test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Games Cause Violence... AGAIN!

odstparker#7820 odstparker Member Posts: 466 Arc User
edited February 2014 in Ten Forward
Here we go again. We who play video games for some (or most) of our lives are once again being blamed for things like murder, shootings, abuse, and other such things. Some may think that sounds a bit over dramatic, but that's the basics of it. They say it makes us more "aggressive" and prone to random acts of violence while unknowingly emulating things from the video games that we know and love.

I, for one, hate this topic, and I want to get the opinion of my fellow Trekkers and STO players to see how like minded people (or those who are not) responded to this. Below is my personal opinion on this whole campaign of "research" and "studies".

I play Halo. I have no desire to go into space and slaughter aliens, nor do I have the desire to run over my comrades in arms in a 2 ton death machine.

I play Mass effect. I feel no need to recruit a squad of badasses to fight a galactic war against giant machine squids.

I play Assassin's Creed. I have never stabbed anyone in the neck, back, chest, or other body parts with a knife or other type of blade from a hay bale, lamp post, or rooftop, and I never will.

I played Mortal Kombat. I have never felt the urge to rip anyone's head and spine from his body, tear anyone's skin off of their bones, or otherwise slice and dice anyone.

I played Call of Duty. While I plan to join the military, I will never call for helicopter support based on the fact that I shot seven people to death, nor will I repeatedly crouch on their dead bodies.

There are so many others that I could include, but they all lead to the simple conclusion that is this... I play video games. I'm not any more aggressive, violent, or likely to perform random acts of murder than most idiots at my high school who are getting into much worse things (alcohol, smoking, other drugs, sex, etc.). I understand that when I play a video game, I am simply escaping my life for a few hours to have what I consider to be very good fun with my friends and family.

Maybe, just maybe, we should look to the person, who may not have been taught the same values that most well-adjusted people have, instead of blaming things like video games and guns for all the world's problems. Why don't we get some responsibility for something, instead of casting blame onto everything else to make ourselves feel better.
Post edited by odstparker#7820 on
«1

Comments

  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Yep, just a bunch of moralized punks trying to look for excuses for unruly, misbehaving children rather than placing the blame where it really belongs: bad parenting.
  • grandnaguszek1grandnaguszek1 Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I am 14 and I much prefer venting my anger on inanimate objects in video games like old republic and STO rather than grabbing a lightsaber, vibrosward, or phaser and blowing up everything I see on the street (as cool as slicing things with a lightsaber sounds).

    I was watching "Through the Wormhole" on science channel and one scientists study of the brain showed that people who exhibit criminal behavior have a certain defect in their brain that was seen through a MRI. Let's hope someone doesn't say it got there because he played video games.
    say-star-wars-is-better.jpg
  • sander233sander233 Member Posts: 3,992 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    I don't know about you, but after playing many thousand hours of STO I feel compelled to commit acts of genocidal mass violence against people I don't understand.
    16d89073-5444-45ad-9053-45434ac9498f.png~original

    ...Oh, baby, you know, I've really got to leave you / Oh, I can hear it callin 'me / I said don't you hear it callin' me the way it used to do?...
    - Anne Bredon
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,478 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Well, I can't in all honesty say I've never felt the urge to tear out someone's head and spine, but I've never acted on that impulse. :)

    To expand the list above:

    I've played GTA III, Vice City, San Andreas, and IV, several times each. I have yet to find any desire to drive insanely, steal, rob, commit multiple homicides, fire explosives at police officers, or hire, rob, and kill a prostitute.

    I've played Star Trek: Shattered Mirror on the PS2. I have never actually piloted a starship through an alternate universe, fighting off the twisted mirror images of my friends.

    I've played Fable and Fable II; I am not under the impression that I'm secretly the prophesied one who will save the world from the forces of evil.

    I've played Rock Band 1-3, as well as Guitar Hero: Warriors of Rock; I do not suffer from the delusion that I can actually play a guitar. (Heck, the only reason I played GH:WoR was because until it came out as DLC for RB3, it was the only way I could play Rush's classic 2112. I still have no idea how Alex Lifeson did that guitar solo at the end of "The Priests of Syrinx".)

