test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Huge Aquarius Destroyer

makovdenricmakovdenric Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited May 2013 in PC Gameplay Bug Reports
Don't know if this a bug or a not, but the Aquarius Destroyer is like 5 times the size it was before... both the player ship and the NPC version. I find it quite odd.
Post edited by makovdenric on

Comments

  • capm7capm7 Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Yes, I saw this as well... ridiculously large!

    http://www.midnightsquadron.com/ms/capm/bug1.jpg

    http://www.midnightsquadron.com/ms/capm/bug2.jpg


    I don't like it, needs to go back the way it was.
    ---Capm
    Founder, Midnight Squadron
    http://www.midnightsquadron.com
  • northrimnorthrim Member Posts: 49 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I just experienced that bug too. I hope this is a bug and not intended by cryptic. Please Cryptic, fix this.

    I can live with the rainbow gui, i can also live with brighter window lights which make my Odyssey look like a christmas tree but an aquarius escort which is huger than the odyssey's saucer section is not awesome at all.
  • sanokskyratsanokskyrat Member Posts: 479 Media Corps
    edited May 2013
    out of all the bugs... this has to be the funniest. Lol.
    1368747308047.cached_zpsl4joalbs.jpg
  • axellightningaxellightning Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    out of all the bugs... this has to be the funniest. Lol.

    Second this! :D:D:D
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ikkatsuikkatsu Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    yea this is happening to me too and i dont like it at all. makes me not even want to use my aquarius escort ability
  • robinoldsrobinolds Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Agreed. It's about 10x larger than before. Must carry about 500 crew now.....
  • rybaksixrybaksix Member Posts: 193 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    It looks like it is using the wrong model. Instead of using the Oddy console model it is using the playable ship. But I might be wrong.
  • amosov78amosov78 Member Posts: 1,495 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    It's nice to know that Starfleet got practical use out of reverse subspace compression technology. :P
    U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-71895 - Nebula-class
    Commanding Officer: Captain Pyotr Ramonovich Amosov
    Dedication Plaque: "Nil Intentatum Reliquit"
  • edited May 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • nyx219nyx219 Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    LOL, wow, that's absurdly huge. I need to get in game & check mine. Looks like docking with the Oddy's gonna hurt!
  • ikkatsuikkatsu Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    nyx219 wrote: »
    LOL, wow, that's absurdly huge. I need to get in game & check mine. Looks like docking with the Oddy's gonna hurt!

    lmao its like giving birth to a child then in a few years reversing the process... only with the child way older :P
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Dr. Spock says... Take a deep breath... ...this will only hurt a little bit...

    :eek:
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • ikkatsuikkatsu Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    i wish a dev. or someone in charge would at least acknowledge the aquarius question of glitch or change, so we know which it is and whether or not to be pissed
  • genrldestructiongenrldestruction Member Posts: 194 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    If they acknowledged every bug report they wouldn't have time to actually fix the bug. On the other hand, if there was a acknowledgement of the bugs, maybe they could reduce the number of duplicate reports (I work in IT support, I know that's wishful thinking...).
  • edited May 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • sosolidshoesosolidshoe Member Posts: 174 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    If they acknowledged every bug report they wouldn't have time to actually fix the bug. On the other hand, if there was a acknowledgement of the bugs, maybe they could reduce the number of duplicate reports (I work in IT support, I know that's wishful thinking...).


    You're talking about the dev team that went into the Aquarius data in order to add the Type 6 material to the dropdown menu(since it was incorrectly unavailable before), and somehow completely failed to notice that it's impossible to select any of the materials.

    We are PWE. Your forums and game accounts will be added to our own. Your community will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
  • northrimnorthrim Member Posts: 49 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    It's still not fixed-.- It is a bug right? I mean the devs can't be serious to extend the size of the aquarius with intend. This issue really bothers me - I bought the C-store Odyssey just because of the aquarius escort and now I can't use it because it looks absolutely hilarious and terrible.
  • comodorejonathancomodorejonathan Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I can confirm this bug.

    The Aquarius pet shares its model with the playable Aquarius, and my Fleet Aquarius is now just as stupidly massive, where it used to be slightly smaller than the Defiant.

    Cryptic, can this please be fixed ASAP so I can stop using my ugly Defiant Retrofit? :)
  • ikkatsuikkatsu Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    northrim wrote: »
    It's still not fixed-.- It is a bug right? I mean the devs can't be serious to extend the size of the aquarius with intend. This issue really bothers me - I bought the C-store Odyssey just because of the aquarius escort and now I can't use it because it looks absolutely hilarious and terrible.

    exactly! and its not like they can use the "its free to play, deal with it" argument. i purchased the odyssey tactical cruiser, so i have a right as a consumer to be angry
Sign In or Register to comment.