test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Obsolete Ships.

petaluma1petaluma1 Member Posts: 38 Arc User
edited February 2013 in Federation Discussion
I'm a Tac Officer and I own almost every ship in the Fed Fleet other then Fleet level Ships and I want to discharge some of them to make room in my ship inventory for the new ships coming out next month. What ships are now considered OBSOLETE?

I know of course all lower level ranking ships but what about all of the T5 ships?
Post edited by petaluma1 on
«1

Comments

  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Exploration Cruiser Retrofit
    Long Range Science Vessel Retrofit
    Dreadnought Cruiser

    Just a few off the top of my head - I still use my Dreadnought, but only because I like the design.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    ...I own almost every ship in the Fed Fleet other then Fleet level Ships...

    basically every ship you own then is obsolete, salvage the consoles from the is the only thing you should do before deleting them. they are not deleted for good anyway since you can reclaim the ships you bought anytime.
    Go pro or go home
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    I have to kinda disagree on [the Dreadnought being obsolete], even if the Galaxy-X have problems its pretty much the only Federation cruiser that can mount cannons (even if it cannot really use then well due to low tac stations and turn rate) and nothing else come that can replace it.

    Also as listed were Zen Shop ships you can freely discharge then as if you own then, you can always reclaim then and there is some merit of then at Fleet version.

    I would say the Patrol Escort is the one that been made utter obsolete as the Blockade Runner have better stats that even its Fleet version, were only the BO layout slightly differs but still I rather have 2 Lt. Eng BO stations that 1 Lt. Eng and 1 Lt Sci BO station as the Ens Uni does not make much difference.

    Of course the Blockade Runner is part of the Steam pack and you have to buy it on Steam but still, it just outclasses the Patrol Escort.

    Yes, but I've seen a bunch of people who are of the opinion that the Dreadnought has been made obsolete by the Vesta. Other than the tanking ability, I'd have to agree, the Vesta has the same abilities (and more - Aux cannons!) and has a better turn rate and shields. Granted, I still fly my Dreadnought as my primary ship, but it's effectively made obsolete in almost everything it was originally made to do.

    I agree with the Blockade Runner Retrofit, it's a far superior ship, besting some of the other escorts. I'm still surprised by the potential of this ship.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Pretty much all the original cruisers and sci-ships. The original "free" escorts are still serviceable though, though they're beginning to show their age "age", especially the patrol escort.


    Assault Cruiser - Was more or less obsolete when the Advanced Heavy Cruiser Retrofit came out. With the Fleet Assault Cruiser and Fleet Advanced Heavy Cruiser Retrofit, the assault cruiser is a dinosaur and a joke of a DPS cruiser.

    Star Cruiser - Made obsolete by the freebie Odyssey and the c-store one.

    Galaxy retrofit - Has never been a good ship really, it's saucer separation console being a gimmick with a 5 min cooldown. It's shields and hull are now below cruiser standard and coupled with it's turn rate it's just a big fat target.

    Galaxy-X - It was always a hit and miss ship even when it finally got it's fourth rear weapon slot. It's poor turnrate and tactical boff stations make it pretty weak in comparison to the fleet sovereign and fleet excelsior. Yes you can fit the thing with dual heavy cannons, but with single cannons and 2x cannon rapid fire the other two do far more sustained damage. The D'kora and Galor also do a better job as a DPS cruiser.

    Deep Space Science Vessel and Recon Science Ship - Were pretty much obsolete with the release of the Long Range Science Vessel Retrofit, but with the release of the Nebula, Atrox, Vesta and all the fleet sci-ships, there's very little reason you'd want to fly the original T5 ships. While it's starting to look a bit old in the tooth compared to the newer ones, the long range science vessel retrofit can still keep up.
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    If it it isn't a fleet ship/have 10 consoles get rid of it.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • farmallmfarmallm Member Posts: 4,630 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I don't get out my low tier ships often. I might once in a while for a little cruise around the block. I still use my T5 Negh'Var and Sovereign classes that you got for free. They are not the top of the line, but still get the job done.
    Enterprise%20C_zpsrdrf3v8d.jpg

    USS Casinghead NCC 92047 launched 2350
    Fleet Admiral Stowe - Dominion War Vet.
  • cmdrskyfallercmdrskyfaller Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The Nebula tier 5 became the equivalent of a tier 3 in performance after the science nerfs post- F2P.


    That ship needs a major overhaul. The fleet version of it is upping the tier 3.. where is the tier 5 fleet version?

    Its supposed to be a sci ship with cruiser capabilities not a junky science ship with consoles that have never been of any use.
  • matridunadan1matridunadan1 Member Posts: 579 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Thanks to the glut of science, escort and carriers, pretty much all cruisers are going the way of the dodo.

    Impressive to look at, but unless you min/max your build you are just a space whale waiting for the Pequod.
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Nebula is also obsolete. As some of the tholian ships (orb)? and vestas have "same layout" but superior stats/bonuses otherwise.
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • talos85talos85 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I've been away for a while, so I've lost total track of where ships are in the pecking order. I'm currently in an Advanced Research Vessel Retro-fit, is this obsolete?

    I played a pvp games and barely any damage with it, although I'm more tuned for disabling systems, leeching enemy power and tanking. I only killed one ship but I also only died once to, and my healing was up there a long with the rest of the fleet numbers at least.

    I'm also an Engineering captain in this ship, and was wondering whether the federation from the c-store was useful and worth getting?
  • lagunadlagunad Member Posts: 198 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Perhaps it would be easier to list the ships that are *not* obsolete?

    Vesta
    Odyssey
    Armitage
    Multi-Vector/Advanced Escort
    possibly Assault Cruiser Refit (no experience)
    possibly Chimera Heavy Destroyer (no experience)

    + Lock-box/Lobi/Fleet ships
  • sunfranckssunfrancks Member Posts: 3,925 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Any ship that has less than 10 consoles is considered obsolete.
    Even the Vet reward Chimera is obsolete.
    Fed: Eng Lib Borg (Five) Tac Andorian (Shen) Sci Alien/Klingon (Maelrock) KDF:Tac Romulan KDF (Sasha) Tac Klingon (K'dopis)
    Founder, member and former leader to Pride Of The Federation Fleet.
    What I feel after I hear about every decision made since Andre "Mobile Games Generalisimo" Emerson arrived...
    3oz8xC9gn8Fh4DK9Q4.gif





  • zarathos1978zarathos1978 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I'm also an Engineering captain in this ship, and was wondering whether the federation from the c-store was useful and worth getting?

    Unless you get into serious OPvP games, then it does not really matter what ship you are flying. In PUGs everything works. I fly DSSV as my main PvP ship for sci character and she's kicking in the guts anyone stupid enough to look nasty in her direction ;)

    OPvP is a bit different as people there tend to take the PvP a "bit" more seriously then average PUGer (who is more often then only seeking some fun, or AFK for dilit) and then every bit of advantage you can get matters.

    If you are PUGer or doing casual PvP with some friends (and if you are asking such questions I assume you are) and are not really into all this OPvP business - do not worry. Nebula is fine ship.

    For PvE it matter even less. You can do anything outside ESTFs (and I would not be sure about this) in a shuttle. Compared to this free ship is sooo OP :D Yeah, you can argue about getting one console more and a second or two less in some run, but then does it really matters?
  • talos85talos85 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I got the armitage, swapped all my consoles and weapons over which were tier X modules and purple. I redid my spec adding a lot more tactical ability in with some added defence but I still did a full one or two less digits in damage than everyone above me.

    When I asked those in my arena at the end what I was doing wrong and tried to explain to them, all I got was "the suck factor may be relevant".
  • defcon1776defcon1776 Member Posts: 313 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Make lower tier ships viable again with a tier specific VA STF.:P
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid." Q
    Join the 44th Fleet. [FED and KDF] Apply Online: startrek.44thfleet.com
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • thegrimcorsairthegrimcorsair Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    All Cruisers and Carriers are obsoleted by the Tholian Recluse in the role of healer.

    All Escorts/Raptors are obsoleted by the Jem'Hadar Attack Ship in the role of main damage dealer.

    All Science Ships are obsoleted by the Wells/Korrath in the role of primary debuffer.
    If you feel Keel'el's effect is well designed, please, for your own safety, be very careful around shallow pools of water.
  • petaluma1petaluma1 Member Posts: 38 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Thanks for everyone's feed back. I agree with everyone of you. I really need to get that Steam Boat based on the comments. Does that ship have 4 or 5 Tac slots? if not why would it be better then the Fleet MVE?
  • jadensecurajadensecura Member Posts: 660 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    It only has 4 tac consoles, but dual Lt eng slots open up all kinds of options, and it also has slightly stronger hull and shields. That said, the Fleet Advanced Escort is also an excellent ship. It's sort of Fleet Defiant for pure DPS, Fleet Advanced Escort for DPS/CC, and Steamrunner for DPS/Tank.
  • lord0fhavenlord0fhaven Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The Vulcan D'kyr needs a fleet refit along with the Atrox.
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • warbird001warbird001 Member Posts: 246 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Truthfully, no ship is obsolete, its the players that make it obsolete. I am still flying a Long Range Science Retrofit because I refuse to switch to the Vesta just for a few extras and plus I really hate that ship anyway. But I do fine in PvP, people who fly the lockbox ships, bugs, timeships etc... I just ignore them because if they are that desperate to win at a free game, its probably more embarrassing for them then it is for you.

    Keep in mind that you are not as sad as them and keep on trucking, for fun and adventure
  • petaluma1petaluma1 Member Posts: 38 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Amen Warbird ! and I think that said it all....
  • loading159loading159 Member Posts: 184 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    sunfrancks wrote: »
    Any ship that has less than 10 consoles is considered obsolete.
    Even the Vet reward Chimera is obsolete.

    this is so far from the truth.
    Captain Moe
    U.S.S. Prometheus
    Fleet Multi Vector Advanced Escort
    Resistance is futile
  • sander233sander233 Member Posts: 3,992 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    warbird001 wrote: »
    Truthfully, no ship is obsolete, its the players that make it obsolete. I am still flying a Long Range Science Retrofit because I refuse to switch to the Vesta just for a few extras and plus I really hate that ship anyway. But I do fine in PvP, people who fly the lockbox ships, bugs, timeships etc... I just ignore them because if they are that desperate to win at a free game, its probably more embarrassing for them then it is for you.

    Keep in mind that you are not as sad as them and keep on trucking, for fun and adventure

    +1.

    I choose my ships based on how much they make me smile when I look at them. I'm not in a fleet so I don't have fleet ships. Apart from the Galor for my Fed Tac and a few mirrors I wouldn't touch any lockbox or lobi ship with a very long pole.

    I hold my own in PvP, I fill my role better than most in STFs, and I have a lot of fun letting my characters (who are really just extensions of different aspects of my own personality) explore the wonders of the galaxy. Explore and kill Borg.

    How do you win a game like STO? Simple. You find ways make yourself smile. Whether that's making some joker in a BoP suck warp plasma when he thinks he's sneaking up on your cruiser for an easy kill, whether that's getting surrounded by borg tactical drones and hack/slashing your way to safety with your trusty bat'leth, whether its discovering a cleverly written and amusing Foundry mission, or whether its suddenly finding yourself severely outmatched and discovering a new interesting way to die.

    Its a game. Games are supposed to be fun. Have fun and you win the game.
    16d89073-5444-45ad-9053-45434ac9498f.png~original

    ...Oh, baby, you know, I've really got to leave you / Oh, I can hear it callin 'me / I said don't you hear it callin' me the way it used to do?...
    - Anne Bredon
  • dan6526dan6526 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    In the Realm of complete optimization, yes some ships are not going to perform.

    Fleet ships (or their equivalent) have more console slots and naturally higher shields and hull. In the end, if you are a performance freak, you will need to upgrade ASAP.

    But outside that I do believe the following cruisers were obsolete by C-Store ships:

    Assault Cruiser (RAdm) - Adv Heavy Cruiser Refit, Assault Cruiser Refit, Support Cruiser Retrofit
    Star Cruiser (RAdm) - Oddyssey Star Cruiser (free, not just C-Store)
    Exploration Cruiser - By the nature of it's BOFF setup, completely done in by the Oddy
    Dreadnaught - Has one purpose, point and shoot alphas, beyond that the AC was better.

    The Oddyssey Star Cruiser bundle is what killed them forever though. You had the ability to slot both a universal LtCmdr and Ensign. Even the Oddyssey Star Cruiser that was free (now in fleet store) is obsolete LOL. Here's the cruisers you may look as viable:

    Fleet Adv Heavy Cruiser Refit
    Fleet Assault Cruiser Refit
    Oddyssey Star Cruiser (Sci - Power settings can be offset and consoles are not that useful)
    Fleet Support Cruiser Retrofit

    I'm also wondering if the Fleet LRSV is made less useful by the Fleet (Nova) SV LOL. I love that ship, the LtCmdr Tactical on my Fleet Nova rocks. I hate the way it looks, but love the way it plays.
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    warbird001 wrote: »
    Truthfully, no ship is obsolete, its the players that make it obsolete. I am still flying a Long Range Science Retrofit because I refuse to switch to the Vesta just for a few extras and plus I really hate that ship anyway. But I do fine in PvP, people who fly the lockbox ships, bugs, timeships etc... I just ignore them because if they are that desperate to win at a free game, its probably more embarrassing for them then it is for you.

    Keep in mind that you are not as sad as them and keep on trucking, for fun and adventure

    truthfully, that is your opinion, and at that not even one that can hold up to simple facts.
    you say you fly a long range science retrofit...namely the voyager, which has a fleet variant that is superior in each and every way imaginable.
    Nobody says you need to switch to the vesta if this ship is not your favourite, but considering your ship not obsolete when there is an upgraded version of the very same ship is pure nonsense.
    Your argumentations like "i do fine", "if they are that desperate to win..." are pathetic.

    your last sentence however, made me laugh hard. Appart from being the most rediculous statement i have read in a long time on this forum (that means a lot) it just shows what type of opinionated casual gamer you are. In the sense of: "That guy beat me, he must be cheating and paying to win"

    i do not condamn your approach at the game as just beeing a star trek barbie land, where you choose your ship purley by looks and the only real challenge is to win the next beauty contest on risa, aslong as we do not cross ways in an elite stf or something else. If you wish to underperform constantly, please don't involve others and stay out of elite stf and PVP, you are doing the rest of your team a favour.

    If you take the game casual, thats cool, but then live with the consequenz that there are much better players in much better ships around and don't be so smug about your casual approach to the game.
    Go pro or go home
  • ufpterrellufpterrell Member Posts: 736 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    I don't understand all this talk of ships being obsolete. It's nonsense, I fly my Galaxy-R because I like it... and I get on quite well with it. It does some decent team healing and keeps me alive in fleet PvP matches even up against two or three foes. Just because something isn't the super duper brand new ship of the month doesn't mean it's not useful. I use the Nebula too on my Science VA and get on fine too, sure it's a lot slower to turn but it gives an interesting mix of cruiser and science play styles. Hell I went for a spin in my T2.5 Exeter last night! Loved it!

    For the record, I have most Fed ships off the C-store inc the Odyssey and Vesta bundles. They're good ships, some might say too good... but I enjoy flying the older ships just the same.

    They are NOT obsolete.
    Terrell.png

    Looking for a dedicated Star Trek community? Visit www.ufplanets.com for details.
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited February 2013
    ufpterrell wrote: »
    I don't understand all this talk of ships being obsolete. It's nonsense, I fly my Galaxy-R because I like it... and I get on quite well with it. It does some decent team healing and keeps me alive in fleet PvP matches even up against two or three foes. Just because something isn't the super duper brand new ship of the month doesn't mean it's not useful. I use the Nebula too on my Science VA and get on fine too, sure it's a lot slower to turn but it gives an interesting mix of cruiser and science play styles. Hell I went for a spin in my T2.5 Exeter last night! Loved it!

    For the record, I have most Fed ships off the C-store inc the Odyssey and Vesta bundles. They're good ships, some might say too good... but I enjoy flying the older ships just the same.

    They are NOT obsolete.

    you don't get it, for both ships you mention there is a fleet upgrade that has superior stats...which makes their non fleet counterpart OBSOLETE.

    in the case of the galaxy R, any oddy can copy the boff setup of the galaxy + saucer separation with far superior stats and a bunch of other boff setups.
    Nobody says the old ships can't be good, they are just inferior to their fleet counterpart, or some specific new ships on the market.
    "And doing fine" doesn't mean that you could do better...
    the whole discussion is about 10 console ships makeing 9 console ships obsolete...and since there are the exact same ships you mentioned + many more older versions available now with 10 consoles, it makes utterly no sense to still use the 9 conole counterparts.

    That the vesta made the old c-store science vessels with 9 consoles obsolete is a fact, but it is disputeable if the vesta is better than the 10 console fleet versions of those ships. i tend to believe that some still hold up to the vesta.
    Same goes for the oddy, which made both the fleet and the normal version of the galaxy-r obsolete.
    But if you must have a galaxy-r, because you have the need to feel like picard, get yourself the fleet version. the 9 console version is hopelessly outdated and OBSOLETE, also because of it's boff layout, but thats a different sad story.
    Go pro or go home
Sign In or Register to comment.