (the precise amount reported) he identified were discharged after the screening and purely identified by this "flying brick in the dog pen" test.
It's a good thing you're not in Law, then: you'd make a lousy Judge! "The presumption of guilt" is a bad, bad thing!
Thankfully its a game where no writ or warrant can be issued to place your privacy before a panel of your peers huh? Last I heard behavioral profiling was still a method used by LE.
Said NO to Arc. Gets punished by not being given a free outfit, free lobi, and free shuttle. Now forced to use Arc's site when trying to get to STO site. Still not rewards for beta testing the Arc website by force. Bravo Cryptic.
Something does need to be done about deliberate AFKers. Good. Now what? The AFKer goes to one of his alts and, Ta Da!, evades the penalty.
Surprised? I'm not. The proposed AFK penalty has exactly zero teeth unless it is imposed as an account wide penalty. However, the 'false positive' corrections added in due to the numerous threads sure to pop up here complaining will further reduce the proposed AFK penalty to something which people will refer to with many snide comments and much laughter. In short this problem, which isn't limited to STO, will continue to be a problem. Both here and elsewhere.
I suggest increases in duration with each successive incident. Two hours about right for the first time and tack on another two hours for each successive one. Then, 'stop the clock' on the account for everything. So going AFK affects Rep rewards, Doff assignments, etc.
I'll even go so far as to suggest 'stopping the clock' on Holdings for the the fleet(s) the AFKer is a member of. As to whether or not this is fair, is it fair complete strangers should suffer the penalties the AFKer imposes on them now? if strangers suffer from the actions of an AFKer then friends should suffer as well.
But this will all amount to nothing. Deliberate AFK as a way to exploit the game, which also cheats pwe/cryptic out of revenue but they are too willfully blind to see it, will continue as before. Except now pwe/cryptic will say, "See? We fixed that! So stop complaining and give us your money!"
A six year old boy and his starship. Living the dream.
In the US if the decision like this was being made by a Judge, it would be small claims (i.e. civil court) where the rules of evidence are much more lenient.
In such cases one side merely has to tip the balance to one way or another to show it is more likely than not that the other side is "guilty".
And ones (mis)behavior in civil court can easily get ones case thrown out by the judge and a ruling made against you, and depending on the courts jurisdiction further penalties can be imposed by the judge. (i.e. like fines for contempt)
And let's be honest if these forums were a civil court a large number of the people complaining would get tossed out for their displays of contempt.
that and a certain amount of presumption of guilt is required to get the case to court in the first place.
If one dies one gets a timer to get in again. So if some one needs to go afk e.g. to pick up a phone, dying is an option, then afk penalty does not work.
If one dies one gets a timer to get in again. So if some one needs to go afk e.g. to pick up a phone, dying is an option, then afk penalty does not work.
If the respawn timer cancels out the afk penalty isn't that just an easy way for someone to go afk for the entire stf and only respawn at the end?
Sadly, reporting AFK players is about as much use as an ejector seat in a helicopter.
This strictly depends on who's sitting in the seat... >;-)
Said NO to Arc. Gets punished by not being given a free outfit, free lobi, and free shuttle. Now forced to use Arc's site when trying to get to STO site. Still not rewards for beta testing the Arc website by force. Bravo Cryptic.
Can't wait to see the results of this. Regardless of the outcome, this is set to be the most hilarious addition to STO since the party amplifier. Thanks Cryptic for keeping this game amusing.
Possible outcomes:
1. People find a way around it, people run to the forums to rage
2. False positives, people run to the forums to rage
"Working as intended" indeed!
Two things will be true no matter the action Cryptic takes:
1) Someone will find a way around it.
2) There will be false positives.
Does this mean they should give up? I think not.
Said NO to Arc. Gets punished by not being given a free outfit, free lobi, and free shuttle. Now forced to use Arc's site when trying to get to STO site. Still not rewards for beta testing the Arc website by force. Bravo Cryptic.
1) Someone will find a way around it.
2) There will be false positives.
3) People will rage about it. Depending on the amount of false positives, probably more than they did about the AFKers.
No false positives are acceptable. AFKers are only a "problem" for people who are more interested in watching others than playing the game. Any mechanism designed to appease them should have zero effect on the rest of us.
Although its a good thing something is being done about AFKers,i see a problem.
That is,what if the door bell rings and you have to answer it?
Suddenly needing the bathroom,or an unexpected phone call????
Although its a good thing something is being done about AFKers,i see a problem.
That is,what if the door bell rings and you have to answer it?
Suddenly needing the bathroom,or an unexpected phone call????
I see it to, but if they for instance make it that you only receive your reward if you do over a limit of damage, some where over a few phasers and torpedos but not so high that new players with not that great a gear can still get theirs, but not so low that the the AFKer will turn into "one hitter" and then go AFKers..
Although its a good thing something is being done about AFKers,i see a problem.
That is,what if the door bell rings and you have to answer it?
Suddenly needing the bathroom,or an unexpected phone call????
Come on really? A fifteen minute match you are about to begin, and you can't tell if you need to urinate beforehand? You go on a long vacation trip and stop five minutes out to urinate? There's always Depends for incontenence, a necessary evil regardless.
Heaven forbid you ignore the "phone gods" . . . lols, you can buy an answering machine for that old rotary phone. If it's important they will call back, or leave a message. Make them wait 10 minutes, **they** are asking to talk with **you**. You may answer at your convienence. If you are expecting an important call, what are you doing on the computer anyway?
And, my friends usually tell me if they are coming over - as they know I might be away, or occupied. UPS is going to leave that parcel at the door - signiture or not, as will the post office - if you have to sign for it, you pick it up at the PO anyway. If it's the police, a 2 hour AFK penalty is the least of your problems.
All excuses, all within your control, all your responsibility.
I have to wonder how this will work for those romulan/klingon players who stay cloaked the whole match but do move around it. Is the AFK penalty based on non-movement, or no damage done? And if so, is there a minimum damage you have to reach to be considered not afk? I'm just saying that its way to easy to get around this otherwise.
I have to wonder how this will work for those romulan/klingon players who stay cloaked the whole match but do move around it. Is the AFK penalty based on non-movement, or no damage done? And if so, is there a minimum damage you have to reach to be considered not afk? I'm just saying that its way to easy to get around this otherwise. I would propose to have a system that allows players to vote 1 off the island if they aren't helping.
Comments
Somehow I doubt it. Expecting lots of rage posts about "I helped but got marked as AFK anyways. What gives?"
It's the Cryptic Queue-of-DOOM about to be sprung upon us.
:cool:
I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
What will be funny is the amount of players raging about it... who actually were AFKing/leeching. There's no incentive to come clean about it, of course. And every reason to derp up the STO forums with "Omg I didn't do anything wrong!"
It's like a kid getting sent to the principal's office. What's the first thing they always say? "I didn't do anything!"
People will just be mad they were caught in the act and will lie and say Cryptic screwed up to try to save face for their laziness/negligence.
Of course, I'm not ruling out false positives at all... I'm just saying that the forums will have players who were mad that they were caught AFKing and pretending they weren't in order to blame Cryptic.
It's a good thing you're not in Law, then: you'd make a lousy Judge! "The presumption of guilt" is a bad, bad thing!
Its not that we support AFKing, its that we have been around the block with these kind of automated systems in sto and remember how well they usually work. Last one was the auto ban for mentioning energy credit selling websites in chat. For weeks it was banning people for saying all kinds of random stuff and people had to wait days and even several weeks to get there accounts reinstated.
So yeah when we see systems like this coming and they are being all quite about how it is going to work we are not exactly filled with confidence that we are not about to get screwed over by this new system.
This isn't about accusing a specific individual, its about predicting the emergence of a subgroup of posters and players. An accurate prediction that any developer has to think about when reading user feedback.
Two totally different things
Agreed. I was in a STF just after they tried it out and pulled it. We had 2 players afk in the STF (just pushing random buttons it seemed), and when I came here to say "they found a way around it!" I saw the same person complaining that he was lagging and not really afk. I know an afk player when I see it -- the guy was afk and purposely trying to game the new system. It does happen a lot and your right, they can't be expected to come clean about it -- all you can expect is that this "brick" will make the dogs it hit bark the loudest.
