weakest class?
AndromedaB - Sanctuary
Posts: 1,376 Arc User
what do u think is the weakest class in pvp and pve
as in which needs a boost the most
and why
as in which needs a boost the most
and why
Post edited by AndromedaB - Sanctuary on
0
Comments
-
attention **** much?
http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=247582
Now watch as 80%+ people say Wizard is the most gimped and 90%+ say veno is the most OP.
Thanks for the two extra threads.0 -
not really sure what you mean by weak... but wiz got almost no survivability and lose a lot of 1v1 pks (I know we have our place in TW etc.. but so do all other classes) Just seems like other classes have some way to live.. some kind of a reliable stun or one of those skills that absorb damage etc..Youtube Channel: youtube.com/user/D2VeT/videos?flow=grid&view=0
Current gear: pwcalc.com/6ab2893fbfb080a8
[SIGPIC]http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=684hgk&s=5[/SIGPIC]0 -
I see PW-MY class names! Shame on you! b:surrenderNon-mule alts:
Drazo - Venomancer - Dreamweaver - Semi-active
Knatami - Barbarian - Heavens Tear - Inactive
Drazorus - Archer - Sanctuary - Inactive
Cidemami - Cleric - Dreamweaver - Inactive
Recilsami - Blademaster - Heavens Tear - Inactive
DrazoThePsy - Psychic - Dreamweaver - Active
DrazoTheSas - Assassin - Dreamweaver - Active0 -
Having played all of them, I'd have to say none of them.Main characters
Celestial Sage Venomancer Zoe - 100
Sage Barbarian Malego - 910 -
Venos are pretty bad in PvP but EXCELENT in PvE. But many people say Wiz are the worse. I personally think it has to be cleric do to the fact they can accidentally heal the enemy player and its HARD to do your quests. Also you burn through mana really fast.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
SoultheWolf - Lost City wrote: »Venos are pretty bad in PvP but EXCELENT in PvE. But many people say Wiz are the worse. I personally think it has to be cleric do to the fact they can accidentally heal the enemy player and its HARD to do your quests. Also you burn through mana really fast.
I know 1 veno who haven't gotten her nix yet.0 -
SoultheWolf - Lost City wrote: »Venos are pretty bad in PvP but EXCELENT in PvE. But many people say Wiz are the worse. I personally think it has to be cleric do to the fact they can accidentally heal the enemy player and its HARD to do your quests. Also you burn through mana really fast.
Veno bad in PvP? News to me...Youtube Channel: youtube.com/user/D2VeT/videos?flow=grid&view=0
Current gear: pwcalc.com/6ab2893fbfb080a8
[SIGPIC]http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=684hgk&s=5[/SIGPIC]0 -
Adroit - Lost City wrote: »not really sure what you mean by weak... but wiz got almost no survivability and lose a lot of 1v1 pks (I know we have our place in TW etc.. but so do all other classes) Just seems like other classes have some way to live.. some kind of a reliable stun or one of those skills that absorb damage etc..
add vit or change your entire armor set. isnt that what everyone tells a robe veno that gets 1 hit by everyone? every other class can change their build as well before crying about how they feel cheated and their class gets screwed so bad.0 -
add vit or change your entire armor set. isnt that what everyone tells a robe veno that gets 1 hit by everyone? every other class can change their build as well before crying about how they feel cheated and their class gets screwed so bad.
i have tried both non **** biulds for wiz
both suck
and because i tried pure and LA i know how it does
not too great0 -
add vit or change your entire armor set. isnt that what everyone tells a robe veno that gets 1 hit by everyone? every other class can change their build as well before crying about how they feel cheated and their class gets screwed so bad.
You are right, veno can be good in PVP if they are not a robe, it will be even better if they have a nix. but you should also know not every veno want to PVP only. I have said to switch to heavy when I reach 70, then 80, then 90, just do not know if I will eventually switch or not. may be when I decide to go PVP only. but overall I do not think veno is weak at all.0 -
Wizards are weak?
A level 54 wizard can double her physical defense, so arcane wizards with pdef ornaments can have good defense, and light armor wizards can have great physical defense. And, with distance shrink, wizards should be able to pick their battles. I think wizards have relatively low health only because they can make such good use of their own health.
But, if I were comparing strengths and weaknesses, I would compare them based on skills and builds and gear -- and not just on class.0 -
Fleuri - Sanctuary wrote: »Wizards are weak?
A level 54 wizard can double her physical defense, so arcane wizards with pdef ornaments can have good defense, and light armor wizards can have great physical defense. And, with distance shrink, wizards should be able to pick their battles. I think wizards have relatively low health only because they can make such good use of their own health.
But, if I were comparing strengths and weaknesses, I would compare them based on skills and builds and gear -- and not just on class.
u've obviously never played a wizardYoutube Channel: youtube.com/user/D2VeT/videos?flow=grid&view=0
Current gear: pwcalc.com/6ab2893fbfb080a8
[SIGPIC]http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=684hgk&s=5[/SIGPIC]0 -
Its common knowledge that wizzies pre 6x have life miserable. Most everyone concedes this. Doesn't make em less fun to play though imo.0
-
wizzies need some easier way to deal w/ incr magic resis mobs. lol
but overall in pve, a lot of the misery would be gone if wizzies squad with someone.0 -
I never had any problems with my wizard in PvE. Just depends on how you play it.
Arguably clerics are a bit easier, since they can heal and all. lol0 -
Adroit - Lost City wrote: »u've obviously never played a wizard
I am a delicate archer and, from my point of view, getting hit usually means I made a mistake or had inadequate gear or both.
But, actually, I have played a wizard, and I found myself almost always kiting. Level 3 wizards get gush, but I see low level wizards just standing there and I wonder about them.0 -
VENO BAD WEK
WUTKINDA CLASS WOLD LOOOOSE N OEVONE VS OW N PETtt?0 -
Rule - Heavens Tear wrote: »Its common knowledge that wizzies pre 6x have life miserable. Most everyone concedes this. Doesn't make em less fun to play though imo.
Miserable? At 50 or so I was running the cube succesfully everyday (LA ftw), unfortuanately atm I feel really weak as at this point in time with my BM I was doing about the same damage per hit but hitting more often due to diferences in cast time, so I am feeling extremely weak...Seraph - Dreamweaver wrote: »I never had any problems with my wizard in PvE. Just depends on how you play it.
Arguably clerics are a bit easier, since they can heal and all. lol
Agree with the first part, disagree with the second, cleric repairs bills will theoretically be higher since they can't kite as well as wizards, thus relying on their heals to keep them alive while they get hit. I may be wrong, I dunno, I could never play a cleric.Fleuri - Sanctuary wrote: »I am a delicate archer and, from my point of view, getting hit usually means I made a mistake or had inadequate gear or both.
But, actually, I have played a wizard, and I found myself almost always kiting. Level 3 wizards get gush, but I see low level wizards just standing there and I wonder about them.
Just because we don't run doesn't mean there is something wrong with us. In the low levels I ran, alot, but now I rarely actually run simply because it is less time efficient.
There is only two real problem with wizards and those are 1) Alot of people think we suck so won't help us or whatever. 2) Our knockback range fails hardcore, whats the point of having to run into a caster mob to be able to knock them back? 10m isn't long enough to be useful unless you are solo grinding seaweed thieves or other pure physical mobs...
All classes are completely balanced if you look at pve and pvp together, but if you look at one or the other then you will undoubtedly find a class lacks in one area or the other.0 -
From my pvp experiences... its pretty balanced. There is no class I run from and no class I keep an eye out for, for easy points. (except maybe venos lol they are -usually- squishy and easy to kill) 90+ Wiz in pvp are insanely scary too, PlazmaStryke 3-4 shots me(LA wiz, with my charm and pots.. damn my heavy armor[still farming my robes]) b:sad
For pve, weakest defensively, maybe wizard. Slowest killer, maybe cleric.0 -
Obsessed - Heavens Tear wrote: »From my pvp experiences... its pretty balanced. There is no class I run from and no class I keep an eye out for, for easy points. (except maybe venos lol they are -usually- squishy and easy to kill) 90+ Wiz in pvp are insanely scary too, PlazmaStryke 3-4 shots me(LA wiz, with my charm and pots.. damn my heavy armor[still farming my robes]) b:sad
For pve, weakest defensively, maybe wizard. Slowest killer, maybe cleric.
Barbs are the slowest killers. Clerics are pretty much among the fastest if you can afford pots/powders/charms.b:victory0 -
Mothergoose - Sanctuary wrote: »Barbs are the slowest killers. Clerics are pretty much among the fastest if you can afford pots/powders/charms.b:victory
When lev 90's put out thier opinions, perhaps a bit more weight should be given.0 -
Venomancer's! cause their Phoenix is so dang weak!
Next.. Archer's. Since when does an arrow in the **** hurt more then getting hit by a huge fireball?
Weakest at tanking hits.. Barbarian. Their mdef is sooooo low it's laughable.
I think.... they're all equally as weak as eachother!0 -
Wizards are pretty much the weakest.
Why?
Because i am a 70+ wizard so i am allowed to say that lol.
It comes down to this essentially.
The damage to channel/cast time ratio is effed up.
For the amount of time it takes to fire off a "powerful" skill, the damage should make people want to defecate in their pants.
And it simply doesnt.
Also, considering how squishy we are?...the damage should definitely be higher. I dont mind being squishy, but usually damage makes up for it (at least for mages in other games).
People say, yea, but your magic defense is through the roof!.....
Well, what good does that do when every other class has a means of hitting with a physical attack?
I know im only 70, and yes i am full magic. (LA simply doesnt fit the true mage build). I think my damage is decent...but nothing special.
Now, i understand all of this changes at 99+ for mages.....but lets face it, 99 out of 100 people will never get that far. Especially with the hardest class to level (arguably).
Personally, i think PWE knows the love for a "mage" type build in online games, and they didnt want everyone and their mother (literally) rolling a mage for damage purposes.
They chose archers for that instead. lol0 -
Mothergoose - Sanctuary wrote: »Barbs are the slowest killers. Clerics are pretty much among the fastest if you can afford pots/powders/charms.b:victory0
-
Wizards.
You know something is wrong when Cleric's skills have the same damage (for starter skills), and nearly the same damage (ultimate / wield thunder) yet Clerics have buffs and can heal themselves.
Either tone down the cleric's skill damage, or raise the mage's.
Its ridiculous that Pyrogram, Gush are simply animation switches of Plume Shot and Cyclone. (And even more ridiculous that Plume shot is physical where as pyrogram is magic).
You probably could have gotten away with just giving a cleric pyrogram and gush.0 -
Chocooo - Lost City wrote: »Wizards.
You know something is wrong when Cleric's skills have the same damage (for starter skills), and nearly the same damage (ultimate / wield thunder) yet Clerics have buffs and can heal themselves.
Either tone down the cleric's skill damage, or raise the mage's.
Its ridiculous that Pyrogram, Gush are simply animation switches of Plume Shot and Cyclone. (And even more ridiculous that Plume shot is physical where as pyrogram is magic).
You probably could have gotten away with just giving a cleric pyrogram and gush.
Couldn't agree more.
Wizards honestly need their own magic attack buff that stacks with clerics, to set them apart from clerics.0 -
Hm? I know Wizards who tick my charm 1 shot o.O with HP buffs on even.0
-
XAsch - Sanctuary wrote: »Hm? I know Wizards who tick my charm 1 shot o.O with HP buffs on even.0
-
XAsch - Sanctuary wrote: »Hm? I know Wizards who tick my charm 1 shot o.O with HP buffs on even.
Then you stun them and gobble them up? MMMM Wizzy bites!
Wiz is all about spike dmg. And Mag dmg. A guaranteed pain for BM\Barb. since your defence against mag is poor. But at lev 89, those wizzies have to be awfully high level just to scratch you?0 -
Friction - Lost City wrote: »Wizards honestly need their own magic attack buff that stacks with clerics, to set them apart from clerics.
I'm sorry, but that's just BS. How would giving Wizards a Magic attack buff like the clerics set them apart? it would make them more similar!!
As a cleric I'm bored of the limited attack skills I have. I wouldn't mind some different elements, and I definitely wouldn't mind a skill giving me +100% Physical defense of equipment value instead of a skill that lasts 20 seconds and just drains my charm over that period. it's not even usable without a charm (btw. I'm talking about plume shell). Yes it keeps me alive for a while, but duels just prove how much MP it drains.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk