T6 Science ship with 3 fore and 3 aft -WTfrikkadel!!!

chrishellmax2363

Really.

Ill give you my cash.

Ill even want to give it to you , cryptic for designing such beautiful machine.

BUT.

What the heck are you smoking when you give a T6 ship only 3 fore weapons. Whats this a retro T6 ship to be flown only for its looks.

Im talking about the voyager lookalike ship. Cant think of the name as i type this.

My eclipse can run circles around this ship and i get this *scoffing at it low non ample weaponry*

Come on . Really.

Tell the dev that forgot to put 4 and 4 on that ship to grab that ship and take it back to the
drawing board.

You hear me. Ill pay you, but not for a ship that sucks on that level. Even the scryer seems to have 4/3 weaponry.

*Jumps of the back of her unicorn* I need that ship, but till it looks worth it in the weapons deperatment, im holding unto my dollars.

Nothing to see here, move along...

neoakiraii

OMG what is this stuff on the forms today people are smoking and not sharing with me:mad:

seriousdave

Sooo you're pissed because the new sci ship has the layout of a sci ship?
Of course how dare they, the next thing they'll do is a escort with only 3 aft weapons, what an atrocity.:rolleyes:

reginamala78

Um, if weapon slots are what makes or breaks a sci ship for you, maybe you should be flying something else? Also, Scryer and Dauntless are both 3/3. (If you're going to rant, please be accurate)

ummax

count consoles not weapon slots that is what determines ship power most ships have 3 and 3 a few have some more in the front but its the consoles and I want that ship for my science officer he will vaporize people with it in an extravaganza of shiny particles and stuff. Oh and the little support craft that comes with it is also way neat looking!

its the price I have an issue with..

wilbor2

I've not looked at at the new voyager ship as I'm more then happy with my vesta T5u. But to complain about its weapon slots is nuts. As all other Sci ships in the game have the same amount plus there is lots of omni direction beams on the exchange now adays.

erei1

With Cryptic, you can expect a 4-3 sci ship sooner or later, for 30-35$. Just like they did with 5/2 then 5/3 ships.
But not today.

hyperionx09

The next 4/3 Sci ship will be another Dyson T6 Science Destroyer without the need to mode change. Except it's called the Jenolian T6 Science Destroyer. Just because it's supposed to have some ties to both the Jenolian Sphere, the Dyson Sphere, and the Delta Quadrant.

Followed by a 4/3+1 Voth Science Destroyer as a Lockbox reward. Brand new original Voth design. That +1 is a fixed Gravity Well mine launcher (launches 3 tracking mines that each unleash a GWell II equivalent upon detonation, but slightly shorter duration).

ETA? Summer of 20Never, during the month-long Triple EXP event that also coincides with the release of the Federation Valkyrie hangar pets and Phantom "frigate" pets. In addition, Romulans also get full wardrobe access to formerly locked Romulan Republic and Tal Shiar attire in addition to faction-specific attire, and KDF finally get more clothes period. Though most would still look like hand-me-downs from the Federation Salvation Army.

mscowboy

erei1 wrote: »

With Cryptic, you can expect a 4-3 sci ship sooner or later, for 30-35$. Just like they did with 5/2 then 5/3 ships.
But not today.

The 5/2 is an escort with the same number of mounts as usual, with an aft weapon moved forward. The 5/3 is a battlecruiser with the same. An equivalent sci ship would be 4/2. Ships have never exceeded the standard number of mounts for their class, even if they get moved around a bit.

warmaker001b

chrishellmax2363 wrote: »

Really.

Ill give you my cash.

Ill even want to give it to you , cryptic for designing such beautiful machine.

BUT.

What the heck are you smoking when you give a T6 ship only 3 fore weapons. Whats this a retro T6 ship to be flown only for its looks.

Im talking about the voyager lookalike ship. Cant think of the name as i type this.

My eclipse can run circles around this ship and i get this *scoffing at it low non ample weaponry*

Come on . Really.

Tell the dev that forgot to put 4 and 4 on that ship to grab that ship and take it back to the
drawing board.

You hear me. Ill pay you, but not for a ship that sucks on that level. Even the scryer seems to have 4/3 weaponry.

*Jumps of the back of her unicorn* I need that ship, but till it looks worth it in the weapons deperatment, im holding unto my dollars.

Nothing to see here, move along...

You have absolutely no clue what the hell you're talking about. Did you also know that Science Vessels are not... you know... Escorts or TAC Cruisers?

And the Scryer is a 3/3 weapon slot Science Vessel. Again, you have absolutely no clue what your'e talking about.

emacsheadroom

chrishellmax2363 wrote: »

*Jumps of the back of her unicorn*

It's funny that everything you wrote before this line gave me the impression that you live in a fantasy world inside your own head where you'd throw a tantrum if you don't get what you want, as if some great injustice was done to you.

farseeridranel

Why would you need more weapons on a Science vessel anyway? Science vessel captains use their finest magic to address issues with their enemies, not crude weapons like the barbarians

bravecatherine

chrishellmax2363 wrote: »

Really.

Ill give you my cash.

Ill even want to give it to you , cryptic for designing such beautiful machine.

BUT.

What the heck are you smoking when you give a T6 ship only 3 fore weapons. Whats this a retro T6 ship to be flown only for its looks.

Im talking about the voyager lookalike ship. Cant think of the name as i type this.

My eclipse can run circles around this ship and i get this *scoffing at it low non ample weaponry*

Come on . Really.

Tell the dev that forgot to put 4 and 4 on that ship to grab that ship and take it back to the
drawing board.

You hear me. Ill pay you, but not for a ship that sucks on that level. Even the scryer seems to have 4/3 weaponry.

*Jumps of the back of her unicorn* I need that ship, but till it looks worth it in the weapons deperatment, im holding unto my dollars.

Nothing to see here, move along...

Let me guess you are one of those pro who fly science ships with full power to weapons?:D

varekraith

I oppose this.
What they need to do is to bring science powers in line with all this pure DPS TRIBBLE they got stuck on.
:rolleyes:

angrytarg

Deadliest Sci ships have 5 sci consoles, 3-4 eng consoles and only 2 tac consoles and weapon slots are only slotted with milld fire support / projectiles.

orangeitis

I always imagine the Universe-class Enterprise-J would have 6/6 weapons and 15 consoles.

Damn, 150 years is a long time to wait. =(