juanpancho Arc User

I don't think it's a stupid assumption. If you play for a year or two and then suddenly get permabanned and loose all the effort put into it the risk taken would actually be the stupid choice.

I was already aware that you like the rule change, and I'm happy for you and all the people the multiclient part benefits. What I don't like is the 2 simoultaneous accounts cap since I was playing with 3 and would like to keep doing so. I also wanted to refute the "PWI wants to **** the abusive farmers" part as my reading…

If they don't have friends they will just pay cheap change to anyone nearby and continue on soloing. Taking the reactions of people who I explicitly told I multiboxed as a sample, I dare say the numbers of people also doing it must be very low, at least on Sanctuary, as less than 10% of them even knew what it meant.…

As I stated before on this thread, I think it's about money as you say, just not the one made by grinders but the one made by merchants. It's most likely aimed at merchants with buy/sell spots all over the map (maybe 30, 40, 50+ accounts?) that make money without playing and adding to massive amounts of lag. Why do I think…

As far as I have understood by reading related posts/articles, Gold Farming is when people play to get ingame goods and later resell them, just not for ingame coin but for real life money.

Good call dude, on the same boat here. To PWI: I received your "Why did you quit playing Perfect World International?" survey, and you forgot to put a Policie Change option so I can answer properly. Just saying in case you really care.

Because a few months after I started playing I got bored playing just one character, smashing the same key to spam skills so I stoped playing. Then like 8 months later I started playing a second character simultaneously, and after 3 months or so I started getting bored and stopped playing again. Then, like 8 more months…

I didn't think I'd post again on this thread as it seems to me most, if not all, valid points that could motivate an amendment to the new rule (not a rollback to the old one) are already made. Wether PWI takes them into consideration or not is another issue and only time will tell. However, this a technical subtopic for…

The guy that talked about the merchanting issue got me thinking some people may actually create and log at once 15, 20 and maybe more accounts to have a presence all across the hot buying and selling spots on the map. That would be really excesive. But with what you say I totally agree and hope these guys (PWI) may…

Absolutelly agreed, the thing is: how many people make that top level game you talk about? To have a quite objective idea don't think of the people you know and look at how many members form the dominating factions on each server. Now look at the total number of people playing the game. Add to that the fact that you play…

I don't know what the official statistics may be, but multi-boxers under the original policie must be a very small part of the player base, and those among said group with 3+ pcs must have been (not allowed anymore) an even much smaller part of it. I can't really see that as the reason as those MB's that play non-stop may…

The thing is they could not be in the same place, maybe not even in the same continent, yet make you loose your time ticketing anyway.

Some people could lie to you to make you loose your time ticketing.

There's no way you could know if you were ganked by one person multiboxing or 5 angry teenagers lanpartying in one house because they are brothers, cousins, friends, whatever.

As long as they are the only two characters you have logged, yes. The literal extent of the rule would even allow your blue named cleric to heal you, and also give mp if demon cleric, while you PK. Well, on a PVE server where it can be level 30+ and remain blue named of course.

If by "network administration" you meant a bandwidth quota managment, you may be right, though it would be a very poor course of action if that was the goal. In my opinion allowing multiclienting, even if limited, will increase the amount of catshops (and therefore lag) in all Archosaur's, remember there is one per server,…

With the new rule you can run two accounts on two windows on one computer, or one window in two separate computers. Just not more than two in any possible combination. EDIT: ^^ This, and sorry for misleading but I didn't read correctly. If your characters are on the same account they can't be used at the same time. Also…

^^ This. It resizes all HUD elements to a rational proportion at the resolution the OP uses. I just wish it would work on higher resolutions too.

That depends on your motivations. I had stopped playing a little more than a year ago or so my barb and cleric duo started in early '09, but I always kept on reading the forums just for the lol's. Seeing how many people complained about those who do not know how to play the game, how hard it is to get a level 100 to do…

Maybe it was to mitigate the lack of clerics and/or barbs so many people complain about, now everybody can have their own, though not both (J/K). Now seriously, if multiclienting (by far more accessible than multiboxing) is allowed and there is no limit just think about how walking around Archosaur would be.

On the contrary, they have enabled everybody to duo them without needing two computers. The only thing that can't be done anymore is opening it with 1-3 lvl1 alts from other accounts squaded on separate pc's. Also, high level 5 aps dd's, (EDIT) venos and now mystics who can solo this instances paying 3 other players to…

Something like that. With the change you can have two accounts logged, it doesn't matter if it's in one or two pcs, and you actively play both of them or just use one to buff the other. You can mix and match anyway you want the characters you may have on those accounts as long as it's just two at the time. Also, if…

It's your game, it's your rules, so I'll stick to them, but I have to say I've been playing with 3 pcs under what have been your rules so far because it was not considered and "abuse" until today. In fact, it was even encouraged by some mods and gms on the forums when people asked about it. For my part, and as Kitamura…

I highly doubt it considering men must look like a Herc Pet to have huge ****. b:laugh

I can't say for sure as the dq page is down, but I think that as with the chest of coins, it's the other way around and you get coins for dq points. EDIT: NVM... I just visited JoJ...

You don't need proof, for sure PWI staff will not act without the proper study of his/her transactions.

Ok, thanks for the info, I was about to waste some coins on a set of claws to test it just out of curiosity. b:surprised

I have not done this but I think you can use all tiger form skills with claws.

Well... I don't think yourmom was joking, and in fact I think that focus is partially right. Ideally, a really anti-whatever-comes tank should first have hi str but with enough dex to be able to use the highest level heavy or light armor available to your character level, that way you can adjust to tank a phisical or magic…

I agree that build may not be all I think a perfect tank should be, but you (Okami) should post your how-to-build-a-perfect-tank-guide before claiming the right to qualify anyone else as "useless". That way we all could admire it (and you for being so smart, of course) or just laugh at it if it makes little or no sense.…