Question about FC Glitch's Current "Solution"

Knownase - Heavens Tear

Friendly harmless bump of love!

Traz - Dreamweaver

Why can't we just compromise and agree on them making something new that's worth a damn to level to 105? I prefer that kind of anger verse the continuous threads about wanting glitches back in game....

(I know it's still "glitchable" but you get what I'm saying)

Xx_BeLLa_xX - Harshlands

Want a solution? Remove the dragon at the third boss and just let the dragons at the end with the exp they had before, that's all, people wont be able to glicth the third boss and low level people who do full FC will be happy with the dragons after exp room.

The dragon at third boss is useless now anyway so just put the boss, if you can change the exp of a mob you can prolly remove the mob from a spot, cause now the low lvl people are punished for some nab who glitched. People in squad was doing full for the box and cause the dragons was giving exp, now almost no one want do full cause 3 boss to kill to get a box and no exp for it.

If they can create a whole new map with new mobs (Morai), sometime create new class, remove some skill effect but too much complicated to just remove a mob from a boss or change it for a other mob which give 1 exp.

FatherTed - Dreamweaver

Traz - Dreamweaver wrote: »

Why can't we just compromise and agree on them making something new that's worth a damn to level to 105? I prefer that kind of anger verse the continuous threads about wanting glitches back in game....

(I know it's still "glitchable" but you get what I'm saying)

That's kind of the problem though Traz. If they put something in game to give a bigger benefit to hitting 105, that majority of the people who could take advantage of that would be players who cheated to get there - which would **** people off even worse.

Traz - Dreamweaver

FatherTed - Dreamweaver wrote: »

That's kind of the problem though Traz. If they put something in game to give a bigger benefit to hitting 105, that majority of the people who could take advantage of that would be players who cheated to get there - which would **** people off even worse.

That didn't make any sense.

If they make a new PV or new instance everyone has a fair shot and it's legit. That's the proper way to go about it, not asking to put back in glitches.

FatherTed - Dreamweaver

I didn't say putting the glitch back in made any sense. TBH I don't care about the situation one way or the other, because I don't feel like I am missing anything.

What I'm saying is that as the game stands currently, if they added new content for 105s, the majority of the people who could take advantage of that content are people who cheated to get there. At that point anyone who didn't abuse the glitch to hit 105 would have a legitimate reason to /rage. They'd basically be rewarding the people who abused the glitch.

If/when they do add a new instance where you can legally level to 105 in a reasonable amount of time - then you are absolutely correct. When that happens, they most definitely should add new content for people who hit the level cap.

All I was trying to say was that before any new content is put in for 105s, they need to add this new instance or whatever it is that gives non-cheaters a way to reach 105. I'm just extremely tired and phrasing myself poorly. I usually haven't woken up yet

Traz - Dreamweaver

FatherTed - Dreamweaver wrote: »

I didn't say putting the glitch back in made any sense. TBH I don't care about the situation one way or the other, because I don't feel like I am missing anything.

What I'm saying is that as the game stands currently, if they added new content for 105s, the majority of the people who could take advantage of that content are people who cheated to get there. At that point anyone who didn't abuse the glitch to hit 105 would have a legitimate reason to /rage. They'd basically be rewarding the people who abused the glitch.

If/when they do add a new instance where you can legally level to 105 in a reasonable amount of time - then you are absolutely correct. When that happens, they most definitely should add new content for people who hit the level cap.

All I was trying to say was that before any new content is put in for 105s, they need to add this new instance or whatever it is that gives non-cheaters a way to reach 105. I'm just extremely tired and phrasing myself poorly. I usually haven't woken up yet

I said add new content to GET to 105, not new content FOR 105s.

FatherTed - Dreamweaver

That would certainly make more sense.

I misread "If they put something in game to give a bigger benefit to hitting 105" as "Ok guys, congrats on hitting 105 - here's something new and fun for you to do." Hence my confusion.

I did say I was tired b:surrender

shashahah

>>>just a note for the qqers, i didnt read any responses on the first post until here<<<

what the reason behind cutting ALL goon xp is?
devs aint able to differ styren goons from others, so they just cut all xp.

Traz - Dreamweaver

shashahah wrote: »

>>>just a note for the qqers, i didnt read any responses on the first post until here<<<

what the reason behind cutting ALL goon xp is?
devs aint able to differ styren goons from others, so they just cut all xp.

It's probably the only thing the current dev team was allowed to do to "fix" the problem. FC was originally coded by the first dev team. They left PWI during beta and might have had some agreement about any code done by them. The new devs probably have to call them up to change the code instead of the current team. Lots of things like this happen and basically make changing any old code impossible.

ResMePls - Heavens Tear

Is it stupidity? N0. Is it lack 0f initiative? yes..The devs c0uld have fixed this in a m0re l0gically c0rrect way but hey, it's s0 much easier t0 just say '0k g00ns ID is 3545435, lets just reduce the exp gain t0 10%' pr0blem s0lved with little w0rk inv0lved.

Traz - Dreamweaver

ResMePls - Heavens Tear wrote: »

Is it stupidity? N0. Is it lack 0f initiative? yes..The devs c0uld have fixed this in a m0re l0gically c0rrect way but hey, it's s0 much easier t0 just say '0k g00ns ID is 3545435, lets just reduce the exp gain t0 10%' pr0blem s0lved with little w0rk inv0lved.

You don't know very much about coding I see. I refer to my previous post as frankie has actually commented about it before.

Northern - Dreamweaver

Great idea !!Lets just have them add in something new that will only be available to level 101+ that will get you to 105 within say 3 months of playing for a couple hours daily. I'd definitely support that, and I'd even be willing support needing to pay 250k or so door fee in coin to help as a coin sink to get into said instance.

I'd also support them adding in a 250k coin fee to enter regular fc to help as a coin sink....imagine the amount of coin that would take out the game........

That or just revert goonz back an make it legal, idc which really.

ResMePls - Heavens Tear

Traz - Dreamweaver wrote: »

You don't know very much about coding I see. I refer to my previous post as frankie has actually commented about it before.

0h hai dere rand0m pers0n that thinks he is g0d m0de at c0ding. There is many ways c0ding w0rks, and this is 0ne 0f many ways that I pr0vided that c0de can be written as an example. G0 back t0 y0ur litter b0x kitty kthxbye.b:bye

krittycat

Traz - Dreamweaver wrote: »

You don't know very much about coding I see. I refer to my previous post as frankie has actually commented about it before.

With the dev tools (I have seen them), it is actually just about that simple.b:chuckle

And all frankie has said is that PWE has no ability to touch the coding. All code editing has to be done by the Chinese devs and then forwarded to us... unless you would like to provide a post which shows that he posted what you're talking about?b:surrender

Traz - Dreamweaver

KrittyCat wrote: »

With the dev tools (I have seen them), it is actually just about that simple.b:chuckle

And all frankie has said is that PWE has no ability to touch the coding. All code editing has to be done by the Chinese devs and then forwarded to us... unless you would like to provide a post which shows that he posted what you're talking about?b:surrender

It is very easy to make those kinds of changes and plenty do it on.... we'll just say personal versions that no one else plays but them on their computers.... but code agreements are code agreements. I don't care to spend hours finding that post it was almost 8 months ago. All I know is with dev changes and new programmers things get very complicated and it's not as easy as changing a number when "politics" are involved.

HexOmega - Dreamweaver

ResMePls - Heavens Tear wrote: »

Is it stupidity? N0. Is it lack 0f initiative? yes..The devs c0uld have fixed this in a m0re l0gically c0rrect way but hey, it's s0 much easier t0 just say '0k g00ns ID is 3545435, lets just reduce the exp gain t0 10%' pr0blem s0lved with little w0rk inv0lved.

ive missed y0u

p0st more, y0ur p0sts are original!
im y0ur fan!




dont be hatin on each other coding code codes

Yogaxpto - Dreamweaver

KrittyCat wrote: »

With the dev tools (I have seen them), it is actually just about that simple.b:chuckle

And all frankie has said is that PWE has no ability to touch the coding. All code editing has to be done by the Chinese devs and then forwarded to us... unless you would like to provide a post which shows that he posted what you're talking about?b:surrender

PWE should hire the ones that they ban for hacking then. Seems logical,if PWE devs are that dumb.