test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Make Klingon Escorts equal to Fed Escorts

benovidebenovide Member Posts: 397
Blah

Consoles
BOff slots
Hull Points
Even Weapon slots.

Level to level, KDF Escorts are inferior to Fed Escorts. All the way up to level 50, the only Escort KDF gets that's decent without being a Zen ship, is the Fleet Qin Raptor, and even then, it's STILL inferior to the Fleet Patrol. Compared to Mirror Versions of the Fed Escorts, they are still superior.

Not equal.

Then when you go to level 50, and get Fleet Escorts, Feds only have 1 fleet Escort Retro that's worse/equal to the Fleet Qin Heavy Raptor. Samrow is even worse.

We get BoPs which are even bigger glass cannons than the escorts, making them less able to tank it out like Fed Escorts can. Then when you go to Klink Escorts such as the Raptors, even in the manner they handle, Fed Escorts are still superior.

It makes it pointless for KDF Raptors to even exist in this game.

Glass Cannon BoP (I love my BoP don't get me wrong) that needs another to fly with it (or that Fed Fleet Retro is going to slaughter it) or Cruiser.

VQ is decent, but over time it gets old, and pretty fast.

Essentially the only viable Escort Ship for the KDF without being a Zen ship, is the JHHEC, or the Temporal Destroyer. Qin Raptor is decent, but compared to even the crappiest fleet retro, fleet qin is barely able to even be remotely called an equal. It's irritating.
Post edited by benovide on
«1

Comments

  • twamtwam Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    To be honest, what I miss most is a KDF tactical ship with 5 tac consoles.

    That's the one thing that's actually, truly missing.

    BoP's are not escorts, but they can be a very good match in a fight - they're just different, but very effective in their own right. Even individually.

    Raptors vs escorts, yeah. There's a lack of choice on the KDF side of things, but I'd be perfectly happy if that were filled by some different types of Raptors. I love my Mirror Qin, for one.

    However, there is the Garumba and the fleet Scourge, which effectively are escort-type ships. Very viable ones, at that.

    I just wish the 3 different 5-tac console ships the Feds got would have one or two competitors on the KDF side of things.
  • seekerkorhilseekerkorhil Member Posts: 472
    edited April 2013
    twam wrote: »

    I just wish the 3 different 5-tac console ships the Feds got would have one or two competitors on the KDF side of things.

    Lets look at those 3 shall we:

    Fleet Defiant. 3 ensign tac slots is horrible if you want to run a full cannon build like most. Not enough tanking slots for 2x epts, A2sif, TSS and HE. If you want to cloak its a 9 console ship. KDF still get their cloaks for free.

    Fleet Advanced Escort. Only 1 lt. commander tac slot AND 3 ensign tac slots. Lt Com is the best slot for tactical powers so that is a major loss. See above regarding the 3rd ensign tac slot. Also if you want the MVAM console its effectively a 9 console ship.

    Tactical Andorian Ship. Truely a glass cannon. Nearly no survivability from BO powers meaning a Tac captain in one of these spends more time dead than alive. If you want to use any of its special console you HAVE to use phasers and you are flying a 9/8/7 console ship. Also, due to increased power drain, a 5th front weapon is nowhere near as big a deal as people think.


    Ok so sure the KDF should get a 5 tac console ship, but only if it cant cloak and gets no more than a single lt engineering Boff slot.
  • benovidebenovide Member Posts: 397
    edited April 2013
    twam wrote: »
    To be honest, what I miss most is a KDF tactical ship with 5 tac consoles.

    That's the one thing that's actually, truly missing.

    BoP's are not escorts, but they can be a very good match in a fight - they're just different, but very effective in their own right. Even individually.

    Raptors vs escorts, yeah. There's a lack of choice on the KDF side of things, but I'd be perfectly happy if that were filled by some different types of Raptors. I love my Mirror Qin, for one.

    However, there is the Garumba and the fleet Scourge, which effectively are escort-type ships. Very viable ones, at that.

    I just wish the 3 different 5-tac console ships the Feds got would have one or two competitors on the KDF side of things.

    fleet scourge isn't too bad, I love my Guramba, but they aren't Klingon vessels in a sense. And you have to pay money for them.
  • benovidebenovide Member Posts: 397
    edited April 2013
    Lets look at those 3 shall we:

    Fleet Defiant. 3 ensign tac slots is horrible if you want to run a full cannon build like most. Not enough tanking slots for 2x epts, A2sif, TSS and HE. If you want to cloak its a 9 console ship. KDF still get their cloaks for free.

