test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Star Trek Online General Discussion

New Fed Ships Are Ugly

pappaborgpappaborg Member Posts: 17 Arc User
edited September 2014 in Star Trek Online General Discussion
Is it just me or are the new fed and sci ship that are coming out look really ugly. Even, the fed dyson ship is ugly. It seems like the designers are out of touch with what a beautiful ship is.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Appearance is a subjective thing. What one person likes another hates. CBS clearly liked the appearances enough to approve their use. If we all only liked the same things it would be a boring world.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • moonshadowdarkmoonshadowdark Member Posts: 1,899 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Yeah, well, so's your First Officer.
    "A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP"

    -Leonard Nimoy, RIP
  • teluasteluas Member Posts: 132 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Appearance is a subjective thing. What one person likes another hates. CBS clearly liked the appearances enough to approve their use. If we all only liked the same things it would be a boring world.

    I wish there was a way to "thumbs up" this post, as its the absolute truth. I, for one, find the new cruiser design to be hideous. However, the Sci ship design makes a certain amount of sense in my mind, and I find the escort to be a brilliantly elegant evolution of the Defiant. :)
  • adamkafeiadamkafei Member Posts: 6,539 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Hrm... the science one is growing on me.
    ZiOfChe.png?1
  • damienvryce2damienvryce2 Member Posts: 428 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    Appearance is a subjective thing. What one person likes another hates. CBS clearly liked the appearances enough to approve their use. If we all only liked the same things it would be a boring world.

    Although I know you're right cosmic I would still like to weigh in on this subject...they're fugly. :D

    Thank you.
    STO: Where men are men and the women probably are too.
    I support the Star Trek Battles channel.
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    I think the Eclipse is growing on me. The Scryer... No, not really. The Phantom. Well, it's a Defiant-like ship. But not a Defiant.
    The colors/materials are unusual.

    I hope we'll see some more standard ships again, too, but for a new type of ship with a special role, maybe the new ones aren't so bad.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Cryptic - We've seen the error of our ways and have decided to only use canon ships. To that end we have also decided to wind the in game time back to TOS era. There will only be three ships to get...The connie, the rom warbird and the KDF battlecruiser.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    The shapes are okay (I think the different pictures they used today, with less cinematic glare, helped), but the skins are still wrong. May have to dig out the MACO shield just on principle.
  • damienvryce2damienvryce2 Member Posts: 428 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    khan5000 wrote: »
    Cryptic - We've seen the error of our ways and have decided to only use canon ships. To that end we have also decided to wind the in game time back to TOS era. There will only be three ships to get...The connie, the rom warbird and the KDF battlecruiser.

    But what happens to all of my wonderfully ugly kitbashes?? :(
    STO: Where men are men and the women probably are too.
    I support the Star Trek Battles channel.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Those incoming Fed ships look terrible. Stop having Stockholm Syndrome!
    XzRTofz.gif
  • mycroft1701mycroft1701 Member Posts: 109 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    reginamala78 wrote: »
    The shapes are okay (I think the different pictures they used today, with less cinematic glare, helped), but the skins are still wrong. May have to dig out the MACO shield just on principle.

    Personally, I'd have said the opposite ☺
  • rinksterrinkster Member Posts: 3,549 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Can't say I like the looks of them myself.

    That fact alone is a significent factor in my buying decision.

    I'm going to be looking at it a lot, if it doesn't say Star Trek to me loudly enough, I'm not interested.
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,963 Arc User
    edited September 2014
    Okay, seriously, this is how many threads on this topic now? I know for a fact there's an active one down in the fed ships forum.

    (For the record, I agree that except for the Guardian-class they're all fugly. And even the Guardian needs to lose the TRON lines and blue paint.)
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited September 2014
    This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.