test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

TRIBBLE Maintenance and Release Notes - March 20, 2014

2»

Comments

  • wixibanwixiban Member Posts: 162 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    How about the mouse direct ship control? Has that been fixed as well?

    I hope this also gets looked at before hitting holodeck
    Wixiban.png
  • towanitowani Member Posts: 104 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    We will be bringing down the Tribble server for maintenance to apply a new update: ST.40.20140316a.5

    New ESD:
    Players cannot shoot at each other in shooter mode.
    Fixed for reals this time.


    Honestly, IMHO, they should leave this allowable in the Holodecks. They serve no other purpose anyways... could be fun allowing shooter mode to work to shot each other in the holodecks.
    Maybe open up the holodecks so that when you enter (zone in) it's a random environment - maybe a random PVP or PVE map... could be either free for all or team death matches. Completely random - would pull from an already exisiting map, like ESD, DS9, Bajor, etc, but form it's own 'holodeck' instance for random shooter mode fun
    Hi. Apparently I'm new here and joined in Jun 2012. Guess I'm in good company though... seems everyone else joined then too!
  • antoniosalieriantoniosalieri Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Did you guys learn nothing from the entire borg use plasma weapon thing.

    You guys obviously never care to ever fix PvP. All well.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack.
  • bignutterbignutter Member Posts: 125 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Has the Mark 10 and 11 Omega and Romulan Rep Equipment gone from the Reputation system?

    If it has then I see the Following 6 Accolades becoming unobtainable. (The following are for obtaining Mark 10 and 11 Sets)

    Omega Force Recruit
    Omega Force Veteran

    Fed:
    M.A.C.O. Recruit
    M.A.C.O. Veteran

    KDF:
    Honor Guard Recruit
    Honor Guard Veteran

    Also the Mark 11 had a Purchase costume option available.
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    wixiban wrote: »
    I hope this also gets looked at before hitting holodeck
    I hope too, because it's still not fixed.
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Did you guys learn nothing from the entire borg use plasma weapon thing.

    You guys obviously never care to ever fix PvP. All well.

    the tier 2 rep passive has AP resist on the hull it seems, but it competes with that acc boosting on tac station power activation, thats steep competition. the shield will no doubt have AP res, but what are the odds its better then an elite shield. until elite shields are removed or something gear like thats not nearly as big a deal
  • antoniosalieriantoniosalieri Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    the tier 2 rep passive has AP resist on the hull it seems, but it competes with that acc boosting on tac station power activation, thats steep competition. the shield will no doubt have AP res, but what are the odds its better then an elite shield. until elite shields are removed or something gear like thats not nearly as big a deal

    Its more then just this passive though... look at the dyson rep and the consoles that give +defense +res + a bonus to AP.

    I don't use AP I think its a terrible option anyway... I just find it funny to see them repeating the exact same past mistake. When at one point they Admitted the borg plasma and all the gear with +plasma resist was a PvP issue. After admitting that they go and do the exact same thing to another weapon type... seems really really dumb.

    The first mistake I could understand didn't see the issue until they had coded a lot of borg and borg gear so I said ya ok hard to fix... they power creeped it out with fleet shields so no big deal. (they still never added passive plasma resist options).

    Now they have repeated the exact same mistake making one weapon type less attractive for pvp. Sure this passive isn't a big deal... but if your choosing a weapon for pvp why choose the one where 1 in 6 or 7 people will have this passive... and another 1 in 4 will have a few +defense consoles that also boost AP resist... and perhaps another 1 or 2 are going to end up having shields now that have +AP resist on them.

    They could have fixed this by giving NPCs there own weapon type when they redid them. (they added proton so its not impossible). Or by simply adding a (vs players) argument to most gear. Heck even shields could get fixed that way with (+20 Plasma/AP resistance when originating from a None player entity).

    We know there system has the code already built in to do either.... so its obviously a will thing. They have no desire at all to even balance new stuff for PvP... so the thought of them going back and fixing old stuff. (like some people seem to still hope for) is just nuts.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    We know there system has the code already built in to do either.... so its obviously a will thing. They have no desire at all to even balance new stuff for PvP... so the thought of them going back and fixing old stuff. (like some people seem to still hope for) is just nuts.

    Usually the only way they take a consideration or suggested for possible improvements or balance is if they have something to take to their overlords that if they do such a thing that they will make money off of it.

    Case in point along with what you have stated about not concerned with PvP and/or balance of it with new items pushed out. The only reason they got time put in for the ship swap and build saving is the way they handled it with their overlords that they would sell additional slots per ship and more inventory space for those who already maxed theirs out. This was done to address the item pushing because they have noticed a lot of us were at critical levels with all these items that no concern was made for storage or even pvp.

    I'll be honest though unless you can come up for the design for them and give it to them on a silver platter on how to setup pay per view PvP matches for players, Star Trek fans(both who play and just want to see something Star Trek) to be on who will win that is most likely the only way you'll ever see them take PvP into consideration when pushing out items for true balance purposes. For PvP lovers its sad because you have even less of a chance than heavily invested KDF players have in Development of the KDF lol.

    I do agree though there is a lot of old content that is horribly broken, glitched, bugged etc. Then on top of that a lot of iconic ships that pretty much have no purpose/don't have working mechanics as they are made from. Some pitiful excuses are well its a game so it can't work exactly the way it did in canon. My gripe with it is they advertise it as it is in canon but don't wanna put in that work to get it done right. Its like that last Stoked before it basically ended in its first form that they didn't have what it takes to take a Star Trek MMO where it needs to go. Roughly old stuff will stay broken and the overlords will have them throw out lockboxes until all the canon boxes are used up and then milk all the made up stuff they can until its drained dry and then they might give them the reins back but at that point it'll be such a disaster they will be forced to shut down the game.
  • cookiecrookcookiecrook Member Posts: 4,543 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Usually the only way they take a consideration or suggested for possible improvements or balance is if they have something to take to their overlords that if they do such a thing that they will make money off of it.

    Case in point along with what you have stated about not concerned with PvP and/or balance of it with new items pushed out. The only reason they got time put in for the ship swap and build saving is the way they handled it with their overlords that they would sell additional slots per ship and more inventory space for those who already maxed theirs out. This was done to address the item pushing because they have noticed a lot of us were at critical levels with all these items that no concern was made for storage or even pvp.

    I'll be honest though unless you can come up for the design for them and give it to them on a silver platter on how to setup pay per view PvP matches for players, Star Trek fans(both who play and just want to see something Star Trek) to be on who will win that is most likely the only way you'll ever see them take PvP into consideration when pushing out items for true balance purposes. For PvP lovers its sad because you have even less of a chance than heavily invested KDF players have in Development of the KDF lol.

    I do agree though there is a lot of old content that is horribly broken, glitched, bugged etc. Then on top of that a lot of iconic ships that pretty much have no purpose/don't have working mechanics as they are made from. Some pitiful excuses are well its a game so it can't work exactly the way it did in canon. My gripe with it is they advertise it as it is in canon but don't wanna put in that work to get it done right. Its like that last Stoked before it basically ended in its first form that they didn't have what it takes to take a Star Trek MMO where it needs to go. Roughly old stuff will stay broken and the overlords will have them throw out lockboxes until all the canon boxes are used up and then milk all the made up stuff they can until its drained dry and then they might give them the reins back but at that point it'll be such a disaster they will be forced to shut down the game.

    I agree with everything in your post. One missing aspect to PvP is DeathMatch for both ground and space. The whole one-trick pony of pre-made teams isn't everyone's cup of tea.
    <
    > <
    > <
    >
    Looking for a new fleet? Drop by the in-game chat channel, "tenforwardforum", and say hi to the members of A Fleet Called Ten Forward (Fed) and The Orion Pirates (KDF). If you already have a fleet you are happy with, please feel free to drop by our chat channel if you are looking for a friendly bunch of helpful people to socialize with.
  • edited March 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • john98837john98837 Member Posts: 761 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    Tried the Undine Battlezone out today, found it to be an interesting design but rediculously easy. I was able to solo capture each of the different capture points without any real effort. Was pretty much fly in, kill a few ships, interact with something, wait around a minute or two for a few ships to show up and promptly meet there end, repeat.

    Payouts as posted are terrible, 15 marks, 240 dil, and 3 processors for the boss fight, hopefully that's getting changed.
  • bioskyline1bioskyline1 Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    bignutter wrote: »
    Has the Mark 10 and 11 Omega and Romulan Rep Equipment gone from the Reputation system?

    If it has then I see the Following 6 Accolades becoming unobtainable. (The following are for obtaining Mark 10 and 11 Sets)

    Omega Force Recruit
    Omega Force Veteran

    Fed:
    M.A.C.O. Recruit
    M.A.C.O. Veteran

    KDF:
    Honor Guard Recruit
    Honor Guard Veteran

    they will still be atainiable. i got both recruit and vertran completed when i got my mk12 gear. it auto gives you accolade of the lower sets.
  • bughunter357bughunter357 Member Posts: 588 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    yulianhua wrote: »
    Makes it kind of hard to test kits with costumes, then, huh? :(

    But that's not always the case. I do have access to some unlocked costumes (see my edited message above), but not all, so it's not consistant on what unlocks it knows about.

    Tribble just needs to honor all unlocks and be done with it, rather than this half-acknowledging mode it's in. :confused:

    been that way for a LONG time and I don't think it has ever been changed which sucks cuz I would like to see all my costumes and unlocks on tribble as well.
  • awlaforgeawlaforge Member Posts: 235 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    x3of9 wrote: »
    For those still having issues with the launcher/patcher freezing, this is something to try that worked for me:
    1. Open Task Manager by Right-Clicking on the Taskbar and Selecting "Start Task Manager"
    2. Select the "Processes" tab
    3. Find "Star Trek Online.exe" in the list and right-click it
    4. Click on "Properties"
    5. Click on the "Compatibility" tab
    6. Click the checkbox for "Run this program in compatibility mode for:"
    7. Select "Windows XP (Service Pack 3)" from the drop-down menu
    8. Click "OK" and then terminate the patcher.
    9. Try launching the patcher again. This should prevent it from freezing again.

    Note: I did this on Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit. I have 8GB of RAM and noticed in the console (Ctrl C when the launcher is opened) that when it attempted to patch Tribble, it would throw an error trying to allocate memory. I feel this may be an issue with the patcher running 32-bit mode in a 64-bit OS and somehow having a problem with addressing that memory.


    Odd thing is that also works for Windows 7 32 bit...
  • speedofheatspeedofheat Member Posts: 111 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    I found deleting my beta directory and copying the live directory, then renaming it beta worked quite well
    y3m-yM6W2jBAA7NpYi95PewTOHD9vSNpFGl3huKvuKsGif7jH9lBSYRtnx-AxOUzQw00u0SrjnMeAt0McFsPmCC2FoawxgX3ZON4Ork7H39MCRYsgBUn0QYSADDqYpB6wB5twq-_jNOp7AdrNeItQjiXChE9kwGvBsqc-vTz7oj3YM?width=660&height=198&cropmode=none
  • ghyudtghyudt Member Posts: 1,112 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    I wonder if anyone realizes that posting in the forums while patching will slow it down. This also goes for those complaining about lag a rubberbanding. Stop opening multiple windows.
  • scipherscipher Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2014
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    Because this isnt charity and half of PvP problems are because of the the PvP crowd refuses to adapt ... anything they see as a threat to their current system they will not stop complaining about it.

    Kinda hard to sell anything when the PvP inicial response is "its OP, its selling power" because God forbids you have to change builds.

    You people are dead set into maintaining the current system, there is no point on doing anything because anything, ANYTHING is automatic viewed as either a threat or irrelevant.

    As long you seen to be non-customers why should they listen? You dont buy anything as in actually BUY anything and all you do is complain about "balance", is balance having a energy type with a build in 20% Severity when everything else gets a 2.5% chance? That is balance? Its balance saying "beams are fine" until FaW comes about and suddenly high DPS from beams is "a issue"?

    You know what? Its a nerf for AP yes ... can be really but on the other hand 3% accuracy with 5 stacks ... that means people that pick it will end up against people that picked the resistance, cancels out ... in fact not cancel out as someone can run with Romulan Plasma and gets the 15% ... funny that all up in arms about the AP and yet the 15% accuracy is not apparently a issue worth mentioning ...

    Best point so far I agree all I hear is it's OP or nerf it.
    "No more wire hangers, Christina"
Sign In or Register to comment.