    Fleet Advanced Escort. Only 1 lt. commander tac slot AND 3 ensign tac slots. Lt Com is the best slot for tactical powers so that is a major loss. See above regarding the 3rd ensign tac slot. Also if you want the MVAM console its effectively a 9 console ship.

    Tactical Andorian Ship. Truely a glass cannon. Nearly no survivability from BO powers meaning a Tac captain in one of these spends more time dead than alive. If you want to use any of its special console you HAVE to use phasers and you are flying a 9/8/7 console ship. Also, due to increased power drain, a 5th front weapon is nowhere near as big a deal as people think.


    Ok so sure the KDF should get a 5 tac console ship, but only if it cant cloak and gets no more than a single lt engineering Boff slot.

    Do you play KDF at all?
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I would think the Klingon escorts would be a little more aggressive. :)
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • admgreeradmgreer Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    So if you want them equal then Feds get Battle cloaks and Aceton assemilators and leech as well right?
  • seekerkorhilseekerkorhil Member Posts: 472
    edited April 2013
    benovide wrote: »
    Do you play KDF at all?

    Yes I use the Garumba. Its special ability makes it a 10 console ship, its got the same layout as the best fed escort, all its missing is the 10% hull and shields you get for being a fleet ship.

    But by all means, give it a 5th tac console. Then it will be the best escort in game. 5 Tac consoles and the best BO layout. Insane. :eek:
  • twamtwam Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    @benovide: Sure, but fleet ships arguably cost money too. The 4 ship modules cost 2k zen or, at current rates, 1,5k zen's worth of EC's, when calculating through contraband. Both ways go some way to a 2,5k zen ship, especially as the Garumba is account wide.

    @seekerkorhil: Oh, I'm aware of the trade-offs these ships make, definitely. I'd just really like to have the option, and would expect a KDF-variant to have its downsides too. Maybe a new Nausicaan crossover between a Raptor and their own shipyard - offensive, no cloak, Raptor-style layout, decent handling?

    Also, while I see the weak points on the FAE, it does potentially have the single highest turn rate of any ship, with the MVAM module, if I'm not mistaken. I don't own it, but beta vector on the FAE must make it move like an ADHD squirrel on PCP. I'd still like to try that thing, if I get a chance/some leftover funds :P
  • travelingmastertravelingmaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Ostensibly, the reason the KDF escorts aren't quite a match against Federation escorts is because of the in-built cloaking device. I can accept that somewhat, as the cloak IS an edge. . .though not as big of an edge as certain Feddies like to claim.

    My biggest issue with the Raptors is the turnrate. Really. It's 1-2 turnrate below the average Federation escorts. That alone makes it difficult to dogfight with a Federation escort. The only other issues are the 5 tac console options and the lack of overall choice. Having 2-3 raptors/destroyers to pick from would be great. If Cryptic wants to make money off of KDF ships, the best ships to release right now would be raptors/destroyers, instead of battlecruisers.

    If I had my way, raptors wouldn't exist at all. We'd have BoPs with raptor hull and shield stats, battlecloak, and universal boffslots. That would actually compensate us for not having a ******n science ship line. We'd have a ship that could REASONABLY pull off both the DPS role and the Sci Boat role, and the KDF not having a dedicated science ship line wouldn't be so annoying.
    My PvP toon is Krov, of The House of Snoo. Beware of my Hegh'ta of doom.
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Feds have better
    Escorts
    Science Ships
    Fleet Ship Discounts
    Cosmetic Variety

    KDF has better
    Cruisers
    Raiders
    Carriers & Pets
    Consoles

    Each side has strengths and weaknesses. Isn't that where all the 'uniqueness' arguments come from?
  • dma1986dma1986 Member Posts: 541 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Feds have better
    Escorts
    Science Ships
    Fleet Ship Discounts
    Cosmetic Variety
    Dev support

    KDF has better
    Cruisers
    Raiders
    Carriers & Pets
    Consoles
    Players

    Each side has strengths and weaknesses. Isn't that where all the 'uniqueness' arguments come from?
    Fixed that for you.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The KDF doesn't have escorts.
    Not a one!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    What about make Fed cruisers equal to KDF battlecruisers ?
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Fleet Somraw's hull and shields were fixed a few patches ago, its a pretty good escort. Almost like a Fleet Patrol escort, it gets 1 less eng console, 1 more sci, slightly less shields, slightly more hull, and cloak. It has the same base turn as the fleet patrol, and being smaller then the Qin it doesn't suffer pivot point issues either. It is a little better then the fleet patrol due to the cloak and having 3 sci consoles I think.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • travelingmastertravelingmaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    dalnar83 wrote: »
    What about make Fed cruisers equal to KDF battlecruisers ?

