test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New Incoming ships

general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
Okay So I for one am excited for the New Star trek Online Expansion it opens up many possibilities. I For One think with the Romulan Faction we have a chance to add some wicked new ships, such as the Narada, Jellyfish and Possibly the New Constitution class, while I think it would be more likely to get the Narada and Jellyfish as they are from this time. I also think with the somewhat recent release of the Andorian Escort we could get a better NX bundle with interior, weapons, shuttles, ect. A Mirror NX as well as a NX refit. to me it seems like a good time to give the ENT era some love, if not before the Expansion, maybe shortly after. Try to keep the JJ and ENT flames to a minimum, I simply want to know if you want to see the same things in-game i do and if not what would you like to see?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Post edited by general1devon on
«1

Comments

  • catoblepasbetacatoblepasbeta Member Posts: 1,532 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Okay So I for one am excited for the New Star trek Online Expansion it opens up many possibilities. I For One think with the Romulan Faction we have a chance to add some wicked new ships, such as the Narada, Jellyfish and Possibly the New Constitution class, while I think it would be more likely to get the Narada and Jellyfish as they are from this time. I also think with the somewhat recent release of the Andorian Escort we could get a better NX bundle with interior, weapons, shuttles, ect. A Mirror NX as well as a NX refit. to me it seems like a good time to give the ENT era some love, if not before the Expansion, maybe shortly after. Try to keep the JJ and ENT flames to a minimum, I simply want to know if you want to see the same things in-game i do and if not what would you lie to see?
    The only things you mention that I would be in favor of would be the Enterprise bundle getting some new stuff. Even then, I am not exactly an Enterprise fan, I jsut think it's only fair to folks who are. The rest of that stuff quite frankly repulses me.

    Can't the Narada be simulated by taking a Tufi Freighter and sticking the borg set on it?
  • abaddon653abaddon653 Member Posts: 1,144 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Sorry I hate to tell you this but the Narada and the Jellyfish, anything JJ Trek is licensed to Paramount not CBS and so will never be included in the game.
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Narada and Jellyfish definitely arn't happening due to licensing issues with Paramount. Plus the Narada is too freaking big.

    Working on anything for the NX wouldn't be profitable. And there's no way we're ever getting an NX refit either.
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Narada? Jellyfish? JJ's Enterprise? lol, you are VERY late to the party my friend. As for the NX refit; although I personally would like to see it in game, Star Trek: Legacy and Ultimate Universe 2.0 fills that niche and satisfies that itch very nicely since the Atlantis build isn't exactly soft nor hard canon.
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I would love a enterprise bundle
    JtaDmwW.png
  • general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    abaddon653 wrote: »
    Sorry I hate to tell you this but the Narada and the Jellyfish, anything JJ Trek is licensed to Paramount not CBS and so will never be included in the game.
    Never Say never,
    hypl wrote: »
    Narada and Jellyfish definitely arn't happening due to licensing issues with Paramount. Plus the Narada is too freaking big.

    Working on anything for the NX wouldn't be profitable. And there's no way we're ever getting an NX refit either.
    I wouldn't say unprofitable, there are plenty of Enterprise Fans out there
    a3001 wrote: »
    Narada? Jellyfish? JJ's Enterprise? lol, you are VERY late to the party my friend. As for the NX refit; although I personally would like to see it in game, Star Trek: Legacy and Ultimate Universe 2.0 fills that niche and satisfies that itch very nicely since the Atlantis build isn't exactly soft nor hard canon.

    And How Exactly am I late to the party when I've Seen all the shows and movies, and been playing STO since launch. Kittens are funny but your not, your argument is invalid, but I cant be too mad at anyone who supports the NX refit
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Never Say never,

    Sorry, but even the Cryptic Devs have said this many times over the years. STO is the Original Prime Universe that Gene Roddenberry created, not the new alternate timeline.

    The only thing we might see from the new Star Trek is the Kelvin, since that technically a modified Saladin / Hermes and existed at the time the timelines diverged. But that is a massive long-shot.
    hypl wrote: »
    Working on anything for the NX wouldn't be profitable. And there's no way we're ever getting an NX refit either.

    You realize Braga is working actively to make Season 5 of Enterprise on Netflix. Which was the planned debut of the NX-Refit. And if that happens, then it makes it fair game for Cryptic to add to STO.
  • kharonsoremankharonsoreman Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    a3001 wrote: »
    Narada? Jellyfish? JJ's Enterprise? lol, you are VERY late to the party my friend. As for the NX refit; although I personally would like to see it in game, Star Trek: Legacy and Ultimate Universe 2.0 fills that niche and satisfies that itch very nicely since the Atlantis build isn't exactly soft nor hard canon.

    We have the NX offspring anyway, its called the Akira :lol
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    A wolf remains a wolf, even if it has not eaten your sheep.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    We have the NX offspring anyway, its called the Akira :lol

    Ahem

    Just interesting a ship named Enterprise that looks like the NX was concieved long before the Akira. And in a plot thats awfully similar to the 2009 movie. :rolleyes:
  • kharonsoremankharonsoreman Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Ahem

    Just interesting a ship named Enterprise that looks like the NX was concieved long before the Akira. And in a plot thats awfully similar to the 2009 movie. :rolleyes:

    Sarcasm.. It was a joke..

    but anyway.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    A wolf remains a wolf, even if it has not eaten your sheep.
  • radaikofromulusradaikofromulus Member Posts: 164 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Okay So I for one am excited for the New Star trek Online Expansion it opens up many possibilities. I For One think with the Romulan Faction we have a chance to add some wicked new ships, such as the Narada, Jellyfish and Possibly the New Constitution class, while I think it would be more likely to get the Narada and Jellyfish as they are from this time. I also think with the somewhat recent release of the Andorian Escort we could get a better NX bundle with interior, weapons, shuttles, ect. A Mirror NX as well as a NX refit. to me it seems like a good time to give the ENT era some love, if not before the Expansion, maybe shortly after. Try to keep the JJ and ENT flames to a minimum, I simply want to know if you want to see the same things in-game i do and if not what would you like to see?

    Problem with the new RR ship scheme is that all ships are of the type Warbird. Log on to Tribble and go to the Romulan sector and fight in an incursion. You will see T'Liss Light Warbirds. These are BoPs not Warbirds. A Warbird is a type of heavy cruiser. It has classes like D'Deridex or Valdore. Just like the Klingons have battle cruisers, a type of heavy cruiser, for which there are various classifications: K'Tinga, Vorcha and Negh'var.

    What in the world?
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The only thing we might see from the new Star Trek is the Kelvin, since that technically a modified Saladin / Hermes and existed at the time the timelines diverged. But that is a massive long-shot.

    Not to be overly nitpicky (I'm adamantly against anything JJ crossing back over, let me be clear on that), but wasn't Spock's ship built in the Prime?
  • general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Sorry, but even the Cryptic Devs have said this many times over the years. STO is the Original Prime Universe that Gene Roddenberry created, not the new alternate timeline.

    The only thing we might see from the new Star Trek is the Kelvin, since that technically a modified Saladin / Hermes and existed at the time the timelines diverged. But that is a massive long-shot.



    You realize Braga is working actively to make Season 5 of Enterprise on Netflix. Which was the planned debut of the NX-Refit. And if that happens, then it makes it fair game for Cryptic to add to STO.

    What? they're gonna add the unpremiered Season 5? WOO ^_^
    Not to be overly nitpicky (I'm adamantly against anything JJ crossing back over, let me be clear on that), but wasn't Spock's ship built in the Prime?

    and yes both the Narada and the Jellyfish are Prime, the Narada was a mining vessel heavily modified with borg technology (http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Narada) and the Jellyfish was commissioned by the Vulcan Science academy (http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Jellyfish_%28ship%29) to protect Romulus and Remus from the Supernova, it was already too late though
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • kharonsoremankharonsoreman Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Not to be overly nitpicky (I'm adamantly against anything JJ crossing back over, let me be clear on that), but wasn't Spock's ship built in the Prime?

    Technically speaking both were.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    A wolf remains a wolf, even if it has not eaten your sheep.
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    What? they're gonna add the unpremiered Season 5? WOO ^_^

    They are trying to. Still no word from CBS.
    Not to be overly nitpicky (I'm adamantly against anything JJ crossing back over, let me be clear on that), but wasn't Spock's ship built in the Prime?

    Yes, but they were also unique ships. While the Kelvin, like I said previously, is just a modified Saladin. And Cryptic can easily circumvent Parmamount and use the TOS Saucer for the Saladin and add in an Engineering hull on top and Paramount shouldn't say a thing since they are using the TOS hull and not the one from the movie.
  • general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    They are trying to. Still no word from CBS.



    Yes, but they were also unique ships. While the Kelvin, like I said previously, is just a modified Saladin. And Cryptic can easily circumvent Parmamount and use the TOS Saucer for the Saladin and add in an Engineering hull on top and Paramount shouldn't say a thing since they are using the TOS hull and not the one from the movie.

    Damn I hope they do, and I really hope paramount pulls its finger out its TRIBBLE and lets Cryptic add their ships to STO, I think it would help bring in new players
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    You realize Braga is working actively to make Season 5 of Enterprise on Netflix.

    Awesome, I didn't know that! Do you have a link where I can read about it?

    I would love to see the Jellyfish and a mirror NX class, but I kind of doubt we'll get either.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Awesome, I didn't know that! Do you have a link where I can read about it?

    I would love to see the Jellyfish and a mirror NX class, but I kind of doubt we'll get either.


    http://www.blastr.com/2013-3-26/could-enterprise-return-help-netflix-brannon-braga-thinks-so
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited March 2013

    And How Exactly am I late to the party when I've Seen all the shows and movies, and been playing STO since launch. Kittens are funny but your not, your argument is invalid, but I cant be too mad at anyone who supports the NX refit

    Purely for your amusement, and (perhaps by the off chance) your education, let me lay it all out for you:
    reyan01 wrote: »
    No - for the same reason as the JJ-prise/2009 Enterprise won't be in the game. Paramount owns the movies, CBS owns the rights to the TV series.

    Crypric has a contract with CBS but not Paramount, therefore nothing from Trek 09, or the upcoming new movie, will feature in STO. And I don't expect that to change since the cost of obtaining consent from CBS and obtaining a contract from Paramount would very likely cost an absolute fortune and would likely have little return.

    Albeit not a direct quote from any mod (which would have ended this argument WAYYYY before season 1), as far as legal rights, copyright laws, and licencing are as far concerned, the statement above me pretty much sums up what Cryptic can make, and what Cryptic can not make.

    From Wikipedia:

    At Star Trek's creation, Norway Productions, Roddenberry's production company, shared ownership with Desilu Productions and, after Gulf+Western acquired Desilu in 1967, with Paramount Pictures, the conglomerate's film studio. Paramount did not want to own the unsuccessful show; net profit was to be shared between Norway, Desilu/Paramount, Shatner, and NBC but Star Trek lost money, and the studio did not expect to syndicate it. In 1970 Paramount offered to sell all rights to Star Trek to Roddenberry, but he could not afford the $150,000 ($898,000 today) price
    In 1989 Gulf+Western renamed itself as Paramount Communications, and in 1994 merged with Viacom. In 2005 Viacom divided into CBS Corporation, whose CBS Television Studios subsidiary retained the Star Trek brand, and Viacom, whose Paramount Pictures subsidiary retained the Star Trek film library and rights to make additional films, along with video distribution rights to the TV series on behalf of CBS. - Wikipedia


    Nifty eh? To really condense it for you, just skip to the bottom half. Now, going back to the first quote:

    "No - for the same reason as the JJ-prise/2009 Enterprise won't be in the game. Paramount owns the movies, CBS owns the rights to the TV series.

    Crypric has a contract with CBS but not Paramount, therefore nothing from Trek 09, or the upcoming new movie, will feature in STO."

    Couldn't have said it better myself. My argument is locktight, good sir. What's yours?
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    a3001 wrote: »
    Purely for your amusement, and (perhaps by the off chance) your education, let me lay it all out for you:


    Albeit not a direct quote from any mod (which would have ended this argument WAYYYY before season 1), as far as legal rights, copyright laws, and licencing are as far concerned, the statement above me pretty much sums up what Cryptic can make, and what Cryptic can not make.

    From Wikipedia:

    At Star Trek's creation, Norway Productions, Roddenberry's production company, shared ownership with Desilu Productions and, after Gulf+Western acquired Desilu in 1967, with Paramount Pictures, the conglomerate's film studio. Paramount did not want to own the unsuccessful show; net profit was to be shared between Norway, Desilu/Paramount, Shatner, and NBC but Star Trek lost money, and the studio did not expect to syndicate it. In 1970 Paramount offered to sell all rights to Star Trek to Roddenberry, but he could not afford the $150,000 ($898,000 today) price
    In 1989 Gulf+Western renamed itself as Paramount Communications, and in 1994 merged with Viacom. In 2005 Viacom divided into CBS Corporation, whose CBS Television Studios subsidiary retained the Star Trek brand, and Viacom, whose Paramount Pictures subsidiary retained the Star Trek film library and rights to make additional films, along with video distribution rights to the TV series on behalf of CBS. - Wikipedia


    Nifty eh? To really condense it for you, just skip to the bottom half. Now, going back to the first quote:

    "No - for the same reason as the JJ-prise/2009 Enterprise won't be in the game. Paramount owns the movies, CBS owns the rights to the TV series.

    Crypric has a contract with CBS but not Paramount, therefore nothing from Trek 09, or the upcoming new movie, will feature in STO."

    Couldn't have said it better myself. My argument is locktight, good sir. What's yours?

    Paramount owns the rights to the movies, I know that, but saying that there will never be anything from the new movies in the game is like saying that Star Wars the Clone wars is gone for good. Nothing is impossible, sure there's a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo that that doesnt rule out the possibility. and besides, if you actually read my entire OP I said thats what I want ingame, and that if you dont agree what would you want ingame?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited March 2013
    The only thing we might see from the new Star Trek is the Kelvin, since that technically a modified Saladin / Hermes and existed at the time the timelines diverged. But that is a massive long-shot.

    With the exception of having only one nacelle, it's nothing like a Saladin class, 'cos of the huge engineering hull.
    We have more chance of getting a pre Borg Nerada or Jellyfish due to them appearing in the Countdown comics, the prequel to STO.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Paramount owns the rights to the movies, I know that, but saying that there will never be anything from the new movies in the game is like saying that Star Wars the Clone wars is gone for good. Nothing is impossible, sure there's a bunch of legal mumbo jumbo that that doesnt rule out the possibility. and besides, if you actually read my entire OP I said thats what I want ingame, and that if you dont agree what would you want ingame?

    its not completely impossible. they just have to jump through more hoops, and it might have a hefty pricetag attached to it should it ever actually happen. Paramount could always say No even after CBS opens negotiations with STO and paramount on it.
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Paramount owns the rights to the movies, I know that...

    So you agree my argument is valid? Legality aside, the chances of Paramount relinquishing the rights to the movies are slim to none since, from your OP, the 2009 film was a smashing success. Thus, the common response for something that makes money for a business that operates solely for the pursuit of profit is a solid 'no'.

    And for the sake of the record: what i want to see is less JJ and more Roddenberry.
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    artan42 wrote: »
    With the exception of having only one nacelle, it's nothing like a Saladin class, 'cos of the huge engineering hull.

