in weapon: Stone of the Savant or Diamond of Tiger?
Akaichan - Raging Tide
Posts: 16 Arc User
-channeling or attack level?
I always played cleric and recently in a discussion with friends we couldn't decide whether it should be Stone of the Savant built in the weapon which gives -3 channelling, or Diamond of Tiger, which gives Attack level +1.
Thank you for your answers!!!! b:thanksb:thanks
I always played cleric and recently in a discussion with friends we couldn't decide whether it should be Stone of the Savant built in the weapon which gives -3 channelling, or Diamond of Tiger, which gives Attack level +1.
Thank you for your answers!!!! b:thanksb:thanks
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Post edited by Akaichan - Raging Tide on
0
Comments
-
Akaichan - Raging Tide wrote: »-channeling or attack level?
I always played cleric and recently in a discussion with friends we couldn't decide whether it should be Stone of the Savant built in the weapon which gives -3 channelling, or Diamond of Tiger, which gives Attack level +1.
Thank you for your answers!!!! b:thanksb:thanks
Both of those are terrible choices to put in a psy wep. -chan does virtually nothing, a sapphire gem will give far more attack damage increase than a DoT and a +ccit shard is just slightly better than a dot, go for a sapphire shard. If it were any other magic class other than psy, -chan shard would be an optionfull 3r9 +11/12 (still using immac shards though) w/o CSing, leveled to 105 spaming pv, yes i have no life =D0 -
what he saidFederation of United Casters Keeping Others From Failing And
Positively Succeeding (Taken from SkogDyr of Lost City)0 -
Adding to what has been already been said, DoT are only good in armors to go full damage route, in weapon you pretty much nerf the base damage on which everything multiply on.
Primeval, while I did read someone thinking on them doing good in weapon, I still think that with enough crit gears, the difference is too little to matter to an arcane compared to the lowered base damage.
Savant... for psychic? I have a tendancy to start ranting loudly whever someone bring -channel gear on psy. Not the kind that come on endgame as bonus, the kind that are mdef neck/belt with only -chan on them. Yes, there is a few spells which could use the -chan, but these are the less used and all the more commonly used one got next to nothing channel time and huge casting time(this one cannot be reduced). Psy were made for fastest spell speed, at the cost of barely being able to improve it.0 -
Akaichan - Raging Tide wrote: »-channeling or attack level?
I always played cleric and recently in a discussion with friends we couldn't decide whether it should be Stone of the Savant built in the weapon which gives -3 channelling, or Diamond of Tiger, which gives Attack level +1.
Thank you for your answers!!!! b:thanksb:thanks
Leave these forums and never come back you outrageous son of a bi***.I AGOREY0 -
Longknife - Harshlands wrote: »Leave these forums and never come back you outrageous son of a bi***.
Longknife be nice xD
i also was like b:shocked when i read this
but just gotta help them out.
Something to add that i didnt see,
dont need DoT on wep
cuz we already have so many atk lvls compared to other classes
with BV+gear so wasting a DoT on wep is kinda crazy
when sapphire shards would give you better dmg.
So atk lvls we got down
Also agree on psy not needing -chan much,
ive seen a psy with like -36 chan and could barely even notice the difference
when i have like -16 chan i think
just thought id show you an example of - chan on psys.
- chan would better suit a wizzy for example having one of the slowest chan out there.0 -
Longknife - Harshlands wrote: »Leave these forums and never come back you outrageous son of a bi***.
*Caution* Internet tough guy on the loose!0 -
shotwhointhewhat wrote: »*Caution* Internet tough guy on the loose!
My internet muscles are the size of my head.I AGOREY0 -
Longknife - Harshlands wrote: »My internet muscles are the size of my head.
He's overall knowledge of the class is legit.0 -
SpazzMcAps - Harshlands wrote: »He's overall knowledge of the class is legit.
Lol'd.
It's astounding how many people put DoT's/savants in their weapon on private servers (a lot on pwi too, but not everyone can afford it here). Always nice seeing those blue sparkles on a weapon screaming ''Hey guys, I'm new here!''.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
before reading this thread i was ok.
now i want to vomit.
if you can afford a flawless sapphire use that instead of DoT
if you can afford a shabby sapphire use that instead of savantyou only purge once #yopo0 -
There has to be something that makes Psy forums happy.... like bunnies.... or ponies..[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Kerona - Sanctuary wrote: »There has to be something that makes Psy forums happy.... like bunnies.... or ponies..
*** ponies now and forever b:angry long live Optimus Primeb:victoryFederation of United Casters Keeping Others From Failing And
Positively Succeeding (Taken from SkogDyr of Lost City)0 -
Vancore - Sanctuary wrote: »*** ponies now and forever b:angry long live Optimus Primeb:victory
dis guy knows his ****0 -
Vancore - Sanctuary wrote: »*** ponies now and forever b:angry long live Optimus Primeb:victory
Dont know if serious...[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Remember: OP may be a duck|OP/GMs/Devs may not deliver|Search function is your friend|Lurk more|Be wary of Mods: they can't be trusted|This place isn't a hugbox|Your tears sustain me|Know what Bait is|"Soon" may never come|Postcount, Dubs, and other GETs are important|Don't revive long dead threads|There is a section for everything|You can be banned for anything|No Fun Allowed outside of OT|Sweetiebot rules OT|"Circlejerks" are inevitable|Threads can be derailed and saved|Those who use"XD" should off themselves at their earliest convenience|0 -
0
-
Which stones you place in your weapon depends first and foremost, on your playstyle... Second on your overall gear and what you are looking to have as a target for your gear set...
I myself have 1 Savant Stone in my own weapon... It is the Sage / R6 Weapon you can get through the Messenger of Sages at L.90... Underworld Sovereign... The weapon itself already has it's own -10% channeling and 18-19 magic (mine has 18 qq), and for that reason I placed 1 G12 Sapphire (+100 mgc atk) and 1 Savant Stone (-3% channeling). I feel these two stones compliment this particular weapon quite nicely, and I have had no regrets in having set this weapon up in this manner. I have of course had plenty of, *cough* "compliments".
If I had the Psychic Soul Drill for instance, I would likely place again 1 G12 Sapphire (+100 mgc atk) but would place 1 Primeval Stone (+1% crit rate) in order to keep to what would compliment that particular weapon. I might even be inclined to shard this one with 2 Primeval Stones.
The Attack Level stones might be good if you have an overall "theme" of attack levels throughout your gear, where as added attack levels even in small contribution would compliment your character and playstyle. If you do not at least have r8+, nirvy second cast, or r9 sets with their attack level bonuses and about half if not more attack level stones in your gears, I would not suggest attack levels in your weapon then.
Defense level stones I see the same way as attack level stones in your weapon.
It is most common that sapphire shards are used in a psy's weapon.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »The Attack Level stones might be good if you have an overall "theme" of attack levels throughout your gear,
No. Flawless sapphire shards are barely worse than DoT's if you rate DoT's as adding 1% damage each (which they don't, particularly after fb blessing, voodoos, r9 bonuses, etc). Higher than flawless, DoT's don't stand a chance. There is no reason to ever put DoT's in your weapon.0 -
T_i_m - Dreamweaver wrote: »No. Flawless sapphire shards are barely worse than DoT's if you rate DoT's as adding 1% damage each (which they don't, particularly after fb blessing, voodoos, r9 bonuses, etc). Higher than flawless, DoT's don't stand a chance. There is no reason to ever put DoT's in your weapon.
Pretty blue glow?0 -
saphire shards giv the best glow but all know DoT armour ice spikes r the best0
-
T_i_m - Dreamweaver wrote: »No. Flawless sapphire shards are barely worse than DoT's if you rate DoT's as adding 1% damage each (which they don't, particularly after fb blessing, voodoos, r9 bonuses, etc). Higher than flawless, DoT's don't stand a chance. There is no reason to ever put DoT's in your weapon.
http://pwi-wiki.perfectworld.com/index.php/Damage#Attack_and_Defense_Levels
Know your equations[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Arctix - Dreamweaver wrote: »saphire shards giv the best glow but all know DoT armour ice spikes r the best
Mana shards too.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »
Now, apply them!
Attack levels provide diminishing returns, but the appropriate shard will add directly to damage dealt for a constant return.0 -
T_i_m - Dreamweaver wrote: »Now, apply them!
Attack levels provide diminishing returns, but the appropriate shard will add directly to damage dealt for a constant return.
based on that graph, still looks like +atk levels adds up nicely... is the reason r9 is qq'd about so much by the non-r9's...
ps. omg, and lol... do i smell a goon glitched 105? b:question[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
VoItaire - Harshlands wrote: »Mana shards too.Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »based on that graph, still looks like +atk levels adds up nicely... is the reason r9 is qq'd about so much by the non-r9's...
ps. omg, and lol... do i smell a goon glitched 105? b:question
It's been proven many times that Dots in weapons suck. Don't go to the "omg goon glitch 105" tactic every time you're proved wrong0 -
Guys guys, it's really not much of a contest between sapphire or tigers. Attack lvls are nice and all, but they're incredibly inferior once you consider that they don't affect one vital spell for pissing off your opponents. That skill is bubble of life. b:victory
But seriously Apostasy, people qq about r9, but not because of 2 attack lvls. Do they even multiply like sapphs do?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »ps. omg, and lol... do i smell a goon glitched 105? b:question
I smell something nasty too, and it's coming from your mouth.
Stop talking ****.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »I smell something nasty too, and it's coming from your mouth.
Stop talking ****.
I'm back bishes!!!0 -
VoItaire - Harshlands wrote: »Attack lvls are nice and all. But seriously Apostasy, people qq about r9, but not because of 2 attack lvls. Do they even multiply like sapphs do?
In reply to this, seriously. My initial post basicly said it all my intial reply to this thread. Everyone taking my statement of considering +1 Atk Lvl Stones out of context, it becomes trolled into a conversation of merely 2 such stones in one's weapon versus 2 sapphires. Which is not at all what I stated.
It is a matter of the combat equations being based on 4 things... If you are attacking, your magic damage and attack levels (which includes your character level) versus your opponent's resist and defense levels... where atk lvls vs def lvls becomes a major factor... This is the reason why R9 gears are as powerful as they are, compared against all other sets still to this day. And what is the major difference between the full R9 set and all other sets that have bonuses? Atk and Def lvls. You can literally create a non-R9 set combination that has better outright stats, and why will you still have to work harder against an R9 than they will against you? Atk and Def lvls. Again it is as I stated in my initial post linked above.Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »I smell something nasty too, and it's coming from your mouth.
Stop talking ****.SpazzMcAps - Harshlands wrote: »It's been proven many times that Dots in weapons suck. Don't go to the "omg goon glitch 105" tactic every time you're proved wrong[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »In reply to this, seriously. My initial post basicly said it all my intial reply to this thread.
Oh, I missed the part where you have a weapon with -10% channeling and +310mp...
...and 1 savant...
...on a psychic.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Nowitsawn - Heavens Tear wrote: »Oh, I missed the part where you have a weapon with -10% channeling and +310mp...
...and 1 savant...
...on a psychic.
come show me how a level 100 psy pks baby b:kiss b:chuckle b:bye[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
Categories
- All Categories
- 182K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk