Spend Promo for 1/28-2/1

Needs to come with complementary marriage packs.

Toddloveleah - Harshlands wrote: »

Agreed, completely useless.

As there haven't been weekly codes lately, no raffle codes and sparkie seems to be mia. PWI must of just decided to have this promo as....something I guess.

But yeah completely worthless unless for some reason you can't get free blessings and happen to be married that's about it.

Yep. Sparkie likes to disappear every now and then. That's most likely due to running multiple sections of the company and being severely short-staffed. As always, when you need to find someone to blame, normally PWE/Wanmei are the general culprits.

Also, sparkie doesn't determine the sales/discounts/prizes, etc. His bosses do.

Toddloveleah - Harshlands wrote: »

Cool story bruh, only thing I said was sparkie went mia I didn't put any blame on him just said he was mia.

Assuming makes a you know what out of you and me.

Assuming? Story? Huh? No assumption involved, but your last comment made you look pretty unaware of the current situation @ PWE. Sparkie runs ARC's community management system and is the CM of a couple other PWE titles.

Unless what you are stating is that sparkiesoft has multiple twins?

Toddloveleah - Harshlands wrote: »

No all I said was diamond rings are worthless unless you are married and can't get free blessings in my last statement.

Then you went off saying sparkie doesn't control prices or anything which IDEK how you got on that subject all I said about sparkie in my whole pretty short statement was he's MIA.

You were assuming I was placing a bunch of blame on sparkie or something, you were wrong deal with it.

No one in this thread so far placed any blame on sparkie and the only person that mentioned sparkie was me and all I said was "sparkie is mia". That's it.

And he is MIA because of what I stated. This isn't a story, lol. I fail to see what you are trying to state.

1.) It's not a story.
2.) Fact: Sparkie is MIA.
3.) Fact: Sparkie is MIA because of the above.
4.) I never assumed anyone placed blame on anyone; you made the assumption that I assumed you assumed something, which in return, was invalid and untrue.
5.) Saying someone is MIA means "missing in action"; I gave the reason(s) why he is "missing in action"; you stated that I assumed you put blame on him for this, which was untrue.

Toddloveleah - Harshlands wrote: »

Then what was this statement even about? were you just saying that to say that because if its not at me then you shouldn't quote or at least make it obvious you aren't saying that at me.

But really I'm not going to keep replying all your replies make zero sense and if you weren't trying to come at me about mentioning sparkie than you sure did fool me because if some read your first statement they would probably guess you were replying to someone that put blame on sparkie which aint true.

peace

I said it because you had initially brought up Sparkie and how he generally is no where to be found. By simply stating where he is and why he is there instead of here, I brought forth an articulate statement of compounding factual evidence. Sure, we could have simply stated "Sparkie is MIA", and left it at that. I think that by quoting the person that stated that and referencing said quote, it makes the initial argument of where sparkie is actually have relevance. One would not simply just state something about a staff member of PWE without context, would they?

For example,

"Yes I could put it in my mouth too!"

That means very little, yes? Plus, it sounds wrong!

Let's put it into context by quoting what the second person in this hypothetical conversation would have stated prior to the above:

"I'm going to grab some bacon and put in in my mouth. How about you?"

Now, by quoting the above, it brings context to the situation. It melds the two together to formulate a cohesive statement, argument, question, theory, retort, etc. When you stated "sparkie is MIA", I made a statement in regards to your statement. In order to properly do that, one should quote the initial statement to give context.

Whether or not you continue to reply is irrelevant. I feel that if a reader saw this, they should have enough context to conclude what my statement was.

Reward Distribution

Promotion is repeatable up to 10 times per character!
All items will be acquired through the in-game mail system.
Reward items will be sent within the first 2 hours following the end of the promotion.
All items acquired will be bound.
Items will be sent to the character that made the purchase.

b:laugh Why do I need 10 of those rings?

No I mean seriously I would understand if it was b pack or exp scrolls or something consumable..
But I wonder what does someone do with 10 of those rings ?b:laugh

even so it's free so... b:bye

yeah its been garbage lately but my personal fave is how they dont mention the have to be married to use it part srry feels like a scam regardless if its spend 40 get it

FYI, if you charge money to get this ring, and are not married, you can go back to the merchant that processed your charge and dispute the charge for PWE not fulfilling their bargain.

This is possible because sparkiesoft does not mention you must be married in game to use the ring. And the ring is being advertised as a 'reward' for charging $40, which is considered a transaction for goods promised by the company. Sure you will get it, but you can't use it, which defeats the purpose.

So...charge away, people. And dispute! That will teach PWE

This is what happens when noobs that have never played pwi, have no idea what items are, decide what we get as 'rewards'.

OOH LOOK SHINY RING yes they will love this..