I find myself disappointed that a race as warlike as the Klingons don't get a battlecruiser that offers both 5 forward guns and 5 tac slots. It would make all the sense in world if they decided they needed their own version of the Scimitar, in the form of an actual dreadnought instead of the so-called flagships we have currently.
As it stands I love my Mat'Ha and Tac Pilot raptors and fly them the most, I just wish the Klingons had the option of a slightly heavier vessel that had that console/hardpoint combination.
0
Comments
Join Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
IMO even the fact that you have to look at the Mogh/Kurak is frustrating - both the Vor'cha and Negh'var have huge forward-facing weapon arrays on their screen models, but are 4/4 in game because that was the maximum allowed in 2010.
http://sto.gamepedia.com/Kortar_Class_Pilot_Raptor
Both have 5+5, but aren't cruisers.
The Scim breaks the mould for layouts and size. Any cruiser by definition must have 4-5 engineering slots and tac or sci slots cannot exceed engineering slots numbers as those are the purviews of escorts and sci ships.
Would like to see a T6 Torky though.
EDIT:
http://sto.gamepedia.com/Martok_Tactical_Battlecruiser_(T6)
This gets close with a 4+5 setup, only KDF cruiser I know of to have 5 tac consoles.
With the D7 / K'T'Inga finally hitting T6, the last canon KDF ship still needing to transition is the Vor'Cha.
Not quite:
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20061013044655/memoryalpha/en/images/9/9d/Klingon_b-o-p,_Borderland_2.jpg
This ship has yet to be added.
"Let them eat static!"