test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Cyptic, stop using my artwork.

infinitespacesinfinitespaces Member Posts: 43 Arc User
*** MODS PLEASE ESCALATE ***

I recenty found out you are using one of my art pieces as concept art for your game. The forum post in which it is being used is http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=866911&cpage=4 (It is in the background of the final image before comments, titled as 'Concept Art' ).

The background is in fact a digital painting i did back in 2004 entitled 'Beyond Horizons' the original of which can be found here: http://hameed.deviantart.com/art/Beyond-Horizons-6738517 (I believe the crop may have been taken from the wallpaper editition downloadable via description)

As the rights holders of the image and as a professional digital artist of more than a decade with a speciality in space/scifi art I was pretty astonished although somewhat flattered that you chose to use my work, although i fail to understand what made you think you where allowed to do so, since the image is obviously copyrighted and you never approached me for permission.

My rights in the matter are naturally quite clear, the only reason i am here in the forums and not mailing my lawyer in this case is that i have been a lifetime subscriber of the game for some months, and despite its various issues, am a big fan of it.

Please consider this a slap on the wrist, and please warn your design team not to use my work, and to be more careful when choosing concept art for publication.

Yours Sincerely.
Hameed Nawaz.
http://hameed.deviantart.com
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Post edited by infinitespaces on
«1

Comments

  • zarxidejackozarxidejacko Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Looks like they rotated it and zoomed in.

    edit. yes looks exactly as downloadable wallpaper.
    2010 is my join date.
  • guriphuguriphu Member Posts: 494 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    You've been using the internet for how long, and you think posting on a video game forum is going to accomplish anything? More to the point, you think that PWE is going to ever admit to wrongdoing? If you want to point out that PWE and/or Cryptic are two-faced hypocrites to a few dozen people, more power to you, I guess, but if you want any kind of real response, you should cut to the chase and contact your lawyer.

    Pretty nice painting, though.
  • brigadooombrigadooom Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl

    I'm inclined to agree with infinitespaces :o
    ----
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • malakhglitchmalakhglitch Member Posts: 55 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    The suggestion about contacting your lawyer is sound. If they are passing off something you made as theirs then it's a legal matter.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • grouchyotakugrouchyotaku Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    From the 'Terms of Service' document...
    12. Designation of Agent to Receive Notification of Claimed Infringement of Copyright(s). DMCA Notices.

    If you believe that anything on the Site infringes upon any copyright which you own or control, you may file a notification of such infringement to the contact information set below:

    Address: 101 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 400, Redwood City, CA 94065
    Telephone Number: 650-590-7700
    Facsimile (Fax) Number: 650-591-1211
    Electronic Mail Address (Email): dmca@perfectworld.com

    We may give notice of a claim of copyright infringement to our users by means of a general notice on the Site, electronic mail to a user's email address in our records, or by written communication sent by first-class mail to a user's address in our records.

    http://www.perfectworld.com/about/terms
  • maddog0000doommaddog0000doom Member Posts: 1,017 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    if u didnt want people to use it why post it online. if ur that upset about it, dont make it avaible to millions.

    personaly i think cryptic should use something from hubble. and not some TRIBBLE they found online.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • redsnake721redsnake721 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    if u didnt want people to use it why post it online. if ur that upset about it, dont make it avaible to millions.

    personaly i think cryptic should use something from hubble. and not some TRIBBLE they found online.

    "TRIBBLE"? I would like to see you create something half as good. As an Artist myself I understand that the internet is the new way to get your art availabe for people to see. Any artist that wants to be successful has to use the internet for exposure. To say that because he made it available to be seen online he desirves to have it stolen, and re-used by a company to make money off of with out paying him or asking for his permission is what he gets is stupid and very trollish. You are the very defination of "Hater"
  • naeviusnaevius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Are they the same?

    If I look at the small moon under the star in the upper right of the STO pic, I see a similar star in your artwork. However, the 3 bright stars under that in the STO pic are not present in yours. Also, the ring around the star in your pic is not present in the STO pic.

    Can you do an overlay that lines up?
    _________________________________________________
    [Kluless][Kold][Steel Heels][Snagtooth]
    [Louis Cipher][Outta Gum][Thysa Kymbo][Spanner][Frakk]
    [D'Mented][D'Licious]
    Joined October 2009. READ BEFORE POSTING
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    brigadooom wrote: »
    http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl

    I'm inclined to agree with infinitespaces :o


    It's really close, but not exactly the same even allowing for zooming, rotating, and cropping.

    I'm not saying it wasn't an altered version of the same picture... there are a number of images that seem suspiciously congruent. There are also enough differences to make me wonder.

    Probably best to file an infringement claim and let it proceed from there. I'm no copyright lawyer and I'm not a PWE employee. We don't know if Cryptic claims to have produced the artwork internally or if they bought it from somewhere.

    If it was a variant of the same image, maybe it was supposed to be used as a background for an internal mockup of the UI design and shouldn't have been posted publicly. That's only speculation on my part, since it's labeled as "Concept Art".

    Either way, I'll make sure BranFlakes knows about this thread.
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • bootybootsbootyboots Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bluegeek wrote: »
    It's really close, but not exactly the same even allowing for zooming, rotating, and cropping.

    I'm not saying it wasn't an altered version of the same picture... there are a number of images that seem suspiciously congruent. There are also enough differences to make me wonder.

    Probably best to file an infringement claim and let it proceed from there. I'm no copyright lawyer and I'm not a PWE employee. We don't know if Cryptic claims to have produced the artwork internally or if they bought it from somewhere.

    If it was a variant of the same image, maybe it was supposed to be used as a background for an internal mockup of the UI design and shouldn't have been posted publicly. That's only speculation on my part, since it's labeled as "Concept Art".

    Either way, I'll make sure BranFlakes knows about this thread.


    its clearly a derivative work based on http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl and used to promote a commercial product. Copyright violation lawsuits have been won for less.

    http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-fairuse.html
    "How much of someone else's work can I use without getting permission?
    Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports."

    How much do I have to change in order to claim copyright in someone else's work?
    Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work. Accordingly, you cannot claim copyright to another's work, no matter how much you change it, unless you have the owner's consent.




    If this was meant just for internal concept art. It should have never left the artist's working folder. Its a bad, risky practice

    Its also occurred to me that both artists might have used the same source material (a nasa colorized photo for example) and artist bringing the complaint may be in the wrong.
    House of Sigma (channel KDFdefera for PvE requiring only KDF teams) List of KDF issues [my in-game handle @bootymcboots] (channel KDF Empire for KDF orientated discussion - still in development/growing)
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,115 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bootyboots wrote: »
    its clearly a derivative work based on http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl and used to promote a commercial product. Copyright violation lawsuits have been won for less.

    http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-fairuse.html
    "How much of someone else's work can I use without getting permission?
    Under the fair use doctrine of the U.S. copyright statute, it is permissible to use limited portions of a work including quotes, for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports."

    How much do I have to change in order to claim copyright in someone else's work?
    Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work. Accordingly, you cannot claim copyright to another's work, no matter how much you change it, unless you have the owner's consent.




    If this was meant just for internal concept art. It should have never left the artist's working folder. Its a bad, risky practice

    Its also occurred to me that both artists might have used the same source material (a nasa colorized photo for example) and artist bringing the complaint may be in the wrong.

    Um, remember; if you base used work is modyfied and varies by more than 10% from the original - you're SoL.
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • fewzzfewzz Member Posts: 242 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Naughty Cryptic just got caught red handed have they?
  • bootybootsbootyboots Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Um, remember; if you base used work is modyfied and varies by more than 10% from the original - you're SoL.

    I guess you didn't read the quote from the US copyright office


    Anyway, at this point its a dispute between the two artists with Cryptic being entangled. We really don't have enough information to judge if there was a violation or not, and even if we did it would be academic.
    House of Sigma (channel KDFdefera for PvE requiring only KDF teams) List of KDF issues [my in-game handle @bootymcboots] (channel KDF Empire for KDF orientated discussion - still in development/growing)
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I'm in the "who cares?" bin.

    The concept art image in dispute is NOT part of the game, and the starfield was chopped up and rearranged heavily. The parts of your work that are actually unique, aren't in the concept art. The parts they may have used look like random bits of Hubble imagery.

    I find it somewhat suspicious that this is the only one of your arts to have the "donotuseplz" button on it....

    *looks more* Oh wait... the art you linked ISN'T the best match for the concept art at all.... It's this one: http://hameed.deviantart.com/art/Beyond-Horizons-6738517#/art/Beyond-Horizons-WP-Pack-6764094?_sid=bef1103 Which you have made available for free download.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bootyboots wrote: »
    I guess you didn't read the quote from the US copyright office


    Anyway, at this point its a dispute between the two artists with Cryptic being entangled. We really don't have enough information to judge if there was a violation or not, and even if we did it would be academic.
    There is much precedent in this field, and many cases have been made where the original artist LOST a suit. Why? "Is the derivative work Original?" IE are they JUST copying your work or are they incorporating peices of it into a new peice of art?

    In this situation, you cannot make a case based on the first one. Clearly the work was HEAVILY modified, and isn't even the focus of the image.... It's just there for background fluff. If you did win and got awarded damages they'd probably give you a few dollars in "compensation" and that'd be the end of it.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,115 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bootyboots wrote: »
    I guess you didn't read the quote from the US copyright office
    .

    Oh, I read it, however, case law on the matter will usually win out; and that's been the case for most claims like the OP's over the years. BTW - the 'fair use' clause (which was also mentioned in the post with the other copyright lawinfo) wouldn't even be an issue in this case as it's clearly NOT 'fair use'; as Cryptic was not doing a review of the artwork; or using it for academic purposes. As the OP posits, if they did use it (and that would be for a court to decide in the end should the OP pursue legal action); it was indeed for commercial/promotional purposes once they posted that concept art.

    The issue then comes down to 'damages' - and that would be where the 'percentage of change' figures into the legal equation.
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Oh, I read it, however, case law on the matter will usually win out; and that's been the case for most claims like the OP's over the years. BTW - the 'fair use' clause (which was also mentioned in the post with the other copyright lawinfo) wouldn't even be an issue in this case as it's clearly NOT 'fair use'; as Cryptic was not doing a review of the artwork; or using it for academic purposes. As the OP posits, if they did use it (and that would be for a court to decide in the end should the OP pursue legal action); it was indeed for commercial/promotional purposes once they posted that concept art.

    The issue then comes down to 'damages' - and that would be where the 'percentage of change' figures into the legal equation.
    Yes, and "damages" in this case would be a paltry sum compared to legal costs.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • twg042370twg042370 Member Posts: 2,312 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    if u didnt want people to use it why post it online. if ur that upset about it, dont make it avaible to millions.

    Hush, you ninny. This is different than some kid posting it to their Tumblr.

    Anyway, OP: If you are being ripped off, ask nice. Then get a lawyer to ask nice. If it goes on past that I hope you got deep pockets. Good luck.
    <3
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Um, remember; if you base used work is modyfied and varies by more than 10% from the original - you're SoL.

    This isn't the case, but...

    No identifying features from either picture match - the stars do not match, the planets are completely absent from Cryptic's image, and at no point do the nebulae match - the closest matche is the CLO "pillar" - which is against a different color background, broken in a different pattern, surrounded by different features, and illuminated differently in each. Rotating and reflecting Hameed's image can't yield anything resembling that background.

    Only the style and the color scheme, both of which are extremely common in artist renderings of astronomical objects, and if either of these things were subject to copyright Hameed's entire collection and that of hundreds of other artists would simply all be violations of Chesley Bonestell's pioneering work in the genre.
  • oneandonlyrecceoneandonlyrecce Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    hevach wrote: »
    This isn't the case, but...

    No identifying features from either picture match - the stars do not match, the planets are completely absent from Cryptic's image, and at no point do the nebulae match - the closest matche is the CLO "pillar"....
    bootyboots wrote: »
    its clearly a derivative work based on http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl...

    I''ve got to agree with Booty Boots that is the same image.
    bootyboots wrote: »
    If this was meant just for internal concept art. It should have never left the artist's working folder. Its a bad, risky practice...
    I think you're got it right here. This image was probably put together to "sell" the idea to StanD, or for StanD as part of the pitch to get the funds from PWE. And it's "leaked" onto this blog page. I'm guessing that the level of governance for these blog post is pretty low compared to the that for tier one promotional and in-game material. It shouldn't have happened. Something for them to tighten up on
  • infinitespacesinfinitespaces Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    bluegeek wrote: »
    It's really close, but not exactly the same even allowing for zooming, rotating, and cropping.

    I'm not saying it wasn't an altered version of the same picture... there are a number of images that seem suspiciously congruent. There are also enough differences to make me wonder.

    Probably best to file an infringement claim and let it proceed from there. I'm no copyright lawyer and I'm not a PWE employee. We don't know if Cryptic claims to have produced the artwork internally or if they bought it from somewhere.

    If it was a variant of the same image, maybe it was supposed to be used as a background for an internal mockup of the UI design and shouldn't have been posted publicly. That's only speculation on my part, since it's labeled as "Concept Art".

    Either way, I'll make sure BranFlakes knows about this thread.

    Thank you. This type of thing has happened to me before, it is likely that the image was never meant for actual publication and purely made as a mock-up for office use.

    The image in question is without doubt my work, though somewhat altered to fit that particular purpose.

    As i mentioned before i am a fan, and would add that i likely would have granted written permission for its use as i have done in the past, had i been asked.

    My complaint here was more to prevent this happening again to me or anyone else for that matter, there is obviously some source of art within the company that needs to be properly verified, my hope was merely to make the management aware of the situation.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited June 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I don't see the pic in the link provided by the OP...

    Must be They pulled it already.
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • valetheonvaletheon Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    daveyny wrote: »
    I don't see the pic in the link provided by the OP...

    Must be They pulled it already.

    Yea it was there, they pulled it.
    "Sometimes we're freakin idiots, and that's fun" -Fleetmate

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    One of many reminders that i'm not a REAL Romulan. >_<
  • lan451lan451 Member Posts: 3,386 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Yep it got pulled. Just see the gif image that's been posted a few times to get the idea.
    JWZrsUV.jpg
    Mine Trap Supporter
  • steamwrightsteamwright Member Posts: 2,820
    edited June 2013
    brigadooom wrote: »
    http://imgur.com/YjWu8hl

    I'm inclined to agree with infinitespaces :o

    from what you posted, I can see the match too. There's a ray coming off the large white star, down and to the viewer's left. As your image flashes between the two, I can see what appears to be the same ray, now largely grayed out, stlll in the same spot pointing between the nacelles. Looks like someone darkened the star but didn't remove everything.
  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    Maybe you should check what "derivative" is.

    Its a nebulae, you cannot copyright a nebulae and people have very funny ideas about copyright, you cannot claim something is derivative when itself its "derivative" otherwise photograph would be in a hell of a mess because who take a photo of anything first would have the copyright of ANY photo of that subject.
    It's not a photograph.

    "Nebulae, starfield, and planet textures done in photoshop, planets rendered with max."-from the deviantart page.

    How do you think Hameed would have gotten pictures of those planets if this was a photograph, anyways? They clearly are not from this solar system.
  • f9thaceshighf9thaceshigh Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    The concept artist probably found it on google and hence wouldn't even have known the provenance of the original image. There's no malicious intent here, cryptic isn't making any money off the image itself, it was just used in the backdrop of a mockup of the new character selector screen. and I doubt anybody but the OP would have even noticed it was anything more then a generic hubble pic.
  • hasukurobihasukurobi Member Posts: 1,421 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    It did not sound like the OP wanted to actually press charges. The OP said they wer just giving Cryptic/PWE a friendly heads up and asking them not to do it further without asking permission.

    As for Cryptic/PWE it is rather likely that they bought the art from someone else who probably altered it and claimed it as their own rather than just stealing it outright. If I were the Op I would be more interested in knowing who they acquired it from rather than warning them against posting my art but that is just me...

    It is also my feelings on the matter that if indeed this is the artwork (even if altered) of this person then Cryptic/PWE should at least be kind enough to give the artist credit on what they have already posted but as the OP said that no further legal action was intended that this should perhaps be the end of it for the time being.
  • bootybootsbootyboots Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    As several people pointed out though, this image would have had to have been heavily modified to fit in that picture. I find it hard to believe anyone would have bothered to do that just for a background shot in a concept art. I think it's an amazing coincidence that the image happens to be similar to the OP's. Even if it is the OP's, the concept artist probably found it on google and hence wouldn't even have known the provenance of the original image. There's no malicious intent here, cryptic isn't making any money off the image itself, it was just used in the backdrop of a mockup of the new character selector screen. and I doubt anybody but the OP would have even noticed it was anything more then a generic hubble pic.

    Its pretty clearly derivative and Cryptic pulled their artwork based on it

    Why they didn't use a Nasa backdrop is beyond me. There are tons of them and in the public domain
    House of Sigma (channel KDFdefera for PvE requiring only KDF teams) List of KDF issues [my in-game handle @bootymcboots] (channel KDF Empire for KDF orientated discussion - still in development/growing)
This discussion has been closed.