test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

My next ship: Eclipse or Concorde?

ambassadormolariambassadormolari Member Posts: 709 Arc User
So, thanks to a hefty amount of grinding (and a lot of the rewards from the Delta Recruit event), I'm now nearing 3000 zen, with which I hope to finally buy a fancy zen store ship for my Federation Engineer main. As tempting as the Galaxy variants are, I've narrowed the choices down to the two ships that appeal to me the most: the Concorde Command Battlecruiser and the Eclipse Intel. Both have a lot of unique benefits and abilities, both can allow for very strong builds, and both ships look quite nice in the bargain.

So, I'm going to ask you more experienced Federation gamers:
1. Which ship is generally more effective as an all-rounder that I can use in multiple roles? Note that I primarily play PVE. I'd ask which you enjoy using more, but I know that fun is completely subjective.
2. In your opinion, which ship looks nicer?* Ie, which can you better envision flying across a title sequence as someone says "space, the final frontier" in the background?

Your feedback, as always, is welcome.

*For this question, I'm asking about the Eclipse as it is, without its variant nacelles. I know that the Eclipse with Scryer nacelles looks fantastic, but I'm also aware, sadly, that I'd have to buy the Scryer to get the aforementioned nacelles.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Comments

  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited December 2015
    IMO, the best Fed TAC Cruiser in the game is easily, hands down, the Eclipse. I have repeatedly sang praises for the Eclipse in threads such as these. In this thread, scroll down for my take on it and a few other Fed Cruisers. Some other posts I had on the Eclipse: Here, here. You'd need to scroll a bit down to find my replies on those links. Sucks since this forum doesn't let you link to a specific reply number.

    No Fed TAC Cruiser in this game approaches the level of handling, flexibility, firepower of the Eclipse. There are 2 mixed things about it:

    1. Aesthetically speaking, not many people like it. I don't like how it looks, either.
    2. The trait "Battle Ready" is not as useful as some. It can be good when you're running lots of ENG & Intel abilities. The extra defense rung up by this trait works very well with the Phantom's "Reciprocity" trait.

    Outside these 2 issues of the Eclipse, you will find no finer Fed TAC Cruiser. The thing WANTS to fly like a Klingon Battlecruiser and that's a very good thing compared to the other Fed Cruisers that are more sluggish.

    The ENG Command FDC? Personally, I'm not fond of it. Very mediocre BOFF & Console layout, as well as all the other inherent problems of the Command FDCs, a bit of which I covered at the very top of my reply in the link above. The trait on the ENG Command FDC is also terrible.

    **IF** you get a Command FDC, let it be only one: The TAC version. The trait "All Hands On Deck" is fabulous but the ship itself to me is very "meh."
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited December 2015
    Let me join the chrous so we can sing some more songs of praise for the almighty eclipse.

    Srsly though, that thing is a beast. It's glorious intel cmdr. seat is a blessing and will bring doom & destruction to all your enemies. The gathering intel mechanic might be kind of "meh" but only because non-boss ships won't live long enough to be affected by it.
    Also the AoE vampire consoles is pretty neat since it got the passive stat buff. I highly recommend the fleet version to give your OSS powered barrages of SS3 or BFAW an extra punch with that 4th tac console.
    With the right traits, consoles & stuff it might be maneuverable be enough to wield cannons soemwhat decently but I wouldn't recommend it. That's more a thing for it's kdf counterpart the Qib with it's battlecloak and it's cannon trait.

  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    If the Eclipse had long, modern, standard looking Starfleet nacelles, my my my...
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    freakiumfreakium Member Posts: 427 Arc User
    I'm a sucker for aesthetics and the Command Battlecruisers are gorgeous compared to the Eclipse. I will say off the bat that stats-wise, the Eclipse will win. The Concorde is for supporting teams more than causing explosions. Its starship trait tied to Brace for Impact is also throwaway for me. Like warmaker001b said, the Presidio's trait is much more desirable.
    m12Pkoj.png
  • Options
    ambassadormolariambassadormolari Member Posts: 709 Arc User
    IMO, the best Fed TAC Cruiser in the game is easily, hands down, the Eclipse. I have repeatedly sang praises for the Eclipse in threads such as these. In this thread, scroll down for my take on it and a few other Fed Cruisers. Some other posts I had on the Eclipse: Here, here. You'd need to scroll a bit down to find my replies on those links. Sucks since this forum doesn't let you link to a specific reply number.

    No Fed TAC Cruiser in this game approaches the level of handling, flexibility, firepower of the Eclipse. There are 2 mixed things about it:

    1. Aesthetically speaking, not many people like it. I don't like how it looks, either.
    2. The trait "Battle Ready" is not as useful as some. It can be good when you're running lots of ENG & Intel abilities. The extra defense rung up by this trait works very well with the Phantom's "Reciprocity" trait.

    Outside these 2 issues of the Eclipse, you will find no finer Fed TAC Cruiser. The thing WANTS to fly like a Klingon Battlecruiser and that's a very good thing compared to the other Fed Cruisers that are more sluggish.

    The ENG Command FDC? Personally, I'm not fond of it. Very mediocre BOFF & Console layout, as well as all the other inherent problems of the Command FDCs, a bit of which I covered at the very top of my reply in the link above. The trait on the ENG Command FDC is also terrible.

    **IF** you get a Command FDC, let it be only one: The TAC version. The trait "All Hands On Deck" is fabulous but the ship itself to me is very "meh."
    Let me join the chrous so we can sing some more songs of praise for the almighty eclipse.

    Srsly though, that thing is a beast. It's glorious intel cmdr. seat is a blessing and will bring doom & destruction to all your enemies. The gathering intel mechanic might be kind of "meh" but only because non-boss ships won't live long enough to be affected by it.
    Also the AoE vampire consoles is pretty neat since it got the passive stat buff. I highly recommend the fleet version to give your OSS powered barrages of SS3 or BFAW an extra punch with that 4th tac console.
    With the right traits, consoles & stuff it might be maneuverable be enough to wield cannons soemwhat decently but I wouldn't recommend it. That's more a thing for it's kdf counterpart the Qib with it's battlecloak and it's cannon trait.



    Hmm, I should probably point out at this stage that I'm what many would call a casual player, and have neither the time nor commitment to grind for high-end consoles or a full antiproton arsenal. That being said, you've made a very good case for the Eclipse.
    freakium wrote: »
    I'm a sucker for aesthetics and the Command Battlecruisers are gorgeous compared to the Eclipse. I will say off the bat that stats-wise, the Eclipse will win. The Concorde is for supporting teams more than causing explosions. Its starship trait tied to Brace for Impact is also throwaway for me. Like warmaker001b said, the Presidio's trait is much more desirable.

    Yes, the Presidio is definitely a beautiful ship, and one that I was also seriously considering. I'll think I'll now consider the Presidio in place of the Concorde vs the Eclipse.
    If the Eclipse had long, modern, standard looking Starfleet nacelles, my my my...

    Yeah, I've seen pics of the Eclipse with Scryer nacelles, and it looks amazing. Unfortunately, I don't feel willing to buy another ship in addition to the Eclipse just to add its nacelles (especially since I'm not sure if I'll ever use the Scryer)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    h29829282h29829282 Member Posts: 38 Arc User
    Sitting back with my Yamato Dreadnought​​
  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    h29829282 wrote: »
    Sitting back with my Yamato Dreadnought​​

    T6 Galaxy-X isn't fit to hold the Eclipse's or T6 Avenger's jockstrap.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 5,986 Arc User
    Eclipse all the way if you want function over form , it's the ship to go for
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • Options
      khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,007 Arc User
      might get me an Eclipse too
      Your pain runs deep.
      Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
    • Options
      vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,857 Arc User
      edited January 2016
      Eclipse is the closest thing to a KDF battlecruiser as far as handling goes as you can get. the Presidio gets an edge with the extra LT tac slot, and hangar offset by the better engineering seats on the eclipse. if you want max firepower, probably Presidio. dogfighter? Eclipse.
      trait: Eclipse: Battle ready +Defense, +Damage Resistance after using an Engineering or Intel Bridge Officer ability.

      +7.5 All Damage Resistance Rating for 15 sec when using an Engineering or Intelligence Bridge Officer ability.
      to self: +7.5% Defense for 15 sec when using and Engineering or Intelligence Bridge Officer ability.

      Presidio: All Hands On Deck -Recharge on Science and Captain abilities.

      -10% Recharge Time on Science Bridge Officer abilities.
      Self: -5% Recharge Time on Captain Abilities.

      Can occur once every 5 seconds.
      Spock.jpg

    • Options
      seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
      if you want max firepower, probably Presidio.

      Definitely not.

      I'm one of the biggest fans of the Presidio you'll find, but the Presidio can't touch the firepower of the Eclipse. The Eclipse and the Aribter are the pinnacle of offensive power for the Federation side.

      Presidio definitely wins on the trait, and it's just plan tough as nails. The Presidio is a great ship, but if you're after pure firepower your choice should be between the Eclipse or the Arbiter.