    Playing the various Mario Brothers games has never caused me to want to run through a sewer while eating mushrooms and jumping on turtles. Minecraft has aroused in me no desire to grab a pickaxe and dig under my house, looking for coal and iron. Even playing Champions Online hasn't convinced me to put on a spandex outfit and run about defeating criminal plots.

    Basically, all such studies I've seen suffer from the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy. They played video games, they later committed criminal acts - video games must be the cause! Similarly, they probably drank water and breathed air at some point before becoming criminals, therefore water and air make people criminals, yes?
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • nagrom7nagrom7 Member Posts: 995 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    jonsills wrote: »
    Basically, all such studies I've seen suffer from the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy. They played video games, they later committed criminal acts - video games must be the cause! Similarly, they probably drank water and breathed air at some point before becoming criminals, therefore water and air make people criminals, yes?

    That settles it.
    We must ban air and water! My studies show that without air and water, the criminals within humanity will die off. It's a brilliant plan! :D
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Harden up Princess
    Looking for an Oceanic fleet? Check out our website:
    www.ausmonauts.com
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    So video games were responsible for the Crusades and World War II? Didn't know that our ancestors played video games hundreds of years ago.
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    So video games were responsible for the Crusades and World War II? Didn't know that our ancestors played video games hundreds of years ago.

    Didn't you know? It was those infamous miniature wargames, Chess and Checkers, desensitizing children to violence.
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Yeah, This keeps on getting passed around, I think its because of the hot button topic that it is for the Media

    It likes to point the finger at somebody, Yet ironically the news is strangely contributory to the desensitisation of violence in the general public, It also creates a sort of mental conditioning where people begin to believe the world around them is more violent and dangerous than it really is, Largely because they see a lot of news coverage of violent crimes
    ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_world_syndrome) they called it mean world syndrome

    Basically the media likes to scare you, And wants you to believe the world is a nasty place, It also has to deal with the direct competition to its existance , Gaming, Interactive mediaums are generally more engaging than passive TV mediums, And you tend to be drawn to them over the later

    What better way is there to discredit video games and create the sense of fear than to make people believe that video games are causing harm to children ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo)
    Ironically its this irrational Fear that causes paranoia and damages our basic trust in communities

    In the words of Dr. Mark Warr, "What makes fear of crime so important as a social problem is its consequences for our society. When people take precautions based on fear that restrict their life and their children?s lives, we restrict our freedom and we do so unnecessarily. Fear also undermines the civility and trust in our communities that make civic life possible, and that?s a terrible consequence for a democratic society.?
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    jonsills wrote: »
    Basically, all such studies I've seen suffer from the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy. They played video games, they later committed criminal acts - video games must be the cause! Similarly, they probably drank water and breathed air at some point before becoming criminals, therefore water and air make people criminals, yes?

    It's not even a good example of the fallacy. If you look at violent criminals in general, and especially rampage killers, they play video games less than you'd expect than you'd expect of society on average. Out of the last ten high profile ramage killers, only one played violent games extensively before his crime (another couple were former gamers who quit a year or more before their crime). These were all males, mostly white, in the industry's goldmine demographics - if you grabbed ten random guys like this off the street and only one of them had an Xbox at home you'd be pretty sure five others were lying.

    Of course, the one thing they do have in common? Brains like a bag of cats. Most of them had diagnosed mental problems and most of the rest had suspected problems that were never seen by a psychiatrist. Some became uncooperative with treatment or stopped taking their meds, some were untreated or stopped responding to medications, and a couple got screwed by insurance.

    That almost never gets discussed, of course, and whenever it does the media and every politician on either side of the debate have the attention spans of first graders on espresso anyway and it takes about half an hour for the entire debate to get so far off track they might as well not have tried.

