Posible with epic recasts ?
BKXIX - Heavens Tear
Posts: 14 Arc User
Post edited by BKXIX - Heavens Tear on
0
Comments
-
Nope, the weapon can get -0.05 x 3 at most. You'd need -0.15 OHT bracers to make up for that.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
How many theoretical recasts would you have to get those bonuses?Once upon a time I was stuck in Hall of Deception.
The Devs felt sorry for me having to smash lowbies all day, so they decided to promote me.
I then rerolled a Psychic.0 -
Pretty relevant (also still on page 1): pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=14815710
-
BKXIX - Heavens Tear wrote: »
Once you have that gear, make a video of it, and we can tell you what we think b:victory, until that time it is best to guard comments, for fear of being called those ugly creatures people call trolls.0 -
BKXIX - Heavens Tear wrote: »
what do you think b:shocked
I think, this is stupid. b:bye[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
BKXIX - Heavens Tear wrote: »
I think it would be stupid to do that with a bm when a 5aps axe demon barb would have far better damage output and defenses due to the possibility of using R9rr. Here: http://pwcalc.com/26913ec7dc9776d5
Also, not a smart thing to do, waste your life trying for nearly impossible rolls.
P.s.: I'd rather use jades, but I put vit stones so the HP and defense difference could show in numbers.0 -
augustfinknottle wrote: »I think it would be stupid to do that with a bm when a 5aps axe demon barb would have far better damage output and defenses due to the possibility of using R9rr. Here: http://pwcalc.com/26913ec7dc9776d5
Also, not a smart thing to do, waste your life trying for nearly impossible rolls.
P.s.: I'd rather use jades, but I put vit stones so the HP and defense difference could show in numbers.
Who said tank barbs can't hold aggro? b:chuckle
But it's still not possible for R8R weapons to have more than 3x -0.05, so...[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »Who said tank barbs can't hold aggro? b:chuckle
But it's still not possible for R8R weapons to have more than 3x -0.05, so...
Alright, then. This lame build would do it: http://pwcalc.com/3924685e79ef6e6db:sad0 -
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »Who said tank barbs can't hold aggro? b:chuckle
Me. Over and over again. Lets hope the devour upgrade fixes it. Then they gotta work on AoE aggro.FateBlade - Lost City wrote: »I think, this is stupid. b:bye
+1.
Make realistic and probable builds, not "vaguely possible" builds. Its just wishin and trollin, and really confuses new people who are actually interested in getting ahead in game without impossible ****.pwcalc.com/bb6fc16982637a5c / pwcalc.com/28948ee5778526f50 -
Curiosity for you BMs in R9.
Would primeval in the weapon be a better viable option then garnets?
Hear me out and yes I'm hijacking this thread because I think it's a little silly.
The added damage of 2 garnets net's you about an extra 600 raw damage in PvP. Vs an extra 2% crit for a higher chance for a zerk crit which is a potential 1 shot/charm bypass depending on the skill and class it's used on.0 -
Curiosity for you BMs in R9.
Would primeval in the weapon be a better viable option then garnets?
Hear me out and yes I'm hijacking this thread because I think it's a little silly.
The added damage of 2 garnets net's you about an extra 600 raw damage in PvP. Vs an extra 2% crit for a higher chance for a zerk crit which is a potential 1 shot/charm bypass depending on the skill and class it's used on.
Jen didnt someone do a comparison of like 20% crit with X+garnet damage vs 22% Crit with X damage somewhere in another thread, showing the 20% cirt with X+Garnet damage being better?pwcalc.com/bb6fc16982637a5c / pwcalc.com/28948ee5778526f50 -
Maelael - Heavens Tear wrote: »Jen didnt someone do a comparison of like 20% crit with X+garnet damage vs 22% Crit with X damage somewhere in another thread, showing the 20% cirt with X+Garnet damage being better?
Overall, I guess. But she's talking about the advantage of having a zerk crit more often.
Far from an expert on pvp here, but arent (zerk) crits usually what decide the fight?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »Overall, I guess. But she's talking about the advantage of having a zerk crit more often.
Far from an expert on pvp here, but arent (zerk) crits usually what decide the fight?
Correct. And not always, but in most of the cases where I fought a BM / Seeker / Barb in R9 the Zerk Crit put a HUGE dent in my HP pool and generally but not always resulted in me losing that fight.0 -
Correct. And not always, but in most of the cases where I fought a BM / Seeker / Barb in R9 the Zerk Crit put a HUGE dent in my HP pool and generally but not always was the outcome of me losing that fight.
Idk, but being it only 2% extra chance of crit on a 20% proc rate addon, I'd think that constant, reliable damage would be better, even for PVP. Though, ofc, this is a discussion that will end whenever someone gets overconfident in his luck, thus choosing crit over p.att., of deluded with it, choosing att. over crit.0 -
augustfinknottle wrote: »Idk, but being it only 2% extra chance of crit on a 20% proc rate addon, I'd think that constant, reliable damage would be better, even for PVP. Though, ofc, this is a discussion that will end whenever someone gets overconfident in his luck, thus choosing crit over p.att., of deluded with it, choosing att. over crit.
So basically it's a matter of preference.
Guess you'd better make a new thread on it if you want to hear opinions on it, Jen.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk