test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Klingon Discussion

Vor'cha

tenchi2k1tenchi2k1 Member Posts: 23 Arc User
in Klingon Discussion
I have sent support requests and they just give me a load of bull each time. So i am posting here. They need to add a T6 varient of the Vor'cha, or make it able to be upgraded to T5U. and Add a T6 Fleet. any one of those or all of them. Please.

Comments

  • theillusivenmantheillusivenman Member Posts: 438 Arc User
    There's an T5 Fleet Vorcha already that is upgradeable to T5U -- Fleet Tor'khat.
    I do agree Vorcha is too iconic ship to pass up the T6 variant, and would love to see it added down the line personally as well.
    5980291nyfcc.png
    "Reality is a thing of the past."
    Proud supporter of equality for all human beings.
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    ohh id love to see a t6 also but i doubt we will get one soon. to add anything else to the fleet torkaht would just make it over powered its already that good IMO. or other way it could go is Cryptic would TRIBBLE it up somehow to where it loses its current awesome boff seating arrangement .
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    I may have to pull my T5-U Fleet Tor'khat out of mothballs to see what I can make it do. Throw in some new power conduits, new shields, new armor plating...of course...all in the Vor'cha skin.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    The T5 Fleet Vor'Cha is still a very capable Battlecruiser. It's just the spotlight has shifted to newer stuff. It has a very generous TAC BOFF layout to easily support the most demanding tactical ability layouts a ship like it needs. Beams? Cannons? Torpedo thrown in? Doesn't matter, the LtCmdr+Lt TAC can support it with minimal use of precious DOFF spots for cutting cool downs.

    Not only that, the ship is still one of the most maneuverable ships under the overall umbrella of Cruisers. Very few equal or surpass her 10 base turn rate, even among the KDF Battlecruisers which have a reputation for superior handling. Beamboating is easy in any ship, but Cannons? That needs maneuverability and the Vor'Cha has that in spades.

    She should still shine in today's content but I have a hard time recommending her to friends when she costs 4 FSMs for a single character purchase. This ship to my surprise never got a C-Store version, despite her and even the Lv40 BGen Vor'Cha Retrofit's popularity years ago.

    A T6 Vor'Cha would be nice indeed.
    Post edited by warmaker001b on
    XzRTofz.gif
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    warmaker001b wrote: »
    The T5 Fleet Vor'Cha is still a very capable Battlecruiser. It's just the spotlight has shifted to newer stuff. It has a very generous TAC BOFF layout to easily support the most demanding tactical demands a ship like it needs. Beams? Cannons? Torpedo thrown in? Doesn't matter, the LtCmdr+Lt TAC can support it with minimal use of precious DOFF spots for cutting cool downs.

    Not only that, the ship is still one of the most maneuverable ships under the overall umbrella of Cruisers. Very few equal or surpass her 10 base turn rate, even among the KDF Battlecruisers which have a reputation for superior handling. Beamboating is easy in any ship, but Cannons? That needs maneuverability and the Vor'Cha has that in spades.

    She should still shine in today's content but I have a hard time recommending her to friends when she costs 4 FSMs for a single character purchase. This ship to my surprise never got a Fleet version, despite her and even the Lv40 BGen Vor'Cha Retrofit's popularity years ago.

    A T6 Vor'Cha would be nice indeed.

    you are correct the cost is extremely high for a single unlock. But even after buying these new ships i still go back to it as soon as i get the trait unlock ( usually that is a hour in Dyson battle-zone) no other ship to date preforms as well for me as it does.

    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    Just took my T5-U Fleet Tor'khat out...I forgot how good this ship was when set up properly. Have the Vor'cha skin with the exception of the Vor'kang mission pod. Pretty! This and the Fleet K'tinga are still very nice ships.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • theillusivenmantheillusivenman Member Posts: 438 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    goodscotch wrote: »
    Just took my T5-U Fleet Tor'khat out...I forgot how good this ship was when set up properly. Have the Vor'cha skin with the exception of the Vor'kang mission pod. Pretty! This and the Fleet K'tinga are still very nice ships.

    They are, and they both need the T6 variant with a Fleet version too! K'T'inga only needs a bump to LtCmd tact (to be more useful as a cannon boat), and Vorcha intel instead of command, imo would make them the nicest cruisers in the game.

