test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Friday Screenshot Available

124

Comments

  • lordfuzunlordfuzun Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    This is an updated version of the model, and still no Torpedo launchers sooo, don't know what people are talking about.



    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/ambassador/yamaguchi-saucer-bottom.jpg

    She was called ambassador class, maybe they just added very limited weapons so it can be a ship of diplomacy, and wanted a beam boat.:D

    That's the Yamaguchi model not the Enterprise-C model.
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    So are you guys going to update that overused picture of the Enterpise C in the fleet base with that nice game version. :)
    GwaoHAD.png
  • aaronh42aaronh42 Member Posts: 291 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    No we just need a screenshot of the Andorian Starship....
  • capnmanxcapnmanx Member Posts: 1,452 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    tuskin67 wrote: »
    And the first picture is the Ent-C with no Torpedo launcher, that is just a smudge or a dark blue stripe.

    Seems too neat to just be a smudge, especially the placement of the 2 little dimples. Definitely looks like a torp launcher to me.
  • tacofangstacofangs Member Posts: 2,951 Cryptic Developer
    edited January 2013
    Hurray! :::throws confetti:::
    I must admit, looking at her more and more over the past couple of months. . . she's grown on me.
    Only YOU can prevent forum fires!
    19843299196_235e44bcf6_o.jpg
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I've got this song stuck in my head now...

    :)
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • gabytrekgabytrek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I spent about 15 minutes trying to find something "off" with the new Ambassador-class ship in the screenshot using this photograph of the original model used in "Yesterday's Enterprise":

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/ambassador/entc-deflector.jpg

    The ONLY thing I could find off with the STO model is that the NCC number isn't spaced as widely as on the TNG studio model. The font for the numbers looks just barely slightly off too.

    So basically... if the only thing that's technically "incorrect" with this new STO ship is that the NCC number is just slightly off... WELL DONE CRYPTIC. For all intents and purposes, you guys nailed the Ambassador-class, which (at least for me) has been the most anticipated ship addition to the game as long as I've been playing.

    \o/
    @GabyBee
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • mrspidey2mrspidey2 Member Posts: 959 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Meh, I never got all the fuss about that ship. Never liked the design.

    Good recreation though, Cryptic.
    2bnb7apx.jpg
  • yezar82yezar82 Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I have no words :eek:
    For Cardassia!

  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    K'Vort: WANT!

    I can haz K'Vort plz?
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • mobiusoneofgalmmobiusoneofgalm Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I love that ship - you did a great job for what we can see now - very nice aztec pattern. Now bring the forward topedo tube onto the neck just above the dish and release that beauty onto our hands, and please: Give it out as T5. Noone want it as T3 Vessel.
  • born2bwild1born2bwild1 Member Posts: 1,329 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    So hey when are we getting a T"7" Connie??

    75k hull
    5/5 weapons
    5 eng
    5 Sci
    5 Tac
    2.0 shield mod
    enchanced battle clock
    30+ power to all systems
    150 hard cap for power

    Just want to cover all the bases.
  • lordfuzunlordfuzun Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    It' s just a lighting artifact. If you compare the area on different photo, its not present. If you compare the location to larger, cleaner photos it's the transition from the forward slant of the neck to the more vertical section of the neck just above wher eit joins the secondary hull.
  • captiandata1captiandata1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    maybe the ambassador class forward torpedeos could be lauched form or around the sencor dome to honer the tos conni constitution class
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    walshicus wrote: »
    Om nom nom...

    ....nom NOM NOMNOM NOM SO GOOOD!!! ;D !Ay papi que bonito! She's quite beautiful. Well done jamies Mc' Jamzorz.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • tomin8rtomin8r Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Excellent looking ship, although it begs the question; If we can have ships look like this now, why doesn't Cryptic go back and fix existing errors in the ships we already have?

    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163481

    An example would be the TMP Constitution refit, the right pylon is asymmetrical/on a bit of an angle, and it clips through the right nacelle. Simple fixes should be relatively simple, if the art department has the capability to make ships that look as good as the Ambassador.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    K'Vort: WANT!

    I can haz K'Vort plz?

    Yeah, I want to see her too.

    Curious to see if they tweeked her to be more than just a scaled up B'rel.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    knuhteb5 wrote: »
    ....nom NOM NOMNOM NOM SO GOOOD!!! ;D !Ay papi que bonito! She's quite beautiful. Well done jamies Mc' Jamzorz.

    Jamzz-Jamzz didn't make it, according to Tacofang...

    HERE
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • lilchibiclarililchibiclari Member Posts: 1,193 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    That said, if the 2nd anniversary is any indication, the free ship will most likely be a let down. I am guessing the "free" ship will be something of a preview ship, with stats being ok, but not whatever everyone is hoping or expecting. With the eventual C-store release being more closer to what Cryptic (and hopefully the playerbase) images the Ambassador being. Like they did with the Odyssey-class.

    I agree. The "free" version will probably be comparable to the Tier 5 Dilithium ships (i.e. lacking the 10th console, special ability, and with slightly weaker stats all around), while the C-store version will be the premium one.
  • psiameesepsiameese Member Posts: 1,650 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I'm perfectly fine with the Ambassador coming as default without the torpedo launcher being more obvious. As long as both the free and C-store variant come with more that one material type from which to choose. If a type can offer variant deflector dishes than why not offer one which includes the aft and forward torpedo launchers in the spirit in which the original designer intended. Even if the canon model was finished without them.

    I felt similarly with regard to the Nebula-class science ship. Despite the default design offering shielded impulse engines, I still want a material type to offer red illumination anyway.
    (/\) Exploring Star Trek Online Since July 2008 (/\)
  • podsixpodsix Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I hope that we'll be able to access the Yamaguchi style parts as well. It's that later refit that really says "Ambassador Class" to me. http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/ambassador.htm
    7n4nvF5.png
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    K'Vort: WANT!

    I can haz K'Vort plz?

    No K'Vort...you get new ship
    GwaoHAD.png
  • zerobangzerobang Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The art team did extensive research on the base model of the Enterprise-C, including looking at official IP sources. The images they saw did not have escape pods on the underside of the saucer (and *I* don't think there is a torpedo launcher, either, as Azurian pointed out). If there are any canon resources out there that have these two features, post them in this thread and I will pass them along :)

    Cheers,

    Brandon =/\=

    i was thinking too that it looked a bit plain and checked pictures of it for escape pods, could not find any

    //edit: and now i see this: http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/ambassador/yamaguchi-saucer-bottom.jpg

    but they were not on the 1701-C


    ...
    edit//

    a torp launcher should be there, that is a detail that just wasn't needed for the TV episode (the ship was never firing), but they said they had torpedo launchers! And in STO of course we need weapon hard points, i think even CBS told you so. (just no more "pimples" plz)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • jjumetleyjjumetley Member Posts: 281 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The ugliest of all Enterprise ships...

    ...but a welcome addition. Finally the family is complete. If only we could get the Probert version as well.
  • sollafsollaf Member Posts: 164 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    tacofangs wrote: »
    Hurray! :::throws confetti:::
    I must admit, looking at her more and more over the past couple of months. . . she's grown on me.]

    I love the detail on the skin. It looks amazing, can't wait to fly her. Also can't wait to here the voice over work that Denice Crosby is doing.
    Sollaf: Join date Sep 2009, Lifer. Disgruntled with the JHSS, my Bug feels less shiny now.
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    daveyny wrote: »
    Jamzz-Jamzz didn't make it, according to Tacofang...

    HERE

    Thanks for the clarification. Props to Adam Gibson then. What a cool looking ship. Makes the Whaleaxy Class look like a barge (No offense to Enterprise-D lovers but, I prefer the ambassador class).
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • guardianvalourguardianvalour Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Truly the Enterprise C (Ambassador class) is a ship of beauty. I am very excited by this screenshot. Great work to all those involved in bringing it to life in Star Trek Online. I look forward to its launch.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The ambo is one of my favourite boats fed side, but there is something that I find bizarre. There are a number of amazing models of ships made for other star trek games such as bridge commander which I'm sure could have been used.

    People on BC-Central spend a lot of time researching so that they might build accurate ship models. More than a few people of that forum are players of STO and I'm sure many of them wouldn't mind seeing their models in this game. To be quite honest, many of the cryptic designed barges are rather...ugly to say the least.

    I'm really looking forward to flying this ambassador, one way or another!
    I need a beer.

This discussion has been closed.