test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New Star Trek teaser released today

betawatcherbetawatcher Member Posts: 2 Arc User
edited December 2012 in Ten Forward
Exclusively at Apple trailers:

http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrekintodarkness/

It is the first one at the top when you expand the list of trailers.
Post edited by betawatcher on
«1

Comments

  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Edit, nvm, found the Youtube version below ;)

    For those who aren't aware, this is the new trailer that premiered with The Hobbit. And close observation around 1:17 mark reveals the Enterprise took quite a beating, with visible damage all over the saucer section, and the deflector
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Wow./10chars
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdgRx94W5ko

    Youtube link for those having trouble with the Apple link.
  • brigadooombrigadooom Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Interesting. It's a shame the interiors still look like an Apple store. :( I wonder what Noel Clarke's character was dropping into that drink, and why he was crying when doing so.

    There seems to be a theme of things being turned upside down, and of falling a very long way. To right one's self and get back up, maybe? You've got to hit rock bottom...

    I spy a wacky-looking bird of prey :D
    ----
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    brigadooom wrote: »
    Interesting. It's a shame the interiors still look like an Apple store. :( I wonder what Noel Clarke's character was dropping into that drink, and why he was crying when doing so.

    There seems to be a theme of things being turned upside down, and of falling a very long way. To right one's self and get back up, maybe? You've got to hit rock bottom...

    I spy a wacky-looking bird of prey :D
    Well, the bridge and frequently-visited areas need to look good, at least. The rest of observation is purely preference

    And nice observation about the possible theme ;) I still want to know just who Benedicts character is though... because according to the leaked photos/videos from set, Spock and his character have a fight, Spock neck-pinches him, and while he does fall down briefly, he's not unconscious and stands up within seconds.

    Seen here, leaked from set: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw7xmQ1MVaM (first half of video is just photos)

    Khan couldn't do that, genetically enhanced or normal. Gary Mitchell might with godlike powers, but more likely he'd just stop it coming... but never at moment does Benedict's character show eyes of silver, glowing or otherwise.
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    "When the Enterprise is ashes...only then do you have my permission to die"

    Wait...my bad, wrong movie. :P
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • captainrevo1captainrevo1 Member Posts: 3,948 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    The trailer looks awesome. i so cant wait for this film.

    on another note, the trailer makes it look like those pods are for dead officers, as its right next to the bit with the flyover and the folding of the flag, but they look suspiciously like stasis pods.

    could there be a space seed/khan thing either going on as the main plot somehow despite benedict playing john harrison or setting it up for khan in number 3?
  • edited December 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    This is a Star Trek movie, I'm still not getting excited, I should be but I'm not. Keep looking for Robin to make an appearance or maybe Spiderman to swing by. The trailer doesn't help, it focuses on one thing for less than a second, maybe I'm just getting old but this is what I expect a Star Trek Trailer to be like:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWcbmkdsFYs

    minus the corny talkover at the beginning lol

    Something like this would be better. Only not as many spoilers.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited December 2012
    I'm pretty sure I saw a BOP in there.
    Was Chekhov wearing a red shirt at one point?
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • ashkrik23ashkrik23 Member Posts: 10,809 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I'm getting the vibe they are going to do a Wrath of Khan Spock death.. considering the blue shirt holding his hand up to the glass on the opposite side of Kirk's. I am excited :D.
    King of Lions rawr! Protect the wildlife of the world. Check out my foundry series Perfection and Scars of the Pride. arcgames.com/en/forums#/discussion/1138650/ashkrik23s-foundry-missions
    ashkrik_by_lindale_ff-d65zc3i.png
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Wha..........aaaaaa..............aaaaaaaaaaaaa..........aaaaa.........aaaaaaaaa.......aaaat.
  • brigadooombrigadooom Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    trek21 wrote: »
    Well, the bridge and frequently-visited areas need to look good, at least. The rest of observation is purely preference

    And nice observation about the possible theme ;) I still want to know just who Benedicts character is though... because according to the leaked photos/videos from set, Spock and his character have a fight, Spock neck-pinches him, and while he does fall down briefly, he's not unconscious and stands up within seconds.

    Seen here, leaked from set: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gw7xmQ1MVaM (first half of video is just photos)

    Khan couldn't do that, genetically enhanced or normal. Gary Mitchell might with godlike powers, but more likely he'd just stop it coming... but never at moment does Benedict's character show eyes of silver, glowing or otherwise.

    True, I just think that the 'Apple store' look is awfully bland and flimsy-looking, even plastic-y :o

    If Cumberbatch is playing Mitchell, his eyes don't strictly need to glow for him to have powers, as he was already well above average in 'ESP' - perhaps Abrams is going to use the latent pre-galactic-barrier abilities he had, and he simply found the correct circumstances to acquire or enable/improve upon those abilities. Maybe through some sort of... augmentation? Who knows.

    The Bird of Prey was chasing something, so I'm guessing that scene leads up to some scenes we saw in the first trailer where we see some Klingons in combat helmets getting their behinds handed to them by Cumberbatch.

    The room full of coffins (stasis pods?) we briefly see two people walking out of, one in white and the other in black (who also looks like a rather large bloke) looks like an interesting scene. Maybe the result of a massacre by Cumberbatch that really sets him up as the antagonist... however they're all 'open' with windows into them. It's around the funeral scene, so I believe it to be misdirection and they're probably stasis pods or something. Which itself hints at an expulsion of an unwanted section of society.
    ----
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited December 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    ashkrik23 wrote: »
    I'm getting the vibe they are going to do a Wrath of Khan Spock death.. considering the blue shirt holding his hand up to the glass on the opposite side of Kirk's. I am excited :D.

    I suspect that's a misdirection. They wouldn't kill off Spock this early into the reboot.

    At least, I hope they don't.
    brigadooom wrote: »
    True, I just think that the 'Apple store' look is awfully bland and flimsy-looking, even plastic-y :o

    I agree. Though it's not as plastic-y as the TOS bridge. :P
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    TOS bridge was much more realistic this one contains part of the set from "minority report" and what looks like a photocopier
    Live long and Prosper
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    brigadooom wrote: »
    True, I just think that the 'Apple store' look is awfully bland and flimsy-looking, even plastic-y :o

    If Cumberbatch is playing Mitchell, his eyes don't strictly need to glow for him to have powers, as he was already well above average in 'ESP' - perhaps Abrams is going to use the latent pre-galactic-barrier abilities he had, and he simply found the correct circumstances to acquire or enable/improve upon those abilities. Maybe through some sort of... augmentation? Who knows.

    The Bird of Prey was chasing something, so I'm guessing that scene leads up to some scenes we saw in the first trailer where we see some Klingons in combat helmets getting their behinds handed to them by Cumberbatch.

    The room full of coffins (stasis pods?) we briefly see two people walking out of, one in white and the other in black (who also looks like a rather large bloke) looks like an interesting scene. Maybe the result of a massacre by Cumberbatch that really sets him up as the antagonist... however they're all 'open' with windows into them. It's around the funeral scene, so I believe it to be misdirection and they're probably stasis pods or something. Which itself hints at an expulsion of an unwanted section of society.
    Well, I think it gives off the 'look' of high-tech, but it's not my favorite bridge ;) Mostly because while it accomplishes the look, it doesn't quite give off the 'feel' of one, at least for me. I like it, don't get me wrong, but yeah.

    Though I'm almost beginning to believe that 'John Harrison' really isn't pulling our legs, as far as Benedict's character :D He's definitely not Khan, and so far we've seen no concrete evidence that he's Gary Mitchell, great strength and ability to resist Vulcan neck-pinch notwithstanding

    As for the pods, the built-in windows hint at either stasis pods as you think, or simply a variant of the torpedo tube coffins they shot Spock out of in II... hey, they have Carol Marcus here, and the famous window scene (though I still doubt Spock or Kirk will die, but it will be a tension-filled moment), so why not?
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    TOS bridge was much more realistic this one contains part of the set from "minority report" and what looks like a photocopier

    I agree for the most part. The layout of the TOS bridge is great; it's just the colors and textures that slightly bug me.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Part of me thinks they're setting up for a Klingon antagonist in the third film.

    The first one mentioned them sort of peripherally. Moreso if you count the deleted scenes.

    This one appears to be featuring Qo'noS directly as part of the movie. What's more, things are getting wrecked there. By a human.

    My bet? Movie three is a rising Klingon warlord who's tired of Romulan time travelers and spuerhumans making a joke of the Klingons. He/She(?) seizes power in the wake of Harrison's rampage and builds an armada over the course of a couple of years, finally leading an all-out attack on Earth. While Spock commands the Enterprise at the head of the Federation's defending fleet, Kirk fist-fights the Klingon warlord on the ground somewhere. Expect fighter craft from both sides because lol Star Wars, but other than that it could easily be the best of the three.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Maybe a Klingon time ship from the 29th century pops back and vapourises the idiot romulan Before he can mess up the time line

    trillions of lives are saved and we can all cheer the brave warrior
    Live long and Prosper
  • wunjeewunjee Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    That retro BoP is awesome looking.

    This whole movie looks like it's going to be great. Haters can hate on JJTrek all they want but as far as Trek movies go, this feels like one. I absolutely cannot wait.

    Why did the last scene in that teaser make me think of TwoK?
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Because thats where he stole it from
    Live long and Prosper
  • wunjeewunjee Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    There's a difference between stealing something and paying homage.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    No there isn't
    thats the trite line of every 5th rate hack

    "its a homage"

    I could tell you scene by scene where the first film comes from
    The man is a hack
    Live long and Prosper
  • wunjeewunjee Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Haters gon' hate.

    I'll be enjoying the movie. You can go ahead and stew over it.
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    No there isn't
    thats the trite line of every 5th rate hack

    "its a homage"

    I could tell you scene by scene where the first film comes from
    The man is a hack

    you can also explain the whole universe, but that doesn't mean you are right about it. We got it, you do not like JJtrek...others do, deal with it.
    Go pro or go home
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    wunjee wrote: »
    Haters gon' hate.

    I'll be enjoying the movie. You can go ahead and stew over it.
    Yup, me too ;)

    And of course a closed-minded possibly-not-sane person makes no distinction between homage and rip-off... which is illogical, btw

    If Spock were here, he'd be disgusted by your complete illogic. Fascinated by what a curious case you are, but disgusted all the same way a Vulcan can be
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Lovers gonna love

    some of you guys would Love a film even if it was 4 hours of watching the night shift in sickbay play chess
    Live long and Prosper
  • wunjeewunjee Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I hated Enterprise, if that's any consolation.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    wunjee wrote: »
    I hated Enterprise, if that's any consolation.
    Somehow I doubt it ;) He regards any hatred of the original as blasphemy... though of course he'll deny that too
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Sign In or Register to comment.