test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Fleets, Exploration, To Boldly Go Where...

uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited July 2013 in Fleet System and Holdings
No crazy suggestion post has gone before...


Looking at potential ways to progress end game, I came up
with a revision to my idea about exploration, Pvp, Expansion in the universe.

Creating a Race
I'd like to create a new feature in Foundry for fleets.
This upgrade would allow a Fleet leaders to fabricate planets As well as Make a racial template for its fleets species. You may choose to pool from the same faction (Federation, Klingon) or create up to 10 variations yourself.

Each Fleet will be able to pick symbols to represent their empire, when seen in the sector map, you will
see these symbols (if in a team-fleet)

Each fleet will right back story, This will show in the Boxes of the pop up in sector space.

Interacting with the fleet
Once a fleet has created its race, it will be published into a spawn location ( Up to 5 per a system). Typically sectors will have up to 25 systems, So each race will be granted by default 5 systems to expand to. Fleets bases will be stationed in the home world (spawn location) system of the race.

PvE and PvP Missions
The game will have scripted in it various Missions. Both Pve And PvP Quest givers will be located on the lobby floor in the Star-base.

Pve Missions Will include tasks like, go and offer alliance proposals to other races (fleets), Colonize new worlds, Scan annomolies etc.

PvP Missions will include things like, conquest of another fleets systems, Kill other fleet members (the general quest, ie bread and butter) that you are at war with, and even Attacks on the other fleets star-base.

Conquest and Expansion

Below is a map, please review.
http://i82.servimg.com/u/f82/18/05/75/56/sector14.jpg

In this example we can see 3 fleets (Red, Purple and Blue) And we also see a neutral non-colonized system in the middle of the map.

The Aura's here represent the influence of that race in order to expand it, you need Pvers. If a neutral system is not in your influence zone, It is not Colonizeable or exploitable to you.

If two factions share influence in a bordering system, they can both engage in battle there, or each of the two can colonize it. However, the influence cannot extend into the territory of another fleet, only to borders established by both parties.

(this is the sole control mechanic to stop massive Extreme expansion rates)

Colonies
Because your home system is the only one with a star-base (at least at first)
You will need to protect your space. You do this by preventing other players from
attacking your planets, etc.

Colonies will have classifications depending on how many days they have been under
the control of that race. Further, they will offer unique benefits to the fleet, based on
its type. These colonies are automatically picked by its corresponding system type.

Colony Focus's
Military Colony
These colonies are established on Planet based systems. They offer 15 Defense Platforms, and 5 Defense AI controlled ships, as its benefit.

Mining Colony
These colonies are established in Asteroid based systems. They offer 1500 Dilithium a day to the fleet.

Trade Colonies
These colonies are established on Moon Based Systems. they offer 150,000 EC a day to the fleet.

Outskirts Colony (a small, Outlying colony, Automatically applies to systems on the border of the empire (With in 2 squares of the edge of its space).

Colony Types
Home world
This is the colonies are the home world of the system. If lost, the race dies off, and another race is born (after 24 hours). They Gain 200% effects of the colony focus.

Border World
These Worlds are with in 2 parsecs (Squares) of the fleets border. They only receive 50% of the effects of the system (due to corruption).

Colony
These worlds are neither Border, or home worlds, They receive 100% of the focus bonus's.


Alliances

Subjection treaty
In one of two situations, an empire may be placed here, Either because they were conquered, and the conquere choose not to kill the off, by rather turn them into slaves (which has benefits) Or because they spawned in a spawn location in the influence of a superior race. Subjected rates pay 15% of their Ec and Dilithium income to their master race.

Alliance
These Two parties are allied, and can protect each other space from invaders.
this increases the income rates of EC and Dilithium by 0.5% up to 12.5% over the period of 30 days.

Trade Alliance
These two parties trade with each other. this increases the income rates of EC and Dilithium by 1% up to 10% over the period of 30 days.

War
These parties are at war, and are attackable to each other in their two territories (only)


Colonizing & Conquering a system
A homeworld is system is only conquered through the destruction of its fleet star-base.
Other colonies can be

Blockaded (stops all income on the planet from happening while that fleet has players in orbit).

Destroyed (This will wipe out life on this planet, but in return will prevent you from colonizing it for a week).

Enslaved population
this will allow you to make the population work for you, but will only last up to a week or until liberated by its race. you will only gain 20% of the income when doing this.

Colonization
This will just involve the planet is in your influence zone, and going to the planet, and transporting materials, and deploying defense satellites in orbit. (takes about 5 minutes)

What the fleet members get for doing quests here

Each fleet will be granted a slot for each ship type (Sci, Eng, Tac) additional
slots can be bought with zen.

This will allow the Fleet leader to design a ship (through a series of connector parts) its color, and its tac/officer slots. these in return can be bought with Special operation fleet marks, which only come from doing quests in this area.

The foundry will receive upgrades to allow for unique designs of ships that have
yet to be seen by the people in sto/star trek. Perhapse we can include many Parts
from ships of races yet to be seen, like Voth, Kazon, etc.


This proposal was watered down from a much more complex system involving planetary happy rates, rebellions of planets, and much more.
Post edited by uhmari on

Comments

  • onehappytapewormonehappytapeworm Member Posts: 106 Bug Hunter
    edited June 2013
    We are all ship Captains in this game. There is not a class called Government Official. This is an entirely separate game you are suggesting. It is one thing to belong to a fleet that is constantly working on their home port and upgrading its facilities. But I doubt Picard would ever settle for parking the Enterprise in orbit of plant X while he runs the colony and what not.
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Interesting,

    I had not considered this. This actually makes things very difficult.
    The purpose of the system is to create races that are constantly changing
    so that exploration is always changing in game.

    So we have to make a choice on two choices.

    Permanent races that are dev created, At the cost of having static play
    Or stepping out side of that role of captain, and playing emperor at the cost of going against that role.

    Since there is races in the Star trek series, and their were govern with people, why
    not open up that possibility? Let me know what you think; because if we go with option 1
    we are forced to have say 20 static empires.

    Unless we could find a way for players to create it and still fill that role (which is a possible third option)
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I have a working concept, Will revise it and post later about it.

    Logics tells me Remove control of the race, but keep the rest.
  • onehappytapewormonehappytapeworm Member Posts: 106 Bug Hunter
    edited June 2013
    I would not participate. I came to STO to captain a starship, I have no desire to build, maintain, or expand an empire, or to nurse a race to glory.

    But that is me.
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    we have took that into consideration.

    I have a working conceptual way of making the play keep the role of captain
    but allowing for players to create an empire (races) for exploitative content to
    remain unique.


    They would follow through with the creation part above, then the race would
    automatically react according to players choices of quests etc.

    For example, you have two quests, Pve and PvP.

    Pve quests give + 25 Points on the bar
    PvP Quests give - 30 Points on the bar


    The bar is set ups so that

    0-20 % is Evil race 21-79 % is Neutral (both) 80-100% Is Good

    The quests of the race will differ depending on what alignment the race is.
    When creating the race, you will select its starting alignment. Then, once
    spawned, the race will have a decay rate of X % Per a day back to its original
    alignment.

    PvP races will be offered in the area, but will flag you for having the quest.
    PvE Will be offered in the area, but will not flag you. However because
    pvp has more risk involved, it will have more impact (this should balance out
    considering more people are pro-pve, then pvp)

    Let me know what you think from there
  • onehappytapewormonehappytapeworm Member Posts: 106 Bug Hunter
    edited June 2013
    Again, creating an entire race is not what this is about. What you are suggesting is in line with Age of Empires or Civilization type games. STO is not about building or maintaining an empire or race.

    Fleets are designed to represent smaller groups within Starfleet/KDF/Romulan Republic. Much like my Company is a smaller group within the Army.

    So long as you are suggesting or advocating the idea of creating and maintaining a race, I shall continue to tell you that it is not for this game. I would be happy to entertain ideas that have to do with new fleet missions.

    For example, perhaps there could be some sort of reward for setting up a fleet vs fleet PvP, such as 5 members of my Fed fleet go up against 5 members of a KDF fleet winners get 50 fleet marks each and losers get 25 each with no other rewards. This would encourage fleet teamwork and perhaps increase PvP as this would mean 125 or 250 Fleet Marks each round for the fleet.
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    I understand your point, But allowing a player to just design the race, and then for it to be placed into the universe poses no opposition to this. It allows the game to receive new races, to interact with.

    the most important thing would be how to design that system, and when a race would cease to exist. a good idea may be that people do enough quests with that race a month, the races stays alive.

    but you would set up the interaction with the race in the universe, as you interact with feds, or other races. Just doing quests and tasks for them. Yes the race was created by the player, but not controlled by it.

    maybe in time, you could allow the player to station his fleet base in orbit of one of their planets.
  • onehappytapewormonehappytapeworm Member Posts: 106 Bug Hunter
    edited June 2013
    Eh. It would be neat to maybe have a contest once a year or whatever to introduce a player designed race along with a brief back story so that the game does get in influx of new stuff is an okay idea.
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Its much better If we can allow the spawning when a race dies out.

    I really am curious to see.

    lets assume we both agree, that foundry is the best tool to make exploration
    be the future of pve (and maybe pvp) that the foundry can faciliate this need
    of new constant Content, that allows us to explore new stuff.

    What would the birth and death conditions be if you had the choice?
    What sort of mechanic would you use to cause the race to expand, and thrive?
    How would you involve it so that fleets would be part of it?
  • captainbaileycaptainbailey Member Posts: 356 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Can we send you to this planet for awhile and in about 10 years or so come back and let us know how it worked out that way we can have some peace from your trolling for awhile and the forum and game can be a little quieter?
  • taya4svktaya4svk Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Can we send you to this planet for awhile and in about 10 years or so come back and let us know how it worked out that way we can have some peace from your trolling for awhile and the forum and game can be a little quieter?


    Nice way to try it out, isnt it? :)


    And I do agree that this is Star Trek and your proposal about conquering, colonization, has nothing to do with Star Trek universe..

    A new game could be designed that way, but not here. There is so much going on already..
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I'm going to have to agree that the basic premise is okay, but seems out of scope for this game. At least for now.

    Yes, we want better exploration options, we'd like to be able to discover planets that we can revisit later on, and we'd like to be able to do different stuff on these new worlds. If possible, a story that unfolds over time.

    No, I don't think this should be something that only fleets can do. Otherwise, anything that allows a player to feel as if they have discovered a developing planet or an ancient world is great.

    Yes, we'd like some kind of territory control, so that it feels like there are actual wars and conflicts going on.

    No, I don't want to see open territory, non-consensual PvP. No, I don't think the game needs to include a complex planetary conquest system and I don't want it to become Civs in Space. The focus should remain on starship combat and away teams. A simple Cap and Hold mechanic should be enough.

    Note: The above is entirely my own opinion.
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    You know what might fly?

    What about a new kind of Fleet holding called a Fleet Colony?

    (Yeah, yeah, I know I said not for fleets only... but maybe in addition to an Exploration system?)

    Basically the Fleet Colony could be a space map and planet map where various exploration and colonization DOFF assignments are available.

    Those assignments could generate the inputs necessary for the projects that unlock features of the Fleet Colony. As you unlock features, the colony outpost grows and begins to provide services. You could even perhaps unlock special away team missions. At the very least, you should be able to prowl around the countryside doing similar things as on the New Romulus map.

    The Fleet Colony could even be used as the setting for Colony Defense and Colony Invasion scenarios. It could even include Doors for Foundry missions.

    Anyhow, just a thought.
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • afree100afree100 Member Posts: 332 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I agree with Bluegeek, Umari if you like that kind of game you might want to consider EvE Online, it doesn't have colonization (I don't think) or customised races, but it would be more likely to get them than STO and has all the other things you mentioned.

    Although the foundry and crafting are Cryptics next targets...
    I wish there was the ability to play any content (Story/PvP/STFs/Other PvE/Foundry/ Exploration) and get the same rewards for the same time spent as CSE, ISE and KASE under a single mark system, freedom to do what you want in a game means a lot.

    From a good game designers perspective: Rewards that are more powerful functionally = bad, they destabilize a game, like a virus to a program...
    Rewards in general should be limited:
    rewards = product of work
    work = something you have to do (opposite of freedom)
    pleasure from work = enjoyment - responsibility - repetition, enjoyment is variable
    pleasure from freedom = enjoyment - nothing

    Therefore rewards should be supplement not focus, story/content should be focused, otherwise less players playing game/having fun in game.

    Humans hate repetition, it should be minimized wherever possible...
    Repetition is the main cause of death for a game...
    So games should change as much as possible without colliding with the target audiences interests.

    In life the human urge to repel repetition is a good thing, it drives innovation and increases the amount of things a human will experience in their lifetime.

    Sequential as opposed to parallel helps combat repetition...

    So constant releases for a game is better than waiting a while and releasing it all at once, it shortens the amount of time between players logging into a game and therefore decreases the likelihood of the "oh I haven't played this in a while, delete" phenomenon and keeps players interested; although it does combat suspense.

    Suspense is both good and bad, it keeps players occupied and therefore interested but also frustrates them in some cases and increases repetition (decreasing relaxation etc)...

    Well a lot of that stuff is not limited to games, if any of it is.
    Starfleet M.A.C.O. KDF Honor Guard
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Thanks for the feed back, Its very good to hear or have a conversation on this topic, as its one of my focal points ( and i am aware daniel is focused on it also).

    Doff mission are a nice concept, but they are to long, and ... well yawn to be of any major part of the game, It needs some upgrades. We should have reports back to read with audio, to make it interesting. Audio dev work is costly, and timely, so its very hard to do this.


    When interviewing players on this topic, I was told the following

    General feedback

    1. Players love rewards, and want lots of them.
    2. Players love to be immersed into Role play content, Even if they are not RPers.
    3. The greatest improvement which players felt would vastly improve role playing to Role play is audio upgrades followed by a good story.

    The best solution to PvE exploration is undoubtedly the foundry. The question is, How to set it up.

    We know the following

    We need new races
    We need new zones to place them in.
    We need those races to facilitate PvE Min, And possibly / Desirably pvp.
    We need a mechanic that allows a player who loves a race to revisit, and grow with that
    races story line
    It would be great to have racial vs racial interaction (war, alliances etc).


    Now, Comes the hard part.

    in essence we are trying to make a new "federation" or "klingon empire".

    The race itself, its back story, and even things like the races body templates, ships, and planets/solar systems can be done through Foundry. This is now a problem, an upgrade to foundry can resolve this.


    The question is, How do allow these races to grow from single planet pre-warp civilizations to mega empires like the iconians.

    What conditions are to be met with each type of alliance or relationship.
    What conditions decides if the race will grow, or not.


    These are all difficult questions, all of which will likely require a complex system (like diplomacy, and so forth).

    I am looking at a way for foundry to tie it all together, Or some modification to it, but i am still uncertain as of yet..
  • ceekayzeroceekayzero Member Posts: 411 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    uhmari wrote: »
    Doff mission are a nice concept, but they are to long, and ... well yawn to be of any major part of the game, It needs some upgrades. We should have reports back to read with audio, to make it interesting. Audio dev work is costly, and timely, so its very hard to do this.

    [Snip]

    Now, Comes the hard part.

    in essence we are trying to make a new "federation" or "klingon empire".

    The race itself, its back story, and even things like the races body templates, ships, and planets/solar systems can be done through Foundry. This is now a problem, an upgrade to foundry can resolve this.


    The question is, How do allow these races to grow from single planet pre-warp civilizations to mega empires like the iconians.

    What conditions are to be met with each type of alliance or relationship.
    What conditions decides if the race will grow, or not.


    These are all difficult questions, all of which will likely require a complex system (like diplomacy, and so forth).

    I am looking at a way for foundry to tie it all together, Or some modification to it, but i am still uncertain as of yet..

    I disagree on the DOFF mission concept. DOFFing is one of the best parts of the game right now. I would like to see more DOFF missions with a story background to go into the exploration aspects of the game, or to fill out the storyline a bit. I think this is especially true for fleet holdings - instead of sending doffs to the base to be compacted into glue; we should be able to send them out on doff "construction missions" to get SB XP or something. We captain a starship, they do the gruntwork.

    Now for your other point: It's an interesting storyline idea, Uhmari. Thing is, I think your storyline idea is more-or-less the entire Romulan Republic storyline! You have a fledgling Republic that the Federation and Klingons are fighting for influence over.

    But this is where stuff like Diplomacy, DOFFing, Reputation, and other non-combat mechanics can come into play - where you have to run doff missions to build up New Romulus, etc. and gain influence. Alternatively, you could use DOFF missions or these non-combat mechanics to sabotage the other side's progress.

    This could go hand-in-hand with cap-and-hold PvP, in my opinion.
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    uhmari wrote: »
    Now, Comes the hard part.

    in essence we are trying to make a new "federation" or "klingon empire".

    The race itself, its back story, and even things like the races body templates, ships, and planets/solar systems can be done through Foundry. This is now a problem, an upgrade to foundry can resolve this.


    The question is, How do allow these races to grow from single planet pre-warp civilizations to mega empires like the iconians.

    What conditions are to be met with each type of alliance or relationship.
    What conditions decides if the race will grow, or not.


    These are all difficult questions, all of which will likely require a complex system (like diplomacy, and so forth).

    I am looking at a way for foundry to tie it all together, Or some modification to it, but i am still uncertain as of yet..

    Well, I agree... going from what we have to a fully-functioning exploration system is the hard part.

    I have to say that I don't favor a "programmed" or "random" evolution of new worlds and new cultures. While there could be some random elements, we are basically talking about something that needs to follow a plan. That plan will be a lot better if it feels more like a story than an "if...then" script.

    I think the Foundry could eventually be the right tool to do the job, if it can be extended for the purpose. Authors need the ability to purposefully tie their mission arcs together somehow and to add elements that make it feel more like exploration and less like point and click.

    One thing that would be required is giving Authors the ability to set prerequisites to run a mission arc, like, played Story A before being able to start Story B. That way the story of that planet can be told in a more linear fashion.

    In fact, it would be great if the system could prompt you to play Story B after you got done with Story A. The only thing I don't like about that is the necessity to have Story B planned before completing the work on Story A. But if they implement the ability to subscribe or follow particular Authors, that problem could be easily solved.

    Another thing that would help would be the ability to set some kind of persistent variables in one arc that can then trigger events or dialog in the next. Thus being able to create the illusion that something you did had an effect in the future.

    Combining the two would be amazing: Consider playing Story A in such a way that you could run either Story B or Story C next, but not both? If you wanted to know what Story C was like, you could always repeat Story A and make different choices.

    The backend systems that accomplish things can be as complex as the Devs (and Authors) want to make them. But from a player standpoint, the less they have to fiddle with things and the more they can just dive in and do, the better.


    EDIT: And of course, now, I am way off the subject matter for this particular forum. So I won't develop that thought any further. Back to Fleet Holdings...
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    In fact, it would be great if the system could prompt you to play Story B after you got done with Story A. The only thing I don't like about that is the necessity to have Story B planned before completing the work on Story A. But if they implement the ability to subscribe or follow particular Authors, that problem could be easily solved.

    This is actually a simple task.

    You insert a choice to them, Their choice has a result. that Result is diplomatic.
    If you give then an environment, They will tailor their race to adapt to that,
    especially if you make it so that those choices have a major impact on their
    survival rate.

    for example,


    You have encountered another species, Emperor, What shall we do?

    1. Declare war! Death to those scally wags!
    2. Purpose a trade treaty
    3. Send a friendly greeting (Some random, automated message like "Life long and prosper!".

    These choices can impact them on a massive scale.

    So the objective, is basically three things

    1. Diplomacy
    2. Growth and decline rates
    3. System of expansion (conquest, colonization)

    If we create these systems, we would of liked forged enough room for empires to spawm.

    Take eve for example, it has empty space (which we will have with the space expansion). It has a diplomacy system, and a system to build outposts (star-bases); lastly it has a system for defense and expansion.

    from these things they devs really never have to look at messing with it, the players
    decide the rest. so in theory, all we have to do, is something similar
    The only thing I don't like about that is the necessity to have Story B planned before completing the work on Story A. But if they implement the ability to subscribe or follow particular Authors, that problem could be easily solved.


    There is an easy mechanic to address this.

    Add a place to tell the map to look for option 2, 3 or 4. If its blank, then it displays a message <we have no assignments for you now, come back later>.
    Combining the two would be amazing: Consider playing Story A in such a way that you could run either Story B or Story C next, but not both? If you wanted to know what Story C was like, you could always repeat Story A and make different choices.

    Right, known as "phasing" its when you are in a different story line then others and those the environment around you is different then what, say your fleet buddy would see.


    We can do this we create a template for players, say a chain of 20 quests, 8 (of each side) of which are side (yes or no) Quests, and then the 2 (start and finish)
    http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/18/05/75/56/box10.jpg

    Like this (link) but maybe more complex.

    then all the player has to do is go in and create the different quests for the two story lines, lets say the good version, or evil version of the race?

    hope you get the point, al you have to do is just make it so they fill in blanks, and problem is solved!
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Now for your other point: It's an interesting storyline idea, Uhmari. Thing is, I think your storyline idea is more-or-less the entire Romulan Republic storyline! You have a fledgling Republic that the Federation and Klingons are fighting for influence over.


    Exactly, And all you have to do in foundry, is make a similar chain for your race.
  • uhmariuhmari Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I think i have solved the problem of expansion, Thriving, and decline of a race.


    Create a mark/reward system for the owner of the race. Make the expansion of the races
    like a game of risk (very strategic).

    you go with the original idea of expanding the universe by X amount of sectors with x amount of solar systems (in this case, lets say 10 sectors, 25 systems each, total of 250 systems).

    Lets say, that 5 of those 25 systems are spawn locations.


    As a new race, you obviously will want to grow your race, so you will need to colonize.
    What we will do is set up a chain about the race, designed by its creator.

    This chain will give the player a choice of career with the race, Pve or PvP.

    After the chain of training, and explanation of the career objectives, the player will continue on to
    do X amount of things for the race.


    Life as a pvp/pve player in relation to the new race.


    So each position (pve and pvp) will have objectives. PvP will be focused on military capture, and expansion
    of the race. they will also patrol and defend that races space. (note, this will pin fleets to alliances with a race, and will cause them to fight against players with pvp flags enabled; these flags will be required to do pvp quests, which are like kill other enemies in your space, etc)

    PvE'ers will get other missions like Colonization, and diplomacy.

    Each of the two casts will be controlled by the races leader.
    he will get a special map Ui/hud that will allow him to click on systems in the sector map
    and select options like "colonize, conquer X system".

    this creates a quest for the player (pve or pvp depending on the quest) to do.

    Once this task is completed by the pvp'er/pve'er the race expands, and gains control of another system (through conquest or colonization) and because of this the racial leader gains a special upgrade mark, that he can use to


    - Buy a trade station (they are like complexes on asteroids, etc
    - Upgrade his empires level (unlocks more options for special features like ship parts etc; It also extends his races influence range) (influence range is a n aura that is around the races space, thta expands out, this aura is required to touch a neutral system (uncolonized) or hostile system (colonized) to conquer or colonize it, Or even to form alliances.
    - Special marks are used to create and forge alliances.


    so in essence the player is interacting with the race, like picard did, helping them etc, to expand solving problems etc.

    now we can increase complexity of this by adding a mechanic that each time a quest happends, an exp bar for that race, vs the faction happens. If faction one does quests, it gives exp, if the klingons do it, it takes exp from the other side, and adds it to theirs (a sort of tug-o-war diplomacy).

    This reputation can have special benefits also.
Sign In or Register to comment.