test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Dominion Dreadnought vs. Dominion Cruiser

magnumoftheblackmagnumoftheblack Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited January 2013 in PvP Gameplay
Has anyone run the numbers between the two dominion ships? Which is more viable for PVP? Just doesn't make sense to buy a ship that is not PVP worthy.
Post edited by magnumoftheblack on
«1

Comments

  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Many have already been saying neither is really viable for pvp but will make decent pve ships.

    jemhadar Dreadnought carrier turns and moves to slow to take advantage of its Cmdr and Lt tac stations and doesn't have enough healing for a ship like that to survive.

    Jemhadar Heavy escort carrier has worst turn of any escort and also bad boff layout for an escort so probably won't fare to much better. It has Cmdr tac and lt universal, but if you use the universal as tac it will only have ensign sci.

    Sort of like the steamrunner, people thought it was cool at first, but only having ensign sci really limited it and now it isn't even seen in pvp much.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • devorasxdevorasx Member Posts: 693
    edited January 2013
    The heavy escort is.... pfft lol, target practice. The carrier on the other hand is tanky as it is has damage potenial.
    Co-founder of The Spanish Inquisition TSI - Cause no one expects it!

    PaxOttomana: gawd mirror event is like fighting a tsi premade, they keep comin and comin!
  • webdeathwebdeath Member Posts: 1,570 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    devorasx wrote: »
    The heavy escort is.... pfft lol, target practice. The carrier on the other hand is tanky as it is has damage potenial.

    I have to disagree. The Dreadnought Carrier only has enough heals for an Escort, with the penalties of a being a carrier. It's turn rate is only 1 point better at base then the Vor'quv, and I think .5 better then the Recluse. That sort of a disadvantage is just not going to win it any popularity contests.

    Not to mention you have to be either Super Lucky, or Super Rich, or both, to have both the JHDC + JHAS just for the new Pets. I'd say that the JHHEC is a better ship then the JHDC. But of course that's my opinion.
    You think that your beta test was bad?
    Think about this:
    American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • robdmcrobdmc Member Posts: 1,619 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Unfortunately the best ship this lock box is the mirror patrol escort.
  • deusemperordeusemperor Member Posts: 136 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    the jem dreadnaught would be fantastic if it had similar boff layout to that Mirror Universe Vo?Quv Carrier.

    1 Commander Tactical, 1 Lieutenant Tactical, 1 Lieutenant Commander Engineering, 1 Lieutenant Commander Science

    Be perfect for no win scenario! Have gravity well and enough bite to justify having such low turn rate. I would actually want the dreadnaught if it had that layout and got rid of the stupid ensign slot to get a second lt com.
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    That I agree. MVAM with a PE layout? Its a dream come half true! (No fleet variant.)

    The JHEC isn't an escort. Its a 7 weapon flight deck cruiser which gave up a weapon slot to have enough turn to put the Excelsior to shame. Load it with single cannons, slot a sci in that universal, carry basic eng necessities and paint the town pink with your CRF3.

    I do like the JDNC as well. I do wish it didn't have so many tac slots!! 5 is enough. I find myself forced to carry a tric mine and getting DP3. Which of course is pretty damn powerful by itself.

    The big big difference is that extra weapon. It is the only 7 weapon 2bay carrier the Feds have. I think that alone makes it better than a Recluse. In my book, it is giving up VM for an extra weapon to BFAW from so YMMV.

    Btw, anyone else humming Imperial March while taking the JDNC for a shakedown cruise? I was talking through a rebreathing mask to my fleetmates for a while since I got mine this afternoon. :D


    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • kalvorax#3775 kalvorax Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    robdmc wrote: »
    Unfortunately the best ship this lock box is the mirror patrol escort.

    how is that unfortunate? lol *flys off in said MUPE*
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I find this line of replies sadly hilarious. We put a lot of work into the massive list of fixes/changes above, and ya'll are hung up on the ability to skip our content. =p
  • robdmcrobdmc Member Posts: 1,619 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    cynder2012 wrote: »
    how is that unfortunate? lol *flys off in said MUPE*

    Well I was hoping that the new lockbox ship would have had slightly better Boff layouts. the rest was awesome. I love the idea of a team attack pattern buff but I wouldn't want to use these ship. I like my bug ship a whole lot better then these. I even like the free breen ship more then these. I have an mvam though and this ship opens up a lot more options including more visualizations for the Fleet Advance Escort.

    I was not excepting the mirror ship to be the best prize. That was a bit of a let down but that just means for a few hundred ec I just got a lot of option for my mvam. That is nice. The other sad part is that the dominion ships aren't second place either. the new warhead on my peregrine fighter is.

    This means this lock box is the cheapest one for me.
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Must agree. I picked-up the dreadnought from the Lobi Store for the console, and after briefly giving it a try, I quickly changed my mind.

    It has not endearing qualities whatsoever, other than looking awesome.

    The only thing I can describe it as, is that is resembles one of those second world war destroyers that get towed-to-sea to serve as targets for the navy.

    It cannot turn so its main armaments are useless, even with a purple MXII RCS console. More one cannot afford else its hull will be paper thin.

    It cannot heal. There is just no way this thing can be made viable for PvP IMO.

    Two or more focused targets on it, the ship is overcome relatively quickly.
  • p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    A part of me thinks the HEC is made for Engineers when used w/mini AoE APO console, Victory is life set bonus.

    TT, CVS1 or APD, CRF2, APO3

    EptA, Aux2batt1, ES2 or Dem2

    ET, Aux2batt1

    EptW or EPTS1, Epts2 or RSP1 or even Aux2Damp (10 sec shared cooldown w/Aux2batt)

    HE1

    Shield Batt, Eng Batt

    It has Eng self Tank Captain abilities to go w/mini Tac and Sci captain abilities. The Lt Uni allows flexibility to slot more offensive Tac Torp/BO2 or Sci Debuff/Repair abilities as needed. It can be damaged focused w/Dem2, team rep w/ES2. Still have EPST2 or RSP1 for it's own shield defenses. With the rep system repair bonuses you don't need as many self shield repairs.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • romuzariiromuzarii Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    With its subsystem targetting, it seems to be clearly intended to use beams. Has anyone tried that?
    Well it's useful and all but I still haven't tried it, probably same reason as everyone else: We're all tacs with JHASs >.> Sacrificing a cannon for subsystem targeting seems pointless. Although, I guess it wouldn't be the end of the world to use beams over cannons in this carrier. I don't know...


    I've always felt any ship with native subsystem targeting should have one native beam to work with it, but that's just my opinion.
  • orondisorondis Member Posts: 1,447 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Has anyone run the numbers between the two dominion ships? Which is more viable for PVP? Just doesn't make sense to buy a ship that is not PVP worthy.

    I can't say much about either to be honest.

    The Dominion Dreadnought is about as much use for PvP as the other slow turning carriers, but it'll be awesome in STFs and other PvE contentwhere you can happily equipp it with DHCs. The dominion fighters are the best DPS pets in the game, no doubt. Phaser procs, cannon rapid fire 2, quantum torps and beam overloads will wreck NPCs.

    The Dominion Heavy Escort Carrier seems to be fine for PvP *IF* properly set up. With the dominion fighters it'll be quite powerful, more so then the FHEC
    Previously Alendiak
    Daizen - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
    Selia - Lvl 60 Tactical - Eclipse
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    With its subsystem targetting, it seems to be clearly intended to use beams. Has anyone tried that?

    Must admit starting to wonder that myself.

    The bottom line is this. For the main flagship of the Dominion, I was not expecting a ship this fragile.
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Must admit starting to wonder that myself.

    The bottom line is this. For the main flagship of the Dominion, I was not expecting a ship this fragile.

    That's another of STO paradox. The bigger and more powerful the ship should be (judging by TV series), the more TRIBBLE it usually is :P
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • megacharge07megacharge07 Member Posts: 476 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    orondis wrote: »
    I can't say much about either to be honest.

    The Dominion Dreadnought is about as much use for PvP as the other slow turning carriers, but it'll be awesome in STFs and other PvE contentwhere you can happily equipp it with DHCs. The dominion fighters are the best DPS pets in the game, no doubt. Phaser procs, cannon rapid fire 2, quantum torps and beam overloads will wreck NPCs.

