would a sig like this be allowed?

wildmousex

on other forums I use a rotating sig that changes the pic each time the page is loaded. The link I put in the forums actually points to a PhP file that randomly draws from a folder containing the pics, and then sends the chosen file back.


I know that some of these pics will have to be removed or resized to get them within those rules, and some may be too taboo, but here is the one I currently use elsewhere.



-edit - since img tags are disabled, everytime you click the link you should get a different pic.

if size limits and whatnot are followed does this violate any other rules?

jonsills

Pretty sure the animated .GIFs are a no-no.

neoakiraii

What the Hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the Movie?

lunasto

wildmousex wrote: »

on other forums I use a rotating sig that changes the pic each time the page is loaded. The link I put in the forums actually points to a PhP file that randomly draws from a folder containing the pics, and then sends the chosen file back.


I know that some of these pics will have to be removed or resized to get them within those rules, and some may be too taboo, but here is the one I currently use elsewhere.



-edit - since img tags are disabled, everytime you click the link you should get a different pic.

if size limits and whatnot are followed does this violate any other rules?

XP Your a freak! I hope they don't let that signature on here, double yuk!!

centersolace

No, gifs and image randomizers are disabled.

monkeybone13

wildmousex wrote: »

on other forums I use a rotating sig that changes the pic each time the page is loaded. The link I put in the forums actually points to a PhP file that randomly draws from a folder containing the pics, and then sends the chosen file back.


I know that some of these pics will have to be removed or resized to get them within those rules, and some may be too taboo, but here is the one I currently use elsewhere.



-edit - since img tags are disabled, everytime you click the link you should get a different pic.

if size limits and whatnot are followed does this violate any other rules?

I clicked the link and looked at your gif, then looked at my signature pic.

I have to agree with others. I don't think they would allow rotating signatures. Heck, like stated, we can't even use the image tags to embed images in our posts. They just show up as a clickable link that takes you to the image somewhere else. I wish we could use the image tags and have it set to a maximum size allowed, but what can we do?

My guess is it is to prevent people from spamming the forums with advertisement pics or something.

wildmousex

neoakiraii wrote: »

What the Hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the Movie?

well since the pic is different everytime that link is clicked, I can only guess you got the one with Picard and Chunk (here's a stable link) http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/252/x1pvbu1psflfmcda3ttgmx4pe9.gif/


I do know that some of the pic's are too racy, and would take those out for what I use here for some of those who seem shocked, ---- but if animated pics are out then I guess that ends that, I could do this with stills but just not the same.

centersolace

Believe me m8. If the rules were different, I would have some amazing sigs.

ridddickxxx

neoakiraii wrote: »

What the Hell am I looking at? When does this happen in the Movie?

OMG, i am just looking at your signature and cant stop laughing