    You have a point here. As reginamala indicated above, each faction has its strengths and weaknesses. Though in the case of the KDF, having weaker attack ships doesn't jive with the mentality. The Federation strengths should be in versatile science ships (which they have) and durable/sustained DPS cruisers (which they have). They should have the edge with science and engineering versatility in general. Them having the edge in escorts ultimately doesn't make sense from the Federation point of view.
    My PvP toon is Krov, of The House of Snoo. Beware of my Hegh'ta of doom.
  • melisande77melisande77 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    You have a point here. As reginamala indicated above, each faction has its strengths and weaknesses. Though in the case of the KDF, having weaker attack ships doesn't jive with the mentality. The Federation strengths should be in versatile science ships (which they have) and durable/sustained DPS cruisers (which they have). They should have the edge with science and engineering versatility in general. Them having the edge in escorts ultimately doesn't make sense from the Federation point of view.

    I think that is a bit unrealistic. The only really good sustained damage cruisers we have are the Excellsior and the Regent. KDF cruisers have a very large edge in their boff layouts as well as how the ships actually fly. I think every Fed cruiser captain would kill to get something as simple as +1-2 turn rate buff.
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    You have a point here. As reginamala indicated above, each faction has its strengths and weaknesses. Though in the case of the KDF, having weaker attack ships doesn't jive with the mentality. The Federation strengths should be in versatile science ships (which they have) and durable/sustained DPS cruisers (which they have). They should have the edge with science and engineering versatility in general. Them having the edge in escorts ultimately doesn't make sense from the Federation point of view.

    The gap between top escorts and top raptors is not that great that the gap between cruisers and battle cruisers.

    Galaxy-X is prime Fed battlecruiser...and we both how it compares to KDF.
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • srspellssrspells Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Guys lets be totally honest the better ships are lockbox ships and they can be used on both sides, so tbh thier is equal footing, and you guys still have plasmonic leech, when that goes and battle cloak I will accept you complaining.)


    bug, recluse and timeship user,
    -Spells
    || Open Door Policy ||
    | Dues Ex Mechina |
    Fleet Leader
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    As far as cruisers go the Fleet Torhakt is better then both lockbox cruisers, the D'kora and Galor. Fed side the Fleet Regent and Fleet Excelsior are just as good, I like them better then the lockbox cruisers too due to the extra tac console.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    marc8219 wrote: »
    As far as cruisers go the Fleet Torhakt is better then both lockbox cruisers, the D'kora and Galor. Fed side the Fleet Regent and Fleet Excelsior are just as good, I like them better then the lockbox cruisers too due to the extra tac console.

    No the torkhat isn't a cruiser it's a selfish battlecruiser unable to heal anyone. I hate this kind of ship, designed for solo gameplay. I have one but barely play it. We have enough battlecruisers.


    And yes, the KDF deserves some more raptor options. The fleet scourge doesn't look bad stats-wise but it's not a raptor and i want my kdf to fly a kdf ship. I like the krenn destroyer, it's a nice ship, but it's not aggressive enough to my taste. A 5 tac console raptor with 17-18 turnrate is what the faction needs (= many players want here).

    Even if i'd love a new design with a special console (or even a raptor pack), here are two possible fleet ships :

    http://www.stowiki.org/Qorgh_Raptor
    http://www.stowiki.org/Pach_Raptor
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • edited April 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    dalnar83 wrote: »
    Galaxy-X is prime Fed battlecruiser...and we both how it compares to KDF.
    Gal-X turns faster than its KDF equivalent...the Bortasqu.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Gal-X turns faster than its KDF equivalent...the Bortasqu.

    Oh yeah, that extra 0,5 turn rate, 2 tac console less, lance that always miss and lt.tac station max and extra cloak console instead free cloak :o Oh yeh. I'm pretty sure we all Galaxy-X owners are proud that our ship is better than Bortasque...not.. :rolleyes:
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    diogene0 wrote: »
    No the torkhat isn't a cruiser it's a selfish battlecruiser unable to heal anyone. I hate this kind of ship, designed for solo gameplay. I have one but barely play it. We have enough battlecruisers.


    And yes, the KDF deserves some more raptor options. The fleet scourge doesn't look bad stats-wise but it's not a raptor and i want my kdf to fly a kdf ship. I like the krenn destroyer, it's a nice ship, but it's not aggressive enough to my taste. A 5 tac console raptor with 17-18 turnrate is what the faction needs (= many players want here).

    Even if i'd love a new design with a special console (or even a raptor pack), here are two possible fleet ships :

    http://www.stowiki.org/Qorgh_Raptor
    http://www.stowiki.org/Pach_Raptor

    Yeah the Torhkat isn't the best cruiser for a team healer, but is the best one in an STF or when pugging, kerrat, or cap and hold. THe D'kora and Galor might be better healers, but they aren't ideal healers either for premade teams they usually use Recluse, Oddy or other cruisers that can run tss3 if they don't have a Recluse.


    I didnt say they don't need raptor options, just was pointing out the somraw is good when earlier people were saying all the KDF raptors were junk. So we do have one that is like a Fleet patrol escort, we also need one that is more tac heavy with 5 tac consoles, and also one that has a Lt Cmdr sci like the Fleet advanced escort.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I'd only accept Klingon escorts being equal when Fed cruisers are equal.

    Otherwise, accept that some KDF whiners' stupid arguments about faction uniqueness actually cuts both ways.

    This faction uniqueness schtick is bulldung, this entire Klingon-Federation War is an Undine ruse, so why they hell are we still segregated?


    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • dova25dova25 Member Posts: 475
    edited April 2013
    marc8219 wrote: »
    I didnt say they don't need raptor options, just was pointing out the somraw is good when earlier people were saying all the KDF raptors were junk. So we do have one that is like a Fleet patrol escort, we also need one that is more tac heavy with 5 tac consoles, and also one that has a Lt Cmdr sci like the Fleet advanced escort.

    Yes fleet somraw is a good raptor but it is under kumari pack (95k hit console , 5 fore & 5tac) or MVAE (with latest patch has a 31 turn rate ?! in beta mode and 5 tac consoles) .

    I would love a kdf escort with a bigger bop skin with 5 tac consoles or 5 fore weapon slots and at least 20 turn rate .
    "There already is a Borg faction, its called the Federation. They assimilate everyone else's technology and remove any biological or technical distinctiveness and add it to their own."
    I refuse to be content https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwI0u9L4R8U
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    dova25 wrote: »
    I would love a kdf escort with a bigger bop skin with 5 tac consoles or 5 fore weapon slots and at least 20 turn rate .

    It's not perfect until you want battlecloak for it as well... :rolleyes:
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Feds have better
    Escorts
    Science Ships
    Fleet Ship Discounts
    Cosmetic Variety

    KDF has better
    Cruisers
    Raiders
    Carriers & Pets
    Consoles

    Each side has strengths and weaknesses. Isn't that where all the 'uniqueness' arguments come from?

    It differences that I enjoy. Let thefeds have the better escorts. I enjoy the KDF having the better cruisers suited for combat.
    I dont expect some feds to stop the "unfair" cry for all things better than any other faction though. Regardless of how good they may have it, some always want more more to attempt to overcome percieved short commings.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • this1isavailablethis1isavailable Member Posts: 228 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The fleet somraw is top tier (JHAS being god tier) but it has very poor customisation (only an unified paint job) and devs overlooked it as hell :

    -The patch announcing a buff to its shield mod was a lie. The real value went down by a small margin.
    -Like the norgh it has no windows thanks to a bug that will never be corrected because it is a KDF ship :mad:
    -Its hull indicator shows a b'rel.

    So yeha there are other much better raptor models with no fleet version available :
    -SuQob (Qorgh refit) with only one bug (warp speed trail).
    -Puyjaq (Pach refit), a very nice model with big cannons.
  • dova25dova25 Member Posts: 475
    edited April 2013
    dalnar83 wrote: »
    It's not perfect until you want battlecloak for it as well... :rolleyes:

    Don't worry :) I am afraid that will be the new romulan escort and everybody will be in a hurry to buy it no matter what faction plays now .
    "There already is a Borg faction, its called the Federation. They assimilate everyone else's technology and remove any biological or technical distinctiveness and add it to their own."
    I refuse to be content https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwI0u9L4R8U
Sign In or Register to comment.