Insurrect next Conqueror!!!
BankoDeCuba - Lost City
Posts: 1 Arc User
As title says.....
I dont think its coincidence that their map color is red more like fate they were meant for greatness ijs wat everyone else thinks b:chuckle
I dont think its coincidence that their map color is red more like fate they were meant for greatness ijs wat everyone else thinks b:chuckle
Post edited by BankoDeCuba - Lost City on
0
Comments
-
It's been to long since a full map of one colour. b:surrendertatuaje: grinding mobs and zhenning ???
frankieraye:All right, I admit it, it's a bit retro. lol.0 -
they are red because pwi dont have more colours[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
Red is overrated.0
-
Well....I look at it like this
If Vengeful and lstinct didn't make an alliance together, then Vengeful would more than likely own the majority of the map.
Insurrect....I have only seen ~20 of the members in them guild, and while the one's i've seen are usually sitting in Full NV, R8/R8 recast, R9/R9 recast...I can't tell you how powerful they actually are.Nothing worthwhile to mention here, enjoy the animated signature~
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
Bictorr - Lost City wrote: »Red is overrated.
Period.0 -
I really doubt that a guild that has troubles to beat a guild with about only one party of rank9s will become the new conqueror when they have around 40 rank9s0
-
Chinatown 6 rank 9's? If you say so. Look my face I want to see the 105 mystic avatar x/xSiggy from bellefleurs.
[SIGPIC]http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/94/25yzm05jpg.png/[/SIGPIC]
youtube.com/user/HardToYawn?blend=1&ob=video-mustangbase0 -
Those greede ****.0
-
Azura - Lost City wrote: »I really doubt that a guild that has troubles to beat a guild with about only one party of rank9s will become the new conqueror when they have around 40 rank9s
You were perma dead so you should take 1 off that number you just made up. Wasn't insurrects crystal untouched too?0 -
Bictorr - Lost City wrote: »Red is overrated.
http://i282.photobucket.com/albums/kk246/luminatingheart/Perfect%20World/Territory%20Map/map41.jpg
EDIT: screenshot missing from inb4 all red on 惊天 (1st screenshot)
b:bye0 -
So, Essence = combo breaker?"Amour is better suited to rainbow text, because he is a classy lady." - Nakhimov
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
No single guild will be able to own the whole map in this games landscape with the amount of rank 9's and other well geared players dispersed across many guilds, unless they create an alliance that will help double/triple attack any opposing guilds and freely give up all their land to one guild in the alliance.
I guess it's possible, but I highly doubt any guild will ever own the entire map ever again, the gear gap has been closed significantly across many guilds that are more than capable of being enough of a challenge they can't be steamrolled and allow a guild to successfully defend a triple attack.0 -
-
Azura - Lost City wrote: »I really doubt that a guild that has troubles to beat a guild with about only one party of rank9s will become the new conqueror when they have around 40 rank9s
For the 1st TW the guild has ever done thats not bad.
+ it was, for whatever reason, treated more like a defense war. Which ment the defense teams were asked to protect our base even when it was pointless to do so. Could've used those squads to zerg instead of defending a crystal that was at full health.
I'm looking forward to the challenge! Finally some good TW!0 -
food for thought:
insurrect will never own the full map because the current top 3 guilds that hold land won't let them.
plus they cant form an alliance with any current guild... they recruited all their decent to well geared players into their own guild. Forming an alliance with weak dead guilds is kinda dumb.
Tri-force x2.
b:chuckle
nice wishful thinking tho.Here we go again....0 -
Inb4 they call back
Cheze
Spliffany
Ungrateful
Susa
Nykage
elayne and anyone else who quit so they can "win the game"
Haha0 -
HardToThink - Lost City wrote: »Chinatown 6 rank 9's? If you say so. Look my face I want to see the 105 mystic avatar x/x
I dont know how to show it lmao[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
@BoatFoot
Im pretty sure I took down their hq twice down to 10M.
@Mekkhala
Its not like You have never TW'd before. Most of the ppl in the guild are the same ones from Essence and Tri-Force. Its not like You had a plenty of new ppl in the guild that never did TW before and never player before together.
If You rly treated it as defensive war... Then explain me why didnt You build towers? Actually You started to defend and built towers after we got Your HQ down to 10M.
TW was damn good and Im looking forward for next ones, I enjoyed a lot.
@HardToThink
R9 that attended CT TW were ArchEvil, Azura, BobDevil, Calvin, Djoulz, KindaBusy, Marengo, mingkey, Nniotora, Sclypher. I dunno since when LMF is r9... If You look at Insurrect its like 30-40 ppl full r9... 1h30 war outgearing the other guild ijs...Because size really MATTERS!!!0 -
the reason of them being red its because red is the first color there is when theres pve map. therefore no red on map thats why they took redb:bye[SIGPIC]www.spades.tw[/SIGPIC]
b:cute0 -
-
Berserker_ - Dreamweaver wrote: »the reason of them being red its because red is the first color there is when theres pve map. therefore no red on map thats why they took redb:bye
^ Couldn't have said it any better.
Also, OP - you are delusional. b:bye0 -
Wadzio - Lost City wrote: »@BoatFoot
Im pretty sure I took down their hq twice down to 10M.
@Mekkhala
Its not like You have never TW'd before. Most of the ppl in the guild are the same ones from Essence and Tri-Force. Its not like You had a plenty of new ppl in the guild that never did TW before and never player before together.
If You rly treated it as defensive war... Then explain me why didnt You build towers? Actually You started to defend and built towers after we got Your HQ down to 10M.
TW was damn good and Im looking forward for next ones, I enjoyed a lot.
@HardToThink
R9 that attended CT TW were ArchEvil, Azura, BobDevil, Calvin, Djoulz, KindaBusy, Marengo, mingkey, Nniotora, Sclypher. I dunno since when LMF is r9... If You look at Insurrect its like 30-40 ppl full r9... 1h30 war outgearing the other guild ijs...
I never said it was treated 100% like a defense war. It was treated way more like a defense war than it should have been. That was 25 well geared players that could've been supporting the catas in CT base later on.
Our defense squads noticed it. Some people from CT noticed it.
Old players or not, mistakes were made and theres a lot of learning to do. It is NOT a well polished TW faction yet.
We can sit here and discuss it all day but tbh, it won't matter how fast Insurr can win a TW. Next it will be "Insur uses immune pots ijs" and "Insur has 40 r9 that shouldve been a crystal walk ijs" and "Insurr has too many clerics ijs"
It's an in-game rivalry nobody expects to win respect from CT or Venge.0 -
Particle - Lost City wrote: »You mean in the same way you allied half of the server to "win the game"?
Not to win but so tf doesn't win. Big difference.
Well do the same with insurrect to
Also insurrect is a polished tw faction. How many years have the majority of the ppl been playing together.0 -
First and foremost, thank you CT for the fun fight. We had a few members that have never participated in TW before, so this was more of a "practice" TW match for us to give those members a view of what they should expect in future battles. There were a few mistakes from our part, and some people went in late (including myself), but all this will be corrected within next battles and hopefully the mistakes will be lessen. It doesn't matter how slow or fast you win, as long as you don't lose. Once again thanks for the great fight, and looking forward to more fun matches.0
-
me was banned b:cry
thats why we lost b:avoid[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
LookMyFace - Lost City wrote: »me was banned b:cry
thats why we lost b:avoid
Ouch that sucks man, why what happened? because your face?.. lol0 -
JinSoul - Lost City wrote: »Ouch that sucks man, why what happened? because your face?.. lol
lol no, my face is too sexy to be banned for, they said cause exesive profanity in chat xD[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0 -
LookMyFace - Lost City wrote: »lol no, my face is too sexy to be banned for, they said cause exesive profanity in chat xD
**** you ***** *** **** suck a **** ***** you ************0 -
**** *** ***** ****** *** *** Calvin[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]0
-
LookMyFace - Lost City wrote: »lol no, my face is too sexy to be banned for, they said cause exesive profanity in chat xD
b:sad well, not perma ban?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk