test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Galaxy Model - So Beautiful

anshraanshra Member Posts: 0 Arc User
Devs - Thank-you. That is Amazing. That is all.
- Into the jaws of hell.
Post edited by anshra on

Comments

  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    You know.. I have never been a fan of the Galaxy, I don't know what it is about it. I remember watching Encounter at Farpoint for the first time and thinking it was just an ugly ship who's huge saucer made it look.. deformed. :eek:

    Over the years, it's grown on me.. a little, but still wasn't something I really wanted to fly.

    Even with that in mind.. the Andromeda really is a nice looking ship. I'm honestly impressed with the design, I like the new deflector and the ship seems to have a very detailed model. The last 2 ship releases (Command ships, Iconic Ships) have really been a noticeable leap forward in ship modeling and design. Both the Command Ships and the Iconic Ships are extremely well done.

    These guys just might make me actually like the Galaxy. :D
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • drakethewhitedrakethewhite Member Posts: 1,240 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    You know.. I have never been a fan of the Galaxy, I don't know what it is about it. I remember watching Encounter at Farpoint for the first time and thinking it was just an ugly ship who's huge saucer made it look.. deformed. :eek:

    With the nacelles being *much* lower than the saucer as well as short and fat, it always came across as... well, a backwards toilet to be honest with the saucer being the water tank.

    It is completely the opposite of sleek or impressive IMO.

    But I'm glad people who like it got a good model of it for their end-game. May they enjoy it for a at least a couple years to come.
  • gaevsmangaevsman Member Posts: 3,190 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    I like the venture better... but in tastes... anyway, the new Galaxy model is gorgeus... but i keep my venture! :P
    The forces of darkness are upon us!
  • emacsheadroomemacsheadroom Member Posts: 994 Arc User
    edited April 2015
  • lebtronlebtron Member Posts: 296 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    gaevsman wrote: »
    I like the venture better... but in tastes... anyway, the new Galaxy model is gorgeus... but i keep my venture! :P

    I wondered if it is possible to mix the new fleet explorer with that venture skin. I do not own the venture yet, but on other ship models different skins are sometimes availabe as preview. There is no venture preview on the fleet t6 explorer.
  • edited April 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • amosov78amosov78 Member Posts: 1,495 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Yes, it looks very nice...

    BUT...

    They didn't bother to update the Galaxy X at the same time... or the Nebula, for that matter...

    Would have been nice.

    Still, excellent work from the art staff.

    The Nebula-class would be slightly more problematic since a number of its components; the secondary hull for example, aren't exactly the same as the Galaxy's. Even how the nacelles are mounted onto the pylons is different enough, with the Nebula having larger wedge shaped "brackets" where the pylons slot onto the nacelles. Ideally I'd still prefer the studio model secondary hull for the Nebula, but it's doubtful that'll happen anytime soon, if at all.

    It still wouldn't be easier if they just stuck to the Nebula CGI kitbash version either as the secondary hull is still a different shape.
    U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-71895 - Nebula-class
    Commanding Officer: Captain Pyotr Ramonovich Amosov
    Dedication Plaque: "Nil Intentatum Reliquit"
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    I have to join in the praises about the new Galaxy Class model. :)

    It looks gorgeous and it's finally the ship I grew up with while watching TNG. I was shocked by the magnitude of the aesthetical change once I logged in after the patch and saw how my ship looks. It looks so much better than the old model that it actually feels like a second brand new skin for the Exploration Cruiser together with the Andromeda. It looks fresh and new.
    Thomas did an amazing job with both of them, but the biggest part of my praise and gratitude goes to the work done on the iconic Galaxy Class ship model, thank you sincerely for finally bringing the ship from the show to our game!
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • sonnikkusonnikku Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    anshra wrote: »
    Galaxy Model - So Beautiful

    That's what one of my friends said upon seeing my ship up close in game. I told him he can't hump it. :P
  • zipagatzipagat Member Posts: 1,204 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    shpoks wrote: »
    I have to join in the praises about the new Galaxy Class model. :)

    It looks gorgeous and it's finally the ship I grew up with while watching TNG. I was shocked by the magnitude of the aesthetical change once I logged in after the patch and saw how my ship looks. It looks so much better than the old model that it actually feels like a second brand new skin for the Exploration Cruiser together with the Andromeda. It looks fresh and new.
    Thomas did an amazing job with both of them, but the biggest part of my praise and gratitude goes to the work done on the iconic Galaxy Class ship model, thank you sincerely for finally bringing the ship from the show to our game!

    This, the Galaxy now looks awesome, you can tell a lot of time and effort went into it, the level of detail is fantastic.
  • aethon3050aethon3050 Member Posts: 599 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Yes, it looks very nice...

    BUT...

    They didn't bother to update the Galaxy X at the same time... or the Nebula, for that matter...

    Would have been nice.

    Still, excellent work from the art staff.

