-chan vs +int
DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary
Posts: 30 Arc User
Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry
Post edited by DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary on
0
Comments
-
-10% R9 weapon be OP too!0
-
DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary wrote: »Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry
why don't normal attacks have a cast time and a cooldown?
why can there be -channel on light armors?
why does -channel not reduce casttime too?
why was -channel caped at 99%?i am waiting for you my little flagcarriers b:kiss0 -
Pft the power of -chan in the long run is so much less per % point than - int![SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Seriously b:surrender
You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling
Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.
So why does aps need more options[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Want to solve alot of my problems? On your computer Click - Start - now click - Run - now type - cmd - now type - format c: - If you are using Windows Vista or 7 please be sure you run as administrator.0 -
ZoracGallant - Raging Tide wrote: »Seriously b:surrender
You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling
Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.
So why does aps need more options
pretty much sums it up.
getting -50% chan is hard enough for any of the mag classes and even then for the -chan u have to sacrifice alot of damage compared to how little APS lose for +Int.No0 -
God_Exiler - Sanctuary wrote: »pretty much sums it up.
getting -50% chan is hard enough for any of the mag classes and even then for the -chan u have to sacrifice alot of damage compared to how little APS lose for +Int.
APS sacrifices 33~63 attack levels for 5aps depending on the class.0 -
Hurrdurr - Lothranis wrote: »APS sacrifices 33~63 attack levels for 5aps depending on the class.
Ummm my sin is 5 aps NONr9 sage with 70 attack lvls if I used the sin skill to raise attack lvls and reduce aps I could get even higher (don't use it so I forget how much a boost it is) r9 sins (depending on sharding have 60-80 attack lvls) but they have considerably more Defense and surviablity than me.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Want to solve alot of my problems? On your computer Click - Start - now click - Run - now type - cmd - now type - format c: - If you are using Windows Vista or 7 please be sure you run as administrator.0 -
ZoracGallant - Raging Tide wrote: »Seriously b:surrender
You know how many peices of gear it takes to get a caster to even -50% channeling
Aps is far easier to get then high channeling AND aps is far more useful because with .5-1.5 sec cast time on most spells a sin can attack 2-7 times just in the cast time and deal as much damage or more than the spell.
So why does aps need more options
This.
@OP
Obvious troll is obvious.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Thanks Silvy for the superb sig
VenusArmani's word of the moment: Expand your Vocabulary, Expand your horizons!
pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showpost.php?p=17992481&postcount=189
Pusillanimous:
1) lacking courage or resolution; cowardly; faint-hearted
2) Proceeding from or indicating a cowardly spirit0 -
All -channeling does is instantly let you use your entire mana pool up. If each auto attack cost 2 mana, then 5.0 would burn MP charms like crack addicts burned... Crack.
-int shards would be stupid. 5.0 bow Archers would break this game so bad, it wouldn't even be funny. With R8 recast chest and boots getting -0.15 int each, and the set bonus for having legs adding another -0.10, then putting two -0.30 interval shards in, you'd be like 3.33 base with an R8 bow. Soooooo OP.
This of course assuming the OP didn't mean +interval, which would be awesome. Add in some -def level, -attack level, and -vit shards while you're at it.101 Sage Sin*/Archer
100 Demon BM*/Barb
96 Demon Cleric/Sage Seeker
95 Demon Wiz/
94 Sage Veno
85 Psy/80 Mystic
And a handful of other alts, all 79 and under.
*Pre RB level0 -
DoSz_Bow - Sanctuary wrote: »Why is PWI so biased to mages? Why are there -chan shards for weapons but no +int shards? I think we need to petition PWI for +int shards or get rid of -chan shards. Same thing with runes, if we cant have +int, they cant have -chan. I know PWI is never fair, but come on... b:angry
I will sign this petition !!0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk