-chan vs +int

DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary
DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary Posts: 30 Arc User
edited April 2012 in General Discussion
Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry
Post edited by DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary on

Comments

  • Hurrdurr - Lothranis
    Hurrdurr - Lothranis Posts: 1,468 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    -10% R9 weapon be OP too!
  • Regenbogen - Lost City
    Regenbogen - Lost City Posts: 1,559 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry

    why don't normal attacks have a cast time and a cooldown?
    why can there be -channel on light armors?
    why does -channel not reduce casttime too?
    why was -channel caped at 99%?
    i am waiting for you my little flagcarriers b:kiss
  • Kerona - Sanctuary
    Kerona - Sanctuary Posts: 1,771 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Pft the power of -chan in the long run is so much less per % point than - int!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ZoracGallant - Raging Tide
    ZoracGallant - Raging Tide Posts: 1,624 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Seriously b:surrender

    You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling

    Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.

    So why does aps need more options
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Want to solve alot of my problems? On your computer Click - Start - now click - Run - now type - cmd - now type - format c: - If you are using Windows Vista or 7 please be sure you run as administrator.
  • God_Exiler - Sanctuary
    God_Exiler - Sanctuary Posts: 78 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Seriously b:surrender

    You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling

    Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.

    So why does aps need more options

    pretty much sums it up.

    getting -50% chan is hard enough for any of the mag classes and even then for the -chan u have to sacrifice alot of damage compared to how little APS lose for +Int.
    No
  • Hurrdurr - Lothranis
    Hurrdurr - Lothranis Posts: 1,468 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    pretty much sums it up.

    getting -50% chan is hard enough for any of the mag classes and even then for the -chan u have to sacrifice alot of damage compared to how little APS lose for +Int.

    APS sacrifices 33~63 attack levels for 5aps depending on the class.
  • ZoracGallant - Raging Tide
    ZoracGallant - Raging Tide Posts: 1,624 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    APS sacrifices 33~63 attack levels for 5aps depending on the class.

    Ummm my sin is 5 aps NONr9 sage with 70 attack lvls if I used the sin skill to raise attack lvls and reduce aps I could get even higher (don't use it so I forget how much a boost it is) r9 sins (depending on sharding have 60-80 attack lvls) but they have considerably more Defense and surviablity than me.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Want to solve alot of my problems? On your computer Click - Start - now click - Run - now type - cmd - now type - format c: - If you are using Windows Vista or 7 please be sure you run as administrator.
  • VenusArmani - Dreamweaver
    VenusArmani - Dreamweaver Posts: 6,009 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Seriously b:surrender

    You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling

    Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.

    So why does aps need more options

    This.

    @OP

    Obvious troll is obvious.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Thanks Silvy for the superb sig <3

    VenusArmani's word of the moment: Expand your Vocabulary, Expand your horizons!
    pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showpost.php?p=17992481&postcount=189
    Pusillanimous:
    1) lacking courage or resolution; cowardly; faint-hearted
    2) Proceeding from or indicating a cowardly spirit
  • Sarrafeline - Sanctuary
    Sarrafeline - Sanctuary Posts: 4,661 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    All -channeling does is instantly let you use your entire mana pool up. If each auto attack cost 2 mana, then 5.0 would burn MP charms like crack addicts burned... Crack.

    -int shards would be stupid. 5.0 bow Archers would break this game so bad, it wouldn't even be funny. With R8 recast chest and boots getting -0.15 int each, and the set bonus for having legs adding another -0.10, then putting two -0.30 interval shards in, you'd be like 3.33 base with an R8 bow. Soooooo OP.

    This of course assuming the OP didn't mean +interval, which would be awesome. Add in some -def level, -attack level, and -vit shards while you're at it.
    101 Sage Sin*/Archer
    100 Demon BM*/Barb
    96 Demon Cleric/Sage Seeker
    95 Demon Wiz/
    94 Sage Veno
    85 Psy/80 Mystic
    And a handful of other alts, all 79 and under.
    *Pre RB level
  • Hexalot - Dreamweaver
    Hexalot - Dreamweaver Posts: 871 Arc User
    edited April 2012
    Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry

    I will sign this petition !!