test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Klingon Discussion

Klingon Ship Change

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
edited September 2011 in Klingon Discussion
Could we get a Lt.Cmdr Tac Boff station instead of a Lt. and an ensign spot please so we could put this ship on par with the Excelsior minus the transwarp I guess which is fine.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    I'LL SECOND THAT!!


    or do I need run to the nearest Fed and ask them what we should do since the "holier than though" attitudes of some still mean thet try to define my fandom for me?
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    I've felt for a long time the T-5 Vorcha needed a Lt. Commander Tac Boff slot.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    If you are talking about the Vor'Cha, i don't know, i'm doing very well without it, and do a hell of a lot of damage. And as tac captain i would rather miss the tanking ability of the Vor'Cha, more then the higher level tac boff slot.
    But i can see how a eng captain would miss the tac slot more.

    Maybe it is time to reevaluate the boff slots and have them dynamic depending on the kind of captain of the ship.
    Like a tac gets better eng slots, while a eng gets better tac slots and a sci gets a more even slot distribution.
    Could help in even out the ships across the different kinds of captains better.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    personal I like to see the following boff layouts


    Cruisers
    1 Cmdr Eng
    1 Lt Cmdr Tac
    1 Lt Cmdr Science
    1 Lt Cmdr Universal

    Science vessels
    1 Cmdr Science
    1 LtCmdr Eng
    1 LtCmdr Tac
    1 LtCmdr Universal

    Escort
    1 Cmdr Tac
    1 LtCmdr Eng
    1 ltCmdr Science
    1 LtCmdr Universal
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Pretty sure everyone would except for the Feds :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Ratter116 wrote: »
    Pretty sure everyone would except for the Feds :D

    The use of a U-slot will rase their ire over the fact that we have them on more than one vessel, so I'm against heavy use of U-slots outside of the BoP. My mind can no longer handle the noise of the arguements that may arise.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    I've always thought the solution to this, and almost every other player request for a modified BOFF layout, would be to allow limited player modification of their own personal BOFF layout.

    And ofcourse, as I've always said, if the game allows us KDF's to have one of the only uniquely Federation ships left, I'm running to make another Fed-Bop post.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Jermbot wrote: »
    I've always thought the solution to this, and almost every other player request for a modified BOFF layout, would be to allow limited player modification of their own personal BOFF layout.

    I was looking forward to the First Officer/XO idea to allow this level of customization in a Build.
    What happened to that idea? Wasn't it in the works(tm)?
    And ofcourse, as I've always said, if the game allows us KDF's to have one of the only uniquely Federation ships left, I'm running to make another Fed-Bop post.
    bad memory day. What is this vessel again? While I do not wish to take away from teh feds a unique vessel they posses, it might make sense if the KDF has something design in the reverse ideaolgy.

    Of course with the proposed release of the new Gorn, Orion, Nausican vessels, the T4 and under BoP variants and a flagship. I do not think we are hurting for more vessels and could easily not step on fed toes (to save them the loss of a unique vessel set-up).
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Roach wrote: »
    I was looking forward to the First Officer/XO idea to allow this level of customization in a Build.
    What happened to that idea? Wasn't it in the works(tm)?

    It's coming after the DOFF system. At some point...
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Ratter116 wrote: »
    Pretty sure everyone would except for the Feds :D
    Roach wrote: »
    The use of a U-slot will rase their ire over the fact that we have them on more than one vessel, so I'm against heavy use of U-slots outside of the BoP. My mind can no longer handle the noise of the arguements that may arise.

    well I was meaning that for all Ships fed and klingon.


    Either the above or complete universal.

    Of course I also like to see universal consoles. Each ship gets X Console and you can decide what you slot.

    with the cavet that the console you slot also effect what the bridge office are. Ie if you slot only tac console you can only equip Tactical Bridge officers.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Hi

    I want to fly hegh'ta heavy bird of prey when I reach full rank with Klingon, my question is this ship for tactical, engineer or science officers.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    It has all universal boff slots, its for everyone :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited September 2011
    Idali wrote:
    It has all universal boff slots, its for everyone :)

    Thank you very much for answer.
Sign In or Register to comment.