test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Odyssey and Galaxy upgrades?

admiralbrenanadmiralbrenan Member Posts: 84 Arc User
edited June 2013 in Federation Discussion
So in a recent interview, i believe it was Al who said that they might be going back and looking at ways to buff the Galaxy Retrofit. One idea he proposed would be to make it a flight deck cruiser. I squeed when i heard this cause the feds don't have a flight deck cruiser (i said cruiser not escort/science so no vesta or akira in this conversation) and the Galaxy is the perfect candidate for this upgrade. Yesterday i hopped back into my base Odyssey (cause i don't have the shiny ones) and was thinking if the Galaxy might be getting this treatment, could the biggest ship in the fleet also get this overhaul. The stipulation to this would be that the adding of a hanger bay would only apply to the base version, not the c-store versions. The reason is because the rear module is replaced by the Aquarius on the +1 versions instead of a massive hanger bay which the base version has. Anyways this is just a thought and thought i would post it on the forums.
Please no trolling/rude remarks, it upsets the eppohs on my ship lol :)
Post edited by admiralbrenan on

Comments

  • red01999red01999 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    A flight deck Galaxy would be perfect. I honestly think that you could probably just swap the saucer section for a flight deck saucer and it could have all of the carrier facilities right there ready and waiting on top of an existing stardrive section. It would be an easy upgrade, easily reversed, and all sorts of good. I'd probably get one.

    The Odyssey on the other hand, I am somewhat reluctant to "recommend" for this. I'd like to see both the base AND the c-store version get this buff. This is not just because I bought the c-store version, there are other reasons - not the least of which that I'm very certain that a flight deck would be far better than the Aquarius. That said, balance is an issue with the Odyssey, so I dunno about that one.
  • starblade7starblade7 Member Posts: 169 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    The issue with adding Hangar Bays to Federation Cruisers is that, in terms of lore, every Federation Cruiser has at the very least a good complement of shuttles. However, for the ships in STO which have actual Hangar Bays, it's not simply because the ship has hangars, but because it's a balance choice too.

    That said, giving the Galaxy Retrofit (and its Fleet counterpart) a Hangar Bay would be a nice touch. However, given the many threads on the subject of rebalancing the Gal-X and Gal-R, and the fact that there have been no obvious changes to those ships, I wouldn't set my hopes too high. What gets discussed in an interview is not exactly a binding contract, so it may take a while for any changes to get rolled out.
    Forget the possibility of PvP, for so much has become pay-to-win, never to be balanced. Forget the promise of exploration and research, for in the grim dark future of Star Trek Online there is only war. There is no peace amongst the stars, only an eternity of carnage and slaughter, and the laughter of thirsting publishers.
  • red01999red01999 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    One thing to keep in mind is that making the Galaxy a carrier is a nice side-stepping of the issue. People want the Gal to be stronger. The devs want it an uber tank. This allows it to gain more options (including offensive) without compromising the basic design. This seems like the most likely option, really, in terms of adding stuff for the ship.

    Also I would argue that the shuttle bays for a lot of Federation cruisers aren't really suited to large-scale combat flight operations. Look at the hangars on the Atrox - those things are HUGE, and while I haven't seen a Klingon carrier to compare it to (or, for that matter, a Vesta or HEC) THAT closely, they seem to be pretty fundamentally different than the shuttle bays. An upgrade such as this for the Galaxy class would, I imagine, involve hollowing a LOT of the saucer out, and possibly putting new entrances on it (e.g. top and bottom of the forward saucer section).
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    imo, i don't think we need a carrier version of the Odyssey as it is already over and done with (3-pack attack, 2nd year anniversery gift, and tier 5 fleet shipyard unlock). Quite frankly, you'll be better off asking the desert for water than getting the Odyssey turned into a carrier.

    That said, the Galaxy carrier idea, while not bad per say, isn't exactly the brightest idea either. You're talking about taking a 40-50 year old spaceframe, gutting it, overhauling it, and giving it carrier capabilities. Coupled with saucer separation, it's starting to sound a bit OP'd isn't it?
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • emacsheadroomemacsheadroom Member Posts: 994 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    a3001 wrote: »
    Coupled with saucer separation, it's starting to sound a bit OP'd isn't it?

