Actually, I sincerely disrepute what you said, drawing to clauses (in order of referance) 34C, 16B, 47E and, for good measure, 26M point 2.
It is under these ground I believe that Captain Winters is uneligable to be the holder of or be in direct contact with for the forementioned "win" and I believe that his disregard for other members of the community only strngthens my point.
It is my suggestion that a select comittee or even a ballot be held in order to determine who exactly should have the win.
Comments
Well, that's not our fault
It is under these ground I believe that Captain Winters is uneligable to be the holder of or be in direct contact with for the forementioned "win" and I believe that his disregard for other members of the community only strngthens my point.
It is my suggestion that a select comittee or even a ballot be held in order to determine who exactly should have the win.
A stroke of the brush does not guarantee A Win from the bristles.
For the win!
Which means, I am winning!!!
In reality, I'm the one with the Win at the end of it all