test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New Miranda Class please

darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
edited February 2013 in Federation Discussion
Hello people.

I've been thinking that the Miranda class needs a new lease on life. Sure, we get to fly it when we start (well, those who haven't bought z-store ships), but I really think we should have a higher level version of the ship.

Why? Well, the ship is iconic. Kahn almost defeated Kirk in Star Trek II in one, they fought at alongside the Defiant at the battle for DS9, they fought the Borg defending Earth in First Contact, etc etc etc.

Now, by no means should this be a VA ship!!! That would be ludicrous. A commander or captain variant, however, would be quite cool. Load it up with a new console and stick it in the z-store. This would help the fact that not too many things have been going in to the z-store lately. It could be a cruiser/escort hybrid.

Anyone else like to see the Miranda get revamped? Comment if you do.

Oh, please no hijacks about Feds getting all the ships from the klinks. If you have a ship you'd like to see in the game then make a thread that suggests the idea. I'd support it even though I don't play klink.
Post edited by darramouss1 on

Comments

  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Now, by no means should this be a VA ship!!! That would be ludicrous.

    Why not? You yourself stated they fought at alongside the Defiant at the battle for DS9, they fought the Borg defending Earth in First Contact, etc etc etc. Why couldn't it be as powerful as a saber? Or a Ferengi Marauder? Or a Vulcan science ship? The whole idea of what can or can't be a VA ship has decayed so much with the lockbox lotto that I'm not really sure why it's worth a debate anymore. The Miranda will be less powerful than a Galor or a Bug Ship or whatever. So it should be a-OK in terms of what's what. Howbout this, make it an RA ship instead? One bump below the VA, sort of. And definitely below whatever pops out of a lottery box.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • darramouss1darramouss1 Member Posts: 1,811 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Just because they fight alongside a ship doesn't make them as strong. That's like saying if I fought alongside Muhammad Ali in his day that I would have been just as great a fighter as he.
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    If I'm not mistaken, Mirandas in DS9/FC were basically the space equivalent of redshirts.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Faught along side you say?

    Funny... I always thought it was "Blown to pieces alongside the Defiant" xD
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    daveyny wrote: »

    This. A thousand times this.

    Heck, I'd be happy if they just replaced the standard ShiKahr with that.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    STO tech could easily make a tier 5 miranda, it would be cool to see the Saratoga class in game.
  • dashuk2381dashuk2381 Member Posts: 230 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    anazonda wrote: »
    Faught along side you say?

    Funny... I always thought it was "Blown to pieces alongside the Defiant" xD

    This...

    In the Dominion War and against the Borg the only thing I saw from the Miranda was it getting blown to bits all over the screen. Even in Star Trek II, the Miranda catches the Enterprise with pants down/no shields and still the Connie takes a beating and keeps on going. However when the Miranda has no shields, Kirk blows it to pieces with 2 torpedoes and some random phaser fire.

    At least the Connie/Excelsior are tankish and were shown to be pretty durable ships in the Star Trek films and shows. The Miranda though is mostly just cannon fodder.

    That having been said, I don't mind those that want to have their nostalgic ship later on in the game. They could do a variant like they did for the Nebula and Galaxy to upate the look so it feels more like an updated ship and make it playable at Commander/Captain level. Especially for Engineer, who I feel has the worst ship options at Commander, but at least we have the Ambassador now along with the Excelsior.
  • ebeneezergoodeebeneezergoode Member Posts: 227 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Once the Dominion War kicked off, they became even more of a death trap than Oberths historically had been during TNG. I mean that ship existed so the Enterprise D had something to shake their heads and tut at because they'd been so unfortunate and screwed over so hard by events, i.e. space madness, swirly energy thing from binary star, space madness, bird of prey (ok that wasn't TNG but still), wonky cloaking accidents, and also space madness. Did I mention space madness?

    The Miranda fared a little better, right up until DS9 when they were cannon fodder with warp nacelles. Those things got taken down by the dozen. Even in Kirk's era, they were a budget starship, a mid-weight ship. Anything it could do, a Connie could do better. That's what made Khan laying a smack down on the Enterprise such a shocker, since he did it in a worse ship. In STO, Kirk'd likely have called hax and reported Khan to a GM.

    That said, there's so much that made it to tier 5 since the Fleet system came into being that I don't suppose there's many good reasons to exclude anything at this point. If a Sabre or Nova, ships that canonically were inferior to contemporary ships like the Defiant or Prometheus or Intrepid are now just as tough as them, then what's the point of saying anything's too old? Hell, KDF-side I could fly a D7, a class retired by TMP.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • abaddon653abaddon653 Member Posts: 1,144 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    STO needs more space madness, space madness is cool -straightens bow tie-
  • pjlietz1pjlietz1 Member Posts: 41 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    daveyny wrote: »

    Yes yes yes yes yes!

    That ship is sweet, I've loved it for a long time!
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I think a Miranda can hang with a Ferengi Marauder. And they're certainly capable of taking on a Galor in a firefight, so really, this discussion is based on some warped idea of ship tiers that Cryptic broke a long time ago.

    Put a Miranda in a lottery lockbox with some other fancy stuff, and viola, instant excuse for a top tier Miranda.