    Not really. It will still have terrible boff and console slots. A single fighter wing would actually make it almost as good as other endgame Fed cruisers. But compare it to the Armitage and your nonsense statement above sounds as stupid as it really is.
  • emacsheadroomemacsheadroom Member Posts: 994 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    If they really wanted to "fix" the Galaxy, they could give the Fleet version the same boff layout as the Fleet D'deridex and everyone would be satisfied. Overpowered? Nope. The Fleet Sovereign and Excelsior would still beat it by a mile.
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    As much as I would love to see the upgrades/revamp of the Galaxy, I won't get my hopes up, since in the end, it will probably still be... underwhelming.

    As for upgrades to the Odyssey? It's already the most versatile cruiser in the whole game. There is no other ship that can beat it when it comes to pure flexibility. It can go from damage dealer to healer to tank specialization literally with one BOff change, which you can do as soon as red alert drops.

    As much as I would love to see upgrades to that ship, there isn't really much you can do without making her too powerful.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • row124row124 Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    What the galaxy class needs is a two set bonus. I've been suggesting this idea but the sto community is slow on accepting it.

    Antimatter spread + saucer separation = bonus ability or passive ability

    Both of these consoles are on galaxy class starships

    They already have the odyssey bonuses why not a galaxy one?

    Yes some have mentioned that the lock box will give KDF and Roms antimatter spread.

    But the devs can change the galaxy antimatter spread console while maintaining the original lock box ones. They can figure out the details.

    But the idea of a 2 piece console bonus is what is really needed and called for.
  • knockyknocky Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    It would be nice if that God awful Oddy pack I bought got some sort of buff.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kintishokintisho Member Posts: 1,040 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    ummm. FEDs have the vesta.. its a flight deck cruiser sci ship.. rather than add carrier to cruiser, lets make cruiser the main bad assery.. NO defiant COULD EVER destroy a galaxy class 1 on 1 PERIOD a 50 man crew + cash = own a 1000 man crew or 2500 man crew (Oddy) thak you PWE for paying so much (NONE AT ALL) attention to Cannon and mass over power ratios.. oh wait that may imply common sense as a variable.... One could only hope.. RE-Balance this DPS centric mess to at least make some sort of sense somewhat or give me back my $50 I paid for a Massive ship that gets owned by a tiny escort...
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    knocky wrote: »
    It would be nice if that God awful Oddy pack I bought got some sort of buff.
    kintisho wrote: »
    ummm. FEDs have the vesta.. its a flight deck cruiser sci ship.. rather than add carrier to cruiser, lets make cruiser the main bad assery.. NO defiant COULD EVER destroy a galaxy class 1 on 1 PERIOD a 50 man crew + cash = own a 1000 man crew or 2500 man crew (Oddy) thak you PWE for paying so much (NONE AT ALL) attention to Cannon and mass over power ratios.. oh wait that may imply common sense as a variable.... One could only hope.. RE-Balance this DPS centric mess to at least make some sort of sense somewhat or give me back my $50 I paid for a Massive ship that gets owned by a tiny escort...

    Ooook. So if you think the Odyssey is bad, you're building it wrong. Or playing it wrong. Or don't know how to use an Odyssey. And if you're getting killed by an escort 1v1 in your Odyssey, you REALLY should reconsider your build/playstyle.

    The Odyssey is NOT terrible. It's one of the most versatile ships in the game. With ONE BOff change, you can go from tank mode to damage mode to heal mode. You also get a ship that has incredibly high hull, lots of damage soak, and decent damage output. Not a garbage ship at all. Not the best ship at anything, but far from TRIBBLE.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • admiralbrenanadmiralbrenan Member Posts: 84 Arc User
    edited June 2013
    Hum i think i remember saying something about no hateful comments :) Now remember people I am talking about the STANDARD odyssey not the C-store versions (please move that discussion to another thread) I will agree balance is becoming an issue between escorts and cruisers, i am also not saying that i want the odyssey to become a full blown carrier just 1 hanger bay that's all. also take into consideration that the klingons have multiple flight deck cruiser with ships half the size of the ody :) (if you think the bortas will deserve something make another thread please:) ) as for the base ody over the c-store ody, the +1 is a massive improvement over the base. Now back to the point I said only the standard odyssey for the reason that the +1 odys give up the very large rear bay. if you look at the rear bay it is clearly large enough to house a large squadron of say shuttles or fighters even a few danubes :) I would just like to see the base ody to be brought up to help alleviate some of the problems it has. just one simple hanger bay thats all
Sign In or Register to comment.