test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Would STO allow an adult themed Foundry Mission featuring Holo-Addiction?

Obviously you cant display any nudity in game if you wanted to. But the topic of the mission and dialogue would lean heavily towards adult language that double and triple winked at sex topics.

But its not exactly what you think. By the way, I'll never get around to making this mission, so if someone wants to make it, have at it. Message me if you do.

Setup:
Present day STO. Gamma Quadrant exploration. You come across a three world solar system. All three planets have been visited by alien life, no First contact or Prime Directive concerns to think of. Or is there? 2 of the planets have embraced space exploration, and are at TOS level technology levels, after getting help and tech from visiting species the last 60 years. The two planets have aligned themselves for the defense of their system. Starfleet hasnt visited their system in 20 years. When you make a checkup visit, the two worlds ask you to go talk to the third planet, who has ceased their space program at Archer level tech. The two leading worlds know they are stronger with three planets aligned to defend against all the threats they know are out there from quadrant news they hear. They arent at war with the third planet. They all get along peacefully. But in the 2370s the third world was sold a lot of holosuite tech from the Ferengi. And now the third planet has incorporated holo brothels into their way of life. They're actually very responsible with it they think. In fact, violent crime and sexual assault crime has drastically reduced on the planet the past 20 years. They are totally at peace and content with their heavy sex life that can be catered to them in any way they want. There is hardly any poor on the planet, most of the planet is middle class and higher. They just dont want to bother with space exploration any longer. Theyre content with unlimited sex at home. The 2 world ask your captain to "talk to them" and try to get them off their "addiction" and embrace the realities of the quadrant around them.

Im not exactly sure how to solve this. What would your captain do? How should this mission be resolved in Star Trek style?
STO: @AGNT009 Since Dec 2010
Capt. Will Conquest of the U.S.S. Crusader

Comments

  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    This is more a topic for the Foundry subforum. From my knowledge, though:

    From a technical standpoint, The Foundry blocks most English profanity (as in it will prevent you from posting the mission if you use a word on the banned list) and you may find writing dialogue in this kind of scenario somewhat difficult. You also need to keep in mind that the game is rated T for Teen / PEGI 12.

    From a writing standpoint:
    — It depends which version of the Prime Directive you're using. There's the Kirk version (if they're warp-capable or previously contacted the PD doesn't apply), the Janeway/Picard version (no interference with anybody even at cost to self), the DSC version (limited covert interference to protect life esp. from out-of-context problems is acceptable)... Personally I tend to interpret it from an anti-imperialist mindset, with the PD being a cautionary measure about respecting a people's right to self-determination and preventing the Federation from repeating the misdeeds of Europeans and Americans, and retarding concepts like manifest destiny and white man's burden from taking hold in the Federation.
    — You should probably try to tie the use of holobrothels to more specific problems than a general "you should join the bigger galaxy because... that's what you do". For example, what if, because they can always go have sex with a hologram instead of with a real person, their birthrate is starting to crash? You could also think about issues like devaluation of skills other than holodeck-related ones, which would make for commentary on the decline of many blue-collar occupations in the United States.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • This content has been removed.
  • smokebaileysmokebailey Member Posts: 4,668 Arc User
    Considering one of the actual patrols involves you getting a holographic, Vulcan sex slave (dressed even skimpier than the average Orion lady at that) for a horny Ferengi who collects there things, then I say, "Why not?"
    dvZq2Aj.jpg
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited January 2018
    Foundry end-user license agreement:
    https://www.arcgames.com/en/forums/startrekonline/#/discussion/1009558/the-foundry-end-user-license-agreement/p1
    You may not use New Game Materials to convey any profanity, vulgar, hate language, explicit sexual language, derogatory references to race, gender, religion, age, mental or physical impairment, obesity or sexual orientation, or reference any drugs (legal or illicit) or medication.

    So the prospect of making a more "adult" foundry mission (that's ultimately about sex in this way) is out. We cannot push those boundaries (between the EULA, language filter, and community expectations. Remember that even if can get around EULA concerns you still have to contend with audience reaction [whose baseline is set by a T-rated game].)

    Winks are not prohibited by the EULA, but for best effect I'd say the primary consequences of holo-technology should not be (first and foremost) sex. You may want to focus instead on the broad range of escapism possible with a holo-deck, rather than focusing on escapism through one kind of physical reaction (broadens up the narrative, still allows for some of the themes the OP originally intended beneath the surface, and invites some neat builds.)
    Post edited by duncanidaho11 on
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited January 2018
    [Mod Hat] Moved to the appropriate forum. [/Mod Hat]
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    Foundry end-user license agreement:
    https://www.arcgames.com/en/forums/startrekonline/#/discussion/1009558/the-foundry-end-user-license-agreement/p1
    You may not use New Game Materials to convey any profanity, vulgar, hate language, explicit sexual language, derogatory references to race, gender, religion, age, mental or physical impairment, obesity or sexual orientation, or reference any drugs (legal or illicit) or medication.

    So the prospect of making a more "adult" foundry mission (that's ultimately about sex in this way) is out. We cannot push those boundaries (between the EULA, language filter, and community expectations. Remember that even if can get around EULA concerns you still have to contend with audience reaction [whose baseline is set by a T-rated game].)

    Winks are not prohibited by the EULA, but for best effect I'd say the primary consequences of holo-technology should not be (first and foremost) sex. You may want to focus instead on the broad range of escapism possible with a holo-deck, rather than focusing on escapism through one kind of physical reaction (broadens up the narrative, still allows for some of the themes the OP originally intended beneath the surface, and invites some neat builds.)

    Indeed while, winks are probably not prohibited you might try refocusing things in such a way that sex or sexuality aren't the main focus but rather just one of many parts of the main issue.

    Also when it comes to the Foundry there's things we aren't allowed to do that Cryptic can.
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,504 Arc User
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • disqord#9557 disqord Member Posts: 567 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.

    Vulcan/Orion Entertainment Holograms are a thing.
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited January 2018
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.

    I dunno, I distinctly recall the DS9 series finale starting with Ezri and Julian waking up naked in bed. Never mind oo-mox...

    And again, this game isn't rated E for Everyone, it's rated T for Teen. The Klingon and Romulan storylines have explicit torture scenes (a player I know deleted her Klingon character after "Second Star to the Right" because of it) and Klingon doff missions have you trading in slaves and experimenting on captives. And you're complaining about a little sex talk.

    If some kid sees it, that's on his parents for not monitoring his gaming. Hell, if I had small children, I wouldn't let them play this game just on the off chance they saw ESD Zone Chat. :D

    (So we're clear: This is my opinion as a player and fanfic writer, not as a forum moderator. Moderating actual Foundry missions is beyond the scope of my responsibilities.)
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.

    Vulcan/Orion Entertainment Holograms are a thing.

    And yet building a mission around sexual addiction to "entertainment holograms" (which I always took as performing arts) is not.

    Look, Foundry authors have a wide scope and, in the past, have made references to personal relations happening off screen but let's not forget that the aim here isn't just to see what's technically possible but to actually create a compelling mission that makes the most of its opportunities. Ie. something that's worth playing by other people.

    And to that end the OP's scope is too narrow and likely to cross the EULA since a mission about sexual addiction must ( in order to effectively convey that story) invoke it for story points and characters. The author can wink at that content in slight ways, but to only wink at what you're mission's about is not likely to produce something that functions well.

    In summary: it's not advised, so revise the project and take making a more "adult" foundry mission off the list of priorities.
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    As far as age ratings go the PC version of STO is rated PEGI 12 (I'm more familiar with European system and also in this case it's somewhat better as "T" rating is rather broad.), while the console version is rated PEGI 16.

    For comparison WoW is PEGI 12 like STO and there's quite raunchy material in WoW, so it's probably not "kids will see it" issue, but rather Cryptic put a hard "no" on sexually explicit language so that they don't have to deal with "how far is too far" issues.

    I though I suspect that saying that a person "did some morally questionble actions" or that a place has "some morally questionble actions" happening there would be ok as it's vague enough to not be "explicit sexual language", as it could be exessive drinking, rude or vurgar language or criminal actions that are "morally questionble". That said one must be very careful with that as to not come as trying to bash a religion or social group you don't like.

    In the end a properly mature story about addiction is more compelling then the an "adult" story that really just refences to sex/TRIBBLE because the author wanted to have refences to sex/TRIBBLE, but a mature story needs to deal with its subject matter in a mature way (as it how it would be dealt by mature adults) and indeed a story can have mature themes without ever mention sex at all.
  • This content has been removed.
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    starswordc wrote: »
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.

    I dunno, I distinctly recall the DS9 series finale starting with Ezri and Julian waking up naked in bed. Never mind oo-mox...

    And again, this game isn't rated E for Everyone, it's rated T for Teen. The Klingon and Romulan storylines have explicit torture scenes (a player I know deleted her Klingon character after "Second Star to the Right" because of it) and Klingon doff missions have you trading in slaves and experimenting on captives. And you're complaining about a little sex talk.

    If some kid sees it, that's on his parents for not monitoring his gaming. Hell, if I had small children, I wouldn't let them play this game just on the off chance they saw ESD Zone Chat. :D

    (So we're clear: This is my opinion as a player and fanfic writer, not as a forum moderator. Moderating actual Foundry missions is beyond the scope of my responsibilities.)

    While I don't disagree with you...there is a difference between content they produce and content that players produce. For legal reasons, they have to be more strict on content created by players over themselves. Especially since cryptic's headquarters are in california...the land of the lawyers. And remember that content creation is not the same as chat. If somebody says something offensive in chat, with it's clear form of communication in the modern era, cryptic won't be held with much responsibility. Game content created for their game using their game engine that somebody finds offensive? In california...yeah that can easily be a anti-something lawsuit.

    Yeah lawyers ruin everything,
    IIRC user created content isn't legally speaking treated any more harshly then "official" content (granted could be wrong).

    That said Cryptic cannot assume your average Foundry author knowns the ins and outs of the rating systems US or anywhere in the world for that matter, so Cryptic prefers a hard "no" on certain things like sexual language to avoid making the Foundry rules way too hard for the average player to understand.
  • This content has been removed.
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    > @spiritborn said:
    > As far as age ratings go the PC version of STO is rated PEGI 12 (I'm more familiar with European system and also in this case it's somewhat better as "T" rating is rather broad.), while the console version is rated PEGI 16.
    >
    > For comparison WoW is PEGI 12 like STO and there's quite raunchy material in WoW, so it's probably not "kids will see it" issue, but rather Cryptic put a hard "no" on sexually explicit language so that they don't have to deal with "how far is too far" issues.

    Just to point this out: when the game was first released, the scenes I mentioned didn't exist AFAIK (the Klingons didn't have their own storyline and the Romulans plain didn't exist). It's likely STO was re-rated for consoles and those sequences taken into account.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    spiritborn wrote: »
    coldnapalm wrote: »
    starswordc wrote: »
    leemwatson wrote: »
    Anything that even hints at sex, including innuendo would probably not make it. Whilst the TV Series joked about with it somewhat (Data and his conquests on-screen), at the end of the day, kids can and do play this game. Even a 'sex-joke-anagram' based name will be acted upon. The content must be appropriate for all.

    I dunno, I distinctly recall the DS9 series finale starting with Ezri and Julian waking up naked in bed. Never mind oo-mox...

    And again, this game isn't rated E for Everyone, it's rated T for Teen. The Klingon and Romulan storylines have explicit torture scenes (a player I know deleted her Klingon character after "Second Star to the Right" because of it) and Klingon doff missions have you trading in slaves and experimenting on captives. And you're complaining about a little sex talk.

    If some kid sees it, that's on his parents for not monitoring his gaming. Hell, if I had small children, I wouldn't let them play this game just on the off chance they saw ESD Zone Chat. :D

    (So we're clear: This is my opinion as a player and fanfic writer, not as a forum moderator. Moderating actual Foundry missions is beyond the scope of my responsibilities.)

    While I don't disagree with you...there is a difference between content they produce and content that players produce. For legal reasons, they have to be more strict on content created by players over themselves. Especially since cryptic's headquarters are in california...the land of the lawyers. And remember that content creation is not the same as chat. If somebody says something offensive in chat, with it's clear form of communication in the modern era, cryptic won't be held with much responsibility. Game content created for their game using their game engine that somebody finds offensive? In california...yeah that can easily be a anti-something lawsuit.

    Yeah lawyers ruin everything,
    IIRC user created content isn't legally speaking treated any more harshly then "official" content (granted could be wrong).

    That said Cryptic cannot assume your average Foundry author knowns the ins and outs of the rating systems US or anywhere in the world for that matter, so Cryptic prefers a hard "no" on certain things like sexual language to avoid making the Foundry rules way too hard for the average player to understand.

    Right it isn't judge any harder...but if a player created content crosses the line from T to M and somebody throws a hissy fit and hires a lawyer...who do you think is on the line? The player or cryptic? Hence why the subject would be against the rules for player content creation. Now, it could be that it is just there and they won't really enforce it and if somebody throws a hissy fit, cryptic can go, see we have rules to help absolve them of liability. Or they could really care and pull the mission pretty much right away. But it would be against the EULA. Than again, we probably break something in that pretty much every day we play...or 10 somethings.

    yes and that's why I keep saying that Cryptic prefers to have hard "no" in the EULA as that's way easier then explaining in detail where the line for the rating for "T" goes.
  • spiritbornspiritborn Member Posts: 4,393 Arc User
    edited January 2018
    starswordc wrote: »
    > @spiritborn said:
    > As far as age ratings go the PC version of STO is rated PEGI 12 (I'm more familiar with European system and also in this case it's somewhat better as "T" rating is rather broad.), while the console version is rated PEGI 16.
    >
    > For comparison WoW is PEGI 12 like STO and there's quite raunchy material in WoW, so it's probably not "kids will see it" issue, but rather Cryptic put a hard "no" on sexually explicit language so that they don't have to deal with "how far is too far" issues.

    Just to point this out: when the game was first released, the scenes I mentioned didn't exist AFAIK (the Klingons didn't have their own storyline and the Romulans plain didn't exist). It's likely STO was re-rated for consoles and those sequences taken into account.
    It's possible but WoW has had explict torture scenes since at least "Wrath of the Lich King" and that expansion was PEGI 12+ (as it was marked in 2008) so essentially the same age rating as STO. It's also possible that for what ever reason the age ratings on consoles are more strict.

    EDIT:PEGI 16, is actually only 1-2 years away from "M" rating IIRC M="17 or older" so that would put STO closer to being "M" rated then "E".
Sign In or Register to comment.