This reminds me of something my first sergeant did to our company once in the US Army while deployed in Afghanistan. There was a report of a few people who dabbled in the local pharmaceuticals and this is something not condoned by the US Government or the US Army. We're deployed, so the soldiers that were guilty were thinking "he can't TRIBBLE test us all". Funny enough, the first sergeant was thinking the same thing, and said, "everyone line up for a TRIBBLE test!" He was able to tell from that who needed the screening and who did not from the "what?!?" exclamations he got back out of it. All 18 soldiers (the precise amount reported) he identified were discharged after the screening and purely identified by this "flying brick in the dog pen" test.
Thankfully its a game where no writ or warrant can be issued to place your privacy before a panel of your peers huh? Last I heard behavioral profiling was still a method used by LE.
Easy peasy.
Surprised? I'm not. The proposed AFK penalty has exactly zero teeth unless it is imposed as an account wide penalty. However, the 'false positive' corrections added in due to the numerous threads sure to pop up here complaining will further reduce the proposed AFK penalty to something which people will refer to with many snide comments and much laughter. In short this problem, which isn't limited to STO, will continue to be a problem. Both here and elsewhere.
I suggest increases in duration with each successive incident. Two hours about right for the first time and tack on another two hours for each successive one. Then, 'stop the clock' on the account for everything. So going AFK affects Rep rewards, Doff assignments, etc.
I'll even go so far as to suggest 'stopping the clock' on Holdings for the the fleet(s) the AFKer is a member of. As to whether or not this is fair, is it fair complete strangers should suffer the penalties the AFKer imposes on them now? if strangers suffer from the actions of an AFKer then friends should suffer as well.
But this will all amount to nothing. Deliberate AFK as a way to exploit the game, which also cheats pwe/cryptic out of revenue but they are too willfully blind to see it, will continue as before. Except now pwe/cryptic will say, "See? We fixed that! So stop complaining and give us your money!"
My character Tsin'xing
If the respawn timer cancels out the afk penalty isn't that just an easy way for someone to go afk for the entire stf and only respawn at the end?
This strictly depends on who's sitting in the seat... >;-)
It's just "Dr Doom" Roubini
Refugee from those other games!
Two things will be true no matter the action Cryptic takes:
1) Someone will find a way around it.
2) There will be false positives.
Does this mean they should give up? I think not.
No false positives are acceptable. AFKers are only a "problem" for people who are more interested in watching others than playing the game. Any mechanism designed to appease them should have zero effect on the rest of us.
Don't confuse law with social behavior patterns.
Are you saying there are no criminals? That criminals always confess?
I'm sure there are people smart enough to detect in a program a player that never moves from the warp in point. Or ever fires weapons.
And this is a game, you are supposed to take an active part. And PW is within their legal rights as owners to inflict penalties for slackers.
That is,what if the door bell rings and you have to answer it?
Suddenly needing the bathroom,or an unexpected phone call????
I see it to, but if they for instance make it that you only receive your reward if you do over a limit of damage, some where over a few phasers and torpedos but not so high that new players with not that great a gear can still get theirs, but not so low that the the AFKer will turn into "one hitter" and then go AFKers..
Come on really? A fifteen minute match you are about to begin, and you can't tell if you need to urinate beforehand? You go on a long vacation trip and stop five minutes out to urinate? There's always Depends for incontenence, a necessary evil regardless.
Heaven forbid you ignore the "phone gods" . . . lols, you can buy an answering machine for that old rotary phone. If it's important they will call back, or leave a message. Make them wait 10 minutes, **they** are asking to talk with **you**. You may answer at your convienence. If you are expecting an important call, what are you doing on the computer anyway?
And, my friends usually tell me if they are coming over - as they know I might be away, or occupied. UPS is going to leave that parcel at the door - signiture or not, as will the post office - if you have to sign for it, you pick it up at the PO anyway. If it's the police, a 2 hour AFK penalty is the least of your problems.
All excuses, all within your control, all your responsibility.