That's quite the paradox, how could you nerf nerf when the nerf is nerfed. But how would the nerf be nerfed when the nerf is nerfed? This allows the nerf not to be nerfed since the nerf is nerfed? But if the nerf isn't nerfed, it could still nerf nerfs. But as soon as the nerf is nerfed, the nerf power is lost. So paradoxally it the nerf nerf lost its nerf, while it's still nerfed, which cannot be because the nerf was unable to nerf.
Comments
aww I got moved to 10 forward, i guess cryptic isn't too happy being spied on
I call it, the Stoutes paradox.
what's a cryptic meeting without a few bugs?
patch ntoes whenever,
replaced ntoes with notes in all instances