test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Federation Discussion

Crptic Build It.

age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
edited September 2013 in Federation Discussion
This is far getter desing than D,E and F.

Cryptic Build it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIRR8rkREaM&list=TLykh-NXzgzks
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
Star Trek Gamers
Post edited by age03 on
«1

Comments

  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    We already have an Enterprise


    And let's not even get into Copyright, and licensing, and Lawyers...and blah blah blah
    GwaoHAD.png
  • erei1erei1 Member Posts: 4,081 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Not even a "please" ? That's rude.

    And yeah, we already have an Enterprise.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Your talented that's not to be denied

    HOWEVER

    I don't like it and much prefer the design of D and E

    F NEEDS mega work tbh
    JtaDmwW.png
  • admiralbrenanadmiralbrenan Member Posts: 84 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Does anybody else think that the ship shown it the video looks kind of like an older TMP era odyssey class? (everything except the split neck design)
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Um no, no more fan designs please,... especially 200 yr old ones.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • kimonykimony Member Posts: 571 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I like it it. It would make a great T5 Constitution retrofit. I would want one.

    :)

    And so it begins...

    #SaucersForever #TrianglesCutDeep #TeamBeta #ShipOneisNumberOne
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    What's the obsession people have with such huge and long nacelles?
    I always thought that more advanced Nacelles would become somehow smaller.

    This man is just reworking the constitution class to look more modern, nothing else.


    Maybe it would have been a good design for the new JJ timeline...
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    https://youtu.be/d-f3bscZa0E?t=105
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • coffeemikecoffeemike Member Posts: 942 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I'm sorry but NO. There are a few ships from other ST games that can go into STO... things like the Achilles from the Dominion Wars game. Or even the obscure cannon ships like the Raging Queen/Shelley Class or the Yeager or even the Springfield Class.

    The ship does look like the TMP version of the Odyssey Class. Like really...

    TBH... I doubt also Cryptic will bring out another TMP style ship...
    ~My current ship and build~
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited September 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • dknight0001dknight0001 Member Posts: 1,542
    edited September 2013
    It's a good design except for his mistakes about Warp Drive and the idea of running it on Star Light instead of Matter/Antimatter.

    I'm all for a new Warp Core concept much like Romulans have their Singularity Cores but I kind of need a something I can believe will supply sufficient power.
    I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001. :confused:
    If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
    When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    She to TMPish for modern era, and totally disagree with no red on nacelles. and the pylons are just too long. it has some promise but needs serious work.
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    kimony wrote: »
    I like it it. It would make a great T5 Constitution retrofit. I would want one.

    :)

    And so it begins...

    My thoughts exactly.

    I ma just going through a TOS/TMP withdraw and seeing phaser fired in that era.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • feiqafeiqa Member Posts: 2,410 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    It is very pretty, and if he had not shown it along side the Sovereign I would have thought he was showing us a pre production drawing of that ship actually.

    Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
    Network engineers are not ship designers.
    Nor should they be. Their ships would look weird.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    feiqa wrote: »
    It is very pretty, and if he had not shown it along side the Sovereign I would have thought he was showing us a pre production drawing of that ship actually.

    While it looks nice, it also looks like it's a thinly disguised version of the "Lexington class" from Klingon Academy with altered nacelles and without the trapezoid impulse engine structure on the saucer.

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818020141/startrek/images/4/43/USS_Lexington-1.jpg

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818021338/startrek/images/6/65/USS_Lexington-2.jpg
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    While it looks nice, it also looks like it's a thinly disguised version of the "Lexington class" from Klingon Academy with altered nacelles and without the trapezoid impulse engine structure on the saucer.

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818020141/startrek/images/4/43/USS_Lexington-1.jpg

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818021338/startrek/images/6/65/USS_Lexington-2.jpg

    i take that over his design but wrong era for game.
  • jellico1jellico1 Member Posts: 2,719
    edited September 2013
    good looking ship

    much better than any of the new designs we have in the game now
    Jellico....Engineer ground.....Da'val Romulan space Sci
    Saphire.. Science ground......Ko'el Romulan space Tac
    Leva........Tactical ground.....Koj Romulan space Eng

    JJ-Verse will never be Canon or considered Lore...It will always be JJ-Verse
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    It's a lovely ship, I like it. :) If it were in STO I'd probably own and fly one, I do like the design of this ship. And I tend to agree with the designer about the Enterprise-E, having no neck always stroke me as the fugliest thing about the design, that's why I'm not a fan of the "E".

    Getting this in game could be an issue due to liscencing and copyrights, but that doesn't mean that Cryptic shouldn't try. I watched the video and the designer stroke me as a guy who'd love to see this design fly in space, so maybe there's a chance to get it without too much trouble.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    So you want to combine the E with the A and make it the size of the F in game.

    Um... NO. And we already have the USS Enterprise in game (to say nothing of the horrible mispells I see all the time from players). And since the F hasn't been waxed yet, AND it was supposedly just made, there is no reason to have the G yet.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    While it looks nice, it also looks like it's a thinly disguised version of the "Lexington class" from Klingon Academy with altered nacelles and without the trapezoid impulse engine structure on the saucer.

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818020141/startrek/images/4/43/USS_Lexington-1.jpg

    http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20060818021338/startrek/images/6/65/USS_Lexington-2.jpg

    Thats is Mod I ssume as I know the Lexington is Constitution class.

    ^If you can't say anything constructive or nice don't bother posting negative feedback.
    Who said anything about making the Enterprise although the F Oddy shouldn't be either.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    age03 wrote: »
    Who said anything about making the Enterprise although the F Oddy shouldn't be either.

    You did:
    age03 wrote: »
    This is far getter desing than D,E and F.

    The only Starfleet name to ever have that many lettered incarnations is the Enterprise.

    age03 wrote: »
    Thats is Mod I ssume as I know the Lexington is Constitution class.

    The images posted are of the Lexington class, not the TOS era U.S.S. Lexington.

    Just by the by, there was a Nebula class Lexington too. She fought at the second battle of Sector 001.
  • odstparker#7820 odstparker
    odstparker#7820
         Member Posts: 466 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Maybe don't make it a new Enterprise, but this ship is fantastic! Did we really get two fan designed starships (the Odyssey and the Chimera) picked over this? This, or something like it, should replace the horrible, hard to look at, and impractical design of the Chimera class and become the new Starfleet Destroyer, a good hybrid of the Cruiser and Escort ships.

    I would love to see this ship implemented at some point. Hell, add some hanger bays to the design and make a carrier, make it a science ship, a cruiser, another destroyer, anything!

    We have to reward great ship designers like this guy, and include it somehow, someday.
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I think we need a design that's a crossover between the Odyssey and the Constitution.

    It should be a little smaller than the Sovereign, faster, organic lines looks to keep it modern. It really needs to stick with the traditional cruiser look that we have all learned to love.

    I saw a fan art ship that is like this but cannot find it at the moment.
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • capnmanxcapnmanx Member Posts: 1,452 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I don't like the ship; but I do agree with his thinking about Starfleet design aesthetics. I've always preferred the clean hulls, and off white colours, of the Kirk era ships (though my favourite would be the Oberth, rather than the Connie or Excelsior).
    My old (and now mostly obsolete) exploration suggestions thread. Give it a read. :)
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Who says that in game it would need to be the new Enterprise? It could be any new random class of Starfleet cruiser, the ship realy is great and would be a nice asset to STO anyway.
    capnmanx wrote: »
    I don't like the ship; but I do agree with his thinking about Starfleet design aesthetics. I've always preferred the clean hulls, and off white colours, of the Kirk era ships (though my favourite would be the Oberth, rather than the Connie or Excelsior).

    Me too, although I love the Galaxy class for ex., I've always been a fan of the white hulls and the design philosphy of having 2 pylons on 2 nacelles, stardrive section, neck and a saucer - yes a saucer, not a chevron, not a spearhead but plain old saucer. The neck is also a very important design element to me.

    enoemg wrote: »
    I would love to see this ship implemented at some point. Hell, add some hanger bays to the design and make a carrier, make it a science ship, a cruiser, another destroyer, anything!

    Nothing persobal, but really enough with the carriers! This ship is obviously a cruiser, the designer even made blueprints and designed the entire interior of the ship and this is no carrier, it's a pure blue-blood Federation cruiser.

    On another note I agree with you that there needs to be a way to implement nice designs like this one in the game, it certainly looks better that many things we see in game.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • dknight0001dknight0001 Member Posts: 1,542
    edited September 2013
    enoemg wrote: »
    Maybe don't make it a new Enterprise, but this ship is fantastic! Did we really get two fan designed starships (the Odyssey and the Chimera) picked over this? This, or something like it, should replace the horrible, hard to look at, and impractical design of the Chimera class and become the new Starfleet Destroyer, a good hybrid of the Cruiser and Escort ships.

    Did this guy enter the competition? You gotta be in it to win it.
    I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001. :confused:
    If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
    When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
  • szerontzurszerontzur Member Posts: 2,724 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I do like it, but it is a pretty old fashioned design. The nacelles and pylons would probably need to be updated to fit more with STO's 'modern' designs.

    While it certainly does carry the.. "Aura of Majesty".. of a big Federation cruiser/flagship, I'm not really sure where it would fit in with the current ship lineup in the game. I can't help but think that it would be rendered redundant between the Regent, Excelsior and Ambassador. It would likely be heresy to the creator, but perhaps it could work as a new series of Federation Dual Cannon-capable cruiser? (The photon collector would undoubtably enable it to power some pretty beefy energy weapons.)
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    stirling191 wrote: »
    You did:
    I did not


    Just by the by, there was a Nebula class Lexington too. She fought at the second battle of Sector 001.

    What is the resistry of that ship than?

    Even they get wrong

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/USS_Lexington_%28Nebula_class%29
    NCC-61832"

    That is not the Lexington with that registration #.It really makes me question the authenticity of that site.

    The Offical site

    http://www.startrek.com/boards-topic/33303848/Starship-Lexington-NCC-1709_1195531636_33303848

    USS Lexington NCC 1709.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • anubisdeltaanubisdelta Member Posts: 27 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    age03 wrote: »
    I did not





    What is the resistry of that ship than?

    Even they get wrong

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/USS_Lexington_%28Nebula_class%29
    NCC-61832"

    That is not the Lexington with that registration #.It really makes me question the authenticity of that site.

    The Offical site

    http://www.startrek.com/boards-topic/33303848/Starship-Lexington-NCC-1709_1195531636_33303848

    USS Lexington NCC 1709.

    Unfortunately you are actually Wrong about the lexington been 1709. The Original one was but there have been 2 others with different NCC numbers Which is common for starfleet. A new ship is usualy built and it will have a completely new NCC number to a past ship baring the same name. The Enterprise is a rare exception to this in the fact they all share the 1701 number. Here are the other Two from the Star Trek.com official site.

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-1709 - Constitution-class seen in TOS

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-14427 - Excelsior-class Seen in TNG

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-61832 - Nebula-class Seen in DS9
    Member Since June 2009
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    anubisdelta wrote: »
    Unfortunately you are actually Wrong about the lexington been 1709. The Original one was but there have been 2 others with different NCC numbers Which is common for starfleet. A new ship is usualy built and it will have a completely new NCC number to a past ship baring the same name. The Enterprise is a rare exception to this in the fact they all share the 1701 number. Here are the other Two from the Star Trek.com official site.

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-1709 - Constitution-class seen in TOS

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-14427 - Excelsior-class Seen in TNG

    http://www.startrek.com/database_article/lexington-u-s-s-ncc-61832 - Nebula-class Seen in DS9

    You forget Yamato. She was 1305-E. The writers and designers just got lazy and not look at previous incarnations. truly a ship should have the same number for registry no matter what.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited September 2013
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.