test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Fleet B'rel on Tribble

eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited December 2012 in Klingon Discussion
Tier 5

Hull: 24,750

Shield Modifier: 0.88

Turnrate: 23

Enhanced Battlecloak

Console Layout:
4 Engineering
3 Science
3 Tactical


Costs 5 fleet modules; 1 fleet module if the player owns the regular B'rel Retrofit.


This ships seems great ... except for the console layout. Who the hell needs 4 engineering consoles on a Bird of Prey? :confused:
Post edited by eisenw0lf on
«1

Comments

  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited November 2012
    eisenw0lf wrote: »
    Tier 5

    Hull: 24,750

    Shield Modifier: 0.88

    Turnrate: 23

    Enhanced Battlecloak

    Console Layout:
    4 Engineering
    3 Science
    3 Tactical


    Costs 5 fleet modules; 1 fleet module if the player owns the regular B'rel Retrofit.


    This ships seems great ... except for the console layout. Who the hell needs 4 engineering consoles on a Bird of Prey? :confused:
    It's going to have Enhanced Battle Cloak for sure? If so, what is the point of having the B'rel Retrofit then?

    At least with the Tactical Escort Retrofit, you get the cloak console that can be used with the Fleet Tactical Escort Retrofit.
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    There is really no point anymore in buying the B'rel Retrofit if you access to a Tier 5 Shipyard. Fleet modules cost around 4-5 million EC on the exchange and are therefore easily obtainable.

    But the main question is why does it get a fourth engineering console? Why not science or tactical? It can't tank anyway and it doesn't need an RCS console with its high innate turnrate.
  • cliftona91cliftona91 Member Posts: 254
    edited November 2012
    The B'rel Retrofit is mostly under cloak, more armor helps it survives as it GTFO's out of danger.
  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited November 2012
    I would move one of my universal consoles (I think I have a Rule 62 console or Assimilated Module in one of the Sci slots) to the 4th Engineering slot.

    Then I'd put it another Flow Capacitor to boost my Tachyon Beam 3 and Aceton Assimilator drains. I could consider putting in a Particle Generator console to boost the Aceton Assimilator radiation damage as well.

    Or get that Zero-Point Energy Conduit console.
  • eisenw0lfeisenw0lf Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    cliftona91 wrote: »
    The B'rel Retrofit is mostly under cloak, more armor helps it survives as it GTFO's out of danger.

    This doesn't really matter. It gets destroyed when shot at thanks to the low hullpoints of BoP's in general, even a fourth armor console won't change that.
  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited November 2012
    could always stick a universal console in instead
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • aurigas7aurigas7 Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Tac or Sci console would be more welcome on the glass cannon. Fourth eng console or not, it will explode as soon as someone looks funny at it.

    I'll get it regardless, just love the B'rel. Maybe the isometric charge will find it's way onto this ship :D
    Vorcha_forward.jpg
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    5 Fleet Modules, not the normal 4?

    Still this thing is, even without the EBC, superior to the Hegh'ta. Sweet.
  • f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    aurigas7 wrote: »
    Tac or Sci console would be more welcome on the glass cannon. Fourth eng console or not, it will explode as soon as someone looks funny at it.

    I'll get it regardless, just love the B'rel. Maybe the isometric charge will find it's way onto this ship :D

    Glass cannon award now goes to the Fleet BoP at Tier shipyard III ... the one with LESS hull than a frakkin runabout. :(
    Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
    " We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

    U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I like the stats
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • born2bwild1born2bwild1 Member Posts: 1,329 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    It's another slap in the face to the KDF - it should be availible at T3 shipyard - just like the Fleet defiant retrofit is.

    I bet no more than 5 KDF fleets make it to T5 in the next 6 months
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • travelingmastertravelingmaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    I'd suspect the Devs may be hoping just that very thing, on the bright side:

    we finally get a Fleet vessel with a discount...if yer patient enough and can get your fleet SB to advance in this era of Epohhs and Poke'critters and menial tasks for Romulans.

    Yeah, we get a discount. . .that's a discount in name only. You had to buy the friggin B'Rel retrofit anyways, which is 2k zen at regular prices. Only way you're saving zen is if you bought the ship on sale. TBH, the same goes for the Federation discounted ships too, it's all a farce.

    As it is, all this ship seems to gain is a few k hitpoints, an engineering console, and a shield mod improvement. Big whoop. You might as well save yourself the 500 zen/4-5 million EC and stick with the B'Rel retrofit.
    My PvP toon is Krov, of The House of Snoo. Beware of my Hegh'ta of doom.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Damnit Cryptic we don't need another fleet BoP, especially the gimmicky B'rel. We have a couple huge holes and this isn't one of them. Especially a BoP with 4 Eng console, seriously what the hell is a BoP going to do with an Eng console? Take 5 seconds to blow up instead of 4.5? Why would you take a ship that's centered around tac and sci with a paper thin hull and put an extra eng console on it...

    You wanna know why no one buys Klingon ships, its because you suck at giving us ships worth buying.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    xantris wrote: »
    Damnit Cryptic we don't need another fleet BoP. We have a couple huge holes and this isn't one of them. Especially a BoP with 4 Eng console, seriously what the hell is a BoP going to do with an Eng console? Take 5 seconds to blow up instead of 4.5? Why would you take a ship that's centered around tac and sci with a paper thin hull and put an extra eng console on it...

    You wanna know why no one buys Klingon ships, it because you suck at giving us ships worth buying.

    No Doubt... if it had some higher function to use or possibly if it came with some console that assisted in its function as a projectile boat... then it might be worth it but 2400 hull and marginal shield increase and a whopping engineering console its not worth a pot to pee in.

    The real reason other than those mentioned of why they can't make money on the KDF is that they try to see how crappy of a ship the KDF will buy and that they can get the least amount of fed only players to not say its so OP PLEASE NERF IT!!!

    So yeah if they went toward giving it what it deserves and making it reasonable which the KDF players are reasonable its just that when you give unreasonable reasons such as ships like this for a KDF player to buy it just looks like there is no market for it. Is kind of like if I went to a junkyard and took a pinto and slapped a new coat of paint on it and then tried to sell it to you for a million dollars... I am pretty sure you will not buy it because its still junk... just prettier junk than it used to be :)
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    For some folks with your views, they already MAKE the Bortasque.


    I don't even understand what your trying to say. That I like the Bortasque? We need better fleet escorts and sci ships, including a fleet version of the Kar'fi. Battlecruisers and BoPs need not apply, especially when you're going to design them like a nimrod.
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • cliftona91cliftona91 Member Posts: 254
    edited November 2012
    That same 4th engineering console could be used for:

    SIF Generator: to help repair your TRIBBLE while you GTFO and cloak up

    Bam! Another use for that 4th Engineering Console.

    And also, the B'rel can used Bridge officer and Captain abilities that can't be used under just some normal Battle Cloak. So you could raise up the ships damage resistance even more with Hazard Emitters, Auxiliary to Structural Integrity, and other abilities.

    And why you all ******** about this in the first place? We finally have Fleet ships that you can potentially have a discount on, both have been asked for since Season Six, and now that Cryptic has given them to you, you want to ***** about it?

    Mick Jagger is right: "You can't get no satisfaction"
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    But there are some interesting possibilities off of 4 engineering consoles on a ship that already has a good turn rate. I'd suggest asking Thissler to check it out for building advice...and quit whining, you already KNEW they'd never give you a FLeet Defiant/Bugship Killer, with zero development staff playing KDF at any time.


    Yeah, gimmicky nonsense builds. Klingon's don't have enough meat and potatos to be serving us strawberry shortcake. And no, I don't know that they'll never give us a 5 tac console equivalent(I didn't realize having a decent equivilent of a 5 tac ship was a "Bug killer"). I have no idea how you get the idea that asking for decent ships is whining, so you can go fly a kite.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    cliftona91 wrote: »
    That same 4th engineering console could be used for:

    SIF Generator: to help repair your TRIBBLE while you GTFO and cloak up

    Bam! Another use for that 4th Engineering Console.

    And also, the B'rel can used Bridge officer and Captain abilities that can't be used under just some normal Battle Cloak. So you could raise up the ships damage resistance even more with Hazard Emitters, Auxiliary to Structural Integrity, and other abilities.

    And why you all ******** about this in the first place? We finally have Fleet ships that you can potentially have a discount on, both have been asked for since Season Six, and now that Cryptic has given them to you, you want to ***** about it?

    Mick Jagger is right: "You can't get no satisfaction"

    A SIF generator. Are you kidding me?

    Cause it's terrible. It takes a gimmicky ship and makes it even more gimmicky, and it doesn't even improve it's functionality because it gives it a retardo extra console. I don't give a damn about discounts, i want a decent ship that I might actually buy.
  • cliftona91cliftona91 Member Posts: 254
    edited November 2012
    xantris wrote: »
    A SIF generator. Are you kidding me?

    Cause it's terrible. It takes a gimmicky ship and makes it even more gimmicky, and it doesn't even improve it's functionality because it gives it a retardo extra console. I don't give a damn about discounts, i want a decent ship that I might actually buy.
    Still doesn't require ******** about it. You can express your discontent without so much rage.

    BTW no, I'm not kidding you about the SIF Generator. A small boost can spell the difference between living to blow things up another day and your assailant bathing in your debris. Same with a 4th engineering console being used for armor: even a small difference can mean staying alive
  • edited November 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited November 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    I don't have any "Universals" to put in there. No P2W consoles whatsoever.
    Universal consoles does not mean P2W consoles. There are plenty of consoles you can buy from the exchange, mission rewards, or from the reputation store.

    For instance, you could buy cross faction consoles from the exchange. Assimilated Module, as far as I can tell, can still be earned from Assimilated, or can be bought from the Omega store. Zero-Point Energy Conduit can also be bought from the Romulan reputation store.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    cliftona91 wrote: »
    Still doesn't require ******** about it. You can express your discontent without so much rage.

    BTW no, I'm not kidding you about the SIF Generator. A small boost can spell the difference between living to blow things up another day and your assailant bathing in your debris. Same with a 4th engineering console being used for armor: even a small difference can mean staying alive


    You know as well as I do that nobody is going to use that extra ENG console for an armor or SIF console. It's going to be used as a universal console, because a SIF or armor console on a 24k hull ship is such a marginal difference that its nearly negligible. That was my point.
  • xantrisxantris Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Your problem is, "Decent Ship" is a pure matter of Definition and is highly influenced by (surprise) what you prefer to fly NOW.

    For instance, I find Raptors and Cruisers to be pretty much too annoying to ever use-even specced for turn, it takes them too long to bring nose-to-bear and accelleration tends to be on the 'suck side', (aka yelling "Send men out to PUSH!!!")

    From MY perspective, the Hegh'ta is a decent ship, the Fleet Norgh is a Decent Ship, hell, even the stock "Ki'Tang" is a decent ship.

    But Raptors? Garbage. Half-TRIBBLE Cruisers pretending to be more useful than they really are. The 1000 day ship for KdF: is a Raptor with a Uni console and Battlecloak.

    Cruisers now?

    The Tor'Khat might be okay...for a cruiser, which is to say, a fat raptor with the same defects plus some extra slots.

    Vor'cha? Send those boys out to push on the NOSE! she's stuck again.


    Bortasque-just...give up. driving this is like driving a city bus with flat tyres and bad brakes. Half an hour of playing with this POS and I was ready to log off using a hammer.


    Now that we've established some perspective from THIS side of the screen...


    The stats on the Fleet B'Rel give it more hull than a Hegh'ta. (this would be a plus)
    More consoles too. (Likewise a plus, if you can't figure out what to use there, you don't kinow your game mechanics as well as you think you do.)

    better turn rate? check
    Same weapons slots?" Check
    Improved BC? gimmicky, but not the end-all of the design.

    based on the B'rel Retrofit (which I got thanks to being a lifer-natch!) it's got a better shield multiplier than any other BoP, better hull, better mass/turn ratio and average to good Boff positions.

    to ME, that's pretty decent. To a guy whose standard is "Stand and Deliver in a cruiser and/or carrier" it's probably not.

    It's ALL about Perspective, man...



    I came off like the B'rel is a bad ship. That was a mistake, of course it's not,, its a solid PvP ship. I'm just really dislike that we arent filling actual holes in our lineup when given the chance. For instance, I agree that raptors are terrible, that's why we need a fleet ship to step up and fill the hole that our glut of mediocre raptors currently reside in. Turning one of our Naussican destroyers into a fleet ship and giving it an aggressive layout would have been a good move. Right now we have to turn to lock box ships like the Jem'hadar and temporal destroyer.

    I understand why there are certain PvP players that might really dig this ship. Having said that, the B'rel is largely used as a gimmick torpedo ship to make Feds rage in Kerrat. If you fit a B'rel in a method thats more standard for a BoP, your only getting minor side grades to BoPs that already exist and fill those niches. The KDF has some huge holes in its ship lineup, this is not a ship we need.

    Plus, BoPs just aren't great PvE ships, and like it or not this is primarily a PvE game. How many people are going to actually spend the money on this PvP oriented ship? I can't even get a queue to pop most nights. If you want to generate large scale interest so people get excited and are willing to spend money, you need to put in a ship that also appeals to PvEers. Something like an fleet Garamba or a Karfi would do that.


    But if we are going to add this ship to the lineup, at least do it the right way. Give it a sci console so that someone might actually use something other than a universal in that slot, I can understand why it might not warrant a tac console (because its gimmicky nature would probably make it OP). The extra eng console will be used for a universal. Sure, you could put other stuff in there and see minor gains, but it won't be enough to sway people from using it as a universal on a BoP. At best, someone might use a tachoykentic, which is still a universal with an eng turn console built in.
Sign In or Register to comment.