test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

I will say this about sector space....

darkknightucfdarkknightucf Member Posts: 1,546 Media Corps
.... I enjoy flying around and seeing the star systems. Aside from the Sol system critique I posted on Reddit, it looks nice as well. My "gripe" would be, why not use NASA data for star system locations and slot the notable systems in it.

I'm being ultra-picky, but I enjoy the work done here. It shows your potential. Keep it up, please!
@Odenknight | U.S.S. Challenger | "Remember The Seven"
Fleet Defiant Kinetic Heavy Fire Support | Fleet Manticore Kinetic Strike Ship | Tactical Command Kinetic Siege Refit | Fleet Defiant Quantum Phase Escort | Fleet Valiant Kinetic Heavy Fire Support
Turning the Galaxy-X into a Torpedo Dreadnought & torpedo tutorial, with written torpedo guide.
"A good weapon and a great strategy will win you many battles." - Marshall
I knew using Kinetics would be playing the game on hard mode, but what I didn't realize was how bad the deck is stacked against Kinetics.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Well... STO does not take place in the real world, and any discrepancies are the result of it being in a different (fictional) universe. :P
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • teknesiateknesia Member Posts: 860 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    .... I enjoy flying around and seeing the star systems. Aside from the Sol system critique I posted on Reddit, it looks nice as well. My "gripe" would be, why not use NASA data for star system locations and slot the notable systems in it.

    I'm being ultra-picky, but I enjoy the work done here. It shows your potential. Keep it up, please!

    Because some fans would scream that things weren't in the right place. They still do it even when STO does its best to adhere to canon on locations within reason.
    edbf9204-c725-4dab-a35a-46626a4cb978.jpg
  • geminisierrageminisierra Member Posts: 180 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    teknesia wrote: »
    Because some fans would scream that things weren't in the right place. They still do it even when STO does its best to adhere to canon on locations within reason.

    yeah... when it first came out, there were people complaining that the earth was not the correct distance from the sun... and the moon was to big and a bunch more... you can never satisfy everyone.
  • royalsovereignroyalsovereign Member Posts: 1,344 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Well... STO does not take place in the real world, and any discrepancies are the result of it being in a different (fictional) universe. :P
    Not to mention that all those star systems are moving at different speeds and will have somewhat different arrangements by the time we get to, er, whatever year it is now? What, 2410?
    "You Iconians just hung a vacancy sign on your asses and my foot's looking for a room!"
    --Red Annorax
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Well... STO does not take place in the real world, and any discrepancies are the result of it being in a different (fictional) universe. :P

    Wait...what do you mean fictional? I THOUGHT STAR TREK WAS REAL!? WHAT THE ****!?

    It's all been a lie...all this time...WHY!? :(
Sign In or Register to comment.