    The Dominion Heavy Escort Carrier seems to be fine for PvP *IF* properly set up. With the dominion fighters it'll be quite powerful, more so then the FHEC

    It's Polaron procs, and the Jem'Hadar fighters suck, and the Jem'Hadar attack ship fighters are bugged to hell and do weak sauce dmg, if and when they decide to attack.
    tumblr_mt0cmzAQpC1rm3hhlo2_500.gif
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Must admit starting to wonder that myself.

    The bottom line is this. For the main flagship of the Dominion, I was not expecting a ship this fragile.

    1 look at its station setup shows that it would literally be the most fragile thing at end game
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    The HEC will get turn update from 12 to 13...I guess the sales aren't that great :P
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • shimmerlessshimmerless Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    Uh. Care to explain? Lt Com Eng, Ens Sci, Lt Uni... how's that fragile?

    Run a Lt. Eng and you're really a squishier HEC (I suppose you could run double RSP, you'll prob need it lol). A Lt. Sci and you're gonna struggle as well (though I like those one better, you could go TSS2/1, HE1, EPtS1/RSP1/EPtS3 or something). It's basically an escort without the Def bonus or the speed and turn to get out of arc.

    I don't wanna pass judgment too fast because I'm sure someone might be able to bring out its strengths or come up with a build, but really I just can't see it working. Slow, massive ships can't do anything with a Com. Tac that justifies it being on a team. APO has poor scaling, you can't make cannons work and beam skills stop at Lt. Com, so.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    vids and guides and stuff

    [9:52] [Zone #11] Neal@trapper1532: im a omega force shadow oprative and a maoc elite camander and here i am taking water samples
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    Uh. Care to explain? Lt Com Eng, Ens Sci, Lt Uni... how's that fragile?

    for something completely unable to avoide damage, thats pitiful. an escort with those stations could make great use out of them to keep itself alive, because its also dealing a large amount of damage in return, has a high innate defense score, and can fly and turn very quickly, allowing it to avoid incoming fire. this thing cant do anything about an escort camping on its tail and shooting it till it runs out of defensive options and heals

    all ships can tank just as well as each other, because they all are using the same abilities. the difference is how long they can keep up their survival. this carrier is going to run out of 'invulnerability' much quicker then anything else in its weight class.

    escorts do fine with the lower number of heals because they have high defense and damage avoidance ability. the jem carrier has nether large numbers of tanking abilitys to cycle and fall back on, nor any damage avoidance ability. its screwed.

    it has a chance not to suck if that LT tac was ether eng or sci, but since its tac its a non starter. a pve toy. the only time it can use all that tac is when its using DHCs on imoble STF targets
  • edited January 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Afraid I am going to have to side with dontdrunkimshoot on this point.

    I ran the ship with EptS I, RSP I, EptS III and used the remaining for HE I, and TSS.

    It's ability to withstand the opening salvo is quickly depleted, even against a single escort.

    By the time that the escort has recovered preparing the secondary attack, that's when things start to come apart for this ships defenses. Its the gap between the CD of EptS III with little to fall back on, and hardly any maneuverability to speak of.

    By this stage of the attack you are fighting rear-guard action only, with possibly only 3 weapons trained-on-target. Throughout all engagements, I felt like I was continually fighting only defensively.

    As soon as another ship appeared, I knew I was doomed every single time.

    At no point did the pets I was launching seem to deter the attack, or even frustrate the attacker enough to break off his attack. I was the only one breaking a sweat, amid the thunderous "LOL" in zone chat.
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    Afraid I am going to have to side with dontdrunkimshoot on this point.

    I ran the ship with EptS I, RSP I, EptS III and used the remaining for HE I, and TSS.

    It's ability to withstand the opening salvo is quickly depleted, even against a single escort.

    By the time that the escort has recovered preparing the secondary attack, that's when things start to come apart for this ships defenses. Its the gap between the CD of EptS III with little to fall back on, and hardly any maneuverability to speak of.

    By this stage of the attack you are fighting rear-guard action only, with possibly only 3 weapons trained-on-target. Throughout all engagements, I felt like I was continually fighting only defensively.

    As soon as another ship appeared, I knew I was doomed every single time.

    Sounds strangely familiar....eh, the Galaxy-X !
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • shimmerlessshimmerless Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    I don't see much of a difference to a tactical cruiser in survivability, honestly.