    The Galaxy X's spinal phaser lance was the first thing I checked; it is STILL crooked.

    While I cannot possibly understate what an amazing job they did with the Galaxy (finally, a Lt.Com Tac AND a proper skin, after 5 years!), I cannot help but look at the crooked lance on my Gal-X and wonder why that one bit, at least, could not have been updated.

    I have to say, though, the updated Negh'Var looks amazing, too. I will most certainly be picking one up!
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    aethon3050 wrote: »
    The Galaxy X's spinal phaser lance was the first thing I checked; it is STILL crooked.

    While I cannot possibly understate what an amazing job they did with the Galaxy (finally, a Lt.Com Tac AND a proper skin, after 5 years!), I cannot help but look at the crooked lance on my Gal-X and wonder why that one bit, at least, could not have been updated.
    There is only so much that can be done at a time. If you remodel your bath room it doesn't mean your guest bath room will be remodelled with it, too.

    If or when the Galaxy-X Tier 6 version comes, I am sure it will also see a new model. But probably not before.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • edited April 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • aelfwin1aelfwin1 Member Posts: 2,896 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    :eek:
    I suppose it doesn't matter, I'm not about to shell out any amount of cash for any of it. I might have bought the D'Deridex, but it's honestly too expensive, like everything else they try to sell me.

    Yeah ... , once I realized that the bundle would cost me 1 Mil. Dil and even 1 ship 1/2 a Mil. , I too felt that right now may not be the best time for their purchase .



    ... that's what happens when yer space poor ... , and have a kicka$$ Gal-X ...
  • driveclubfandriveclubfan Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Everybody's praising the T6 Galaxy

    While I'm here, waiting for a T6 Defiant.

    first one who says "Phantom" will get run over by a McLaren F1 LM going at 300km/h, repeatedly.
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Everybody's praising the T6 Galaxy

    While I'm here, waiting for a T6 Defiant.

    first one who says "Phantom" will get run over by a McLaren F1 LM going at 300km/h, repeatedly.

    Surprising how neglected the entire Escort selection has been at T6 so far.

    A handful of Science Ships, a TON of Cruisers, and what? 1 Escort?

    With the limitations on Cannons and the lack of available ships, it sure feels like they're trying to turn people away from playing Escorts/Raptors which is a shame.

    I'm not a huge fan of the Defiant, but a T6 Defiant would probably go a long way toward brining back the Escort. A lot of players would really enjoy that.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • kandorouskandorous Member Posts: 114 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    There is only so much that can be done at a time.

    the galaxy x has been borked for nearly two years now
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Having actually seen it in the game now, I have to say I'm a bit concerned by the window lights. They seem awfully bright. Is there a way to tone them down?

    Slamek?? Is that you??? :confused: :P
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Galaxy Class is still Ugly as sin, but that's not Cryptic fault that they made their modle look exactly like the TRIBBLE the Galaxy class is. Glad the ENt D got blown up by an outdated ship, and replace with something better looking
    GwaoHAD.png
  • stardestroyer001stardestroyer001 Member Posts: 2,615 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Thanks Devs for the re-costume work, it looks great.
    stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
    Missing the good ol' days of PvP: Legacy of Romulus to Season 9
    My List of Useful Links, Recently Updated November 25 2017!
  • davideightdavideight Member Posts: 461 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    my problem with the new model is, that its parts are, despite of saucer and nacelles, arent really interchangeable without having strange remains on hull/neck left.

    for example: you cant use differen pylons on the andromeda, because you get a really weird looking tail left in the aft-middle section.

    id really like to change pylons and still have matching parts.

    cause i think the new pylons completely "break" with the galaxy looks, whos nacelles are always in one line with the impulse engines. the andromeda looks way to broad in the aft section, because the nacelles are just to far away from each other.

    but i cant choose other pylons, because i get this weird "remain-tail" from either the hull andor the neck of the andromeda.


    making either a more narrow andromeda pylon variant, or making a hull-neck variant thats just cut off right were the galaxy/venture pylons end, would be a great addition.

    i also dont get why they dont add more "simple customization" options like having nacelles angled 90° variants or a top-down pylon variant, narrower/wider pylons etc and such. it would add a lot of cutomization without much work.


    overall the models are really nice, only this broad pylon variant is odd, cause it breaks sleek galaxy aft section design ;-)
  • davideightdavideight Member Posts: 461 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    to make clear what i mean with the pylon thing:

    http://postimg.org/image/s04139kwj/33ced466/

    CBh0_Uat_UUAAym_OH_png_large.png
    Bilder hochladen

    the lower variant is the altered one.

    (its just a small change but it makes a lot of difference to me at least ;-) )
  • abaddon653abaddon653 Member Posts: 1,144 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    You're right it is a beautiful ship. Especially as plumes of plasma and debris rocket out from it's hull after my disruptors have torn it to shreds. No greater sight.
Sign In or Register to comment.