    But I'd give a limb for any version of these as long as they get bumped to T6 standard.
    5980291nyfcc.png
    "Reality is a thing of the past."
    Proud supporter of equality for all human beings.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    icsairguns wrote: »
    warmaker001b wrote: »
    The T5 Fleet Vor'Cha is still a very capable Battlecruiser. It's just the spotlight has shifted to newer stuff. It has a very generous TAC BOFF layout to easily support the most demanding tactical demands a ship like it needs. Beams? Cannons? Torpedo thrown in? Doesn't matter, the LtCmdr+Lt TAC can support it with minimal use of precious DOFF spots for cutting cool downs.

    Not only that, the ship is still one of the most maneuverable ships under the overall umbrella of Cruisers. Very few equal or surpass her 10 base turn rate, even among the KDF Battlecruisers which have a reputation for superior handling. Beamboating is easy in any ship, but Cannons? That needs maneuverability and the Vor'Cha has that in spades.

    She should still shine in today's content but I have a hard time recommending her to friends when she costs 4 FSMs for a single character purchase. This ship to my surprise never got a Fleet version, despite her and even the Lv40 BGen Vor'Cha Retrofit's popularity years ago.

    A T6 Vor'Cha would be nice indeed.

    you are correct the cost is extremely high for a single unlock. But even after buying these new ships i still go back to it as soon as i get the trait unlock ( usually that is a hour in Dyson battle-zone) no other ship to date preforms as well for me as it does.

    That cost limits this ship. I would have loved to have this ship on more characters but forking out 4 FSMs just for ONE ship on ONE character was something I wasn't going to exceed. So I only have it on one toon.

    Anything's possible. I mean, the Goomba made it to T6.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • kurumimorishitakurumimorishita Member Posts: 1,410 Arc User
    I wouldn't be surprised to see a T6 Vorcha along with a T6 Sovereign in another Cross Faction Bundle - at least I hope so.
    "We might get pretty singed at that range, but not as singed as they're going to get. Engage."
    - Captain Six of Nine aka Ashley "Don't Call Me Ash" Campbell
    q4F10XV.jpg
    Join the Armada!!!
    ALWAYS OUTNUMBERED, NEVER OUTGUNNED
    KM on DeviantArt
    KM on Imgur | KM on Twitter
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    As I said earlier...I switched to the T5-U Tor'khat last night and used the Vor'cha skin. The Fleet Tor'khat, using the same exact equipment that was in my Fleet K'tinga, is better on the DPS side. That makes sense to me because the Tor'khat has a few more tactical tricks up its sleeve. But for reasons unknown to me as of yet, it seems to not be as robust as the K'tinga. This is puzzling to me because looking at the raw numbers, it has almost 20,000 more hull points and approximately the same shield strength per facing as the K'tinga. I'm gauging this on how I'm faring in Crystalline Entity (Advanced).

    And it may be as simple as I'm pulling more aggro because I'm doing better DPS, therefore I'm drawing more fire. But there may also be other factors involved. I have a riddle to solve. But I'm liking the Fleet Tor'khat/Vor'cha a bit better than the Fleet K'tinga and may stick with it for awhile. Definitely a nice looking ship, especially with the KHG Shields.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    goodscotch wrote: »
    As I said earlier...I switched to the T5-U Tor'khat last night and used the Vor'cha skin. The Fleet Tor'khat, using the same exact equipment that was in my Fleet K'tinga, is better on the DPS side. That makes sense to me because the Tor'khat has a few more tactical tricks up its sleeve. But for reasons unknown to me as of yet, it seems to not be as robust as the K'tinga. This is puzzling to me because looking at the raw numbers, it has almost 20,000 more hull points and approximately the same shield strength per facing as the K'tinga. I'm gauging this on how I'm faring in Crystalline Entity (Advanced).

    And it may be as simple as I'm pulling more aggro because I'm doing better DPS, therefore I'm drawing more fire. But there may also be other factors involved. I have a riddle to solve. But I'm liking the Fleet Tor'khat/Vor'cha a bit better than the Fleet K'tinga and may stick with it for awhile. Definitely a nice looking ship, especially with the KHG Shields.

    if you like friend me in game and we can go over your tork setup. i have been a fan of it for a few years now and played with allot of setups
    @icsairguns
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    icsairguns wrote: »
    ...if you like friend me in game and we can go over your tork setup. i have been a fan of it for a few years now and played with allot of setups
    @icsairguns

    Thanks for the offer of support, comrade!

    klingon-bridge.jpg




Sign In or Register to comment.