That's quite the paradox, how could you nerf nerf when the nerf is nerfed. But how would the nerf be nerfed when the nerf is nerfed? This allows the nerf not to be nerfed since the nerf is nerfed? But if the nerf isn't nerfed, it could still nerf nerfs. But as soon as the nerf is nerfed, the nerf power is lost. So paradoxally it the nerf nerf lost its nerf, while it's still nerfed, which cannot be because the nerf was unable to nerf.
Comments
I call it, the Stoutes paradox.
Because artificially limiting an economy has never caused problems in the past, right? :P
I hope it rises that high, or higher; my Rom tac is in a smaller fleet, that will be make it easier for my fleet-building there.