More executors
blackcid4
Posts: 121 Arc User
I think 30 executors will be better than 12.
Post edited by blackcid4 on
0
Comments
-
Does the maximum number of each rank increase in relation to the level of the faction, or are we stuck with the same number of officers no matter what lvl the fac is?I used to wonder why I would have these scary dreams every month. About the wolf, who kept running through town. And as I wondered, I also thought about how I couldn't remember having those dreams before being bitten by this very big dog...
But now I know the truth.
And I am not afraid.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Shredclaw - Sanctuary wrote: »Does the maximum number of each rank increase in relation to the level of the faction, or are we stuck with the same number of officers no matter what lvl the fac is?
Stuck with the same amount of officers regardless of faction level.
Which kinda sucks depending on the size/popularity/etc of your faction.0 -
Now there are:
1 leader
1 director
4 marshal
12 executors
I think will be better:
1 leader
4 director
8 marshal
30 executors
b:pleased0 -
Wow, that sucks. I thought there could be more than one director. You're right about this, we NEED more officers. My fac is already at the limit.I used to wonder why I would have these scary dreams every month. About the wolf, who kept running through town. And as I wondered, I also thought about how I couldn't remember having those dreams before being bitten by this very big dog...
But now I know the truth.
And I am not afraid.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
And... why executors limit? I don't understand this limit...0
-
Its good the way it is atm.I was early taught to work as well as play,
My life has been one long, happy holiday;
Full of work and full of play-
I dropped the worry on the way-
And God was good to me everyday.0 -
Oh really Lloyd? Are u in a fact with 150 members? I guess you are not... I support this suggestion strongly, we NEED more officers, executors above all. And at least one more director and 2 marshals.For a true Daeva's and Nakir's Swords! Sign at the post!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163102
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Do you really need over 20% of a faction's population to be an officer type?
b:puzzled
I find the current setup acceptable (maybe, apart from the titles themselves, which sound a bit odd).0 -
2 Leaders like Spartans, 4 directors, 8 marshals and 20 executors.0
-
Yes, we need so Belial, it would be more equitative and would erase some internal "fights" for achieving the Executor and Marshal Positions
Mike's proposition is great too. The second Leader could be de "Right Hand" XDDDFor a true Daeva's and Nakir's Swords! Sign at the post!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163102
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
More Executors Ftw0
-
I've thought about what kar_rak said and I think too that it would be more equitative and easy to manage with more officers.0
-
Most of the time only the most exceptional members can be officers, so the current number is sufficient. But hell, wut do I know? my faction GFMC has less than 10 members.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
I made a poll for vote this suggestion.0
-
its pretty ok the way it is now maybe 15 executors and 5 marshalls but well 1 director is good same for leader
but the way it is now isnt that bad at allits impossible to always do the right thing we all make mistakes i am not different from that
just try to be a good person
english isn't my native language so there might be a few spelling/grammatical errors in my posts0 -
I think the best is more executors and marshals... and if it is possible, more directors XDDDD.0
-
definately need more marshals, directors and executors.
cant manage a guild of about 200 players with 1 director and 4 marshals properly[SIGPIC]i415.photobucket.com/albums/pp237/DoT_Ending/Sigs/Evilcopy.png[/SIGPIC]0 -
Why ?
(No option for "No, it's fine the way it is.")0 -
What makes you think trippling the amount of officers will help in any way? If your members arent helpful being regular players, they wont be helpful being officers. Its not 12, 30, 50 or 100 officers that will make your faction any better if they were problematic before being given a rank.No, I love guild problems
If you didnt have failures are leaders, you wouldnt have given this option. If you want a decent poll, please give an option all players can pick. I myself would go for "No, since its unnecessary".cant manage a guild of about 200 players with 1 director and 4 marshals properlyPWI:
"Free to play. Pay to win"
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
So let's see... you think that the fact is divided into groups of 10 people who are commanded by 1 executor.. nice deduction!!!! WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that's not true and you know that :P everyone is free, and the purpose of this thread is not that one.
The point is giving more people the skill to add more useful people to the guild since, for example, spanish guilds have people from spain, from south america... from a wide time territory, so that can be a problem :P
Also the fact of giving a executor position can be problematic 'cause everyone wanna succeed in the guild. Believe me, it would be easier to manage a guild with more positions. Or u are in a guild where everyone is happy with his/her position? I don't think so, and if you think so, then there are 2 possibilities:
1.- you are in a small fact
2.- you are blind :PFor a true Daeva's and Nakir's Swords! Sign at the post!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163102
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Kar_rak - Sanctuary wrote: »Believe me, it would be easier to manage a guild with more positions.
How ? please explain
I don't get it..
As you can already have X amount of executors, as a guild leader it's your responsibility to choose people from different time zones so recruiting is not a problem. Unless you're in one of those guilds that'll recruit anyone without a faction, so you need an executor in every town on the map to recruit..
If someone can't wait a few hours or a day to be recruted into your faction, do you really want to recruit them in the first place ?
Do you want to recruit somone in a different time zone from the rest of the guild, who you'll never see on and will eventually just join another faction ?
anyway, that's just MY opinion.. I must be blind b:chuckle0 -
Well I think you all need to pick better officers. The endSpoons you will forever be missed in this community0
-
Yep, it's responsability of the leader and the director. But what if everyone is good for the position?For a true Daeva's and Nakir's Swords! Sign at the post!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163102
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Kar_rak - Sanctuary wrote: »So let's see... you think that the fact is divided into groups of 10 people who are commanded by 1 executor.. nice deduction!!!! WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! that's not true and you know that :P everyone is free, and the purpose of this thread is not that one.
The point is giving more people the skill to add more useful people to the guild since, for example, spanish guilds have people from spain, from south america... from a wide time territory, so that can be a problem :P
Also the fact of giving a executor position can be problematic 'cause everyone wanna succeed in the guild. Believe me, it would be easier to manage a guild with more positions. Or u are in a guild where everyone is happy with his/her position? I don't think so, and if you think so, then there are 2 possibilities:
1.- you are in a small fact
2.- you are blind :P
Generally, I found (during my guild times on Guild Wars mainly, not here) people who were using officer positions in a guild in order to 'succeed', for 'statu's - they actually did not make the best officers at all.
I find that 18 people is sufficient - but each to their own. I would vote, but those poll options are not exactly... objective .0 -
Poll is not objective? XDDD b:victory0
-
12 executors is enough. Most executors don't recruit anyway. I think marshals should be able to boot people from the factions tho.0
-
Xenaaah - Heavens Tear wrote: »12 executors is enough. Most executors don't recruit anyway. I think marshals should be able to boot people from the factions tho.
Why you write in red?0 -
Rpgradiostorm
"Because your MP3 player doesn't have cookies."
I need to stop reading every sig I see. Now look what you did, I'm hungry.
Lol Black, 2 reasons why some peopl write in red. 1: It attracts attention. The human mind naturallly directs itself to things that stand out. 2: It just looks cool.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
just more executors alone, u shouldn't need THAT much executors b:bye Just the people u know, so 15 is enough. I voted yes, but, not by that much
It creates a problem (a real one) if u made lots of people especially ones you don't know. Why do that? if someone kicks your fellow members for faction from a childish reason you won't be happy would you?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Thanks for Flauschkatze for siggy b:cool
VIT > STR > DEX > MAG... GG
HA > LA > AR... GG
HA + VIT = win b:bye0 -
We dont make executors the people we don't know, that would be unconscious and stupid :P That's not a reason for not implementing it Yulk.
And please, don't try to pull attraction with red colours and such, it looks so childish.For a true Daeva's and Nakir's Swords! Sign at the post!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=163102
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk