test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Is Battle Cloak the only cloak worth using?

tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
After running my Scimitar for a prolonged period now, I noticed my gameplay pattern was changing for that specific character.

All because of Battle Cloak.

On my KDF, I never bothered to cloak, since it can be disrupted too easily and you have to fly out of combat before you can cloak again.

My Starfleet gave up using their one ship (Defiant Retrofit) that had a cloak because it wasn't a Battle Cloak.

But on my Romulan, I will cloak as often as I can and sometimes, even use Cloaked Barrage to fight while cloaked.

Just for the simple reason that I can cloak on demand whenever I want.


Does this mean that Battle Cloak is the only serious cloak in the game?



Disclaimer: I don't want build advice on maximizing cloaking abillities, so don't bother offering it.

Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
Post edited by tilarta on
«1

Comments

  • hanoverhanover Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I get some pretty good decloaking alpha strikes out of my fleet defiant. *shrug*
    Does Arc install a root kit? Ask a Dev today!
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Yep, Battle Cloak is the only cloak that really has any effect on play beyond initial strikes.
  • doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Yup. Non-battle-cloak is useless. If you don't kill in the single strike, then it has no relevance whatsoever. Once you have done so, it is useless for the rest of the fight. It has one, and only one use: Stalking someone in Kerrat. But then...MES could do the same thing.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • momawmomaw Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Standard cloak is nice to have occasionally but not worth a console slot or a pile of zen to get. If your ship doesn't come with cloak built in forget it.
  • ensignthrowawayensignthrowaway Member Posts: 37 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Honestly, I'm starting to feel this way about Enhanced Battle Cloak. I've been TRIBBLE around with a T'varo awhile, and going back to a BoP felt really stifling because I couldn't run heals while cloaked.
  • milanvoriusmilanvorius Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Definitely cloak is not worth a console slot as more and more Highly Powered (HP) :D consoles are released.
    PvE Jem'Hadar motto: Participation Ribbons are life.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I think a lot of people consider battle cloak to be this 'uber, mega, incredible' thing that makes a person into a god-like creature and thus they MUST have it because of how 'OP' it is, or it must be nerfed because it is also 'OP'.

    It ain't that special IMO. It's better than normal cloak, which allows for you to choose where the first strike will happen, but that is about all.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • autumnturningautumnturning Member Posts: 743 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Honestly, I'm starting to feel this way about Enhanced Battle Cloak. I've been TRIBBLE around with a T'varo awhile, and going back to a BoP felt really stifling because I couldn't run heals while cloaked.

    Enhanced Battle Cloaks are just flat out game changing for you as a player, particularly if you go the Torpedo Boat route. After that, even Battle Cloaks feel like they're just "half warmed up left overs" by comparison, simply because they aren't at all comparable (aside from the FX).
  • pokersmith1pokersmith1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »
    I think a lot of people consider battle cloak to be this 'uber, mega, incredible' thing that makes a person into a god-like creature and thus they MUST have it because of how 'OP' it is, or it must be nerfed because it is also 'OP'.

    It ain't that special IMO. It's better than normal cloak, which allows for you to choose where the first strike will happen, but that is about all.

    Regular battle cloaks are okay. But couple them with the cloak cooldown reducing romulan boffs, and the problem starts.
    Elite Defense Starfleet
    Elite Defense Stovokor
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Regular battle cloaks are okay. But couple them with the cloak cooldown reducing romulan boffs, and the problem starts.

    Not just reducing the CD on the cloak, but majorly buffing the Ambush bonus AND making it longer to the point you can choose to 'blip' your cloak to constantly refresh the bonus.

    Even then, the cloak itself isn't an issue, BC or not. It's the BOFFs.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • whamhammer1whamhammer1 Member Posts: 2,290 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »
    Not just reducing the CD on the cloak, but majorly buffing the Ambush bonus AND making it longer to the point you can choose to 'blip' your cloak to constantly refresh the bonus.

    Even then, the cloak itself isn't an issue, BC or not. It's the BOFFs.

    I honestly think that it should be to choose when and where the battle starts. Its one thing for a BoP, or other raider sized ship to be able to run away, but using it on larger ships is just ridiculous. There should be a commitment to fight after you start it.
  • momawmomaw Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Except choosing where and when to start a battle is a strategic choice, and this game has absolutely no concept of strategy. Obviously the place you would use a non-battle-cloak is to do things like intercept ships where you have a firepower advantage, or do raids on stations and planets once you've verified there's no hostile ships around. In STO, the fact that you're going to have a battle, and with what, is already decided. There is no strategic choice to make.
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Cloaking in this game is really poorly designed. All ships should be capable of cloaking, with a combination of BOFF ability and captain skill. Some ships should be easier to cloak than others, requiring less captain skill to be effective. You should be able to claok a Tuffli, briefly, with enough skill, but you should not be able to battlecloak a Tuffli.

    Same as everything else in this game, there is no cost associated with any benefit, everything is free, cryptic wants you to like them and be their friend.
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Both "cloaks" can be worth using, but obviously standard cloak only helps with a first strike while battle cloak can be put to use in all aspects of the battle...
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Regular cloak works fine so long as the mission structure has lulls during which one can recloak and set a new ambush. Only change I'd like to see is allow for heals and EPTS to continue to function (to no effect obviously) so as to not mess up ships with boff-power timing cycles. Add some pauses here and there in missions though, and its plenty useful.
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    My fleet Defiant uses cloak, and it is epically destructive with it (PvE and PvP). Yes, it's worth the console slot if and only if you know how to use it.
    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • pokersmith1pokersmith1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    voporak wrote: »
    My fleet Defiant uses battle cloak, and it is epically destructive with it (PvE and PvP). Yes, it's worth the console slot if and only if you know how to use it.

    No it does not.
    Elite Defense Starfleet
    Elite Defense Stovokor
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I was wondering about the veracity of that statement.

    It's a sore point with KDF fanatics that they are actively hostile to the idea of the Defiant acquiring a battle cloak.

    Even if it has one in the show.
    It's a Romulan Cloak remember? ;)

    So I highly doubted the fleet version would have a battle cloak.

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    No it does not.

    Oh whoops... derp. I meant to say cloak, but somehow 'battle' got in there. Thank you for pointing that out.
    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • pokersmith1pokersmith1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    voporak wrote: »
    Oh whoops... derp. I meant to say cloak, but somehow 'battle' got in there. Thank you for pointing that out.

    NP. A long time ago I used to think that the fed cloak console was a gimmick, and the only way for craptic to redeem this hideous console was to at least make it battle cloak. Now with the advent of romulans, and 90% of romulans flying under the federation flag like rest of the player base, I think this point has become somewhat moot.
    tilarta wrote: »
    I was wondering about the veracity of that statement.

    It's a sore point with KDF fanatics that they are actively hostile to the idea of the Defiant acquiring a battle cloak.

    Even if it has one in the show.
    It's a Romulan Cloak remember? ;)

    So I highly doubted the fleet version would have a battle cloak.

    Four word sentence with nothing but truth in it, and somehow you not only managed to wonder about its veracity, but also saw some sort of conspiracy in it? Gotta give it to you champ ;)
    Elite Defense Starfleet
    Elite Defense Stovokor
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I should have clarified, I was referring to the post about Defiant having a battle cloak, not the one above mine.


    As for the conspiracy, I don't know if Cryptic purposefully kiboshed the idea of a Starfleet battle cloak, but it is firmly on record that KDF fanatics hate the idea.
    I've seen pages of ranting against the idea every time it is suggested!
    I'm waiting for the ranting to start here. ;)


    Now, as regards the Defiant's cloak in the show, it is a battle cloak.
    Firstly, it's Romulan technology and as demonstrated by the latest faction, Romulan cloaks are all battle cloaks.

    Secondly, although I don't remember the episode (most likely the first Defiant episode), Sisko gives the order to cloak while the Defiant is under fire from the Jem'Hadar.

    And for a 3rd point, the Defiant is a warship, so I never understood why a warship wouldn't be using the cloak of a war ready vessel (as opposed to the standard cloak).

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • pokersmith1pokersmith1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    So I misunderstood you, my apologies.

    For the longest time, kdf had nothing going for them, except for their BoPs and their battlecloaks. Everytime there was a cross-faction console, kdf has a history of their best consoles being stolen from them. There was no incentive whatsoever from cryptic for players to join kdf. As such, every little thing that made kdf unique, had to be protected. Kdf tried to protect their consoles and failed miserably. Understandably, the idea of losing battle cloak, and hence by extension, the exclusivity of their BoP play-style, was something that was not very appealing. But like I said in my post above, with the advent of Romulans with their superior everything, the whole point has become moot.

    Now they made it so that a player can start a kdf toon from level scratch. They added more storyline missions. That is good. But kdf is still nowhere to completion and I have a hounding suspicion that it is again going to stay that way for a looong time :(

    Yes, defiant definitely had a battle cloak in the show and I loved it.
    Elite Defense Starfleet
    Elite Defense Stovokor
  • bpharmabpharma Member Posts: 2,022
    edited October 2013
    Pokey, we don't talk about the ginger haired fleet =P

    I think there's really a lot of problems with KDF from the bottom to the top and battle cloak is one of them.

    Sure they get badass KHG armour and every sweaty teens dream of a crew full of half naked Orion's but apart from that most people just don't have an incentive to play a faction with so little support. Maybe it's time Cryptic got silly with how much ec and dili they can earn whilst making all KDF ships have 10-20% more hull than the fed/rom counterparts?

    Also I think the look of Klingons needs to be changed, less dirty and red, more war like with a bit of red.

    It is through repetition that we learn our weakness.
    A master with a stone is better than a novice with a sword.

    Has damage got out of control?
    This is the last thing I will post.
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    bpharma wrote: »
    Maybe it's time Cryptic got silly with how much ec and dili they can earn whilst making all KDF ships have 10-20% more hull than the fed/rom counterparts?

    Throwing balance to the wind never works, all it does is make everyone resentful. The feds would resent the KDF for getting better ships for nothing and the kdf would resent teh feds for STILL not playing KDF. You may think i'm talking nonsense but i've seen it, even on these very forums.

    KDF players all but ranting that the feds refuse to even try out KDF, even with all its benefits and perks; they take it as a personal insult and in a way I guess it is. Its like saying "even with all your extras, your faction is still not worth touching". Imbalance never helps faction parity, EVER. It only embitters everyone involved. Its a lazy solution to actually making a faction more interesting. That said, I can't imagine actual KDF fans want the KDF to go the way of the Romulans, poor sods are stuck playing as members of a generic rebel alliance instead of as actual romulans from the shows.
  • bpharmabpharma Member Posts: 2,022
    edited October 2013
    Maybe so but KDF really need something special, the 10-20% hull might not be too bad, 10% being perhaps the most likely.

    What about a full on redesigning of all the ship interiors, qo'nos and star base to tone down the reds and perhaps change up the colour palette to be less mucky but still keeping a combat edge. Sure it might be deviating a bit from the shows but then the shows had an ulterior motive with the design of the KDF.

    It is through repetition that we learn our weakness.
    A master with a stone is better than a novice with a sword.

    Has damage got out of control?
    This is the last thing I will post.
  • ursusmorologusursusmorologus Member Posts: 5,328 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Its common gamedev technique to give stronger gear to the under-represented factions to make them more attractive and to help smaller teams compete more evenly. KDF used to have that, now its all gone to Feds via lock-boxes and Romulans via battlecloak on every ship. KDF has nothing unique of any merit anymore, well maybe aceton emitters and siphon drones, but even those can be had by Romulans if they align with KDF.

    Its doubly unfortunate because cryptic went the other extreme with Romulans, not just slightly stronger gear but OP stuff everywhere. The T'varo is probably the best overall ship in the game, and every STF is dominated by Scimitars, the BOFFs are stupid, consoles are absurbd, etc. Predictable results, there are a lot of Rom players.

    KDF really needs a shot in the arm. Something to make people want to roll the toons.
  • pokersmith1pokersmith1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    bpharma wrote: »
    Pokey, we don't talk about the ginger haired fleet =P

    o.o

    /10chars
    Elite Defense Starfleet
    Elite Defense Stovokor
  • gthaatargthaatar Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    If the cloak is built in, regardless of what kind of cloak it is, then its useful.

    If you have to slot a console for it, then its not useful.
  • tilartatilarta Member Posts: 1,801 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I can't speak for other players, but my interest in KDF ended shortly after I finished work on my first (and only!) KDF Captain.


    There are two reasons why I avoid playing KDF.

    1. The bugs just don't get fixed.
    Why would anyone want to play a faction full of bugs?

    2. It claims to be KDF, but it's Klingon all the way.
    Klingons are my least favorite race in Star Trek.
    I never approved of the "honor before common sense" approach.

    Also, even if you're playing an Orion, a Nausicaan, a Gorn, a Lethean or a Custom Alien, the mission dialogue still reads as though you are a Klingon.
    And judging from the different mindsets of those species, each of them would take a different approach to each situation, based on their cultural outlook (which is nothing like that of a Klingon!).


    While the first problem may be fixed in time, the 2nd one won't be ever fixed.

    So, no matter what they do to KDF to make it more attractive, I'll never play it again.
    Therefore, playing "dog in the manger" and stopping Starfleet from having stuff that is the domain of KDF isn't going to motivate me to play it.

    Bees like honey, they don't like vinegar.
    Everytime someone makes a character that is an copy of an existing superhuman, Creativity is sad :'(
  • wrathofachilleswrathofachilles Member Posts: 937 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    tilarta wrote: »
    I was wondering about the veracity of that statement.

    It's a sore point with KDF fanatics that they are actively hostile to the idea of the Defiant acquiring a battle cloak.

    Even if it has one in the show.
    It's a Romulan Cloak remember? ;)

    So I highly doubted the fleet version would have a battle cloak.

    I think that all ships with cloak should be able to battle cloak. No ship could "not cloak" simply because they went into battle, it was just a dangerous thing to do because your shields drop. Klingon ships of all sizes in the show would cloak in battle if they felt that today wasn't a good day to die.

    I think much of the issues with cloak would be mitigated if we had targetable subsystems like the ships in bridge commander had. In that game, you could specifically target and disable the enemy cloaking device so that they couldn't hide and run or hide to repair. Ironically, I don't remember if it was cryptic or the people who were originally developing the game, but someone said that the average player found targeting subsystems too... confusing? Or something along those lines... right, cause the plethora of abilities in the game that we have to micromanage (especially those who don't know how to keybind/refuse to keybind/get frustrated trying to make it work and give up on it), their related doffs that most players don't even know exist, shared cool downs, what exactly they effect and to what extent, yeah, that isn't confusing at all. :rolleyes:

    But, someone says, "there are skills to counter cloak! grav well! tractor beam!" erm... are there any others? Either way, maybe if they put in a point at which the cloak gets knocked offline, like if your ship falls below 25%-20% health or something. Then maybe all of the kdf and romulan faction having battle cloak wouldn't be too much of an issue. At least it would eliminate that incredibly frustrating escape by battle cloak RIGHT at the last second. Though battle cloaking at such low health typically just results in a cloaked explosion anyway. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.