    You run EPTS1, RSP1, EPTS3, on the Lt Com and something like EptA, Aux2Struct1 on the Universal Lieutenant. That is almost as survivable as an assault cruiser with, for example, EWP3 and EWP1, and only because of the missing eng console.

    The real issue I see with the dread is not on the defensive side, I think it is (and have seen it in C&H to be) acceptably durable. I rather see this ship suffering from STO's favoring of narrow-arc forward cannons so much... it is clearly intended to be a beam ship, but the mechanics just don't support that with a slow tactical ship. Yet?

    EPtA leaves a gap in your cycle a mile wide, one that TSS1 alone won't patch up.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    vids and guides and stuff

    [9:52] [Zone #11] Neal@trapper1532: im a omega force shadow oprative and a maoc elite camander and here i am taking water samples
  • p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    I think the Lt Tac hurts the Dread for PvP w/o significant remote support, but still I think this thing would be a PvE DPS monster and I'm fine w/that tbh.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    you should proboly use the universal LT for sci, aside from the tac powers, i would run this on one

    EPtA1, RSP1, EPtS3
    TSS1, HE2
    HE1

    with 2 or 3 purple damage control doffs. with only 3 eng powers, you have no choice really, and you need your aux heals as strong as possible.

    i could keep a much quicker excelsior or vorcha alive alright with that, but i would also have AtB with tech doffs putting all that at global. a more support heavy cruiser would also run AtS3 and have ether ET2 or ET3, and TSS2 instead of HE2 with all that hull heal coverage too. and itcould run up to 2 ES, or have an EWP on there. so not only does it lack room for half the defensive options, its got next to no support capability. if anyone shoots at it it wont have anything to spare.
  • mandoknight89mandoknight89 Member Posts: 1,687 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    dalnar83 wrote: »
    That's another of STO paradox. The bigger and more powerful the ship should be (judging by TV series), the more TRIBBLE it usually is :P

    Hence why the JHAS is the most powerful escort in the game despite four of them being required to take down one Galaxy (with a suicide attack!) in the show...
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    sophlogimo wrote: »
    i Don't See Much Of A Difference To A Tactical Cruiser In Survivability, Honestly.

    Dread Bug w/ 6 turn:

    X, X, X, X
    X, X

    X, X, X
    X, X
    X


    ...or...

    X, X, X, X
    X, X

    X, X, X
    X, X

    X

    vs. Assault Refit/Fleet Assault w/ 7 turn:

    X, X, X
    X

    X, X, X, X
    X, X

    X, X

    As for consoles, both the Fleet Assault and Dread Bug are 4/4/2 (while the Refit is 3/4/2).

    Assault sports .15 Impulse.
    Dread Bug .17 Impulse.
    Assault sports 30 Inertia.
    What does the Dread Bug have though?

    Also, the Dread Bug's at 45k hull with a 1.15 shield modifier vs. 42.9k/1.1 for the Fleet and 39k/1 for the Refit...

    For comparison - Heavy Bug:
    37.5k Hull
    1 Shield Modifier
    12 Turn
    .2 Impulse
    ? Inertia
    4/4/2 consoles

    X, X, X, X

    X, X, X
    X, X

    X
    X, X

    So, you could basically do the same layout on the Dread and Heavy:

    X, X, X, X
    X, X

    X, X, X
    X, X

    X

    The Dread would have +7.5k hull and a +1.15 shield modifier (as well as +1 hangar, +5 aux power).
    The Heavy would have +6 turn and +0.03 impulse (as well as +5 shield power).
    Inertia?

    Which would you say has better survivability?

    Then again, folks may want the following Heavy layout for the Dread:

    X, X, X, X
    X, X, X
    X, X

    X, X
    X
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2013
    i have a feeling we are preempting threads complaining about it's helplessness, we just have to look at the stations and know its bad. but the stf facerolers would scream bloody murder if they changed the station setup now, because they want all the tac they can get to murder helpless npc's.

    but, the thing cant go on with that station setup and ever show its face in pvp. but you cant tac away tac from it due to pve'ers. hmmm


    make the other LT station universal too, TRIBBLE it. then its pvp usable, and stf ready.
Sign In or Register to comment.