QQme Defense Victory
Comments
-
b:sin[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »That doesnt even bother me at this point...
I know you are dirty's hubby in game already...
and I know you had to run to her side...
because she was traumatized...
by not knowing how to reply to the rt pk pacecar...
and you can trust me when I say...
I am no one's alt...
I am most certainly the main...
and I am minion to no one...
although, seeing all the bs on the forums...
I am starting to realize that, perhaps it wasnt spell at all...
perhaps it was the 65% of the population...
full of feeble-minded fleas that brought spell's rep about...
/discuss that
So touching but you are right Apost if someone attacked my baby girl SC aka Ryougi(She)ki aka the person that one shots you....I would run to her defense![SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Elvenne - Raging Tide wrote: »So touching but you are right Apost if someone attacked my baby girl SC aka Ryougi(She)ki aka the person that one shots you....I would run to her defense!
That sounds...............................so gaaay.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
No he means this*0
-
-
omfg... where do u people find this stuff? b:shocked i barely has time to play game between work, online here, online faction site, around the house chores, errands, my own lil book project... b:surrender[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »omfg... where do u people find this stuff? b:shocked i barely has time to play game between work, online here, online faction site, around the house chores, errands, my own lil book project... b:surrender
Time management will get you there. b:victory[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
lol .0
-
Dylena - Raging Tide wrote: »No, I meant this.
b:shocked I... I... I never saw that commercial and Im lost for words!
b:sad Need to buy MER[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »b:surrender i agree and disagree... if i was using my time wisely, i wouldnt be on here... id be writin my book i pretty much tripped up on as of december 23rd... qq... b:sad
Don't take this as an insult, but what language is your book written in?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
AriesBreath - Raging Tide wrote: »Don't take this as an insult, but what language is your book written in?
b:shocked Burnnnnnnnn0 -
AriesBreath - Raging Tide wrote: »Don't take this as an insult, but what language is your book written in?
In what language is your book written? ***
xD b:chuckle0 -
Only way I'll believe that is if you had citations every other sentence and especially when alluding to other people's work as is required in scientific works. Also your chapters better be a hundred pages long each at minimum to accurately describe those topics.
My theory is that your just trying to sound smart after watching the string theory series.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »lol... i have 202 pages worth of citations in font 6... from over 6000 pages worth of literature... and yes... each chapter will run about 100 pages, the first and second... i havent actually figured out how many pages last chapter will be...
and string theory is a conglomerate of failed theories... i never bothered watching any series on that, although i have read plenty of literature from people from among string theory's "salespeople"... and it's not string theory anyway... it's "M-theory"...
And you're entitled to your "theory"... even though the proper term is "opinion" ijs
oh yeah... and to add to that... some sentences have as many as 4 citation tags... i tried to keep it to 2 citations per sentence-part max... a maximum of 3 parts to a sentence with the use of 2 commas... and no more than 4 citations to a sentence... otherwise i might have ended up with more citations than actual literature...
You would think for someone who is writing a book that your sentences would be more grammatically correct. I'm not calling you out on lying I'm just saying virtually everyone I know that has been published tend to carry over their writing into everyday life. With the amount of [...] you use that does not seem to be the case xD0 -
b:chuckle One of the main issues I've always had with theories is that they are theories. I like your discription of mass "sponging." I'm guessing that's a new word of the day/ theory someone else liked.
I hope that your book will be able to move the Unification theory along so we can have both the large and small following the same rules. Also, that it will let an old person like me know where all the dark matter has been hiding. That's always bee a question of mine
Here's hoping that you can generate facts as opposed to just theory. As I have gotten older, them theories keep changing. I'm supprised that we were able to make semicoductors, rockets, lasers and such thingies with such wishie-washie theories. I eagerly await your book.
b:bye0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »lol... i have 202 pages worth of citations in font 6... from over 6000 pages worth of literature... and yes... each chapter will run about 100 pages, the first and second... i havent actually figured out how many pages last chapter will be...
Please do show these 202 pages of citations.and string theory is a conglomerate of failed theories... i never bothered watching any series on that, although i have read plenty of literature from people from among string theory's "salespeople"... and it's not string theory anyway... it's "M-theory"...
M-Theory is just an extension of string theory that tries to unite 5 preceding string theories and not string theory in entirety. Also string theory isn't failed as much as it is untestable within current mathematical and technological means.And you're entitled to your "theory"... even though the proper term is "opinion" ijs
I'm using the general term "theory" instead of "scientific theory". From my experience when people point that out when the term is used in a general sense not related to scientific matters to be pretentious scientist wannabees.oh yeah... and to add to that... some sentences have as many as 4 citation tags... i tried to keep it to 2 citations per sentence-part max... a maximum of 3 parts to a sentence with the use of 2 commas... and no more than 4 citations to a sentence... otherwise i might have ended up with more citations than actual literature...
Do post some SS of this please.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Holy ****! There is intelligent life on this planet (me not being one of them). Now this topic is back on track to where it needs to be. Let the trolling continue.b:laugh0
-
Zarkin_Baxil - Raging Tide wrote: »Holy ****! There is intelligent life on this planet (me not being one of them). Now this topic is back on track to where it needs to be. Let the trolling continue.b:laugh
Zarkin_Baxil the super troll, I unleash you to RT forums.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Zarkin's pro,
And I would like to see a picture of these citations Apost. Not as proof, but because I'm curious to how your work looks like.[SIGPIC]Octavia is best pony[/SIGPIC]
Vicious's Brony. Brohoof!
youtube.com/user/SkaiPW - Assassin PvE/PvP Videos!0 -
b:cry[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »Shall I continue?... that was only 10... b:chuckle
Yah, post using actual citation formats so I can actually read them -.-
Most citations have just the works cited to show where they have their info. I see barely any real citations in your posts as most are just descriptions and copy pasta.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Anderson, John D. "Is There Something We Don't Know About Gravity?" Astronomy 37.3 (Mar. 2009: 22-27. Print.
Only real citation in your entire first works cited and even then I don't know where you cited it for s there is no headers.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
OK I was wrong, there are no smart people on this planet. There are only extreemly boring people who quote (mostly) dead smart people. I will leave you earthlings to your own devices. *Tries to fly away but falls out the window and dies*0
-
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »lol... now who's trying to play at what?
I made no claim that I was an expert at the field -.-... look up supergravity... look up supersymmetry... and the history on strong nuclear force... and where any string theory "equation" began... for starters... to add to that, their "spin 2 particle" b:bye but otherwise b:shutup and IF any aspect of string theory gave any type of understanding to higher dimensions (which they claim to btw)... why do they still assume three dimensions for the reality we experience?... mmhmm... as I stated... might as well be written in greek...
It could be assumed that the three dimensions that we live in extended faster then the other 6 spatial dimensions after the big bang. But as I said I'm not an expert in this field, so I'll direct you to the where I got this info from. http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1540v1... best i figured out how to post is by creating pdf files from my computer to my gf's computer (mine is 2005 stock dell, hers is 2010 whatever she got)... what would u like pics of?...
If possible can you take a pic of few general pages of your book, cause it seems to be an interesting read. Sorry if you find this a bit insulting that I find your claim of writing this type of works somewhat unbelievable, but it really isb:surrender
EDIT: No idea whats wrong with the *** *** quote function on this forum, literally had to type everything here -.-[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Spell_Caster - Raging Tide wrote: »WTF is Vicious?
ah...the ones playing Vendetta...i seeb:chuckle
I've seen a lot of people from Raging Tide on that server. A lot of them try to pretend that they're super skilled or something. I don't know who they are exactly, or what faction they're in. It wouldn't really matter anyway. I haven't kept up with the details around here in over a year.Dylena - Raging Tide wrote: »Zarkin_Baxil the super troll, I unleash you to RT forums.
Lol no.Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »lolomgwtflongwallsoftext
Amrd, I blame this on you.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
iwotm8?0 -
Apostasy - Raging Tide wrote: »new methodology that led to the new gravitational theory i arrived at
idk what was wrong with the first methodology, sitting under an apple tree seems fine to me....
.....what was it that fell on your head? maybe something heavier than an apple I guess....
XD0 -
[QUOTE= if you understand them, hopefully something will hit your head... b:chuckle[/QUOTE]
..seems like a 'catch 22' situation right there, not sure your going to get to many takers with that kind of marketing pitch...0 -
RT subforum turned into Science!
I'm liking this lol.[SIGPIC]Octavia is best pony[/SIGPIC]
Vicious's Brony. Brohoof!
youtube.com/user/SkaiPW - Assassin PvE/PvP Videos!0 -
...I liek Mudkipz0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk