test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Proposal: T5 Temporal skins on T6 uni Temporal ships

f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
Ok ... We've already heard that the T6 temporal ships that were "inspired" by a TOS ship will be allowed to wear / use the skin of that TOS era ship.

What I'm proposing is if you get a T6 Temporal Raider Ouroboros Class and already have a T5 temporal escort (any of the three factions) on that same toon, you be allowed to use the skin of that T5 ship.

If you get a T6 Temporal Multi-Mission Science Vessel Eternal Class and have the T5 temporal science ship, then you be allowed to use the skin from that T5 ship on your T6.

I see it quite similar to what they are already looking to do regarding the TOS ships AND it gives a reason for people to still want those older T5 ships that are now outdated.

It would also take these universal ships and give us faction specific looks already done and in game. ... Feds, KDF, and ROM alike.
Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
" We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)

Comments

  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    While I could see it working for the science ship, a raider != a destroyer.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • tmassxtmassx Member Posts: 826 Arc User
    R'Mor skin for T6 science ship? Yes, this would have convinced me to buy T6.
  • f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
    edited May 2016
    While I could see it working for the science ship, a raider != a destroyer.

    I believe the temporal destroyers are actually small enough and close enough that they could convert over nicely.

    And it gives all three factions visual options. That's a good thing.
    Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
    " We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

    U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    genhauk wrote: »
    While I could see it working for the science ship, a raider != a destroyer.

    I believe the temporal destroyers are actually small enough and close enough that they could convert over nicely.

    And it gives all three factions visual options. That's a good thing.

    Do we actually know that, though? For all we know, the temporal raider is super tiny. That's not even taking into account that they have a completely different shape.
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited May 2016
    genhauk wrote: »
    While I could see it working for the science ship, a raider != a destroyer.

    I believe the temporal destroyers are actually small enough and close enough that they could convert over nicely.

    And it gives all three factions visual options. That's a good thing.

    Do we actually know that, though? For all we know, the temporal raider is super tiny. That's not even taking into account that they have a completely different shape.


    Is it really tiny? Even the last couple cross faction raiders (baltim, tandaari) were pretty big for their class.

    Aside from that it's probably not possible due the very different models all these ships use.
Sign In or Register to comment.