    Did you not understand the word "Modified" in my post? :rolleyes:

    Stick an engineering hull on a pylon above the saucer and you turned a Saladin into - le gasp - a Kelvin! :eek:


    You should see some examples of a TOS Kelvin .
    artan42 wrote: »
    We have more chance of getting a pre Borg Nerada or Jellyfish due to them appearing in the Countdown comics, the prequel to STO.

    Um, dream on bud. We will never see these two ships - EVER!

    The closests we will ever get to the Narada being in STO is sticking a Borg Set on a starship and those prongs coming out of the Deflector. And the Jellyfish ... goody another runabout. :rolleyes:
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The Jellyfish and Nero's ship are from the Prime universe.

    The designs are owned by Paramount, yes, but that just means they aren't included in the current fee.

    And all that means is that Paramount needs to be persuaded via a dollar amount or a sufficient promotional need to sign off on Cryptic using them.

    For example, a giveaway at showings of Into Darkness. Or a partnership with IDW or Playmates on Trek movie tie ins. Or maybe as a bonus with the eventual deluxe packaging of the new Star Trek JJ verse shooter.

    It's not like CBS and Paramount are rivals or are fundamentally at odds. It's probably easier than getting the Vesta in game. The real question is whether the cost would be worth it, which is why it would probably make more sense in a scenario where Paramount is paying Cryptic for a promotional tie in or is willing to accept a reduced licensing fee in exchange for exposure for a product.

    CBS and Paramount partner on the JJverse Trek comics licensing, almost the entirety of which features elements of both mixed.
  • insanerandomnesinsanerandomnes Member Posts: 228 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I just want my Scimitar.

    That ship is extremely cool. All other opinions are invalidated by it's epicness.

    AKA, it can't hear you over the sound of it's Thalaron reactor.
    I AM THE HARBINGER OF HOPE!
    I AM THE SWORD OF THE RIGHTOUS!


    dark_dreadnaught_by_insane_randomness-d5z6ydl.jpg
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    a3001 wrote: »
    So you agree my argument is valid? Legality aside, the chances of Paramount relinquishing the rights to the movies are slim to none since, from your OP, the 2009 film was a smashing success. Thus, the common response for something that makes money for a business that operates solely for the pursuit of profit is a solid 'no'.

    And for the sake of the record: what i want to see is less JJ and more Roddenberry.
    Actually, ask yourself this: How much stuff from the movies is already in STO? That should tell you whether or not we'll get more. :p We already have the uniforms worn in the TNG movies, ships of the same class as the Enterprise-E, and several things related to the plots of the TNG movies. Such as, Remans, Scimitar-class ships, Red Matter, the nebula that Insurrection took place in, and a variety of others.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • general1devongeneral1devon Member Posts: 298 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Actually, ask yourself this: How much stuff from the movies is already in STO? That should tell you whether or not we'll get more. :p We already have the uniforms worn in the TNG movies, ships of the same class as the Enterprise-E, and several things related to the plots of the TNG movies. Such as, Remans, Scimitar-class ships, Red Matter, the nebula that Insurrection took place in, and a variety of others.

    This all the way ----^
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Regents Flagship from the series for the KDF.

    Then lots of Gorn, Nauscican, Orion, Leathen, Ferasin and whatever gives the designers thier jollies.
    Have them cover the missing variants that those races would have but do not have ingame, likes escorts for gorn, etc. etc.

    And a Pakled ship I can buy from the C-store that when crewed by all Pakled BOffs has a unique special ability of activating the Pakleds version of a " G?tterd?mmerung" so to speak and it will iether deliver a single devastating (im saying 300K shots or higher) attack to the target or......

    it blows a fuse, smoke billows forth and the ship goes dead for 5 minutes or until the owner spams the phrase " Ship no go boom. There suppossed to be a boom. Can you make go boom?" three times, at which point the ships will function again though the use of said ability will be on an awful awful waiting at the DMV awful cooldown still.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
Sign In or Register to comment.