    This game doesn't follow the rules you all seem to think it does.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • veldrane2kveldrane2k Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    abaddon653 wrote: »
    STO needs more space madness, space madness is cool -straightens bow tie-

    I had a crazy idea for a Tier 5 Miranda. To keep the orginal feel of a balanced cruiser\escort\science vessel, instead of giving it 5 BO slots, cmd, ltc, 2 lts, ens, give it 3 cmd slots, 1 sci, 1 tac, 1 eng. As a RA ship, it would also have 3 of each console to keep the balance. It would keep dual cannons, give it +5 power to all and sensor analysis or maybe Sub systems targeting. Weapons would be 4 fore, 3 aft, ie in the middle, and 3 device slots.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Once the Dominion War kicked off, they became even more of a death trap than Oberths historically had been during TNG. I mean that ship existed so the Enterprise D had something to shake their heads and tut at because they'd been so unfortunate and screwed over so hard by events, i.e. space madness, swirly energy thing from binary star, space madness, bird of prey (ok that wasn't TNG but still), wonky cloaking accidents, and also space madness. Did I mention space madness?

    The Miranda fared a little better, right up until DS9 when they were cannon fodder with warp nacelles. Those things got taken down by the dozen. Even in Kirk's era, they were a budget starship, a mid-weight ship. Anything it could do, a Connie could do better. That's what made Khan laying a smack down on the Enterprise such a shocker, since he did it in a worse ship. In STO, Kirk'd likely have called hax and reported Khan to a GM.

    That said, there's so much that made it to tier 5 since the Fleet system came into being that I don't suppose there's many good reasons to exclude anything at this point. If a Sabre or Nova, ships that canonically were inferior to contemporary ships like the Defiant or Prometheus or Intrepid are now just as tough as them, then what's the point of saying anythings too old? Hell, KDF-side I could fly a D7, a class retired by TMP.

    I just wish that they hadn't made all the minor ships appear to have NO SHIELDS during the battles...

    That looked stupid to me, not Cool.

    What Captain would go into battle with out shields raised.

    Every time that happened, it pushed me beyond the make-believable zone into the Jackass Producer/Director zone.

    :rolleyes:
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • kalvorax#3775 kalvorax Member Posts: 1,663 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    daveyny wrote: »

    wow that looks, well, sexy :P GIMME :D
  • paragon92518paragon92518 Member Posts: 268
    edited February 2013
    Beautiful ship --- but what's the OBSESSION with Trek "insignia-shaped" saucers there days?
  • wildweasalwildweasal Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Why not? You yourself stated they fought at alongside the Defiant at the battle for DS9, they fought the Borg defending Earth in First Contact, etc etc etc. Why couldn't it be as powerful as a saber? Or a Ferengi Marauder? Or a Vulcan science ship? The whole idea of what can or can't be a VA ship has decayed so much with the lockbox lotto that I'm not really sure why it's worth a debate anymore. The Miranda will be less powerful than a Galor or a Bug Ship or whatever. So it should be a-OK in terms of what's what. Howbout this, make it an RA ship instead? One bump below the VA, sort of. And definitely below whatever pops out of a lottery box.

    I like this idea please make it so
    3ondby_zpsikszslyx.jpg
  • abaddon653abaddon653 Member Posts: 1,144 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    veldrane2k wrote: »
    I had a crazy idea for a Tier 5 Miranda. To keep the orginal feel of a balanced cruiser\escort\science vessel, instead of giving it 5 BO slots, cmd, ltc, 2 lts, ens, give it 3 cmd slots, 1 sci, 1 tac, 1 eng. As a RA ship, it would also have 3 of each console to keep the balance. It would keep dual cannons, give it +5 power to all and sensor analysis or maybe Sub systems targeting. Weapons would be 4 fore, 3 aft, ie in the middle, and 3 device slots.

    Dude that's crazy.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    Beautiful ship --- but what's the OBSESSION with Trek "insignia-shaped" saucers there days?

    They've used up the Round & Oval ones?
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I wouldn't mind seeing a T5 Miranda class. As long they make the "Centaur" skin. I would use that on my tactical Capt. I really enjoyed using that at that level.

    They could even use the Miranda as a more "Science" type as well, or a "Science/Tactical" ship.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • salenferretsalenferret Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I've always loved the Miranda-Class, and would love to see a T5 Retrofit version. It's part Escort, part-Cruiser, all sexy Miranda-Class.
  • hravikhravik Member Posts: 1,203 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I'd love to see a new ship in the Miranda style, not the Rademaker one. Way too pointy for my tastes. Something kitbashed from the Sovereign or even Odyssey class would fit more for me.

    Seems like Starfleet has a history of making pocket cruisers out of whatever larger cruisers exist. Constitution - Miranda, Excelsior - Centaur, Galaxy - Nebula.
  • admgreeradmgreer Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    As an avid Star ship modler, I have build many Miranda class ships, There are Tac varients, Sci, and multi role varients, I would love a customizable Miranda, My Suggestion for a Good T5 ship:
    4 weps front and 3 back
    can equip cannons

    Tac: LT CMDR
    Tac: LT
    So you could have: TT1, and CSV or THY 2 or BO3
    ENG: CMDR
    ENG: ENS
    SCI: LT CMDR
    So you could have TSS and HE anf one good Sci trick
    consoles:
    TAC 3
    ENG 4
    SCI 2
    Turn rate 16
    base hull 38k
    shield Mod 0.9
    crew 185
    Special ability/Console: Double bonus to "go down fighting" and "Ramming speed" and "Abandon ship" Shorter respawn timer by %50

    So the closer you are to blowing up the more dangerous you are. (You could always quote Khan "Noo you can't get awaaaay")
Sign In or Register to comment.