More executors

Not going to vote no, because I never experienced problems with officers.

1. Pick your officers correctly
2. Executors can't kick.

Only directors and leaders can kick, do you want 30 of those for this reason?

So since my last post on this thread I didn't see much recruiting when I was playing. I saw one faction who actually had more than one person recruit on WC. So I think 12 executors is enough. Alot of times the leaders who promote players to executors don't do their job. I still want marshals to have the ability to boot players. That's only because some executors in factions do ninja invites and don't check out the player to see what they're like.

Seriously, explain to me what these so powerful executors do so much for your faction and the reason why you need more. So far you have stated no plausable reason. "Faction too big. Need more ppl to handle the children in here" or "Players want to 'succeed' in the faction" are both stupid and senseless.

About the previous question, its a yes. Everyone is happy with their positions. Only a child cares about titles and if you have good people in your faction, they'll lead and help out regardless.

Many factions have people playing in many places (Europe and America). This means many diferents playing times, we need more executors because many times no executors conected.

The fact you dont have any executor at a certain timezone isnt a reason.

Kar_rak - Sanctuary wrote: »

Absoluth, don't you still understand human behaviour, don't you? :P It's a matter of position and power, the 75% of the human population want it, and being an executor is nice in this game, it means you are well-seen in the faction

In other words, there really isnt any need for more executors. It just looks 'cute'.
Human behaviour is obvious, but doesnt apply on a discussion about the need of a higher number of positions. There isnt a single developer that would bother to make any change if the sole reason for it is because some players wanna feel special in their factions. However, they do listen to more objective suggestion, like for instance if only ranked players could build towers during TW battle. Having more ranked members would make it easier to build a strategy in multiple defense situations.
You see the diference? Practical use, not ego.

So unless they give more meaning to the rank itself (we could suggest new abilities for each rank, like extra functions during TW or access to a 'faction vault' npc or seomthing) , it remains unnecessary to have more.

Btw, for those giving the ego motive, the higher number of ranks -> the less meaningful the positions are -> the more insulting it will be not having 1 -> the higher number of members wanting 1. You're just snowballing a problem you shouldnt be having in the first place.

Uh, weird. Posts dissapeared and appeared again

blackcid4 wrote: »

Many factions have people playing in many places (Europe and America). This means many diferents playing times, we need more executors because many times no executors conected.

It's up to the faction leader and director to ensure they have covered time zones with the executors they have promoted.

I don't see this as a valid reason to add more positions.

and MY point is no one can come up with a good reason why they need more..
saying I need more does not make it so.
I asked a few pages ago Why would a faction need more executors.
I've seen "the time-zone reason", which could be remedied by choosing wisely the 12 executors we can already have.
"Big guilds would be easier to manage" .. how ?
What can executors do that no-one else in the guild can't except recruit ?

All an executor can do is recruit.

Please someone explain how 18 people is not enough to recruit in a faction.
(because marshalls, executors, the director and the leader can all recruit as well)b:surrender