test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Devs: Please give us more Klingon PvE content, a LOT more

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
edited May 2010 in Klingon Discussion
Another request for more Klingon PvE content, a LOT more please. Thank you.

Clarification: About the same amount of PvE available to Federation characters is what I mean by this.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    I don't think they will listen. There will be some more Endgame content for the high level players
    How it looks since yesterday there will be not much more for the Klingons then PvP and the bit of PVE content that there is.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    The devs have already announced a TON of new Klingon PvE content coming in Season 2, which is slated to hit the live server sometime in July.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    OP: Read other threads before you beat the horse.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    What is a "TON of Klingon PvE"? Is that 20 missions, 50 missions? We're gonna be lucky to see 10.

    GIVE US DECENT PvP. This can be done in a fraction of the time with a fraction of the resources it takes to develop PvE. Make it Klingon exclusive, at least some of it, because we are, after all, the "PvP faction".

    Give us OPEN PvP. Ground and space. Limited to no greater than 2 to 1 odds (number of players from each faction).

    Give us SPORTS. 1 on 1 duels. Means to arrange tournaments. Consentual player wagering. 40 on 40 to the last Klingon cage matches. Capture the flag type team "combat training".

    Make the rewards for PvP as good as those received from an equal amount of time spent in federation PvE.


    NO CONTENT, NO KLINGONS.

    EQUAL PLAY FOR EQUAL PAY.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Kaiserhawk wrote: »
    OP: Read other threads before you beat the horse.

    Sorry, too much of a real life to spend all day reading the forums to be certain I absorb every bit of information anyone has posted in the past about any given topic, *ever*. lol I just don't have the time or desire. I know others have made similar requests before, but I wanted to voice my own opinion in my own thread, so that's what I did. I don't mean to offend anyone, but if I have, then so be it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    STObee wrote:
    What is a "TON of Klingon PvE"? Is that 20 missions, 50 missions? We're gonna be lucky to see 10.

    A similar amount to what's available for Federation characters would be acceptable to me. By the way, not everyone loves PvP. I have nothing against it, but it's not for everyone and I object to a faction being 90% PvP based; it doesn't appeal to a lot of players. I know that many like PvP, but there are quite a few (probably even the majority of players) that do not prefer PvP over PvE, which is why most people play on the Federation faction right now. While I am glad that they are going to be adding Romulans as the next playable faction, I think they need to fix the existing Klingon faction first before jumping into the frying pan and starting yet another faction when 50% of the existing factions are unacceptably incomplete as-is. I am all for having more playable factions, I just want to see them each done right and given appropriate resources, development and time so that when they come out, they're worth playing.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Hawks wrote: »
    I don't think they will listen. There will be some more Endgame content for the high level players
    How it looks since yesterday there will be not much more for the Klingons then PvP and the bit of PVE content that there is.

    You could be right, but with respect, I hope you are wrong.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Klingons dont want to do the PvE they have now, Im sure there might be enough Feds running up a Klingon now it might be more popular I supose. They made the Klingons the "PvP" faction thats what the majority of Klingons left over. Im not saying they shouldnt bring in new PvE content but they need to put forth a PvP effort in an attempt to get their "PvP" faction in resubing.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Stingray10 wrote: »
    Klingons dont want to do the PvE they have now, Im sure there might be enough Feds running up a Klingon now it might be more popular I supose. They made the Klingons the "PvP" faction thats what the majority of Klingons left over. Im not saying they shouldnt bring in new PvE content but they need to put forth a PvP effort in an attempt to get their "PvP" faction in resubing.

    Exactly. We need TONS more different PvP maps with different objectives. Capture and Hold is the only map we have that actually provides some form of strategy. You can only keep re-playing it so much.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited May 2010
    Jas- wrote:
    Another request for more Klingon PvE content, a LOT more please. Thank you.

    Clarification: About the same amount of PvE available to Federation characters is what I mean by this.

    A ****-ton more would be nice.
Sign In or Register to comment.