      Between those two, Arbiter wins because it has a better trait. Concorde isn't even in the discussion, the Concorde is flat out awful.
      Insert witty signature line here.
    • Options
      gabeoz1gabeoz1 Member Posts: 161 Arc User
      if you want max firepower, probably Presidio.

      Definitely not.

      I'm one of the biggest fans of the Presidio you'll find, but the Presidio can't touch the firepower of the Eclipse. The Eclipse and the Aribter are the pinnacle of offensive power for the Federation side.

      Presidio definitely wins on the trait, and it's just plan tough as nails. The Presidio is a great ship, but if you're after pure firepower your choice should be between the Eclipse or the Arbiter.

      Between those two, Arbiter wins because it has a better trait. Concorde isn't even in the discussion, the Concorde is flat out awful.

      Agree with everything you said, except for the Concorde. It's not awful, I flew the Concorde for 5-6 months until about a month ago (bought the Arbiter). I was able to push out quite a bit of dps on it. But people shouldn't be flying it for dps, as like you said. The Arbiter is far better on dps. While the Concorde focuses on defense and relying on hangar pets.
    • Options
      warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
      IMO, the best Fed TAC Cruiser in the game is easily, hands down, the Eclipse. I have repeatedly sang praises for the Eclipse in threads such as these. In this thread, scroll down for my take on it and a few other Fed Cruisers. Some other posts I had on the Eclipse: Here, here. You'd need to scroll a bit down to find my replies on those links. Sucks since this forum doesn't let you link to a specific reply number.

      No Fed TAC Cruiser in this game approaches the level of handling, flexibility, firepower of the Eclipse. There are 2 mixed things about it:

      1. Aesthetically speaking, not many people like it. I don't like how it looks, either.
      2. The trait "Battle Ready" is not as useful as some. It can be good when you're running lots of ENG & Intel abilities. The extra defense rung up by this trait works very well with the Phantom's "Reciprocity" trait.

      Outside these 2 issues of the Eclipse, you will find no finer Fed TAC Cruiser. The thing WANTS to fly like a Klingon Battlecruiser and that's a very good thing compared to the other Fed Cruisers that are more sluggish.

      The ENG Command FDC? Personally, I'm not fond of it. Very mediocre BOFF & Console layout, as well as all the other inherent problems of the Command FDCs, a bit of which I covered at the very top of my reply in the link above. The trait on the ENG Command FDC is also terrible.

      **IF** you get a Command FDC, let it be only one: The TAC version. The trait "All Hands On Deck" is fabulous but the ship itself to me is very "meh."
      Let me join the chrous so we can sing some more songs of praise for the almighty eclipse.

      Srsly though, that thing is a beast. It's glorious intel cmdr. seat is a blessing and will bring doom & destruction to all your enemies. The gathering intel mechanic might be kind of "meh" but only because non-boss ships won't live long enough to be affected by it.
      Also the AoE vampire consoles is pretty neat since it got the passive stat buff. I highly recommend the fleet version to give your OSS powered barrages of SS3 or BFAW an extra punch with that 4th tac console.
      With the right traits, consoles & stuff it might be maneuverable be enough to wield cannons soemwhat decently but I wouldn't recommend it. That's more a thing for it's kdf counterpart the Qib with it's battlecloak and it's cannon trait.



      Hmm, I should probably point out at this stage that I'm what many would call a casual player, and have neither the time nor commitment to grind for high-end consoles or a full antiproton arsenal. That being said, you've made a very good case for the Eclipse.

      Very late to reply to you. But I never said anything about having to have top of the line gear, have AP, etc. We've talked about nothing but ships and to an extent, traits.

      The ship first and foremost is your foundation. A solid ship combined with a wisely put together build, and familiarity with this game's content will curbstomp-the-ever-living-TRIBBLE out of this game. Mk XII Very Rare is OP in this game. Anything above that is honestly taking lunch money from a child.
      XzRTofz.gif
    • Options
      seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
      gabeoz1 wrote: »

      Agree with everything you said, except for the Concorde. It's not awful, I flew the Concorde for 5-6 months until about a month ago (bought the Arbiter). I was able to push out quite a bit of dps on it. But people shouldn't be flying it for dps, as like you said. The Arbiter is far better on dps. While the Concorde focuses on defense and relying on hangar pets.

      The Presidio does everything the Concorde does only better. It also comes with a far better trait. The sad truth is that the Concorde was rendered obsolete the day it was released. Can it be a servicable ship? Sure it can, but if you're going to buy one ship and one ship only and you buy the Concorde over the Presidio then you have sadly made a mistake.

