test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

If we ever get a T6 Fleet Nebula Class ...

pweistheworstpweistheworst Member Posts: 986 Arc User
If we ever get a T6 Fleet Nebula Class then I hope the devs will consider making it a true "science cruiser" (essentially setup like a T6 fleet version of the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser).

I know some people freak out over the idea of a science ship with four weapons up front and four aft weapons, but the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser is already in the game and STO didn't explode with massively overpowered SCI captains.

We can already setup the Tal Shiar cruiser as a science ship with a commander science station (via the universal commander BOff station) and that ship has the advantages of a science ship; 1.3 shield modifier (more after T-5U upgrade), +10 aux power and +10 shield power, AND sensor analysis.

That is the kind of science cruiser I've always imagined the Nebula class to be ... but that's not what the Nebula class is in this game.

Right now the Fleet Advanced Research Vessel Retrofit (Upgraded to T-5U) has good shields and exotic damage capabilities but 90 percent of the time I'm able to do more damage with my Sci captain if I'm using the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser as my science ship because of the two extra weapon slots.

If the devs ever release a T6 Fleet version of the Nebula class (Advanced Research Vessel Retrofit) then I hope they essentially take the specs for the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser, add a little extra science and T6 goodness (extra console slot, more hull, an Intel or command BOff slot, and a science-focused starship mastery trait).
In the immortal words of Captain Sisko: "It may not be what you believe, but that doesn't make it wrong."

Don't believe the lies in this forum. I am NOT an ARC user. I play STO on Steam or not at all.

Comments

  • divvydavedivvydave Member Posts: 184 Arc User
    I'd like to see the Nebula T6 as a hybrid sci cruiser too, was thinking 4 fore 3 aft weapon slots, secondary deflector, cruiser commands but no sensor analysis.

    4sci 4tac 3eng consoles,
    Com Sci, Lt com Tac, Com Eng Lt Sci/Intel (mainly for OSS).

    Thats just off the top of my head, might be OP but i think it would make a very versatile sci cruiser :)
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    A T6 Nebula is my top Federation wish list ship, as I rocking the Fleet T5U on my main.

    I would really like some attention given to the Sensor Pod Multi-mission aspect of the ship. Perhaps some console that utilizes it to alternate/toggle between a secondary shielding mode and an omni-directional Phaser.

    She is the perfect candidate for a Science Command Ship too.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    My ideal Nebula would use the sensor pod as an AWACS system for cloaked vessels. The Tachyon Detection Field and Tachyon Detection Grid really suffer from the major drawback that you are still firing blindly trying to find cloaked vessels, who can just sit at a distance, and the passive bonuses are still not enough to counteract the buffed stealth capabilities you'll see from level 60 players.

    The Nebula has never quite lived up to its potential as the go-to Federation ship for anti-cloaking, and I think a T6 Nebula should finally make the Nebula a ship to be feared by those ships.

    For PvE it should have a Hot Restart mechanic for Aux power, just my opinion.
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • pweistheworstpweistheworst Member Posts: 986 Arc User
    iconians wrote: »
    My ideal Nebula would use the sensor pod as an AWACS system for cloaked vessels. The Tachyon Detection Field and Tachyon Detection Grid really suffer from the major drawback that you are still firing blindly trying to find cloaked vessels, who can just sit at a distance, and the passive bonuses are still not enough to counteract the buffed stealth capabilities you'll see from level 60 players.

    The Nebula has never quite lived up to its potential as the go-to Federation ship for anti-cloaking, and I think a T6 Nebula should finally make the Nebula a ship to be feared by those ships.

    I love this idea, but if we combine it with everything I mentioned above (namely making it a T6 version of the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser with T6 specs and a secondary deflector) then the Nebula would be painfully over-powered as a science vessel if cloaks were rendered useless by a passive AWACS system.

    However, this could be turned into part of a VERY interesting 3-ship T6 set for the Nebula class: One T6 Nebula that essentially copies the specs of the Tal Shiar Adapted Battle Cruiser but with a few extra T6 science tweaks (8 weapon slots but no secondary deflector), a second T6 Nebula ship that is essentially a T6 version of the current Nebula class science ship (6 weapon slots and has a secondary deflector) but with the passive AWACS system that makes enemy cloaking devices useless, and a third T6 Nebula version that has 4 fore weapons, 3 aft weapons, a secondary deflector and sensor analysis but no sub-system targeting.

    I would also argue that considering how big the Nebula class is supposed to be, it should have one hangar bay, but that probably would tip the scales even more ... although the T6 Breen science carrier isn't so overpowered that everyone plays it (even if the Breen raider pets are CRAZY powerful).
    In the immortal words of Captain Sisko: "It may not be what you believe, but that doesn't make it wrong."

    Don't believe the lies in this forum. I am NOT an ARC user. I play STO on Steam or not at all.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    I think anyone that expects something else but an engineering-focused science vessel with all the standard science aspects from the Tier 6 Nebula is likely to be disappointed. So far with Tier 6 ships, they didn't do anything really surprising. The existing Tier 6 ships follow the original ones pretty closely, with one extra BO slot put somewhere on the ship, a BO slot "hybridized" with a specialization and a mastery and a console.

    The only unpredictable things are:
    • Which Hybrid Specialization (From the ones available now, Intel seems to make the most sense.)
    • What kind of extra BO power is added. Does it get a Lt.Cmdr Science or a Lt.Cmdr Tac slot? Does it get an extra ensign, or its ensign upgraded to Lt?
    • Starship Trait
    • Console Power
    • Console Synergy (will there be any, if so, what's the benefit?)
    • Looks. Will they make an Andromeda or Venture based variant? Something new completely?

    It might be neat to add another uncloaking trick to the Nebula with a trait or console, but let's be honest - that's only interesting in PvP, not a real seller to the PvE masses.
    They continued the trend of using DOFFs to buff subpar powers with Starship Mastery Traits.

    Maybe the trait will be a buff to Jam Sensors or Scramble Sensors that make them useful in PvE again? But that might need to be a significant buff...

    Sensor Manipulation Bonanza - Starship Mastery Trait
    When you placate a target and the effect ends, the target is confused for another n seconds afterwards but becomes immune to this trait for n+m seconds. (Buff to Jam Sensors)
    When you confuse a target and the effect ends, the target is placated for another n seconds afterwards, but becomes immune to this trait for n+m seconds. (Buff to Scramble Sensors)

    Heck... Even with that I don't know why I should use it in PvE... I originally wrote it up with explicitly mentioning only Jam and Scramble Sensors, but maybe with generalizing it to all placates and confuses, it will be more interesting? At least it has more "exploit" potential. :/

    Hyper-Focused Sensor Emitter Array
    Passive: +30 Sensors and +5 % Accuracy
    Active: Lose passive bonus to confuse all enemies within 10km for 10 seconds.
    Synergy - 2 piece: +20 % Critical Hit Severity
    Synergy - 3 pieces: +2 % Critical Hit Probability










    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    As mustrumridcully0 said, you guys hoping something drastically different for the T6 version of _____ ship are going to be sorely disappointed. Look at the ships that have converted to T6 and the evolution to the new tier is a natural progression. My "harsh reality" T6 Nebula? Easy to predict.

    T6 Nebula

    Similar stats to Fleet T5U Nebula. No crazy revamps like 7 weapon slots on a Science Vessel since the T5 Nebula had a 3/3 layout.

    Consoles? Exactly the same as Fleet T5U Nebula: 2 TAC, 4 ENG, 5 SCI

    I've been on the money lately in guessing these right. BOFF Stations:
    Lt TAC
    LtCmdr ENG
    Cmdr SCI
    Ens SCI
    LtCdr Universal / Hybrid - This would be the slot that gets the +1 for T6, going from Lt to LtCdr and giving the Nebula some nice, powerful flexiblity. Cryptic hasn't added a T6 Non-Full Specialization ship with Lt only since last year. Those happened only with the first batch of T6 when Profits/Delta Rising hit. Every T6 Non-Full Spec ship since has had at least LtCdr Hybrid. Also, as a Non-Premium Ship (it's a faction ship, not a Lobi/Lockbox/Promo ship), it will not have the limited Dual Spec access like the JHSS, Xindi Cruiser, etc. does.

    Same Starship Mastery as T5U Nebula but with the expected T6 trait to occur.

    Console Set: There currently is no Nebula Console Set Bonus with the existing Tachyon Detection Field and Tachyon Detection Grid Universal Consoles. What I expect to happen is the T6 Nebula will get a new Universal Console and a new Console Set with 2 and 3 piece bonuses to be made with the older stuff. I would also venture to say the 2 piece bonus will involve even more benefits to Stealth Detection, as if the old T5 Nebula wasn't the best in the game in that already. But Stealth Detection is pointless in PVE. PVP, that's a whole different matter altogether, especially with all those cloak-capable ships out there.

    T6 ship skin? I'd expect the old Galaxy-class parts to get the same attention as the revamped Galaxy skin did when the T6 version released. I'd also expect the special T6 skin to take design cues from the Andromeda with the Type 7 textures and Type 7 patterns.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • capemike4capemike4 Member Posts: 394 Arc User
    Eagerly awaiting the day when(not if) we get a T6 Nebula...quite possibly the only thing that would make me retire my Fleet T5-U Nebula! :D
    When in doubt...Gravity Well TO THE FACE!! :D
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
    @warmaker001b: This is exactly what I expect (and hope for!) as well. I would be severly disappointed if they change "my" Nebula to some weird cruiser hybrid - it is already a tough and heavy science ship with LTC Eng "secondary" and 4 eng consoles, it's cruiser-y enough. I however don't want to miss sensor analysis or sacrifice anything for more weapons.

    The Galaxy has 4/4 weapons - the Nebula is "half a galaxy", so having less weapons makes sense. The upgraded Lt Universal to LTC Universal would grant the ship powerful flexibility. Since we have no precedence for a Uni/Hybrid slot, though, I'd suspect the hybrid goes to the LTC Eng and will be intel (since the Nebula was said in canon to have powerful sensors and a "schleichfahrt" mode due to the lack of impulse trails).

    I would grind for that.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    @warmaker001b: This is exactly what I expect (and hope for!) as well. I would be severly disappointed if they change "my" Nebula to some weird cruiser hybrid - it is already a tough and heavy science ship with LTC Eng "secondary" and 4 eng consoles, it's cruiser-y enough. I however don't want to miss sensor analysis or sacrifice anything for more weapons.

    The Galaxy has 4/4 weapons - the Nebula is "half a galaxy", so having less weapons makes sense. The upgraded Lt Universal to LTC Universal would grant the ship powerful flexibility. Since we have no precedence for a Uni/Hybrid slot, though, I'd suspect the hybrid goes to the LTC Eng and will be intel (since the Nebula was said in canon to have powerful sensors and a "schleichfahrt" mode due to the lack of impulse trails).

    I would grind for that.

    The JHSS is the first ship that has a Universal Station with Hybrid capability.

    But I would not be surprised if the ENG station got the Hybrid slotting, either.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
    The JHSS is the first ship that has a Universal Station with Hybrid capability.

    But I would not be surprised if the ENG station got the Hybrid slotting, either.

    Oh, I didn't know that but I don't know a lot about lockbox ships in general. I assume that a universal/hybrid is "lockbox special" at the moment, so they wouldn't put it on a store ship. But that's only speculation on my end.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    The JHSS is the first ship that has a Universal Station with Hybrid capability.

    But I would not be surprised if the ENG station got the Hybrid slotting, either.

    Oh, I didn't know that but I don't know a lot about lockbox ships in general. I assume that a universal/hybrid is "lockbox special" at the moment, so they wouldn't put it on a store ship. But that's only speculation on my end.
    But just to clarify, the Universal/Hybrid still doesn't mean that you can slot any specailization. Just that you can slot Tac, Eng or Sci abilities or whatever Spec it has.

    if the Tier 6 BOP is really coming as rumours suggest, I suspect it will be a non-lockbox ship with a universal/whatever (probably universal/pilot) slot. Unless they decide to ditch the all-universal aspect of BOPs.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    If the Tier 6 BOP is really coming as rumours suggest, I suspect it will be a non-lockbox ship with a universal/whatever (probably universal/pilot) slot. Unless they decide to ditch the all-universal aspect of BOPs.

    Since that's one of the defining aspects of the entire BOP line they better not.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    narthais wrote: »
    If the Tier 6 BOP is really coming as rumours suggest, I suspect it will be a non-lockbox ship with a universal/whatever (probably universal/pilot) slot. Unless they decide to ditch the all-universal aspect of BOPs.

    Since that's one of the defining aspects of the entire BOP line they better not.
    I would prefer not, but... If you gave the BOP a Tactical Commander and still maintain a few unversal slots, I think most builds would be completely unaffected, except the few people that use the BOP as Science Vessel replacement. And if it means that Cryptic produces more BOPs because they can sell meaningful variants, I guess I'd still be okay. Better than no BOPs at all.
    (And I think I would also like a Heg'Tha variant, not just a B'rel variant.)
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
    Man, give it all the skin available to the Galaxy. Stats aside, let's have it look shweet!
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
    I'd say yes to a T6 nebula, the T5 fleet Nebbie was my go to ship until I got the pathfinder, it had a good boff set up and a T6 version should replace the lt tac and uni lt slots with a ltc tac and and ensign uni
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
      I'd say yes to a T6 nebula, the T5 fleet Nebbie was my go to ship until I got the pathfinder, it had a good boff set up and a T6 version should replace the lt tac and uni lt slots with a ltc tac and and ensign uni

      I disagree with that. A LTC tac on the Nebula would be swing and miss in my opinion. The Lt uni should simply be upgraded to LTC uni. That would reflect the shiop's versatility and still allow people who need tac abilities on a 5 sci console ship to do their thing. I would make much better use of a LTC sci or even LTC eng there, cosnidering the other LTC becomes intel.​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    • coruunascoruunas Member Posts: 127 Arc User
      I've been slightly obsessed with Nebula's for awhile now. Since I need a break from my Rom that i've been playing pretty much nonstop since LoR, I've gone back to my neglected fed SCI
      .
      I've been hoping that instead of a an extra BO or console, they have swappable mission pods. One for each space specialization, sacrificing the subsystem targeting for "<insert specialization skill> I "of whatever pod you install (only at a starbase). Should allow for the ship's reputation as a flexible workhorse without it being called overpowered.
    • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
      edited July 2015
      I agree, making the Tactical a LTC, would be inappropriate. I would want to see the Universal become a LTC, and the existing LTC ENG become a Hybrid position.

      It would actually affect my build the same as making the Universal a Hybrid universal LTC, as I use slot an ENG in the Universal slot anyways. But adding Override Subsystem Safties, Surgical Strikes, or Overwhelm Emitters would be fun.

      But then I am running a double a2b Nebula, and using my Cmdr Sci for TBR 3, with the Doff that makes the Beams attractive, and BFAW2. Just about to break 20k DPS. She has the Hull and Shields to tank well, and 5 arrays and a KCB, helps deal with drain.

      I love the Nebula, but it has taken years for me to find a layout to my taste, especially as a mostly KDF player, although I find myself in my Nebula who is named in a nod to Janeway 'Coffee in Here' more and more often. It's Funny, I love the Nebula and Galaxy-X, but not a huge fan of the Vanilla Galaxy. I'd kill for a New Orleans too.

      Anyways, I've already named my T6 Nebula for whenever she becomes available, the 'U.S.S. Coffee Grinder'

      My T5U is named 'Coffee in Here.'

      https://youtu.be/ZSuXtHpjI2s
      Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
      New Content Wishlist
      T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
      Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
      Dahar Master Jacket

    • This content has been removed.
    • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
      LT Tac
      LtC Eng
      Cmdr Sci
      Ens Sci
      LT Univ/Intel
      4/3 weapon

      All Galaxy skins.

      There's your Nebula Science cruiser.
    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
      LT Tac
      LtC Eng
      Cmdr Sci
      Ens Sci
      LT Univ/Intel
      4/3 weapon

      All Galaxy skins.

      There's your Nebula Science cruiser.

      There's one BOFF missing. And why 4/3 weapons? That doesn't really make sense, especially since there is no reason to change the 2 tac consoles it has.
      ​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    • cmdrscarletcmdrscarlet Member Posts: 5,137 Arc User
      It gets 6 BOffs?

      4/3 because ... meh. It's almost a kitbash of the Galaxy and is a massive ship that has always been the "cruiser" of the Science ship line. So, make it a love-child of a Sci + Cruiser, heh.

      I'm not married to my ideas as any love this ship gets from Cryptic will be welcome.
    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
      It gets 6 BOffs?

      4/3 because ... meh. It's almost a kitbash of the Galaxy and is a massive ship that has always been the "cruiser" of the Science ship line. So, make it a love-child of a Sci + Cruiser, heh.

      I'm not married to my ideas as any love this ship gets from Cryptic will be welcome.

      No, but it gets 13 BOFF skills which means in practice either two LTC or three LT pig-1.gif (or two ensigns, but that was never done before and would arguably not make sense as it would indeed introduce a sixth BOFF). My favourite and maybe most popular wish at this point is CMDR Sci, LTC Eng/Intel, LTC Uni, Lt Tac, Ens Sci. A change from the 3/3 sci vessel setup is unlikely (and unneeded, but that's my opinion) as T5 upgrades always retain what the T5 ship was and "only" add a trait, a 13th BOFF and come with the T5U console (5 Sci in the Nebula's case, 4th Eng is the fleet console) ina ddition to HP and possibly a universal console.

      ​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
      edited July 2015
      I think they should add a Mission pod mechanic. It would be a universal slot in the same place as where a Hangar would be.

      It could be used to slot a weapon, universal console, Hangar pet, but not a Tactical, Engineering, or Science console.

      Have it come with a 360 degree emission seeking Photon Torpedo, as the default piece of gear in that slot. Seeks and Strikes cloaked vessels and prevents them from reclaiming for a period of time. Weapon is affected by Doffs that affect other Projectiles. The accuracy and effective range are improved by using the other Nebula Consoles.

      But you could put universal consoles there instead, or a Hangar pet giving the ship a Hangar Bay.
      Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
      New Content Wishlist
      T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
      Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
      Dahar Master Jacket

    • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,014 Arc User
      potasssium wrote: »
      I think they should add a Mission pod mechanic. It would be a universal slot in the same place as where a Hangar would be.

      It could be used to slot a weapon, universal console, Hangar pet, but not a Tactical, Engineering, or Science console.

      Have it come with a 360 degree emission seeking Photon Torpedo, as the default piece of gear in that slot. Seeks and Strikes cloaked vessels and prevents them from reclaiming for a period of time. Weapon is affected by Doffs that affect other Projectiles.

      But you could put universal consoles there instead, or a Hangar pet giving the ship a Hangar Bay.

      I like that, interesting thought. I doubt that such a new mechanic would be developed for a mere T6 upgrade, but I wouldn't oppose it pig-1.gif

      Maybe they could offer three gimmicks to put there, the torpedo you mentioned, a unique hangar pet (Sentry pods) or a sensor module providing a AoE sensor scan.

      ​​
      lFC4bt2.gif
      ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
      "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
      "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
      "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
      I would like to see that mechanic rolled out to other ships with Sensor or Mission Pods too, of which there are several.

      On ships that don't already have a secondary Deflector, but possess a Sensor/Mission pod, they could mount a Secondary Deflector in that spot as an additional option.
      Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
      New Content Wishlist
      T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
      Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
      Dahar Master Jacket

    • nickcastletonnickcastleton Member Posts: 1,212 Arc User
      edited July 2015
      potasssium wrote: »

      Anyways, I've already named my T6 Nebula for whenever she becomes available, the 'U.S.S. Coffee Grinder'

      My T5U is named 'Coffee in Here.'

      https://youtu.be/ZSuXtHpjI2s

      LOVE IT best ship name ever, though be warned if i run out i may board and steal your ship :smiley:

      As for a t6 nebula surly it would follow the tradition of the nebula class and be a jack of all trades ship.
      0bzJyzP.gif





      "It appears we have lost our sex appeal, captain."- Tuvok
    Sign In or Register to comment.