Same mistake twice?
Comments
-
TBH I agree with the OP's point about the pointlessness of attacking any faction other than Cata right now. If you get a land by pushing Omerta off the map, or stacking Insanity, etc all that will happen is that you'll lose it soon either to Cata or to someone else.
HOWEVER, if you get on the map by having won a stack on Cata, the difference is that you'd be beginning to erode Cata even if by a little. If people stack Cata the way they stacked Insanity, and they manage to grab land, then Cata's advance will be delayed. Their recruitment drive will be put on hold. And that is what will make the difference. Cata's ability to increase its numbers and glean the best of the server depends on its ability to prove that it will win in TW and it current land count.
At the very least, if their land procurement begins to slow down, then their mass recruitment phase may be stunted a bit. That way you don't have them growing stronger as you watch them storm by you. As more stacks occur, their firepower will remain basically the same until the stacks become increased in effectiveness and then cata begins to be less intimidating.
Taking land anywhere else right now is a waste since you'll only lose it later if you don't get other factions to stack with you. The current situation requires a head on approach imho.I seriously wonder: people who don't RPK, if you play the board game "Sorry!" and you roll the dice so that you land on an opponents piece and send it back to the beginning, do you sincerely apologize and ask everyone if you can have a do-over roll so you can give your victim another chance? It's a god damn game..
--LongKnife0 -
HOWEVER, if you get on the map by having won a stack on Cata, the difference is that you'd be beginning to erode Cata even if by a little. If people stack Cata the way they stacked Insanity, and they manage to grab land, then Cata's advance will be delayed. Their recruitment drive will be put on hold. And that is what will make the difference. Cata's ability to increase its numbers and glean the best of the server depends on its ability to prove that it will win in TW and it current land count.
Catalyst has the worst TW's on the server right now. They'd love a good gank. You do realize that they beat Valhalla with less than 60 people, right? You know, the war the whole server was waiting for and Catalyst's most challenging TW so far, and they couldn't even fill the instance. And their recruitment? Go post an application on their forums and see what happens.
Unless this is a troll post. In that case, 10/10.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sig by Bakura~0 -
I LoL'd. It's threads like these that make being the strongest guild entertaining.0
-
Being the strongest guild on PWI is like being the smartest kid with down syndrome.0
-
Rhyme - Harshlands wrote: »Being the strongest guild on PWI is like being the smartest kid with down syndrome.
What does that say about the people who don't play the game but just lurk on the forums?
Are they like the kids who didn't even make the cut for the Special Olympics team?0 -
Irae - Harshlands wrote: »What does that say about the people who don't play the game but just lurk on the forums?
Are they like the kids who didn't even make the cut for the Special Olympics team?
Who said I didn't play PW? I may not play Rhyme anymore but I have plenty of sins and archers to play as.0 -
Ligeia - Harshlands wrote: »If you don't understand why everything here is completely stupid, you shouldn't be talking about TW at all.
Catalyst has the worst TW's on the server right now. They'd love a good gank. You do realize that they beat Valhalla with less than 60 people, right? You know, the war the whole server was waiting for and Catalyst's most challenging TW so far, and they couldn't even fill the instance. And their recruitment? Go post an application on their forums and see what happens.
Unless this is a troll post. In that case, 10/10.
The point was lost in the wording but: when I referred to their "recruitment drive", I meant that influx of strong people who join the faction as it grows stronger and gains a huge amount of land, . I do not know when they will start active recruitment, or if they will at all, but once they start getting that momentum, and they have all the server's best applying to them and their recruitment is open that is when beyond a doubt, there is probably no stopping them.
So re-examining your response:Catalyst has the worst TW's on the server right now. They'd love a good gank.And their recruitment? Go post an application on their forums and see what happens.zbzkda wrote:If people stack Cata the way they stacked Insanity, and they manage to grab land, then Cata's advance will be delayed. Their recruitment drive will be put on hold.
I already know they currently aren't recruiting. It was probably lost in the wording, but the "recruitment drive" I was referring to was nothing but that influx of people who would want to join the strongest guild on the server, and naturally, Catalyst always only takes the best geared applicants, so that time when they do eventually enter open recruitment, if they do, is going to be the time when it'll be most difficult to beat them. IMHO, stacking NOW is the best way to try to take them.
Hope that cleared up any misunderstandings of the first post. Mostly what I was saying was: "If you wanna get land and keep it, organize other guild leaders and stack cata, and stop trying to grab small patches of land.".I seriously wonder: people who don't RPK, if you play the board game "Sorry!" and you roll the dice so that you land on an opponents piece and send it back to the beginning, do you sincerely apologize and ask everyone if you can have a do-over roll so you can give your victim another chance? It's a god damn game..
--LongKnife0 -
The point was lost in the wording but: when I referred to their "recruitment drive", I meant that influx of strong people who join the faction as it grows stronger and gains a huge amount of land, . I do not know when they will start active recruitment, or if they will at all, but once they start getting that momentum, and they have all the server's best applying to them and their recruitment is open that is when beyond a doubt, there is probably no stopping them.
So re-examining your response:
I was very actively talking about ganking them, whether or not they actually want it isn't important: my point was that systematically attacking Catalyst and trying to weaken it if possible is the only "correct" way to take land and hold it right now. Otherwise you'll only lose it soon afterward, and:
To allow you to see that I didn't mean their "recruitment drive" at present and that I indeed meant the big stream of people who would join as they gain map domination:
I already know they currently aren't recruiting. It was probably lost in the wording, but the "recruitment drive" I was referring to was nothing but that influx of people who would want to join the strongest guild on the server, and naturally, Catalyst always only takes the best geared applicants, so that time when they do eventually enter open recruitment, if they do, is going to be the time when it'll be most difficult to beat them. IMHO, stacking NOW is the best way to try to take them.
Hope that cleared up any misunderstandings of the first post. Mostly what I was saying was: "If you wanna get land and keep it, organize other guild leaders and stack cata, and stop trying to grab small patches of land.".
The chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) is a domesticated fowl, a subspecies of the Red Junglefowl. As one of the most common and widespread domestic animals, and with a population of more than 24 billion in 2003,[1] there are more chickens in the world than any other species of bird. Humans keep chickens primarily as a source of food, consuming both their meat and their eggs.
The traditional poultry farming view of the domestication of the chicken is stated in Encyclopaedia Britannica (2007): "Humans first domesticated chickens of Indian origin for the purpose of cockfighting in Asia, Africa, and Europe. Very little formal attention was given to egg or meat production... "[2] Recent genetic studies have pointed to multiple maternal origins in Southeast, East, and South Asia, but with the clade found in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Africa originating in the Indian subcontinent. From India the domesticated fowl made its way to the Persianized kingdom of Lydia in western Asia Minor, and domestic fowl were imported to Greece by the fifth century BC.[3] Fowl had been known in Egypt since the 18th Dynasty, with the "bird that lays every day" having come to Egypt from the land between Syria and Shinar, Babylonia, according to the annals of Tutmose III.[4]
Domestication (from Latin domesticus) or taming is the process whereby a population of animals or plants, through a process of selection, becomes accustomed to human provision and control. A defining characteristic of domestication is artificial selection by humans. Humans have brought these populations under their control and care for a wide range of reasons: to produce food or valuable commodities (such as wool, cotton, or silk), for help with various types of work (such as transportation, protection, and warfare), scientific research, or simply to enjoy as companions or ornaments.[citation needed]
Plants domesticated primarily for aesthetic enjoyment in and around the home are usually called house plants or ornamentals, while those domesticated for large-scale food production are generally called crops. A distinction can be made between those domesticated plants that have been deliberately altered or selected for special desirable characteristics (see cultigen) and those domesticated plants that are essentially no different from their wild counterparts (assuming domestication does not necessarily imply physical modification). Animals domesticated for home companionship are usually called pets while those domesticated for food or work are called livestock or farm animals.[citation needed]
A population is all the organisms that both belong to the same species and live in the same geographical area. The area that is used to define the population is such that inter-breeding is possible between any pair within the area and more probable than cross-breeding with individuals from other areas. Normally breeding is substantially more common within the area than across the border.[1]
In sociology, population refers to a collection of human beings. Demography is a sociological discipline
which entails the statistical study of human populations. This article refers mainly to human population.
In biology, a species is one of the basic units of biological classification and a taxonomic rank. A species is often defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring. While in many cases this definition is adequate, more precise or differing measures are often used, such as similarity of DNA, morphology or ecological niche. Presence of specific locally adapted traits may further subdivide species into subspecies.
The commonly used names for plant and animal taxa sometimes correspond to species: for example, "lion," "walrus," and "Camphor tree"
Biology is a natural science concerned with the study of life and living organisms, including their structure, function, growth, origin, evolution, distribution, and taxonomy.[1] Biology is a vast subject containing many subdivisions, topics, and disciplines. Among the most important topics are five unifying principles that can be said to be the fundamental axioms of modern biology:[2]
Cells are the basic unit of life
New species and inherited traits are the product of evolution
Genes are the basic unit of heredity
An organism regulates its internal environment to maintain a stable and constant condition
Living organisms consume and transform energy.
Subdisciplines of biology are recognized on the basis of the scale at which organisms are studied and the methods used to study them: biochemistry examines the rudimentary chemistry of life; molecular biology studies the complex interactions of systems of biological molecules; cellular biology examines the basic building block of all life, the cell; physiology examines the physical and chemical functions of the tissues, organs, and organ systems of an organism; and ecology examines how various organisms interact and associate with their environment.[3]
Natural science is a branch of science that seeks to elucidate the rules that govern the natural world by applying an empirical and scientific method to the study of the universe. The term natural sciences is used to distinguish it from the social sciences, which apply the scientific method to study human behavior and social patterns; the humanities, which use a critical, or analytical approach to the study of the human condition; and the formal sciences, such as mathematics and logic, which use an a priori, as opposed to factual methodology to study formal systems.
Science (from Latin: scientia meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world.[1][2][3][4] An older and closely related meaning still in use today is that of Aristotle, for whom scientific knowledge was a body of reliable knowledge that can be logically and rationally explained (see "History and etymology" section below).[5]
Since classical antiquity science as a type of knowledge was closely linked to philosophy. In the early modern era the two words, "science" and "philosophy", were sometimes used interchangeably in the English language. By the 17th century, "natural philosophy" (which is today called "natural science") had begun to be considered separately from "philosophy" in general.[6][7] However, "science" continued to be used in a broad sense denoting reliable knowledge about a topic, in the same way it is still used in modern terms such as library science or political science.
In modern use, science is "often treated as synonymous with0 -
I already know they currently aren't recruiting.
Applications have been open again since late June. Since then, we've accepted four people and denied twenty-two (including Kywe, lololol). ijs.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
The point was lost in the wording but: when I referred to their "recruitment drive", I meant that influx of strong people who join the faction as it grows stronger and gains a huge amount of land, . I do not know when they will start active recruitment, or if they will at all, but once they start getting that momentum, and they have all the server's best applying to them and their recruitment is open that is when beyond a doubt, there is probably no stopping them.
So re-examining your response:
I was very actively talking about ganking them, whether or not they actually want it isn't important: my point was that systematically attacking Catalyst and trying to weaken it if possible is the only "correct" way to take land and hold it right now. Otherwise you'll only lose it soon afterward, and:
To allow you to see that I didn't mean their "recruitment drive" at present and that I indeed meant the big stream of people who would join as they gain map domination:
I already know they currently aren't recruiting. It was probably lost in the wording, but the "recruitment drive" I was referring to was nothing but that influx of people who would want to join the strongest guild on the server, and naturally, Catalyst always only takes the best geared applicants, so that time when they do eventually enter open recruitment, if they do, is going to be the time when it'll be most difficult to beat them. IMHO, stacking NOW is the best way to try to take them.
Hope that cleared up any misunderstandings of the first post. Mostly what I was saying was: "If you wanna get land and keep it, organize other guild leaders and stack cata, and stop trying to grab small patches of land.".
http://catalyst.forumotions.com/f1-applications
Which one was yours?Unban me.0 -
I'm not gonna apply to catalyst in the near future: I like the friends I have in the guild where I currently am. Why did you assume I ever applied to Catalyst? I used to very actively patrol their applications page though, and the old Zulu one because I learned a lot about gear from looking at the PwCalc links the applicants gave. Recently they've stopped allowing non-members to actually see the full applications, so I basically have no reason to go to their site anymore.I seriously wonder: people who don't RPK, if you play the board game "Sorry!" and you roll the dice so that you land on an opponents piece and send it back to the beginning, do you sincerely apologize and ask everyone if you can have a do-over roll so you can give your victim another chance? It's a god damn game..
--LongKnife0 -
Rhyme - Harshlands wrote: »Being the strongest guild on Harshlands is like being the smartest kid with down syndrome.
edit for truth
i do enjoy the chatter about who's shielding whom. personally i'm putting on my flame shield so g12 fire shards can't touch me.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk