Drakeflame vs DS
monkeysir35
Posts: 0 Arc User
So my friend is R999 seeker and plans on getting full JoSD on armor and 2 Deity Stones for weapon.
Which is better for damage, 2 Drakeflame stones in the sword or 2 DS? Thank you in advance.
Which is better for damage, 2 Drakeflame stones in the sword or 2 DS? Thank you in advance.
Post edited by monkeysir35 on
0
Comments
-
I think if you cant find that out for yourself, youre not worth that kind of gear b:chuckleEverything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0
-
2 Drakeflames easy answer, I don't have my excel at work, but just think it this way: Do you know any endgame toon? A couple? Are they all using +Phys/Mag Atk shards? Yes? Then you have your answer.
Long answer would be doing the calcs that I bet someone will have the time toWannaBM - Archosaur wrote: »I think if you cant find that out for yourself, youre not worth that kind of gear b:chuckle
Don't be mean... not eveyone is good at maths/excel xD Plus he's talking about a friend, not himself :P0 -
Tl:dr drakeflames
See the wiki on damage for explanations for any formulas.
Assumptions:
Sage seeker 800 str => attack multiplier 7.23 (1+(800/150)+0.9)
Average physical attack = 32000 => current weapon attack 4426
Attack lvls 140
Going up against an enemy with 80 def lvls
Ignoring spirit
Looking at damage before reductions like enemy pdef etc
Drakeflames: +200 weapon attack
7.23*(4426+200) = 33445.98 ~raw attack
33445.98 *0.25=8361.5 ~after PvP reduction
8361.5*(1+(140-80/100))=13378.4 ~damage
Deity stones: + 4 attack lvls
7.23*4426 = 32000 ~raw attack
32000*0.25=8000 ~after PvP reduction
8000*(1+(144-80/100))=13120 ~damage
Any other gem: You would be surprised how many people run around with elemental shards for dat metal damage
7.23*4426=32000 ~raw damage
32000*0.25=8000 ~after PvP reduction
8000*(1+(140-80/100))=12800 ~damage
12800+100+100 (if metal attack) = 13000
12800 (if not metal)
Drakeflames win. Plus with reawakening you’re getting an extra multiplier from all the str, so maxing out weapon attack with shards/cards is well worth it.DarkSkiesx - Demon Archer
mypers.pw/1.7/#114350
DarkSeasx - Sage Assassin
mypers.pw/1.7/#136481
youtube.com/darkskiesx
Tempest-dw.shivtr.com0 -
WannaBM - Archosaur wrote: »I think if you cant find that out for yourself, youre not worth that kind of gear b:chuckle
Like I said it's for a friend, I have my full g16 and have no desire to spend 3k on pixels. He thinks that the DS stones are better and I was telling him that drakestones where better.
Thank you Socqar and DarkSkiesx for the information.0 -
I can't remember the figure off hand but a +32 garnet will do more dmg than one att level shard in your weapon. It was calculated long ago the damage range a weapon would need to exceed a drake and it was pretty ridiculous.Marine - Marshall - Raging Tides - Retired
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
DEMHEALSMAN - Dreamweaver
Yes, because people really need 900+ dex or 1000+ magic just for the lulz0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk