test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Can you please make T5 Ship Traits Account Wide?

erraberrab Member Posts: 1,434 Arc User
Greetings All,

I was wondering what would be the harm if Cryptic made all T6 max T5 Ship Traits an account wide unlock.

I can see where it might be an issue with Lobi and Lock Box ships but with zen shop vessels there should really be no issue IMO.

The reason that I'm asking for this is that I've unlocked many T5 Ship Traits that are currently only available to a certain faction and other factions have no way to get these traits at all.

I have many Characters from each faction on my account and I'd like to be able to use all the T5 ship traits that I unlock on every level appropriate Character on my account.

Thanks for your Time
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Post edited by errab on

Comments

  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Cryptic might make Tier 6 C-Store ships account wide for a particular faction, but not for every character. The way it is currently set up means that Cryptic can release faction ships with the same Ship trait as long as it is generic enough to fit every type of ship. So if I want the Dauntless ship trait on my Klingon, then I would have to purchase the Klingon equivalent of the Dauntless which means more money for Cryptic.
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I support this, but only if it requires some work, in order to give a fair but reasonable way to pass on Masteries without either being too entitled or too complicated for the players or Cryptic. And it's not much different from grinding 100 or so Marks to trade for a Reputation Sponsorship; in this case, skips the middleman and is directly worked on and gained. The XP required per "skill pass" could stand to be lower than what I suggested, but again, I chose a conservative amount rather than one too low.

    Account Bound Mastery Suggestion:
    As to making the 5th Mastery Account-unlock, I support this insofar as still having to work for it. Instead of just leveling it once and then it's unlocked for all characters, I suggest to encourage players to keep using the ship instead of just dropping it and forgetting it.

    For example: I level my Guardian to Rank 5. However, instead of letting the bar stop there, let a second bar appear below it (so that if the "Mastered" code is tied to the bar, it doesn't reset Masteries or anything; it simply opens up a new and separate bar). The XP required to fill it will either be the same as it formerly was getting from 3 to 4, or the rebalanced XP required to get from 4 to 5.

    For every completion of that bar, a player gains an account-bound item; for this example, we'll call it: [Holodeck Bridge Training: Guardian - Desperate Repairs]. The in-game idea is that as a master of your ship, you earn the right to record a training simulation of your performance to share with one officer, in this case, an alt. However, to prevent early abuse, the alt in question needs to be level 50 minimum, though personally, level 40 minimum would be ideal, as we're already Admirals by that point. But I won't complain if it's left at 50 minimum to use, given that if implemented, it's already doing us all a great favor.

    This way, all objectives would be met. Players can have access to as many starship traits as they're willing to work on, this will encourage repeated use of any T6s every so often, and Cryptic can sell more T6s or Delta Operations Packs. The only losers here would be the lazy or unwilling.
  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    Cryptic might make Tier 6 C-Store ships account wide for a particular faction, but not for every character. The way it is currently set up means that Cryptic can release faction ships with the same Ship trait as long as it is generic enough to fit every type of ship. So if I want the Dauntless ship trait on my Klingon, then I would have to purchase the Klingon equivalent of the Dauntless which means more money for Cryptic.

    Cryptic releasing a kdf ship? El oh el
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
  • crypticgekocrypticgeko Member Posts: 87
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera
  • zulisvelzulisvel Member Posts: 518 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    That's a fair compromise and I could live with it. But it doesn't address the disparity between the number of mastery traits Fed characters have access to vs. KDF and Romulans.

    I know other players have suggested it, but what about something kind of like the rep sponsorship tokens? Something along the lines where once a players earns their mastery trait they can then earn it again in the form of an account bound item that can grant the trait to an alt?
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera

    ship traits need to be cross faction because the feds are always going to have between 5 to 10 times as many tier 6 ships launched as the other factions. how else are your other faction characters going to compete with that? thats always going to be a huge advantage.

    maybe you could craft your self a token if you unlock a trait, that you could put in an account bank, to transfer between characters? reuse the tech behind letting alts get through reputations faster if you first completed it with 1.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    ship traits need to be cross faction because the feds are always going to have between 5 to 10 times as many tier 6 ships launched as the other factions. how else are your other faction characters going to compete with that? thats always going to be a huge advantage.

    maybe you could craft your self a token if you unlock a trait, that you could put in an account bank, to transfer between characters? reuse the tech behind letting alts get through reputations faster if you first completed it with 1.

    They can always put them in future lockboxes. After all, it is far cheaper to get a unique console from a Starfleet C-Store ship on the KDF side.
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,923 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    ahh, more entitlement whining.. " I want everything for nothing"

    why don't you just change your whine to "I want all my alts to automatically level the same amount as my main"
    sig.jpg
  • hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    While I understand your sentiment about some feeling entitled, it's exactly because of things like your post that I suggest some work be required to obtain theoretical Starship Mastery trait tokens to pass on to other alts.

    It keeps the feelings of entitlement out, encourages extended use of T6s, and encourages more T6 sales. The end reward of being able to pass otherwise Faction-specific Masteries to alts would do far more than just stuffing them into Lockboxes or forever denying them.

    And it would spark far less of yet another forum war than if Starship Mastery Traits were lockbox bound, like how KDF players ranted over how easy it was for Feds to get Plasmonic Leeches. Except this time around it would be the majority of Fed players ranting about how their special mastery has been made instantly accessible to KDF and Rom players without actually working for it. Not to mention, would be a bigger money loser for Cryptic (30 USD straight for a ship and its trait vs those buying master keys with EC or Dil->Zen, or just buying them straight off the exchange for EC) unless Cryptic makes them character-bind or account-bind on obtainment.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    ship traits need to be cross faction because the feds are always going to have between 5 to 10 times as many tier 6 ships launched as the other factions. how else are your other faction characters going to compete with that? thats always going to be a huge advantage.

    maybe you could craft your self a token if you unlock a trait, that you could put in an account bank, to transfer between characters? reuse the tech behind letting alts get through reputations faster if you first completed it with 1.

    Feds could have 9001 traits...they can still only slot 4. While the number of traits would allow for more varied gameplay across all factions, wouldn't the more pressing concern be that of the quality of the traits themselves rather than the number? Cryptic could give the KDF 9001 more traits and not a one of them might be on par with Reciprocity.
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera

    That's not a bad idea, but to be honest the ship mastery aspect of the ships doesn't really need fixing. Its the least broke aspect of DR if such a thing was possible. For example, my T6 Breen Carrier. I was lucky enough to be able to buy it outright on day one. It took maybe 5 hours of play time to get all 5 levels of ship mastery.

    IMO that's a reasonable amount of time.

    I have noticed that Tactical toons 'seem' develop this faster, regardless of the ship type. Sci characters seem to take forever to level the ship mastery of tac-based ships.

    My Two Bits,

    Admiral Thrax
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    That's not a bad idea, but to be honest the ship mastery aspect of the ships doesn't really need fixing. Its the least broke aspect of DR if such a thing was possible. For example, my T6 Breen Carrier. I was lucky enough to be able to buy it outright on day one. It took maybe 5 hours of play time to get all 5 levels of ship mastery.

    IMO that's a reasonable amount of time.

    I have noticed that Tactical toons 'seem' develop this faster, regardless of the ship type. Sci characters seem to take forever to level the ship mastery of tac-based ships.

    My Two Bits,

    Admiral Thrax

    Yeah, it's kind of been a confusing thing for me...cause there was the initial reduction that took it from okay (imho) to lol-easy...then they went and reduced it again. At the rate the keep reducing it, lol, we'll buy a ship and be T5 by the time we save the name. ;)
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Cryptic could give the KDF 9001 more traits and not a one of them might be on par with Reciprocity.

    my fear. my kdf and rom need this at least or they are just deeply inferior. that and the dauntless trait, 25% boost to all your hull healing come on. and the random 25k heal guardian trait has been the only thing that has saved me quite a few times in what pvp i've been able to play.

    my KDF and rom need these things, period.
  • edited December 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • khamseenairkhamseenair Member Posts: 2,640 Bug Hunter
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera

    Frankly, a system which would benefit from this sort of 'sponsorship' more would be the spec trees... I have 15 alts, only one character has an even half levelled spec tree. It'll take me years to get them all through it thanks to the SP nerf (no matter what you claim; if it looks, smells, and tastes like a nerf... it's a nerf) so a system where either the Spec system is account wide or we at least get some significant discount on the amount of time required to get alts through it would be more beneficial than more adjustments to a system which is already pretty easy to max out. Hell I got two tier 6 ships through all mastery levels without gaining a single damned spec point...
    Join date is wrong, I've actually been around since STO Beta.
    True alters don't have a "main". Account wide unlocks for all unique event rewards!!
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I just cannot see any justification for allowing cross faction traits. I mean the traits you get are specific to your faction, how they run their ships or how their technology works.
    It makes no sense that a Fed ship could use a trait earned on a KDF Raptor or the other way round.
    Within factions, yes that seems OK as they would at least be sharing tech and skills.
    The lobi/lockbox ships are a bit different as they are available to all sides so skills and tactics from their use could be cross faction.
    Also this sort of thing would not affect Fed aligned Romulans or KDF ones either as they can't use T5 or higher ships from their allies anyway.

    Also why should all your traits be instantly available to all your alts once once toon grinds them all. Surely the point of them is that it your captain & crew have learnt how to work together and get the best out of their ships, hence they learn the trait. To simply allow it to be slotted on another toon with no work at all makes no sense.
    It's like just because you can do a handbrake turn in your car does not mean everyone in your family will instantly know how to do the same without putting in the effort and learning how to do it.
    SulMatuul.png
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Feds could have 9001 traits...they can still only slot 4. While the number of traits would allow for more varied gameplay across all factions, wouldn't the more pressing concern be that of the quality of the traits themselves rather than the number? Cryptic could give the KDF 9001 more traits and not a one of them might be on par with Reciprocity.

    Indeed but at this point in the introduction of mastery traits there is a quantity problem. With fewer T6 ships there's fewer choices that can be made between relevant traits to a given build and one situation that I myself am faced with is empty spaces and some desire just to fill them with something useful, never mind if they're on par with the FED's better traits. In the long term this situation is going to be helped by more specialization traits and less niche-specific T6 event ships but in the short term the KDF and RR are simply hurting for choice. It would help if they recieved more c-store T6 ships (and of course it would help even more if those traits were on par with Reciprocity.)
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • bones1970bones1970 Member Posts: 953 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera

    This would be great, then i finally will have some use of my alts again !!
  • reximuzreximuz Member Posts: 1,172 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I don’t think we can do that. It actually causes a lot of data issues, and it’s not in line with the spirit of the design.

    But I agree it is a lot of work. What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    We still have a lot of investigating to do, but I could see this happening.


    LLAP

    Al "Captain Geko" Rivera

    The bigger problem, as some other have mentioned, is that RR and KDF players don't have access to enough traits.

    I was hoping the Breen trait would be useful, but since I don't fly a ship with a hanger...
  • cannydogcannydog Member Posts: 148 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    +1 I like this idea...

    But I doubt Cryptic would ever implement it. Because that would make many of us far too OP. And then they would have to figure out how to Nerf the TRIBBLE out of those same T6 Traits.

    Still my few Romulan characters would love having a trait that was something besides "Lets run away and hide"...:rolleyes:
  • toivatoiva Member Posts: 3,276 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    The problem of ship traits is the disparity between factions. And it's hardly gonna get better.

    So what is needed is some way of getting say 'reciprocity' on a KDF char. The actual speed of leveling a ship is minimal, dare I say negligeable. Of all that can be considered a grind, it is the least grindy.
    TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class.
    Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
    Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.

    Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
  • salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    What we are looking at doing is something more like the Rep Sponsorship. That is, if you complete starship mastery in, say, the Galaxy Cruiser, all your alts could get a significant increase in progressing through starship mastery in a Galaxy Cruiser.

    Not that I'm against this, but it's unnecessary TBH. I can do 2 or 3 (at the most) runs in Starbase 24 and get full starship mastery.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
Sign In or Register to comment.