      Neither ship compares to the Arbiter from a pure DPS perspective, but the Presidio can get much closer while still doing anything the Concorde can do and doing it better. I can honestly say that I can't think of a single Federation T6 ship worse then the Concorde. The only reason I own it is because it came in the pack with the far superior Presidio and Geneva.
      Insert witty signature line here.
    • Options
      ambassadormolariambassadormolari Member Posts: 709 Arc User
      edited February 2016
      So, after reading and reviewing all of the above comments, I decided to go with the Eclipse, and boy I'm glad I did. As has been mentioned above, it is surprisingly maneuverable for a ship of its size, and the combination of Intel BOFF slots and consoles make it pretty handy in a fight as well (never mind that the 5 engineering consoles, structural integrity field and my current starship traits make it pretty tanky as well). I am loving the flexibility of this ship, and am very happy that I picked it in the end.

      Also, re: appearance: my only real beef with it was that the nacelles looked pretty weird. That being said, I've gotten quite used to it, plus, lets be honest, the Aegis set makes almost anything look better.
      [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    • Options
      seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
      So, after reading and reviewing all of the above comments, I decided to go with the Eclipse, and boy I'm glad I did. As has been mentioned above, it is surprisingly maneuverable for a ship of its size, and the combination of Intel BOFF slots and consoles make it pretty handy in a fight as well (never mind that the 5 engineering consoles, structural integrity field and my current starship traits make it pretty tanky as well). I am loving the flexibility of this ship, and am very happy that I picked it in the end.

      Also, re: appearance: my only real beef with it was that the nacelles looked pretty weird. That being said, I've gotten quite used to it, plus, lets be honest, the Aegis set makes almost anything look better.

      You picked a fine ship, you can't go wrong with The Eclipse. Glad you're enjoying it! :)
      Insert witty signature line here.
    • Options
      mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
      So, after reading and reviewing all of the above comments, I decided to go with the Eclipse, and boy I'm glad I did. As has been mentioned above, it is surprisingly maneuverable for a ship of its size, and the combination of Intel BOFF slots and consoles make it pretty handy in a fight as well (never mind that the 5 engineering consoles, structural integrity field and my current starship traits make it pretty tanky as well). I am loving the flexibility of this ship, and am very happy that I picked it in the end.

      Also, re: appearance: my only real beef with it was that the nacelles looked pretty weird. That being said, I've gotten quite used to it, plus, lets be honest, the Aegis set makes almost anything look better.
      I think the Phantom nacelles look good on it, but of course ,that's an extra purchase. (But the ship also comes with a kick TRIBBLE trait.) Consider it if you ever feel you have too much Zen/Dilithium, or you want to get into the Escort business. :)
      Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
    • Options
      seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
      I think the Phantom nacelles look good on it, but of course ,that's an extra purchase. (But the ship also comes with a kick TRIBBLE trait.) Consider it if you ever feel you have too much Zen/Dilithium, or you want to get into the Escort business. :)

      I agree, I have the Phantom so I run my Eclipse with the Phantom Nacelles and it looks much better (in my opinion.)

      I also agree on the Trait, Battle Ready is a vastly under rated trait. I run it on almost all my builds.
      Insert witty signature line here.
    • Options
      seriousdaveseriousdave Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
      I think the Phantom nacelles look good on it, but of course ,that's an extra purchase. (But the ship also comes with a kick TRIBBLE trait.) Consider it if you ever feel you have too much Zen/Dilithium, or you want to get into the Escort business. :)

      I agree, I have the Phantom so I run my Eclipse with the Phantom Nacelles and it looks much better (in my opinion.)

      I also agree on the Trait, Battle Ready is a vastly under rated trait. I run it on almost all my builds.

      Well said.

      The Phantom's and Eclipse's traits work marvelous together.
      Battle Ready grants evasion bonus => mobs keep missing => you get a reduced cooldown on tac & intel powers.
      The eclipse really is made for this.
      Running that combo an every fed character. <3
    • Options
      postinggumpostinggum Member Posts: 1,117 Arc User
      Just noticed my Eclipse gets the ambush bonus when decloaking, a bonus for an already very nice ship, just have to time the power settings to get a big hitting power to benefit from the 25% bonus.

      Starship traits: AHOD and reciprocity( cooldowns on intel, tac, sci and capt powers), subwarp sheath and pedal 2( for 30+ extra damage) plus emegency weapon power( beam power use to 5.7 when used with cruiser command.) All ships bought dil to zen route when the exchange rate was more favourable.
    • Options
      g2g#3372 g2g Member Posts: 14 Arc User
      thanks for sharing :)
    Sign In or Register to comment.