    The chain of conversation that started with the naval yard shooting and ended with Congress debating the right of blind people to own guns took less than a day, and was so elegant in its insanity that I'm still not sure it wasn't just an elaborate piece of performance art coordinated by Sacha Baron Cohen.
  • grandnaguszek1grandnaguszek1 Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    In the area where I live, some guy kept getting screwed by his urologist so one day he took his shotgun and went downtown and killed two of them and severely injured the other one (true story by the way). I'm sure he was inspired by a grand theft auto game that involved killing your urologist!:P
    say-star-wars-is-better.jpg
  • edited February 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • grandnaguszek1grandnaguszek1 Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited February 2014

    Sure in the past they didn't have computers, but losing a game of chess started the 100 years war! Not.









    If that is the case then the Holocaust started because Hitler lost a game of checkers to a Jew. Even without videogames, mass crimes and genocides can still occur. It all depends on the physiological condition of the person and perhaps how they were raised.
    say-star-wars-is-better.jpg
  • johankreigjohankreig Member Posts: 449 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    alas as of yet, I have not encountered a phaser like weapon, nor have i encountered any of teh species in teh game, so I cant tell if I want to enact what I do ingame, however driving tanks through walls, jumoing off massive pipes and crashing planes into other planes, sounds like great fun (battlefield series) lets all go out and do that.

    Its complete, balls, yes it can be adictive, and that addiction could lead to violence, but beyond that its rubbish, a huge number of things can be adictive and can have the exact same effects.
    Jorhana Kreig: KDF, Tal'is: Romulan Fed, Shona'a: Romulan KDF, Johan Paul Kreig: Fed
  • worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    Honestly, the only studies performed by nonbiased people on video games and violence have shown the exact OPPOSITE effect.

    The people who find that video games cause violence? Tend to be linked in some way with the fundamentalist groups that hate video games, D&D, and other fun things.

    In my personal case, video games have reduced violence. I have tempered my urge to find **** Cheney and Kim Jong-un and kill them horribly by playing hundreds of elite Borg STFs and shooting Thot Trel and Hakeev. Essentially, I avoid acting on my hatred of real-life monsters in stupid ways by shooting imaginary monsters and bad guys.

    Plus, it's really fun to kill Thot Trel; he fondly reminds me of all the best D&D villains I've ever DMed with his hammy lines and arrogant superiority. Shooting him and his goons to save the Deferi brings back fond memories of throwing the Fire King into his own volcano and electrocuting Fzoul Chembryl as he ranted about my character's inevitable demise, and teleporting the dragonlord Despayr into space.

    And, of course, that time when I polymorphed Evil Overlord Doomsday's Evil Lair of Evil into positrons.

    I always was a bit a of a rules lawyer, LOL.
  • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    *Sigh*

    What these morons seem to leave out is that these individuals usually already have some form of mental instability to begin with.

    I play war games, both FPS and strategy, with some dogfighting as well. I do not have the temptations to shoot people, send men into battle, or bomb German factories. And I'm slightly mental. Only slightly, though.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
    edited February 2014
    It's always the media and their over-hyped stories, most of us gamers are not violent thugs, but then again it all depends on personality types and mentality.
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • shevetshevet Member Posts: 1,667 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      My favourite comment on this "debate" came from some guy - I forget who - who pointed out that his generation's video games had been things like Pac-Man, and "if video games influenced our behaviour, we'd all have spent the Nineties running around in dark rooms gobbling little white pills to the sound of repetitive music."

      I don't suppose this helps the debate any, but it made me laugh.

      (I think the "debate" can be summed up as "lazy thinkers want to find scapegoats for perceived problems" - which is why I put the word "debate" in inverted commas: you can't actually argue with these people.)
      8b6YIel.png?1
    • philipclaybergphilipclayberg Member Posts: 1,680
      edited February 2014
      A wargaming/computer gaming friend I used to hang out with in the 1990s used to say, "Don't confuse the issue with facts."

      And the games didn't make him violent ... at all ... nor did they make me violent ... just really really tired if it was past midnight and the game hadn't ended yet. One time I tiredly conceded a computer wargame (Guad for the Apple IIGS) that was taking several hours to play and found out afterward I was actually winning. He was really good at "poker face".

      I do confess, though, that my interest in first-person shooters has dwindled considerably since I first played "Wolfenstein 3-D". They just doesn't do much for me anymore, outside of "Star Trek Online" ground missions.
    • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      Ive played Doom, Halo, Duke Nukem 3D, DN land of the babes, DN time to kill, Wolfinstein, Mortal Kombat 1-4, hexen, all street fighter games, warhammer, warhammer 40k + dark crusade, nearly every dungeon crawler since DOS, heroes of might and magic series, Claw and many other side scrolling fighting games, Dungeons and Dragons...im still signed up for a d20 gaming community...and CatStar, carry's a razor edged sword on his belt and a massive MACO rifle on his back!

      but despite the media hype and studys from paid off professional morons, im a pacifist! I hurt no one and never plan to! I even own a gun, to mess with politically correct minded people who say gun owners are all psychos. Given my past gaming entertainment habits and the"aaah run away he owns a gun!" crowd, people begin to malfunction and shut down when I tell em I love people and cant bring myself to hurt anyone. ...I entertain children most often at hospitals with my tails of James T Cat.

      Yes I make fun of Political Correctness because its fun and easy, I never said I wasn't a smart***, I just said Im a pacifist! :P
    • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      shevet wrote: »
      My favourite comment on this "debate" came from some guy - I forget who - who pointed out that his generation's video games had been things like Pac-Man, and "if video games influenced our behaviour, we'd all have spent the Nineties running around in dark rooms gobbling little white pills to the sound of repetitive music."

      I don't suppose this helps the debate any, but it made me laugh.

      (I think the "debate" can be summed up as "lazy thinkers want to find scapegoats for perceived problems" - which is why I put the word "debate" in inverted commas: you can't actually argue with these people.)

      wow, that means pacman could have been influenced by the 60's :O
    • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      catstarsto wrote: »
      Ive played Doom, Halo, Duke Nukem 3D, DN land of the babes, DN time to kill, Wolfinstein, Mortal Kombat 1-4, hexen, all street fighter games, warhammer, warhammer 40k + dark crusade, nearly every dungeon crawler since DOS, heroes of might and magic series, Claw and many other side scrolling fighting games, Dungeons and Dragons...im still signed up for a d20 gaming community...and CatStar, carry's a razor edged sword on his belt and a massive MACO rifle on his back!

      but despite the media hype and studys from paid off professional morons, im a pacifist! I hurt no one and never plan to! I even own a gun, to mess with politically correct minded people who say gun owners are all psychos. Given my past gaming entertainment habits and the"aaah run away he owns a gun!" crowd, people begin to malfunction and shut down when I tell em I love people and cant bring myself to hurt anyone. ...I entertain children most often at hospitals with my tails of James T Cat.

      Yes I make fun of Political Correctness because its fun and easy, I never said I wasn't a smart***, I just said Im a pacifist! :P

      Catstar, you're even more awesome than I thought you were.
    • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,478 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      shevet wrote: »
      My favourite comment on this "debate" came from some guy - I forget who - who pointed out that his generation's video games had been things like Pac-Man, and "if video games influenced our behaviour, we'd all have spent the Nineties running around in dark rooms gobbling little white pills to the sound of repetitive music."
      Isn't that a pretty fair description of a rave? :)
      Lorna-Wing-sig.png
    • revandarklighterrevandarklighter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      jonsills wrote: »
      Isn't that a pretty fair description of a rave? :)

      Well now you mention it...

      But Video games would never influence me... No, apologize me, I have to leave, go to town and ask kid around for some emendations.
      At least there they do not turn into dump present box and just du the running game.
      Btw, if again :roll eyes: the police (whats is their issue with that?) annoys me during that I'll just climb a Skycraper and jump down into some bale of hay, (I don't see why this should be unhealthy....)
      enoemg wrote: »
      I, for one, hate this topic, and I want to get the opinion of my fellow Trekkers and STO players to see how like minded people (or those who are not) responded to this. Below is my personal opinion on this whole campaign of "research" and "studies".

      If you hate it that much why do you bring it up? I mean not that I liked that idiotic topic...
      I played Call of Duty. While I plan to join the military, I will never call for helicopter support based on the fact that I shot seven people to death, nor will I repeatedly crouch on their dead bodies.

      Well as someone who had joined the Military (well trained by doom, obviously) I can tell you: Video games and handling any kind of weapons in real life have nothing in common but the way it might look.
    • richardbickerrichardbicker Member Posts: 1 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      if this was remotely true by there standards i should be a raving murdering alcoholic drug taker who shoots people at random due to the fact i've played alot of violent games like soldier of fortune, most grand theft autos, most of the mortal kombat games, battlefield 2, C.O.D, resident evil games.

      end of the day there is no hard proof its games at all, its the person much like booze if they hide there violent behaviour booze just unleases there true self, the people who go around killing, beating people up are usually just violent anyway. i knew at a young age games are just that games and not real.
    • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      if this was remotely true by there standards i should be a raving murdering alcoholic drug taker who shoots people at random due to the fact i've played alot of violent games like soldier of fortune, most grand theft autos, most of the mortal kombat games, battlefield 2, C.O.D, resident evil games.

      end of the day there is no hard proof its games at all, its the person much like booze if they hide there violent behaviour booze just unleases there true self, the people who go around killing, beating people up are usually just violent anyway. i knew at a young age games are just that games and not real.

      Games aren't real? All this time, my life's been a lie...

      /sarcasm

      Seriously, I think we're all in agreement that this is a stupid topic with little credible scientific evidence to back it up.
    • worffan101worffan101 Member Posts: 9,518 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      ryan218 wrote: »
      Games aren't real? All this time, my life's been a lie...

      /sarcasm

      Seriously, I think we're all in agreement that this is a stupid topic with little credible scientific evidence to back it up.

      In a nutshell, yes.

      I'm going to go back to some plot bunnies that are kicking around my head now.
    • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      This article makes me MAAAAADDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      GwaoHAD.png
    • fmgtorres1979fmgtorres1979 Member Posts: 1,327 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      It's an idea I never shared. However, I do understand there is some truth to it but not so much in the way it is usually stated.
      Some people have "disfunctions" - let's calle it that - that are stimulated by some games which in turn may cause those people to act on their impulses. Still, this is not a "game" problem as they can get those inputs from a very wide range of things. Books, movies, news, internet forum, etc, and even from themselves (their own mind). So, the game may be a tool or a catalyst, but that is a long way from being the actual game to cause violent behaviour.
      What I do believe is that some games, if played by children may eventually cause a "numbness to violence" and an habituation that - again, evetually - may allow for violent behaviours. And once again this is not exactly the game's fault, because firstly adults shouldn't let childdren play those games, and secondly, adults need to educate their children in ways that make them know fully well what is reality and what is not.
    • waaagh951waaagh951 Member Posts: 89 Arc User
      edited February 2014
      Yeah this again.
      Hell i am doing it as a work in school.
      It is intresting sins dreamhack. one of the biggest gaming things in sweden have arond 40 000 visitors yearly play these "violent" video games and as their spoekman said. It is a very calm event.
      I read up on it. video games makes us violent in what way?
      Excuse me I play these games and I am calm. I write books, play games and what else? I listen to the "violent" heavy metal. I am still the calmest in my class despite my destructive hobbies.
      Nope. games are the scrapegoat now. Nothing else
      So please all you who blame games. Move along. Nothing to see here. These are not the games you looking for.
    • odstparker#7820 odstparker Member Posts: 466 Arc User
      edited February 2014

      If you hate it that much why do you bring it up? I mean not that I liked that idiotic topic...



      Well as someone who had joined the Military (well trained by doom, obviously) I can tell you: Video games and handling any kind of weapons in real life have nothing in common but the way it might look.

      I did say that wrong, didn't I? I hate that this topic even exists in the first place, so I'm trying to spread it around and bring it into a better light.

      And of course I have no delusions that what I've done in Call of Duty or Battlefield will effect my future military career, if I pursue it, in any way whatsoever. That's the point I'm trying to make.
    Sign In or Register to comment.