test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Can someone recommend a good Cruiser for a Tactical Captain?

2»

Comments

  • bearopybearopy Member Posts: 9 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Fleet Excelsior all the way!

    The Lt Commander Tactical slot allows me to run alternating Beam Overloads and Fire at Wills while keeping Tac Team 1. The ensign slot is an engineer which gives me Emergency Power to Weapons- which really is better then doubling up on tac team 1's which is what I would have to do if I had the useless ensign tac slot. Throw on a couple of dili mine rcs + hull consoles and a decent deflector and this ship can easily top 65K hull strength while manuevering like an escourt. And this ship is SMALL! It is about the same size as your multivector escourt or the saucer section of the oddy. So I say Excelsior!

    I am running 2 dual beams and 2 single beams on the front and 2 single beams, a borg cutting beam and a turret on the back. This gives 6 weaps on target no matter your angle, maxs out FAW to 6 beams, and puts the best dps in front. I also run 2 Conn Doffs to get your Tac Team cooldown to 18 secs along with 2 maintenance to do the same with Engi Team. The last doff is a purple to give the bonus per battery type. With Red Matter capaciter and Weapons batteries that doff really helps!

    I really enjoy this ship with my tact captain because not only does it do decent damage and draw great threat/aggro with the fire at wills, it also gives you a ton of healing options with the commander engi, lt engi, and ensign engi. Playing pure dps in an escort is fun but got old, so now I go in and tank and offheal in this tiny brick of a deathblossom. :) Good hunting!
  • saxfiresaxfire Member Posts: 558 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    I were gonna say galor but you weren't looking for escort, sorry to interrupt!
    Say the word, it saves the world.
    CUUCUUMBEER! "-With slight partigen with it."
    Proud member or DPS-800 "-We kill dem mines with our scitter turrets."
  • stoutesstoutes Member Posts: 4,219 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    My endpoint in cruisers would most probably be the fleet regent, this is the cruiser build I use at the moment.
    maxvitor wrote: »
    Nerf is OP, plz nerf
    That's quite the paradox, how could you nerf nerf when the nerf is nerfed. But how would the nerf be nerfed when the nerf is nerfed? This allows the nerf not to be nerfed since the nerf is nerfed? But if the nerf isn't nerfed, it could still nerf nerfs. But as soon as the nerf is nerfed, the nerf power is lost. So paradoxally it the nerf nerf lost its nerf, while it's still nerfed, which cannot be because the nerf was unable to nerf.

    I call it, the Stoutes paradox.
  • paxfederaticapaxfederatica Member Posts: 1,496 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Keep in mind that the wide-angle torp on the Regent can not only be used on any other ship, but, like most other torps, can go in back as well as in front. So, even if you don't want to play with a Regent, you can just strip out its wide-angle torp and move it to the cruiser of your choice. Unfortunately I think it only lets you have one of these torps per ship though, so you won't be able to mount one on each end for a 360-degree torp range.
  • stoutesstoutes Member Posts: 4,219 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    Keep in mind that the wide-angle torp on the Regent can not only be used on any other ship, but, unlike most other torps, can go in back as well as in front.

    And now please reread that statement please :D
    maxvitor wrote: »
    Nerf is OP, plz nerf
    That's quite the paradox, how could you nerf nerf when the nerf is nerfed. But how would the nerf be nerfed when the nerf is nerfed? This allows the nerf not to be nerfed since the nerf is nerfed? But if the nerf isn't nerfed, it could still nerf nerfs. But as soon as the nerf is nerfed, the nerf power is lost. So paradoxally it the nerf nerf lost its nerf, while it's still nerfed, which cannot be because the nerf was unable to nerf.

    I call it, the Stoutes paradox.
  • mustafatennickmustafatennick Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    voporak wrote: »
    A cruiser that is good for tactical captains, that's easy:

    ...

    Yep, that's the ugly truth. Tactical captains will never be anywhere near as effective in a cruiser vs being in an escort. The closest you might get is the Galaxy-X, but any way you chew it up cruisers won't work well with tacs. But if you're really wanting a cruiser, Galaxy-X dreadnought, Odyssey tactical, or excelsior.

    EDIT: even though my flagship (in my signature) is a cruiser, I run the tactical escort retrofit (the cloaking Defiant).

    Wow original...

    If you think that why do you fly federation at all romulan ships are superior Boffs are wildly op oh and all have battle cloaks so I by your estimations EVERY player should generically roll a romulan

    On a brighter note I like flying both escort and cruiser and i think myself to be fairly competent in pvp and pve

    In pvp unfortunately I have to rely on DEM and lv 2 nukura passive get loads o bleed through whilst using the usual rsp epts3 for survival

    I just purchased the fleet assault cruiser(regent class) I run it on my tac it is fantastic plus it breaks the mold of pew pew in my rom and KDF escorts/bops


    If you can afford it roll aux 2 bat you'll never look back really

    Just my two cents

    P.s. sorry about the borderline trollish beginning but I hate noobs that think tacs must fly escort eng in cruiser and sci in sci it's a joke
    ----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====---- :cool:
  • dknight0001dknight0001 Member Posts: 1,542
    edited September 2013
    This thread is a year old, the game has changed quite a lot since than.

    Note: Post #31 09-19-2012
    Post #32 Today

    So the views in it are unsurprising.
    I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001. :confused:
    If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
    When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
  • bluegeekbluegeek Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2013
    CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNIQUE TO ALL TEMPORAL ACCORD AGENCIES:

    The Department of Temporal Investigations has determined that this thread is a temporal anomaly. It should have died after there were no new posts after 30 days or more. DIT agents have acted to correct the anachronism and the proper timeline has been restored.

    Please remember to check the dates of threads; and if you find an old thread which violates the PWE Community Rules and Policies or has been inactive for over 30 days before someone replied to it just report it and avoid posting in it per the Temporal Prime Directive.

    Please bear in mind that re-posting in "necro'd" threads is considered a form of spamming.

    Note that you're more than welcome to start a new timeline -- I mean, thread -- on the topic or to post in an existing active thread.

    Live Long and Prosper,
    Bluegeek
    My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. You can file a "forums and website" support ticket here
    Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek
This discussion has been closed.