Can we get some direction on what's happening with Archosaur TW?

GlenRoss - Archosaur

Currently the map shows the correct (to the best of my knowledge) state of ownership. All the colors seem to be right, as of the end of last week's fights. The arrows indicating this week's wars, however, are from last week.

So my faction is shown as attacking a land we won last week, hence already own.

To further complicate matters, mousing over the land we intend to attack this week shows that, yes, we are attacking them. Now we are attacking two lands on the same day. Additionally, if the intention is to roll back the map, we are no longer adjacent to the land we intend to attack.

The attacks are scheduled for different times so we are preparing our members for two fights. But this resolution makes no sense. Suppose we lose the land in the rematch of last week's fight. Then we should not have been able to bid on the second. Do they protest and get to keep their land?

What if someone had bid, this week, on the land we took last week? Can't fight a three-way battle. The faction that would have been this week's bidder would have been bidding on fighting us. Suppose we fought and lost it before they step onto the field. Now they fight an opponent they didn't bid on.

Really guys. We need some direction immediately, so we can tell our people when and where to show up.

tick tock

Metalogue - Archosaur

I've been searching for an answer on this, and haven't found anything. I've been told some factions leaders have been paid as if they owned the lands that they lost last weekend. I'm really excited to see how it all turns out, and I am shocked that there hasn't been anything addressed to this issue yet. Okay, actually, I'm not shocked at all. My assumption is that the bid that was placed this week will only be in effect and valid, but yeah... sucks to prepare for a fight, especially those TWs that are at the same time, on an assumption. >_>


Two simultaneous TW attacks >_> just gg.

OMGBowPewPew - Archosaur

The fact that it hasn't even been addressed is ridiculous!!!

Jarkhen - Archosaur

I got paid as if my faction owned two lands (we won our third last week) - as such, I think it prudent to assume that land ownership has been reverted to last weeks'. The battles will be what is stated when you hover over each territory - which, yes, means quite a few factions will have two attacks this weekend.

Poopinpanto - Heavens Tear

put on a blind fold and go to war..simple.

SinfulLia - Archosaur

Poopinpanto - Heavens Tear wrote: »

put on a blind fold and go to war..simple.

'merica!

paralleogram

For those of us who don't have chars on this server, what wound up happening? b:shocked

GlenRoss - Archosaur

paralleogram wrote: »

For those of us who don't have chars on this server, what wound up happening? b:shocked

All of this week's battles were fought. All of last week's battles were fought.

Side note: In a world where sportsmanship is sometimes in short supply, our "re-opponent" Immunity showed a world of class on Saturday.

We (PandoraBX) and Immunity have had a number of hotly-contested, but always well-played battles, in recent weeks. Each guild has won their fair share.

We attacked City of the Lost, last week, and won the land from Immunity.
This week, we revved up to fight that battle all over again.
When the time came, we raced down the lanes, all the way to the opponents base, only to find our opponent gathered near their steps, all the catas parked and motionless.
We destroyed the crystal, during which time some of their people walked into our midst and sat down to watch.

Very classy gesture.
Kudos and thanks.

paralleogram

GlenRoss - Archosaur wrote: »

All of this week's battles were fought. All of last week's battles were fought.

Side note: In a world where sportsmanship is sometimes in short supply, our "re-opponent" Immunity showed a world of class on Saturday.

We (PandoraBX) and Immunity have had a number of hotly-contested, but always well-played battles, in recent weeks. Each guild has won their fair share.

We attacked City of the Lost, last week, and won the land from Immunity.
This week, we revved up to fight that battle all over again.
When the time came, we raced down the lanes, all the way to the opponents base, only to find our opponent gathered near their steps, all the catas parked and motionless.
We destroyed the crystal, during which time some of their people walked into our midst and sat down to watch.

Very classy gesture.
Kudos and thanks.

yeah, that wouldn't happen on LC.

Untamed_pain - Archosaur

LOL, i can't wait to have longer then a 5 min tw. Guess it's good i got 2 toons in 2 different tw guilds. b:chuckle

__Sami__ - Archosaur

GlenRoss - Archosaur wrote: »

All of this week's battles were fought. All of last week's battles were fought.

Side note: In a world where sportsmanship is sometimes in short supply, our "re-opponent" Immunity showed a world of class on Saturday.

We (PandoraBX) and Immunity have had a number of hotly-contested, but always well-played battles, in recent weeks. Each guild has won their fair share.

We attacked City of the Lost, last week, and won the land from Immunity.
This week, we revved up to fight that battle all over again.
When the time came, we raced down the lanes, all the way to the opponents base, only to find our opponent gathered near their steps, all the catas parked and motionless.
We destroyed the crystal, during which time some of their people walked into our midst and sat down to watch.

Very classy gesture.
Kudos and thanks.

Watch to see faction leaders getting banned for breaking TW rules. While it was classy move, it was a clear violation of rules.

GlenRoss - Archosaur

__Sami__ - Archosaur wrote: »

Watch to see faction leaders getting banned for breaking TW rules. While it was classy move, it was a clear violation of rules.

Hadn't really thought about that.

It would be a really jerk move that benefits no one and it was a correction to a "glitch". Right now PWI wants to repair the game and our attitudes. I don't think they will go out of their way to punish a gesture of sportsmanship.

(If I'm wrong, sorry brothers/sisters. I was only trying to give you the good pub you deserve.)

Eoria - Harshlands

GlenRoss - Archosaur wrote: »

Hadn't really thought about that.

It would be a really jerk move that benefits no one and it was a correction to a "glitch". Right now PWI wants to repair the game and our attitudes. I don't think they will go out of their way to punish a gesture of sportsmanship.

(If I'm wrong, sorry brothers/sisters. I was only trying to give you the good pub you deserve.)

They'll only get banned if reported, most likely. And even then, if they submit an explanation for it if they do get banned, GMs will probably take that into consideration and unban. Maybe.